I have to agree with Rich and Roger. While the magazine has certainly changed a 
lot from the good-old-days, MR continues to publish ground-breaking articles on 
various topics. I doubt you will see a 15 part series on scratch building a 
locomotive in brass ever again, but scenery and operations topics are often 
well covered by authors like Paul Dolkos and Bill Darnaby. That doesn't prevent 
MR-bashing from being popular in many internet groups. I guess in my case I see 
myself as a modeler railroader who happens to work in S scale, so rare is the 
article that doesn't have some use to it. That said, I don't subscribe to 
either MR or RMC, but buy them when I see an article of particular interest. It 
sees to come out about even the past couple of years.

I certainly hope everyone who is so unhappy with MR is s subscriber to Bob 
Nalbone's S magazine. That's all S content, every issue...

Pieter E. Roos


--- On Mon, 10/31/11, Roger Nulton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rich,
> 
> I agree with you.  There’s usually lots of good
> stuff in Model Railroader, including Tony Koester’s
> “Trains of Thought” and Andy S’s column on
> operations.  And the photos are always superb.  I
> find that I can often learn something even from looking at
> the ads.  But I’ve only been in the hobby 25 years.
> 
> Roger Nulton
> 
> From: richgajnak 
> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 11:48 AM
> To: [email protected]
> 
> Subject: {S-Scale List} Re: MRR (was New to the group,
> newer to S gauge



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to