On Sep 23, 2:24 pm, William Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > For the Sage project I think it would *best* if we changed our > behavior on #sage-devel and make the #sage-devel logs public and > searchable. The benefit to the project overall is that less gets > discussed "in secret", process -- such as release management -- gets > archived, etc. If people want to blow of steam or behave in a less > than archivable way, they should do so elsewhere (e.g., #sage-flame). > > Also, by making the #sage-devel logs public, many more people will > benefit from what happens there. I would go so far as to recommend > that we auto-email the logs each day to sage-devel. > Note that typically less than 20 people are logged into #sage-devel at > any time, and there is no posted log, so the people that benefit from > #sage-devel are about 2% of the subscribers to the sage-devel mailing > list, which isn't much.
I agree wholeheartedly and almost entirely. But I think there is non- archivable discussion that is not necessarily flames. #sage-talk, #sage-discuss, Harald's #sagemath, or similar? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
