Warren, you are speaking for everyone here, I think. At least for me. Maybe Roger will ask next time about tips how to fix his car?
@Roger: You got a hardware cheaper or gratis for your contract, which is running for a defined time period, so if you cancel the (no one cares about it) contract, you must pay cancelation bill, no matter how slow your f....g wodafone connection is. The contract just said how much (up to) the f....g speed can be, not how much you will really get. So if you cancel the contract, face the reality and pay the 200 Pound. And read your contract next time before you sign. Or ask a lawyer in a lawyer newsgroup. No, I'm not working for "teh" f....g wodafone, but I read my contracts. I will put your mail address into my spam blocker. 2011/6/7 <war...@wdlee.co.uk> > I can't speak for anyone else, but if you are going to send replies, please > make them at least vaguely relevant. This is a place for discussing SAM > related items, NOT vodaphone contracts, especially when they have absolutely > nothing to do with the conversation at hand. > > > Quoting Roger Jowett <rogerjow...@gmail.com>: > > are you sure if you work for voda phone you can send a letter asking >> for £200 for cancellation of contract after all 85kbps is exactly the >> same as the advertised 28.8mbps connection >> refund anyone? >> >> On 06/06/2011, Rich Mellor <r...@rwapservices.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> Hi Warren, >>> >>> If we can sort out the problem, then yes, I intend sending out >>> replacements free of charge to those who have bought them and not >>> returned them for a refund. >>> >>> I will of course keep people updated >>> >>> Rich >>> >>> >>> On 06/06/2011 11:32, war...@wdlee.co.uk wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Rich, >>>> Thanks for taking the time to reply here. I bought one of the >>>> membranes, but must admit that I hadn't had the time to test it and >>>> discover the problems myself, till after Colin discovered and >>>> mentioned them, and I haven't had a chance to return mine yet. >>>> >>>> If you sort the problem, are you planning to send out replacements >>>> free off charge, to those who bought one and haven't sent it back for >>>> a refund? If you are, then I'm happy to hang on to mine without a >>>> refund for now, but it would be great if you could keep us up-to-date >>>> one way or the other. >>>> >>>> If you manage to fix the problem, I've no doubt that you could be on >>>> to a winner, as many people have had problems with their original >>>> keyboard membranes and eventually more will, no doubt. A successful >>>> solution would be very welcome!! >>>> >>>> Please keep us updated, and thanks for the heads-up! >>>> >>>> Warren >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Quoting Rich Mellor <r...@rwapservices.co.uk>: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Colin Piggot <quazar@...> writes: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Spent a bit more time on this today, and a few emails to Rwap... >>>>>> >>>>>> Warren wrote: >>>>>> > No worries! I'd have probably seen them on ebay anyway, and tried >>>>>> > one, given the problems I've had in the past with my membrane. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Pity the guy making them, didn't produce a test one first and at >>>>>> least >>>>>> > contact somebody with a SAM to try it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've done more testing, the new membrane does seem to have some >>>>>> issues with >>>>>> regards to the actuation force - take it out the SAM keyboard >>>>>> assembly and >>>>>> it works, but when fitted in the keyboard unless you batter the keys >>>>>> it >>>>>> doesn't register. Also, I have also noticed holding the new membrane >>>>>> against >>>>>> an old one is that when I line up the circular contact pads at one >>>>>> edge I >>>>>> can then see at the far end of the new membrane the contacts are out >>>>>> by >>>>>> about 2mm horizontally, that will also add further problems to the >>>>>> actuation >>>>>> of them. >>>>>> >>>>>> The membrane I have is now packaged up to get sent off for a refund.
