All I will use is a coupler pick also, I'm not going to mess with magnetics.  
Remember a coupler used in the 40s and 50s that a had bronze wire that stuck 
toward the side, and the "knuckle" was a thin piece of brass on it's edge.  
Squeezing the two wires toward each other opened the knuckles.  Can't remember 
the name, don;'t think it was the Devore ones. 

DJE

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ed Kozlowsky 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 11:26 AM
  Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} How about Manually Operated Couplers?


    

  Trevor,
  I agree with everything you've said.  I use HO Sergents for Sn2 and I'll use 
them when they're available RTR in standard gauge.  In the mean time, I use 
Prot Max couplers because they uncouple flawlessly with a KD coupler pic and 
they're larger than #5s.

  Ed Kozlowsky
  Sanford, Maine
  sscale.org


    From: tpm1ca <[email protected]>
    To: [email protected] 
    Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2012 11:51 AM
    Subject: {S-Scale List} How about Manually Operated Couplers?



      


    --- In mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com, ken garber <garber.ken@...> wrote:
    >
    > For general switching, yes it would be expensive, but if you pull your
    > train into the yard and need to cut off the power and send to the house, 
it
    > would be adequatel. (Or even two locos that need to be split.)
    > 
    > Ken

    Ken and others:

    Perhaps I'm a luddite, but I don't even like using the trip pins on the 
Kadee couplers. I cut them off.

    I do this partially for appearance sake, partially so I don't have to worry 
about pins interfering with brake hoses or snagging on grade crossings and 
switch frogs, and partially because - having done this for years now - I 
automatically design layouts with good reach-in access everywhere that I need 
to couple/uncouple cars.

    This is a good idea - if you can comfortably work the couplers manually, 
you can also reach the track to clean rails, conduct minor repairs, and all the 
other stuff that needs to be done to keep a layout running flawlessly (or as 
close to flawlessly as possible).

    Since the last time I mentioned "Flawless Operation" on this list it 
started an extensive discussion on what that means and whether it's even 
achievable, I'll go for broke and also mention that when (if?) Frank Sergent 
does his S scale couplers in Ready-to-Use die cast - as he has with his HO 
couplers - I'll be upgrading my entire fleet as fast as I can place an order. 
My layout is already designed with Sergents in mind - and the ability to 
operate the couplers with a magnetic wand instead of physically forcing open 
the Kadees with a skewer has a lot of appeal. I used the HO die cast Sergent 
couplers on my previous layout (an O scale Maine two-footer) so I'm comfortable 
using them. In fact, I prefer them over the Kadees.

    As for DCC-controlled couplers, include me out. For starters, pulling the 
pin on the couplers is the brakeman's job - not the engineer's. Since I prefer 
to run my layout with a two-person crew on each train, having the engineer open 
the knuckles using his throttle would be unrealistic.

    Cheers!

    - Trevor (ducking) in Toronto

    ---

    Trevor Marshall

    Port Rowan in 1:64
    I model a steam-era Canadian National branch line terminal in S scale, and 
blog about it here:
    http://themodelrailwayshow.com/cn1950s

    The Model Railway Show
    Listen in as two S scalers (and recovering radio newscasters) host a 
podcast about the hobby:
    http://www.themodelrailwayshow.com/






  

Reply via email to