On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 8:12 AM S Moonesamy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Rich, > At 05:29 AM 10-06-2026, Salz, Rich wrote: > > * 1. Sixty days have elapsed since the initial version of the > > draft was > > * submitted. Nobody else came up with an alternative to > > your proposal. > > > >That is not accurate. Some people have said that this draft should > >NOT be adopted, which is an alternative to the proposal. > > I took a look at the workflow for this group. The first item in > Section 3.2.2 stated that a proposal is in the form of an > Internet-Draft. An alternative to a proposal would, in my opinion, > be some other proposal. > > A proposal would have to go through a "call for adoption". The > outcome of that call can either be "adopted" or "not adopted" (second > item of Section 3.2.2). While I do not think this document should be adopted, I think it would be fine for it to be on the agenda in Vienna and based on that discussion, potentially to do an adoption call. That way, either we can adopt it or stop discussing it. With that said, I don't really see what "nobody came up with an alternative to your proposal" has to do with it. Not every proposal needs an adoption call. As Rich's message indicates, with any proposal, there is always the alternative to simply do nothing, and if a proposal doesn't meet some minimal level of apparent support it should simply be abandoned without any kind of adoption call. -Ekr
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
