On 10 Jun 2026, at 17:22, Eric Rescorla wrote:
While I do not think this document should be adopted, I think it would
be fine for it to be on the agenda in Vienna and based on that
discussion, potentially to do an adoption call. That way, either we
can adopt it or stop discussing it.
With that said, I don't really see what "nobody came up with an
alternative to your proposal" has to do with it. Not every proposal
needs an adoption call. As Rich's message indicates, with any
proposal, there is always the alternative to simply do nothing, and if
a proposal doesn't meet some minimal level of apparent support it
should simply be abandoned without any kind of adoption call.
[Again, with my co-chair hat on]
Yes, to reinforce all of the above: While personally I'm normally a
"when in doubt, just adopt it" kind of person, in this case the issues
being sorted are whether this work is within charter and, even if it is,
whether the WG thinks that any possible output is something we could
come to consensus on. I think that discussion needs to come to a
conclusion on those two issues.
(And yes, I have been reading all of the messages in the thread. I
haven't found anything that needs particular chair guidance at the
moment.)
pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
