--- In [email protected], "ed_loizeaux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > back to our regularly scheduled discussion topic that seems to
> > come up at least once a year S scale couplers.
> > John Gibson
>
> John...Well, we could switch over to the annual "rail size"
> discussion. Or, the "I want" messages. Or, the "why don't they"
> questions. Then, of course, there is always politics and
religion.
> All of these topics are impossible to reconcile into one uniform
> standardized approach for everyone. And that's the nature of S.
> Hopefully the new-to-S guys can at least understand all the pros
and
> cons and make a better more informed decision as a
> result. "S"miles...Ed L.
====================================================================
Or folks can search the archives instead of resurrecting the same
ol' horse so we can once more beat it to death. <VBG> I say this
totally convicted of course because I just posted about the 1295
couplers, repeating the points I have already made in prior posts in
prior discussion on this well-worn topic. I suppose I could have
simply answered the question by giving links
to my prior messages.
My apologies to the list for contributing to the curse of repeating
topics. <VBG>
~ John
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
