How about uncoupling helpers on the fly? That would be a neat feature. Could even do it in a tunnel (though I wouldn't want to try it).
Bob Frascella Wenham, MA On Oct 3, 2012, at 7:31 AM, Ed Kozlowsky wrote: > > Of what use would a DCC operated coupler be if it was only on the loco? Can > you imagine how many addresses you'd have if each end of every car had one? > Not to mention the cost! > > Ed Kozlowsky > Sanford, Maine > sscale.org > > From: richgajnak <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2012 7:09 AM > Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} MTH Flyer > > > > > --- In mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com, "Tom Hawley" <t.hawley@...> wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Bill Lane > > . . . . . . . . . . . the thought of DCC operated couplers really intrigues > > me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DCC scale couplers? Or like the Lionel U33C, digital-controlled BIG > > couplers one removes and replaces with KDs (or other appropriate available > > coupler)? If scale, that will be something. > > Tom Hawley -- Lansing Mich > > > Tom, > > MTH has had a DCC operated Kadee compatible coupler on their HO locomotives > for several years. It's oversized for HO but ought to be just about right for > S. > > Rich G(ajnak) > > > > >
