Trevor,
I agree with everything you've said.  I use HO Sergents for Sn2 and I'll use 
them when they're available RTR in standard gauge.  In the mean time, I use 
Prot Max couplers because they uncouple flawlessly with a KD coupler pic and 
they're larger than #5s.
 
Ed Kozlowsky
Sanford, Maine
sscale.org


>________________________________
> From: tpm1ca <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2012 11:51 AM
>Subject: {S-Scale List} How about Manually Operated Couplers?
>  
>
> 
>   
> 
>
>
>--- In mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com, ken garber <garber.ken@...> wrote:
>>
>> For general switching, yes it would be expensive, but if you pull your
>> train into the yard and need to cut off the power and send to the house, it
>> would be adequatel.  (Or even two locos that need to be split.)
>> 
>> Ken
>
>Ken and others:
>
>Perhaps I'm a luddite, but I don't even like using the trip pins on the Kadee 
>couplers. I cut them off.
>
>I do this partially for appearance sake, partially so I don't have to worry 
>about pins interfering with brake hoses or snagging on grade crossings and 
>switch frogs, and partially because - having done this for years now - I 
>automatically design layouts with good reach-in access everywhere that I need 
>to couple/uncouple cars.
>
>This is a good idea - if you can comfortably work the couplers manually, you 
>can also reach the track to clean rails, conduct minor repairs, and all the 
>other stuff that needs to be done to keep a layout running flawlessly (or as 
>close to flawlessly as possible).
>
>Since the last time I mentioned "Flawless Operation" on this list it started 
>an extensive discussion on what that means and whether it's even achievable, 
>I'll go for broke and also mention that when (if?) Frank Sergent does his S 
>scale couplers in Ready-to-Use die cast - as he has with his HO couplers - 
>I'll be upgrading my entire fleet as fast as I can place an order. My layout 
>is already designed with Sergents in mind - and the ability to operate the 
>couplers with a magnetic wand instead of physically forcing open the Kadees 
>with a skewer has a lot of appeal. I used the HO die cast Sergent couplers on 
>my previous layout (an O scale Maine two-footer) so I'm comfortable using 
>them. In fact, I prefer them over the Kadees.
>
>As for DCC-controlled couplers, include me out. For starters, pulling the pin 
>on the couplers is the brakeman's job - not the engineer's. Since I prefer to 
>run my layout with a two-person crew on each train, having the engineer open 
>the knuckles using his throttle would be unrealistic.
>
>Cheers!
>
>- Trevor (ducking) in Toronto
>
>---
>
>Trevor Marshall
>
>Port Rowan in 1:64
>I model a steam-era Canadian National branch line terminal in S scale, and 
>blog about it here:
>http://themodelrailwayshow.com/cn1950s
>
>The Model Railway Show
>Listen in as two S scalers (and recovering radio newscasters) host a podcast 
>about the hobby:
>http://www.themodelrailwayshow.com/
>
>   
>      
>
>   

Reply via email to