+1 for logging. Any flames, we can use #sagemath, or a new channel for.
I would love to have at least see yesterday's logs posted. I saw a bit of it, but I forgot to save my logs. On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:14 AM, William Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:35 PM, kcrisman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> There are privacy issues at play here -- I would like some debate > >> about this before we go ahead. Personally, I think #sage-devel should > >> be logged, because it's a development channel, but there is a great > >> deal of personal information exchanged in that venue. > > > > -1. At least for me, I look at this through Google groups, so I know > > that what I say here is public for ever, or at least until digital > > media succumb (which might be sooner than vinyl...). IRC is a > > different, more supple - and hence more flame-susceptible - than this > > venue. > > > > But wait -- in point of fact I've not seen anything bad on sage-devel > in a long long time. Maybe I haven't been paying attention, but all > the discussion from yesterday was I thought very useful to archive. > It was all about sage notebook design, ticket refereeing. > > Maybe we can have a #sage-flame irc channel? > > I vote for logging. > > -- William > > > > -- Tim Joseph Dumol <tim (at) timdumol (dot) com> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
