On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Rob Beezer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2:24 pm, William Stein <[email protected]> wrote: >> For the Sage project I think it would *best* if we changed our >> behavior on #sage-devel and make the #sage-devel logs public and >> searchable. The benefit to the project overall is that less gets >> discussed "in secret", process -- such as release management -- gets >> archived, etc. If people want to blow of steam or behave in a less >> than archivable way, they should do so elsewhere (e.g., #sage-flame). >> >> Also, by making the #sage-devel logs public, many more people will >> benefit from what happens there. I would go so far as to recommend >> that we auto-email the logs each day to sage-devel. >> Note that typically less than 20 people are logged into #sage-devel at >> any time, and there is no posted log, so the people that benefit from >> #sage-devel are about 2% of the subscribers to the sage-devel mailing >> list, which isn't much.
+1 to public logs I'm enjoying reading the log from yesterday > > I agree wholeheartedly and almost entirely. But I think there is non- > archivable discussion that is not necessarily flames. > > #sage-talk, #sage-discuss, Harald's #sagemath, or similar? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
