--- In [email protected], ken garber <garber.ken@...> wrote:
>
> For general switching, yes it would be expensive, but if you pull your
> train into the yard and need to cut off the power and send to the house, it
> would be adequatel.  (Or even two locos that need to be split.)
> 
> Ken

Ken and others:

Perhaps I'm a luddite, but I don't even like using the trip pins on the Kadee 
couplers. I cut them off.

I do this partially for appearance sake, partially so I don't have to worry 
about pins interfering with brake hoses or snagging on grade crossings and 
switch frogs, and partially because - having done this for years now - I 
automatically design layouts with good reach-in access everywhere that I need 
to couple/uncouple cars.

This is a good idea - if you can comfortably work the couplers manually, you 
can also reach the track to clean rails, conduct minor repairs, and all the 
other stuff that needs to be done to keep a layout running flawlessly (or as 
close to flawlessly as possible).

Since the last time I mentioned "Flawless Operation" on this list it started an 
extensive discussion on what that means and whether it's even achievable, I'll 
go for broke and also mention that when (if?) Frank Sergent does his S scale 
couplers in Ready-to-Use die cast - as he has with his HO couplers - I'll be 
upgrading my entire fleet as fast as I can place an order. My layout is already 
designed with Sergents in mind - and the ability to operate the couplers with a 
magnetic wand instead of physically forcing open the Kadees with a skewer has a 
lot of appeal. I used the HO die cast Sergent couplers on my previous layout 
(an O scale Maine two-footer) so I'm comfortable using them. In fact, I prefer 
them over the Kadees.

As for DCC-controlled couplers, include me out. For starters, pulling the pin 
on the couplers is the brakeman's job - not the engineer's. Since I prefer to 
run my layout with a two-person crew on each train, having the engineer open 
the knuckles using his throttle would be unrealistic.

Cheers!

- Trevor (ducking) in Toronto

---

Trevor Marshall

Port Rowan in 1:64
I model a steam-era Canadian National branch line terminal in S scale, and blog 
about it here:
http://themodelrailwayshow.com/cn1950s

The Model Railway Show
Listen in as two S scalers (and recovering radio newscasters) host a podcast 
about the hobby:
http://www.themodelrailwayshow.com




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to