On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:01:34AM +0100, Fulvio wrote: > - if the merge is technically too complicated, having both live > separated is good. > - deleting a free project without reason is bad.
Hi Fulvio, Having various almost the same projects (scid, scidvspc, scidb, ...) is bad. Users don't understand and don't know what to choose. And it scatters dev-talent. Several people on this list already asked what you mean by 'deleting the project'. There are lots of free software projects where version Y is a complete rewrite of version X. What's the problem with freezing scid 4.3, let the source-tree exist, and start with 4.9 with different sources? Cheers, -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | (o- Henk van Lingen Utrecht, The Netherlands | | /\ http://henk.vanlingen.net/ | | v_/_ http://www.tuxtown.net/netiquette/ | + Using Outlook ? -> http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ + ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
