#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | 2c7019c64047f5f84d89d72fec81a7af483cdc66
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
This is a more difficult example where the list is finite (because the sum
of the lower envelope eventually becomes larger than the sum):
{{{
sage: IntegerListsLex(7, floor=[4], max_part=4, min_slope=-1).list()
...
ValueError: Could not check that the specified constraints yield a finite
set
}}}
This should either be fixed or be documented as an example where the check
isn't good enough.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:387>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
