#16331: Game Theory: Build capacity to solve matching games in to Sage.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Matching Games, | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 40d4cfaa662913ca6795a8a9a598b53cf931809c
u/vinceknight/game_theory__build_capacity_to_solve_matching_games_in_to_sage_|
Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
I want to say that in this case it ''does'' make sense to have a lot of
commits for two reasons:
* Implementing from scratch this functionality, like for sage-matroid
* Two different authors, and ideally one wants to keep their
contributions clear
But again, my main concern is just that I am not git wizard enough to view
the appropriate changes. It sounds like one will want to start from (say)
the latest beta release and add the relevant code here. (That's good,
because the original directory src/sage/game_theory/all.py is already in,
I believe.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16331#comment:32>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
