I see nothing that says what controller was used. S-Cab uses modified DCC decoders. They can be used on a layout in conjunction with regular DCC Units. Ed Kozlowsky Sanford, Maine www.SScale.org
>________________________________ > From: Talmadge C 'TC' Carr <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 9:43 AM >Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} Batteries was Re: AC vs DC > > > > >Cant be, S-Cab uses a proprietary controller. Read the message. Sounds more >like Tam Valley. >TCC:} > > >On Jun 13, 2012, at 4:43 AM, Ed Kozlowsky wrote: > >>Probably NWSL S-Cab. >>http://www.nwsl.com/S-CAB_Radio_DCC_Control.html >> >>Ed Kozlowsky >>Sanford, Maine >>www.SScale.org >> >> >> >>>________________________________ >>>From: Pieter Roos <[email protected]> >>>To: [email protected] >>>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:47 PM >>>Subject: {S-Scale List} Batteries was Re: AC vs DC >>> >>>At the recent NE Proto meet someone was showing a system that used small, >>>rechargeable and a radio module to power/control the locomotive. One module >>>attached to the DCC bus on the layout, the other to the decoder in the >>>locomotive. Tge result was DCC wireless to the locomotive. The advantage is >>>that the battery can charge while the loco is running on regular track, but >>>turnout frogs and crossing or other complex track can be insulated without >>>loss of power or control. The batteries supposedly lasted for 3+ hours >>>without recharging, and fit in an HO diesel. >Talmadge C 'TC' Carr >Sn42 and Hn42 somewhere in the wilds of the Pacific Northwest >[email protected] >
