On 03/18/2013 10:05 PM, Jai Dayal wrote:
> Based on principle, I'd follow Fulvio.  It seems that people are 
> trying to push him out of the project he created. That's pretty 
> unacceptable, even if you all came from 3rd tier universities.
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:01 AM, John <joh...@js.id.au 
> <mailto:joh...@js.id.au>> wrote:
>
>     On 14/03/13 22:34, Fulvio wrote:
>     > - He added a few features like Engine Chess Tournaments but
>     didn't send
>     > back to scid his code (this is understandable for big features,
>     but if
>     > you find a bug or do a small improvement like "Clickable Variation
>     > Arrows" or "Tri-coloured Tree Bar-Graphs" you should be nice
>     enough to
>     > send it back to the mainline from which you usually take code,
>     but no
>     > problem with this anyway)
>
>     My own impression is that the SCID project wasn't interested in
>     patches.
>     However, if Steven's project had nice features you covert, the GPL
>     entitles you to take them and use them as you will.
>
>     It's exactly what the SCID on the go did, so as to use SCID databases.
>
>
>     > - He didn't take a lot of code he didn't liked, expecially
>     tcl/tk code,
>     > because he have different ideas on usability and how the UI
>     should be
>     > (no problem with this)
>     >
>     If you have no problem with this, why mention it?
>
>     > Now scidvspc is a separate open source project, with his happy users
>     > (like you, if i understand correctly) and all will be good.
>     > But now, for no reason i can understand, Steve (with Alex
>     complicity) is
>     > trying to delete the 4 years of code that people contributed to
>     scid and
>     > Steven didn't liked.
>     > THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, expecially considering that this is a GPL
>     > project, you don't kill and delete concurrent projects to force
>     people
>     > to use your program.
>
>     Four years of code? It's over two years since anything was
>     released! In
>     any event, the changes to scidvspc have been more extensive, so fram a
>     practical point of view, it's easier to merge into scidvspc than the
>     other way.
>
>     Fulvio, if you want to maintain a separate version, do it. Start right
>     now, announce it right here and see who follows you.
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     Santa
>
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>     Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>     Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>     http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
>     _______________________________________________
>     Scid-users mailing list
>     Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scid-users mailing list
> Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users


Fulvio did not create the project. He merely contributed (once, at some 
point.) He was allowed as project admin just recently, and in my view, a 
big mistake.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to