I'm sorry, you'll have to find out for yourself.

Justin

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Martin Baxter <truthseeker...@lycos.com> wrote:
> That's one constant I've been hearing in every review I've heard from people 
> who've seen this, that Urban's McCoy was truly a thing of beauty. One guy I 
> know even called it "channeling DeForrest Kelley".
>
> Spoil one thing for me, though. Does Urban-as-McCoy say The Line?
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------
>
>  Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
>
>  Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 17:13:27 -0000
>
>  From : "B. Smith" <daikaij...@yahoo.com>
>
>  To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
>
>
> Well I'm late to the party but I have to say that I really, really, really 
> enjoyed the new movie. It was definitely a good time at the movies and it 
> delivered in a big way. The people in the theater actually applauded at the 
> end the movie.
>
> I think all of the main actors did really well in their roles with the 
> exception of Eric Bana who was sort of just there. The biggest surprise for 
> me was Karl Urban taking the McCoy role and running with it. Simon Pegg was 
> hilarious as Scotty. Chris Pine was a fun, rakish young Kirk. I liked Zachary 
> Quinto's take on a younger less in control Spock. Zoe Saldana did a lot with 
> her role and the Spock-Uhura romance made sense in the altered timeline.
>
> One of my favorite bits was the scene with Kirk and Uhura's roomate. That got 
> a huge audience reaction.
>
> The fate of the Kelvin was an epic opening scene. And seeing the Enterprise 
> in space the first time was gretted with cheers of joy.
>
> One plot point I loved was that:
>
> S
> P
> O
> I
> E
> R
> S
>
> B
> E
> L
> O
> W
>
> Kirk's altered timeline was merely a side effect of Nero's quest to hurt 
> Spock for the destruction of Romulus.
>
> And I have to say seeing Kirk come onto the bridge in the gold tunic at the 
> end was just awesome. I marked out like a little kid when I saw that.
>
> I had my concerns about what Abrams and Co. were going to so but they knocked 
> out of the park. I'll definitely watch it again.
>
> --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "ravenadal"  wrote:
>>
>> Okay, Martin, I was with you all the way up to the Gabrielle Union in the 
>> "old school" Uhura uniform comment but, to paraphrase Ozzie Osbourne, you 
>> have just taken a ride on the bloody crazy train!
>>
>> (Uh, gentlemen, that Gabrielle Union home delivery of the DVD IS something I 
>> might be interested in!)
>>
>> ~rave!
>>
>> --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "Martin Baxter"  wrote:
>> >
>> > Not even if you were to buy me the Special Edition DVD when it came out, 
>> > wrapped that in C-notes and had it hand-delivered to me by Gabrielle Union 
>> > in an old-school Uhura uniform. (Let 'em doubt my sincerity NOW.)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------
>> >
>> Subject : RE: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
>> >
>> Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 16:14:32 -0700
>> >
>> From : "Tracey de Morsella"
>> >
>> To :
>> >
>> >
>> C’mon, not even on DVD, the Internet or cable?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On 
>> > Behalf Of Martin Baxter
>> > Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 3:39 PM
>> > To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
>> > Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Fate, I'm on the record. Best I can do is to give it a lot of thought. In 
>> > recent months, I've resisted seeing a lot of movies I was told I *had* to 
>> > see, almost all of which turned out to be crap.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------
>> > Subject : RE: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
>> > Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 12:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
>> > From : Augustus Augustus
>> > To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
>> >
>> > Martin,
>> >
>> > Tracey and Bosco are correct. Just go and see it and enjoy it for what 
>> > it's worth. my wife and i saw it last night, and we both liked it, and 
>> > trust me. when i saw she liked a sci-fi movie, that is a feat!
>> >
>> > Fate.
>> >
>> > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Tracey de Morsella wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Tracey de Morsella
>> > Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
>> > To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
>> > Date: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 2:48 PM
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Martin:
>> >
>> > Why can’t you see it absorb it, enjoy it if possible and then
>> > come home and complain about the inconsistencies, Like Galactigus did
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
>> > [mailto:scifinoir2@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Bosco Bosco
>> >
>> > Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:01 AM
>> >
>> > To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
>> >
>> > Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Dude
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This movie is GREAT. Miss it if you must but it's GREAT. Did I mention it's
>> > frakin GREAT. I really think you're cheating yourself by taking a stand
>> > against without having seen it. Seriously.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > God that movie was GREAT.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Bosco
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Martin Baxter
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Martin Baxter
>> >
>> > Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
>> >
>> > To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
>> >
>> > Date: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 12:45 PM
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Adrianne, I've never thought of Doctor Who as a reboot, merely a
>> > restart. The nature of the show itself allows for far more flexibility in
>> > storytelling. The same can be said for Trek, but there are established
