On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:56:03PM -0500, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> It's been a while since I've looked at RT.  The last time I tried to
> get it some traction in the organization I work for, it foundered on 3
> points:
> 
>       * It didn't understand "customers".
> 
>         The company I work for is in the computer service and support
>         business.  I need a ticketing system to have an integrated
>         'customer file' that keeps track of all the information about
>         a client, specifically including mapping incoming email
>         addresses to clients and auto-carboning the appropriate
>         client supervisory email.  RT didn't do that when I looked at
>         it last, and AT could be made to do it -- I thought -- but I
>         was already selling 'up-hill' and the loose integration was
>         something I couldn't overcome.
> 
>       * I needed a "what happened today" view for the boss -- showing 
>         all of today's ticket activity and status changes and total
>         time billable -- and there wasn't one, quite, and I wan't
>         smart enough to write it myself.
> 
>       * To work helpdesk with it efficiently, I sort of needed a way
>         to start keying in the notes on an empty screen, and then
>         figure out which ticket it applied to, and attach it, or
>         create a new one.
> 

Pay someone to do what you want. RT is fully customizable and
though most people don't realize it, it's real power is in it's
API. I'm sure BP/Jesse don't see the value in features that
will be used by a tiny percentage of RT users, so they made
RT a great base upon which your dream ticket system can be
built.

-Todd
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

Reply via email to