#9976: Decorated functions/methods have generic signature in documentation
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  jsrn              |       Owner:  mvngu                           
        
       Type:  enhancement       |      Status:  needs_review                    
        
   Priority:  major             |   Milestone:  sage-4.7                        
        
  Component:  documentation     |    Keywords:  sphinx, documentation, cython 
inspection
     Author:  jsrn, Simon King  |    Upstream:  N/A                             
        
   Reviewer:                    |      Merged:                                  
        
Work_issues:                    |  
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by jsrn):

 Replying to [comment:52 SimonKing]:
 > Since [attachment:9976_change_to_argspec.patch] does not do the
 necessary changes in sage/structure/element.pyx and in
 sage/misc/lazy_import.pyx, it is hopefully OK that I suggest to replace it
 with the patch that I just updated.

 Sure. The double work was unfortunate -- would have been nice with a more
 direct communication channel to avoid this.

 >
 > That patch also contains the fix for plots: An `AttributeError` is
 raised, not a `KeyError` (and it is tested, of course).

 I also did that, so more double work. My patch was slightly different: I
 added doc-tests demonstrating the different exception class with different
 access methods (maps.punk vs maps['punk']). I also used
 self.__class__.__name__ instead of type(self) for the output string. I
 don't particularly feel strongly for either, though.

 >
 > Since your patches changed, I am afraid I need to run long tests again.
 But I am fairly confident, and so I change the status into "needs review".

 Yup, me too; and compile all documentation again :-S But at long last we
 seem to be right about there...

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9976#comment:53>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to