#6743: cygwin metaticket: port Sage to Microsoft Windows (via Cygwin): stage 1 
--
make building Sage automatic
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  was          |         Owner:  was     
           Type:  enhancement  |        Status:  new     
       Priority:  major        |     Milestone:  sage-5.6
      Component:  cygwin       |    Resolution:          
       Keywords:  sd31 sd32    |   Work issues:          
Report Upstream:  N/A          |     Reviewers:          
        Authors:               |     Merged in:          
   Dependencies:               |      Stopgaps:          
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment (by jdemeyer):

 Replying to [comment:78 kcrisman]:
 > I appreciate all the questions here trying to narrow it down.  However,
 I think the point is to FIRST get Sage to build reliably on Cygwin, and if
 we need all these things, then so be it.  We can remove them later,
 precisely because we're not targeting people just randomly building Sage
 on Cygwin.

 If you're still at this early stage like you're suggesting, maybe updating
 the prereq should be postponed until it's clearer what the real
 requirements are. What's the point of putting effort in checking some
 dependency if the dependency might be removed in a next release? (honest
 question, no offense meant)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6743#comment:79>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to