Follow-up Comment #28, sr #106478 (project administration):
I couldn't understand whether they acknowledge the problem but are unable to
fix it or they claim that it is gnu.org's fault?
This is definitely a problem of your service -- please tell them to try the
session with mx.pittle.org at comment #23. The response of the server to the
RCPT command should be a 2xx code, and not 5xx like this:
550 5.1.1 Host 213.91.219.2 error: B1.1.1
Just for the sake of completeness, here are truncated sessions to Debian,
FSFE, Microsoft, BIMCO and Karl Berry's server -- they all use different
software, but are configured properly and are standards compliant.
lists.gnu.org is performing a legitimate check which fails due to a problem at
your end. I am not sure what else can we do to convince them -- perhaps it
would be much easier to setup a gnu.org account for you as Turkish team
co-ordinator :-)
$ telnet master.debian.org 25
220 master.debian.org ESMTP Exim 4.63 Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:37:11 +0000
rcpt to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250 Accepted
$ telnet cavendish.fsfeurope.org 25
220 cavendish.fsfeurope.org ESMTP Postfix (Debian/GNU)
rcpt to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250 2.1.5 Ok
$ telnet mail.global.frontbridge.com 25
220 mail35-wa4.bigfish.com ESMTP Postfix EGGS and Butter
rcpt to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250 Ok
(Wow! They're using Postfix!)
$ telnet cluster1.comendo.dk 25
220 Comendo Mailfence v.4.0 Ready!
rcpt to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250 Ok
$ telnet freefriends.org 25
220 f7.net ESMTP Sendmail 8.11.7-20030920/8.11.7; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 07:46:29
-0500
rcpt to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250 2.1.5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Recipient ok
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?106478>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/