Hi Rich, Ekr,
At 08:14 AM 10-06-2026, Salz, Rich wrote:
I do not understand your message.
There is an alternative to Brian's draft, do not adopt it.
At 08:22 AM 10-06-2026, Eric Rescorla wrote:
While I do not think this document should be adopted, I think it would
be fine for it to be on the agenda in Vienna and based on that discussion,
potentially to do an adoption call. That way, either we can adopt it
or stop discussing it.
With that said, I don't really see what "nobody came up with an alternative
to your proposal" has to do with it. Not every proposal needs an adoption
call. As Rich's message indicates, with any proposal, there is always the
alternative to simply do nothing, and if a proposal doesn't meet some minimal
level of apparent support it should simply be abandoned without any kind
of adoption call.
For information, Brian requested the chairs to consider an adoption
call: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/y3pzw-xkdPGlUNkgyfWuhT01Vns
Having a formal discussion about what to do could help to either
adopt the draft or end the discussion (Ekr mentioned that in the text
quoted above).
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
