#18972: twographs and Seidel switching
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dimpase | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/dimpase/seidelsw | 25eec1b6d18bb021eccd4b04774111097ff8f3b5
Dependencies: #18960, #18948, | Stopgaps:
#18988, #18991, #18986, #19018, |
#19019 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> An "error" resulting in an improvement of the situation is not an error.
I did it myself, and I claim that it was an error. I shouldn't have, and I
regret it. That makes it an error, at the very least in the intent.
> there is at least one more voice of reason, agreeing with me, and none
agreeing with you.
True, but I would like to have a solution with respect to these things in
the global namespace too. We do need a way to define new classes without
exporting them to the global namespace. At least that would give us a way
to get rid of the 10 000 combinat things exported in the wild: if catalogs
change and are made able to gather all kind of classes and not only
'famous constructions', there will be a lot of deprecation ahead.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18972#comment:127>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
