On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 5:10:40 PM UTC, William wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, November 15, 2016, Dima Pasechnik <dim...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 2:29:30 PM UTC, Erik Bray wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:43 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Erik Bray <erik....@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:49 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Stan <schy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear all, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> A student of mine has been using SMC because the sage appliance in >>> >>>> virtualbox did not appear very useful with the jupyter notebook. >>> Now that he >>> >>>> encountered a critical bug in SMC (reported offline), he is back >>> with the >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm not aware of this bug. I don't know of any critical bugs in >>> SMC. >>> >>> There are exactly 22 known SMC *bugs*, which you can see listed >>> here, >>> >>> all of which we plan to fix ASAP: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/sagemathinc/smc/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3AI-bug%20sort%3Acreated-asc%20-label%3Ablocked >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On can also use SMC via docker on Windows, Linux and OS X, as >>> explained here: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/sagemathinc/smc/blob/master/src/dev/docker/README.md >>> >>> >>> >>> I wish I could recommend the official sagemath docker images, but it >>> >>> looks like they haven't been updated in 6 months to 1 year ago? >>> (What >>> >>> the heck?) >>> >>> >>> >>> https://hub.docker.com/u/sagemath/ >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I'm not sure where you're looking-- >>> > >>> > >>> > Click on the link above. I clicked on sagemath/sage since it is ON >>> > TOP (hence what you find with a typical google search), and it has >>> > vastly more downloads than all other docker Sage images put together. >>> > It's clearly the one people are getting for some reason. >>> > >>> > I then clicked on the sagemath-jupyter one, since -- based on the name >>> > -- I imagine that's the other reasonable choice if a person wants a >>> > web interface... and it is 6 months old. >>> > >>> > Clicking on all of them now, only sagemath/sagemath has been updated >>> > recently. All others are out of date. >>> > >>> >> the image called sagemath/sage is >>> >> definitely deprecated and should be removed. >>> > >>> > OK. Who has the power to do that? Also, I wonder what is driving so >>> > much traffic there? >>> >>> Please see https://github.com/sagemath/docker/issues/4 >>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsagemath%2Fdocker%2Fissues%2F4&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHTpXG0nMQbI6wwvnbQEGBxSjGf9w> >>> >>> >>> I don't know what's driving so much traffic there, but I need to find >>> a way to *clearly* deprecate it without breaking things for whoever it >>> is that's relying on it. >> >> >> Oh dear. It seems that the barrier to posting "official" docker images >> is way too low. >> There is also swenson/sage, dieudonne/sage, gissehel/sagemath, >> xuyouwen/sagemath, >> and probably many more sagemath docker images over there, some old, some >> not... >> >> Probably the best way for the time being just post the "latest" image >> with 7.4 >> to sagemath/sage (previous images would still available via tags, IMHO) >> so that it is in sync with sagemath/sagemath. >> >> >> >>> Anyways, the docker containers really should >>> be preferred over the VM. Forcing people on Windows to use a VM is >>> terrible. I tried to push on this a few months ago but it either >>> wasn't ready or nobody listened. >>> >> >> The main problem with using VM is setting it properly. AFAIK on Windows >> you still have VM >> in the play, so you basically provide something that is meant to work >> better, right? >> > > I don't know exactly the situation with docket + windows, but Docker on OS > X uses a very lightweight hypervisor and automatically forwards networks > and makes OS X host paths available. It's pretty damn amazing, and it's > also very new - just out of beta! They do something very similar for > Windows. >
as https://docs.docker.com/docker-for-windows/#download-docker-for-windows says: "Docker for Windows requires 64bit Windows 10 Pro, Enterprise and Education (1511 November update, Build 10586 or later) and Microsoft Hyper-V." So this looks like we are SOL with Docker as the primary way to provide Sage on Windows... > > >> >> How about we do some more testing of the sagemath/sagemath image, in >> particular >> on Windows and OSX, and then (if we're happy) advertise it on >> sagemath.org >> and elsewhere? >> >> Dima >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "sage-devel" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > -- > Sent from my massive iPhone 6 plus. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
