#16970: Add new plantri spkg
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nvcleemp           |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  packages:          |   Resolution:
  optional                           |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Nico Van Cleemput  |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  u/nvcleemp         |  8808de28c104ef9bd620c86be02bd9e20a2b4469
  /plantri-spkg                      |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #16972             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nvcleemp):

 Hi

 > Oh I see I see, I had not even noticed that the ticket was not in
 `needs_review`. Sorry for interrupting.

 Not a problem. It's always good to have some comments along the way.

 > Nononnono I agree with that, the four functions are fine ! I was only
 talking about the code: why wouldn't the first function call the other
 ones so that there is no duplication of code ?

 That's true. I'll have a look at fixing that.

 > Oh, do you mean that the function will output all different embeddings
 of non-3-connected planar graphs ? If so that's worth a note/warning in
 the doc !

 Yes, it will do that.

 > I am still a bit troubled by this distinction between "plane graphs" and
 "planar graphs". Especially when the website of plantri/fullgen reads
 "planar graph" everywhere.
 >
 > http://cs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/plantri/

 Yes, I know. I actually don't know which notation Brendan uses, but I at
 least know that Gunnar is quite adamant about the distinction. I think
 they just never got around to changing it from the original wording.

 But I can live with planar_graphs if it is noted clearly that for
 non-3-connected graphs each distinct planar embedding will be output.

 At the moment I'm too jet-lagged to risk writing any code. (Unless you
 want some extra work as a reviewer ;-)) I'll continue work on this ticket
 soon.

 Nico

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16970#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to