From: Alan Lambert
Jim,
Please disreguard this post.  I will still use you if I see a car offered that 
I want, Meaning I will go full scale at home and keep my train club high rail 
stock. I was just trying to drum upsome new business for you. 
                             Thanks,
                                           Alan
 

________________________________
 From: Alan Lambert <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} SR gon in S scale?
  

 
   
 
Fine, You just lost me .I was going to go scale but thanks to you I will stay 
high rail. I was trying to drum up more business for you from my side but you 
see the dark side. Go to the STOT yahoo group and you will see what I mean. We 
as high rail want new cars that are modern and thought you might help as a 
producer.You worry about production numbers. Not everyone wants your cars. The 
scale guys are bairly keeping you going from what I see from your website. To 
restate what I started with, I will change couplers and keep high rail wheelsj 
just like Brooks Stover and his railroad. My own opinion.
                                             Thanks,
                                                          Alan
 
 

________________________________
 From: smokymtn28805 <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} SR gon in S scale?
  

  
The entire point to producing my resin rolling stock and diesel kits is to be 
as prototypically accurate as possible.  I have produced the H10-44 and both 
44-tonners with hi-rail wheelsets because there is room for the larger flanges 
and thicker treads.  However, there is no such room under my freight car kits. 

To offer AF-compatible wheelsets means compromising (read:  removing) a lot of 
detail that I spend a bunch of time researching, designing and patterning.  I 
am not willing to make that compromise.  If a modeler wants to remove the 
corner steps and a good portion of the underframe and bolster to accommodate 
larger wheelsets, that's his choice.  Scale modelers make up over 85% of my S 
scale sales.  Removing such detail would kill those sales and that's just not 
good business.  Granted, I may be losing some sales from the hi-rail crowd but, 
at most, I'd only pick up a few more sales while losing a large portion of 
scale sales.

