rtg-bfd  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) xiao.min2
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) xiao.min2
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) xiao.min2
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) Greg Mirsky
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) Greg Mirsky
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) xiao.min2
  • RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) Aijun Wang
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) xiao.min2
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) Jeffrey Haas
  • RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) Aijun Wang
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) xiao.min2
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) Gyan Mishra
  • Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 7 April, 2023) linchangwang
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-12.txt internet-drafts
• I-D Action: draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand-13.txt internet-drafts
• [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC5880 (7240) RFC Errata System
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers-10.txt internet-drafts
  • Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers-10.txt Alan DeKok
  • Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers-10.txt Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers-10.txt Alan DeKok
• bfd - Not having a session at IETF 116 IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
• Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with COMMENT) Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
• Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker
  • Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
  • Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Zaheduzzaman Sarker
  • Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Zaheduzzaman Sarker
  • Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) John Scudder
  • Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Zaheduzzaman Sarker
  • Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
  • Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
• Discussion of issues related to RFC 5884 Greg Mirsky
• Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
  • Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
• Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Alvaro Retana via Datatracker
  • Re: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Alvaro Retana
  • Re: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
  • Re: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Alvaro Retana
• Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Robert Wilton via Datatracker
  • Re: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Jeffrey Haas
  • RE: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Rob Wilton (rwilton)
  • Re: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Jeffrey Haas
  • RE: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Rob Wilton (rwilton)
  • Re: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: [yang-doctors] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
  • Re: [yang-doctors] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
  • Re: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
  • Re: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
  • Re: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
  • RE: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Rob Wilton (rwilton)
  • Re: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
  • RE: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Rob Wilton (rwilton)
  • Re: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
  • Re: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Jeffrey Haas
  • WG, please review [was: Re: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)] John Scudder
  • Re: WG, please review [was: Re: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)] John Scudder
  • Re: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
• Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Lars Eggert via Datatracker
  • Re: Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Reshad Rahman
• NomCom feedback Reshad Rahman
• Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11 Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
  • Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11 John Scudder
  • Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11 Naiming Shen
  • Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11 Magnus Westerlund
  • Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11 Naiming Shen
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11.txt internet-drafts
  • Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11.txt Reshad Rahman
• RE: [Detnet] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mmm-rtgwg-integrated-oam-02.txt Tianran Zhou
  • Re: [Detnet] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mmm-rtgwg-integrated-oam-02.txt Greg Mirsky
  • RE: [Detnet] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mmm-rtgwg-integrated-oam-02.txt Tianran Zhou
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mmm-rtgwg-integrated-oam-02.txt Greg Mirsky
• [IANA #1260764] expert review for draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited David Dong via RT
  • Re: [IANA #1260764] expert review for draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited Tim Bray
• A question about Encapsulation of BFD for SRv6 Policy Greg Mirsky
  • RE: A question about Encapsulation of BFD for SRv6 Policy linchangwang
  • RE: A question about Encapsulation of BFD for SRv6 Policy Alexander Vainshtein
  • RE: A question about Encapsulation of BFD for SRv6 Policy Chenmengxiao
• Segment routing profiles for BFD Jeffrey Haas
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) RFC Errata System
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) John Scudder
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Reshad Rahman
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Dave Katz
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Gļebs Ivanovskis
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) John Scudder
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Dave Katz
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) John Scudder
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Reshad Rahman
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Dave Katz
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Dave Katz
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) John Scudder
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Reshad Rahman
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) xiao.min2
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Greg Mirsky
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) John Scudder
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Dave Katz
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Dave Katz
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) John Scudder
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Reshad Rahman
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Greg Mirsky
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Dave Katz
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Dave Katz
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Dave Katz
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240) Dave Katz
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-10 Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
  • Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-10 Reshad Rahman
  • Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-10 Lars Eggert
• Last Call: <draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-10.txt> (Unsolicited BFD for Sessionless Applications) to Proposed Standard The IESG
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-10.txt internet-drafts
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09 Reshad Rahman
  • Re: AD review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09 Reshad Rahman
  • Re: AD review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09 John Scudder
  • Re: AD review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09 Reshad Rahman
  • Re: AD review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09 John Scudder
  • Re: AD review of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09 Rahman
• Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
  • Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks xiao.min2
  • Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks xiao.min2
  • Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks xiao.min2
  • Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks Reshad Rahman
  • Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks xiao.min2
  • Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks Reshad Rahman
  • Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks xiao.min2
  • Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks xiao.min2
  • Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
  • Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks xiao.min2
• Fwd: Directorate Early Reviews Jeffrey Haas
• NVO3 Working Group LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
  • Re: NVO3 Working Group LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve Reshad Rahman
  • Re: NVO3 Working Group LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
• A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Alexander Vainshtein
  • Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Reshad Rahman
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Alexander Vainshtein
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Reshad Rahman
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? John Scudder
  • Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Mahesh Jethanandani
  • Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Alexander Vainshtein
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? xiao.min2
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Jeffrey Haas
  • RE: [EXTERNAL] A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Alexander Vainshtein
  • RE: [EXTERNAL] A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Alexander Vainshtein
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Mahesh Jethanandani
  • Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? xiao.min2
  • RE: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Mach Chen
  • RE: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Alexander Vainshtein
  • Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? xiao.min2
  • Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? Reshad Rahman
  • Re: A missing read/write attribute in RFC 9314? xiao.min2
• RFC 9314 on YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) rfc-editor
• Regarding resetting bfd.LocalDiag back to No Diagnostic (RFC 5880) Gļebs Ivanovskis
  • Re: Regarding resetting bfd.LocalDiag back to No Diagnostic (RFC 5880) Reshad Rahman
  • Re: Regarding resetting bfd.LocalDiag back to No Diagnostic (RFC 5880) Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: Regarding resetting bfd.LocalDiag back to No Diagnostic (RFC 5880) Greg Mirsky
• [[email protected]: New version of the "Tao of the IETF" published] Jeffrey Haas
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand-12.txt Greg Mirsky
• [Errata Verified] RFC5880 (7083) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Verified] RFC5880 (7082) RFC Errata System
• I-D Action: draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand-12.txt internet-drafts
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7083) RFC Errata System
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7083) John Scudder
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7082) RFC Errata System
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7082) John Scudder
  • Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7082) Dave Katz
• Fw: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-05.txt xiao.min2
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-05.txt internet-drafts
• RE: I-D Action: draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-02.txt linchangwang
  • Re: I-D Action: draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-02.txt Reshad Rahman
  • RE: I-D Action: draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-02.txt linchangwang
• FW: New Version Notification for draft-liu-bfd-srv6-policy-encap-00.txt Yisong Liu
• Fwd: Seeking volunteers for NomCom Jeffrey Haas
• Protocol Action: 'YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis-04.txt) The IESG
• [Errata Rejected] RFC5880 (6818) RFC Errata System
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand-11.txt Greg Mirsky
• Regarding keyed MD5/SHA1 authentication for BFD (RFC 5880) Gļebs Ivanovskis
  • Re: Regarding keyed MD5/SHA1 authentication for BFD (RFC 5880) Alan DeKok
  • Re: Regarding keyed MD5/SHA1 authentication for BFD (RFC 5880) Greg Mirsky
  • Re: Regarding keyed MD5/SHA1 authentication for BFD (RFC 5880) Alan DeKok
  • Re: Regarding keyed MD5/SHA1 authentication for BFD (RFC 5880) Gļebs Ivanovskis
  • Re: Regarding keyed MD5/SHA1 authentication for BFD (RFC 5880) Alan DeKok

• Earlier messages
• Later messages