actually i need a timing belt cover!

On 07/06/2011, Roger Jowett <rogerjow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ditto
> so you walk into a supermarket buy a loaf of bread pay for it then ask
> tehm to chop it into 100 slices and walk out of the shop with only
> one?
> soudns fair to you does it speaking legally and you need to contact a
> legal webstie in order to work that one out do you?
> jeeezuz christ these c*&^nts are ripping you off left right and centre
> and no one complains about the louzy service? christ no wonder they
> find it so easy to send out letters asking for £200 prats like you lot
> would pay it
> im in breach of contract like hell i am 28.8mbps dream on i have seen
> it manage 2mbps on a good day for a few minutes but barely if ever
> im not paying £20 per month for 85kbps
> what does it have to do with this forum?
> well ok then let me use my serial comms port to use teh same external
> v34bis itu t v42mnp5 modem for 115200bps connection with sam im happy
> to do that when can we get it set up then?
> im getting thrity fone lines from bt soon as tehy make a full refund
> for the louzy broadband 30KB per second advertised as 8mbps
> rubbish service in this country
> i bet the yanks wouldnt put up with this rubbish
>
> On 07/06/2011, war...@wdlee.co.uk <war...@wdlee.co.uk> wrote:
>> Meant to say, before I got sidetracked... ahem... ;-)
>>
>> Thanks for the reply and offer of replacements. It's good customer
>> service that keeps people coming back for future purchases! :-)
>>
>> Warren
>>
>> Quoting Rich Mellor <r...@rwapservices.co.uk>:
>>
>>> Hi Warren,
>>>
>>> If we can sort out the problem, then yes, I intend sending out
>>> replacements free of charge to those who have bought them and not
>>> returned them for a refund.
>>>
>>> I will of course keep people updated
>>>
>>> Rich
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/06/2011 11:32, war...@wdlee.co.uk wrote:
>>>> Hi Rich,
>>>> Thanks for taking the time to reply here. I bought one of the
>>>> membranes, but must admit that I hadn't had the time to test it and
>>>> discover the problems myself, till after Colin discovered and
>>>> mentioned them, and I haven't had a chance to return mine yet.
>>>>
>>>> If you sort the problem, are you planning to send out replacements
>>>> free off charge, to those who bought one and haven't sent it back
>>>> for a refund? If you are, then I'm happy to hang on to mine without
>>>> a refund for now, but it would be great if you could keep us
>>>> up-to-date one way or the other.
>>>>
>>>> If you manage to fix the problem, I've no doubt that you could be
>>>> on to a winner, as many people have had problems with their
>>>> original keyboard membranes and eventually more will, no doubt. A
>>>> successful solution would be very welcome!!
>>>>
>>>> Please keep us updated, and thanks for the heads-up!
>>>>
>>>> Warren
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Rich Mellor <r...@rwapservices.co.uk>:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Colin Piggot <quazar@...> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Spent a bit more time on this today, and a few emails to Rwap...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Warren wrote:
>>>>>>> No worries!  I'd have probably seen them on ebay anyway, and tried
>>>>>>> one, given the problems I've had in the past with my membrane.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pity the guy making them, didn't produce a test one first and at
>>>>>>> least
>>>>>>> contact somebody with a SAM to try it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've done more testing, the new membrane does seem to have some
>>>>>> issues with
>>>>>> regards to the actuation force - take it out the SAM keyboard
>>>>>> assembly
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> it works, but when fitted in the keyboard unless you batter the keys
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> doesn't register. Also, I have also noticed holding the new
>>>>>> membrane against
>>>>>> an old one is that when I line up the circular contact pads at one
>>>>>> edge
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> can then see at the far end of the new membrane the contacts are out
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> about 2mm horizontally, that will also add further problems to
>>>>>> the actuation
>>>>>> of them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The membrane I have is now packaged up to get sent off for a
>>>>>> refund...
>

Reply via email to