Jim King
SMMW

--- In [email protected], Alan Lambert <alanlambert64@...> wrote:
>
> From: Alan Lambert
> I was not comparing, I was just giving the lengtth of the American Models 
> condola. I like what Jim is doing but he needs to run more than what he does 
> per run. If he did the high rail guys I talk with all the time might give him 
> a shot .I know we would have o furnish our own wheels and couplers and make 
> miner adaption for the bolster plates, but there are some that would do that. 
> My opinion.
>                                                                         
>  Thanks,
>                                                                                      
>  Alan
> Yes  i'm High rail but I get half of my ideas from the scale side.
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: Donald <donald_macdougall@...>
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 5:00 PM
> Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} SR gon in S scale?
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> No disrespect to American Models,
> However comparing AM and SMMW kits is like American Flyer of old and SHS of 
> today and then some. The kits don't just look some what similar to prototype, 
> they look like the real deal.
> Don  MacDougall
> Scale Modeler
> UK
> 
> --- In [email protected], Alan Lambert <alanlambert64@> wrote:
> >
> > From: Alan Lambert
> >            Lone Star Flyer Club
> >            Arlington, Texas
> > All,
> > The American Models condola measures at 52 ft. I have one and  we need 
> > some longer. I would goo for a drop end also.
> >                                                
> >  Thanks,
> >                                                             
> >  Alan
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: pickycat95 <pickycat95@>
> > To: [email protected] 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 1:16 PM
> > Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} SR gon in S scale?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > Jim King has floated proposals for two kinds of gondolas - several weeks 
> > ago a high-sided one that I think was used in coal service.  The other one 
> > from a few days ago that in general shape looks something like the AM 
> > version.  I haven't had a chance to measure the length of the AM offering 
> > but in details it is rather different than what Jim King has proposed.
> > Ben Trousdale
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Alex Binkley <alex.binkley@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi William:
> > >  I've never seen an AM freight car that looks anything like what Jim is 
> > > offering. There was Quality Craft kit many years ago. This is a hi side 
> > > gon not the standard one that AM offers.
> > > cheers
> > >   ----- Original Message ----- 
> > >   From: William Laffan 
> > >   To: [email protected] 
> > >   Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 1:41 PM
> > >   Subject: RE: {S-Scale List} SR gon in S scale?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   Jim:
> > > 
> > >   I am sure that the kit would be up to your usual high standards.
> > > 
> > >   Unfortunately, it appears to duplicate an existent product done by 
> > > American Models, which practically every S scaler has multiples of.
> > > 
> > >   How about doing a 60' drop-end gon? The only prior example of that was 
> > > a relatively short run brass one (PRR) done a few years back by Bill Lane.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   William E. Laffan   |   Senior Associate Attorney 
> > > 
> > >   Sacks & Zolonz, LLP   |  Workers' Compensation Employer Defense
> > > 
> > >   (t) 1-310-216-7778 x106  |  (f) 1-310-216-9552
> > > 
> > >   Follow Sacks & Zolonz on our blog  |  Twitter |  LinkedIn  |  Facebook
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the 
> > > sole use of the intended recipient(s).  Any review, use, distribution or 
> > > disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended 
> > > recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact 
> > > the sender by reply email or telephone, and delete all copies of this 
> > > message
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> > > Behalf Of SMMW
> > >   Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 11:21 AM
> > >   To: [email protected]; [email protected]; S Trains
> > >   Subject: {S-Scale List} SR gon in S scale?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   All of my S scale rolling stock offerings, except the Barber trucks, 
> > > were created in HO before being converted to S.  An HO kit that I 
> > > produced last year has not been offered to S scale so I thought I'd 
> > > remedy that now.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   Go to this link:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > http://www.smokymountainmodelworks.com/HO_gondolas.html
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   The 2 SR 52'-6" gons at the top of the web page have not been mentioned 
> > > before so if there is interest, now's the time to chime in.  For the 
> > > purists out there, these Pullman-Std. cars were built only for the 
> > > Southern (as far as I can determine), however, they are VERY close in 
> > > detail, rib count and length to ACF's version which a LOT of roads owned 
> > > (visit www.tangentscalemodels.com to view the HO ACF paint schemes).  The 
> > > primary spotting differences between the P-S version and ACF are the ends 
> > > and end sills;  ACF ends were available as a drop-down option and ACF end 
> > > sills were angled.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   The HO cars have sold reasonably well since it's never been produced in 
> > > HO.  It's a "steam-era" car (1 batch built in 1953 delivered in Roman, 1 
> > > batch in 1958 delivered in Block) that ran well into the 90s in MOW 
> > > service.  I shot 2 in the mid-80s still wearing very beat up Roman 
> > > lettering.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   The proposed S scale kits would be available as a 1-pc body with 
> > > separate urethane underframe, brass weight, etched tie down U-loops that 
> > > run the length of the car on both sides and decals.  The etched fret also 
> > > includes the brake platform.  I think an "econo-kit" option is applicable 
> > > for this one since ladders are short (easy to scratchbuild) and 
> > > trucks/couplers/Grandt AB brakes are readily available.  The remaining 
> > > parts are round and flat wire (for steps) and miscellaneous styrene 
> > > strips (ladders).  Depending on how many kits are reserved, I can 
> > > probably sell either decal option kit for around $60.  Decals and etched 
> > > parts are VERY expensive and the latter requires new artwork and minimum 
> > > sheet order quantity.  A mini-CD containing 22 pages and TONS prototype 
> > > pix completes the kit (a full-size CD is available upon request for Mac 
> > > users).
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   This kit would follow the SAL B7 car which is now being designed in HO 
> > > and moving along well.  Please reply off-list if you are interested in 
> > > either/both of the SR gons.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   Jim King
> > > 
> > >   Smoky Mountain Model Works, Inc.
> > > 
> > >   Ph. (828) 777-5619
> > > 
> > >   <www.smokymountainmodelworks.com>
> > >
> >
>

   

     
      

Reply via email to