#9976: Decorated functions/methods have generic signature in documentation
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: jsrn | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7
Component: documentation | Keywords: sphinx, documentation, cython
inspection
Author: jsrn, Simon King | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment(by jsrn):
> That might actually be a good idea. It would coincide with what
> sage.structure.parent.raise_attribute_error does. Moreover, I just saw
that I actually forgot to add a new doctest (although there is a modified
old doctest showing the error).
>
> So, perhaps one of us (hopefully not both...) could add it. Perhaps you?
I plan to move on to ticket #11115.
>
I'll do the change. But a new doc-test showing which error? In
plot.colors? That would be superfluous, right? Or in sageinspect?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9976#comment:55>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