>> > events that formed the show's collective mythos. IMO, those events are
>> > being juggled, solely to make money. Yes, it's the Way of All Things. I
>> > don't have to accept it.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I won't. I'll NEVER see this movie, not on cable, not on free TV, not even
>> > if someone were to send it to me, wrapped in C-notes. I'd send it right
>> > back.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------[ Received Mail
>> > Content ]----------
>> >
>> > Subject : Re: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
>> >
>> > Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 11:43:31 -0400
>> >
>> > From : Adrianne Brennan
>> >
>> > To : scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I dunno. I don't see what they're doing as being any different from the
>> >
>> > reboot of Doctor Who, except with more major canonical differences.
>> >
>> > ~ "Where love and magic meet" ~
>> >
>> > http://www.adrianne brennan.com
>> >
>> > Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon:
>> >
>> > http://www.adrianne brennan.com/ botdm.html
>> >
>> > Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates:
>> >
>> > http://www.adrianne brennan.com/ bamc.html
>> >
>> > Dare to take The Oath in this fantasy series:
>> >
>> > http://www.adrianne brennan.com/ books.html# the_oath
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 10:31 AM, wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > In a message dated 5/10/09 4:24:35 AM, sincere1906@ gmail.com writes:
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > My great fear is that this spawns a whole Trek series that won't have
>> > some
>> >
>> > > universal appeal because they adhere to any dynamic set of principles,
>> > but a
>> >
>> > > Trek universe where things get blow'd up real good and the movie crowd
>> > can
>> >
>> > > clap on cue. Too early to make that judgment before the next film, so
>> > we'll
>> >
>> > > just have to wait and see...
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > MHO
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > Sin/Black Galactus
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > I was about to stay silent on this but the paragraph above prompted me
>> > to
>> >
>> > > put my .02 cents in.
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > What Sin/Black Galactus stated is something I call "The Galactica
>> >
>> >
>> > > Syndrome". That is you got a show based on a earlier project that
>> > while
>> >
>> > > forming it's own audiance base is shunned by most-if not all of the
>> >
>> > > orignials show's base. Shows like this usually don't have that much of
>> > a
>> >
>> > > long shelf-life being period 'flashes in the pan".
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > Pre-new movie Star Trek (OST, ST:NG, ST:DS9, ST:V) while set either/or
>> >
>> >
>> > > different time periods, situtations, characters, etc. could have went
>> > this
>> >
>> > > way. Their was something about those shows (and the movies based on
>> > them)
>> >
>> > > that fans from other shows could like and this brought in many fans
>> > from
>> >
>> > > those shows. Which in turn made the great. However the flipside of
>> > this is
>> >
>> > > that it produces 'lazy' exicution, that eventually results in bad
>> > products
>> >
>> > > which angers and drives of the fans of those shows. Forcing efforts to
>> >
>> >
>> > > bring new life into those shows. Sometimes successful, sometimes not.
>> > It
>> >
>> > > depends on how much cannon they 'break' when doing it to make the show
>> >
>> >
>> > > new/hip to make it acceptable to both new/old fans.
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > This, IMO is why Enterprise was not well recieved by the pre-new movie
>> > Star
>> >
>> > > Trek community. It broke too much cannon, and many of the stories
>> > weren't
>> >
>> > > that good. Which is also why it didn't get that many new fans (IMO if
>> > it
>> >
>> > > wasn't for the ST name Enterprise would have been canciled in it's
>> > first
>> >
>> > > season).
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > while the new Battlestar Galactica was a somewhat hit. It was not so
>> > by
>> >
>> > > many fans of the old series who concider it broke too much cannon (and
>> > the
>> >
>> > > fact it's creators also had 'lazy exicution' sydrome judging from it's
>> > later
>> >
>> > > episodes) and this IMO the show will probally fade over time. And in
>> > my
>> >
>> > > opinion I see the new Star Trek movie and it's alternate timeline will
>> > while
>> >
>> > > finding intial popular support will eventually go the way of new BG as
>> > it's
>> >
>> > > new fans will stick to this movie. While fans of pre-new movie ST will
>> >
>> >
>> > > eventually ignore it and continue on, asking for more stuff in the
>> > pre-new
>> >
>> > > movie ST background.
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > But hey it's only my opinon.
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > -GTW
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > ************ **
>> >
>> > > The Average US Credit Score is 692. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! (
>> >
>> > > http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100126575x122237 6999x1201454299/
>> > aol?redir= http://www. freecreditreport .com/pm/default.
>> > aspx?sc=668072&amp;hmpgID=62&amp;bcd=May51009Avgfoot erNO62)
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > http://www.youtube. com/watch?
>> > v=JQdwk8Yntds
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQdwk8Yntds
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQdwk8Yntds
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQdwk8Yntds



-- 
Read the Bitter Guide to the Bitter Guy.
http://thebitterguy.livejournal.com


------------------------------------

Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYahoo!
 Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:scifinoir2-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:scifinoir2-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    scifinoir2-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to