Yes, but... What you suggest seems eminently reasonable, but there is
something more convincing and compelling about a structure
for which there is a real prototype, even if the individual kit builder makes
some alterations in construction. The series of freelanced
structures drawn in the NMRA Bulletin over the past several years never look
quite right to me: sort of plausible but nothing that
really grabs my attention.
Jace Kahn
General Manager
Ceres & Canisteo RR Co./Champlain County Traction Co.
jacekahn@...> wrote:
> > I'd think the greater demand would be for smallish industrial
> > and commercial prototypes, the kind that justify a siding (like the Sunkist
> > packing house, which can be used for other
> > purposes--
>
> Seems to me it makes more sense to produce the parts needed to build any
> building instead of a kit for a specific building? Siding, doors,
> windows,roofing , etc. are all that's needed . Real buildings are built from
> these same parts so I see no reason to need kits for model buildings?
> ....Regards, Dave Branum
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
