Martin, 
 
when u going?  i need 2 see it again, so i will tag along with u.
 
Fate.

--- On Tue, 5/12/09, Martin Baxter <truthseeker...@lycos.com> wrote:


From: Martin Baxter <truthseeker...@lycos.com>
Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 8:01 AM












To everyone who's been trying to lure me into see this -- *that's* the bait. 
Even though McCoy never uttered that line, I still quote it when apropos in 
real life. I just night have to go, just for that thrill.





---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------
Subject : Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 19:31:00 -0400
>From : Justin Mohareb <justinmohareb@ gmail.com>
To : scifino...@yahoogro ups.com

I'm sorry, you'll have to find out for yourself. 

Justin 

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Martin Baxter wrote: 
> That's one constant I've been hearing in every review I've heard from people 
> who've seen this, that Urban's McCoy was truly a thing of beauty. One guy I 
> know even called it "channeling DeForrest Kelley". 
> 
> Spoil one thing for me, though. Does Urban-as-McCoy say The Line? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------[ Received Mail Content ]---------- 
> 
>  Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS* 
> 
>  Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 17:13:27 -0000 
> 
>  From : "B. Smith" 
> 
>  To : scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
> 
> 
> Well I'm late to the party but I have to say that I really, really, really 
> enjoyed the new movie. It was definitely a good time at the movies and it 
> delivered in a big way. The people in the theater actually applauded at the 
> end the movie. 
> 
> I think all of the main actors did really well in their roles with the 
> exception of Eric Bana who was sort of just there. The biggest surprise for 
> me was Karl Urban taking the McCoy role and running with it. Simon Pegg was 
> hilarious as Scotty. Chris Pine was a fun, rakish young Kirk. I liked Zachary 
> Quinto's take on a younger less in control Spock. Zoe Saldana did a lot with 
> her role and the Spock-Uhura romance made sense in the altered timeline. 
> 
> One of my favorite bits was the scene with Kirk and Uhura's roomate. That got 
> a huge audience reaction. 
> 
> The fate of the Kelvin was an epic opening scene. And seeing the Enterprise 
> in space the first time was gretted with cheers of joy. 
> 
> One plot point I loved was that: 
> 
> S 
> P 
> O 
> I 
> E 
> R 
> S 
> 
> B 
> E 
> L 
> O 
> W 
> 
> Kirk's altered timeline was merely a side effect of Nero's quest to hurt 
> Spock for the destruction of Romulus. 
> 
> And I have to say seeing Kirk come onto the bridge in the gold tunic at the 
> end was just awesome. I marked out like a little kid when I saw that. 
> 
> I had my concerns about what Abrams and Co. were going to so but they knocked 
> out of the park. I'll definitely watch it again. 
> 
> --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, "ravenadal"  wrote: 
>> 
>> Okay, Martin, I was with you all the way up to the Gabrielle Union in the 
>> "old school" Uhura uniform comment but, to paraphrase Ozzie Osbourne, you 
>> have just taken a ride on the bloody crazy train! 
>> 
>> (Uh, gentlemen, that Gabrielle Union home delivery of the DVD IS something I 
>> might be interested in!) 
>> 
>> ~rave! 
>> 
>> --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, "Martin Baxter"  wrote: 
>> > 
>> > Not even if you were to buy me the Special Edition DVD when it came out, 
>> > wrapped that in C-notes and had it hand-delivered to me by Gabrielle Union 
>> > in an old-school Uhura uniform. (Let 'em doubt my sincerity NOW.) 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> ---------[ Received Mail Content ]---------- 
>> > 
>> Subject : RE: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS* 
>> > 
>> Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 16:14:32 -0700 
>> > 
>> From : "Tracey de Morsella" 
>> > 
>> To : 
>> > 
>> > 
>> C’mon, not even on DVD, the Internet or cable? 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifinoir2@ yahoogroups. com] On 
>> > Behalf Of Martin Baxter 
>> > Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 3:39 PM 
>> > To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
>> > Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS* 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Fate, I'm on the record. Best I can do is to give it a lot of thought. In 
>> > recent months, I've resisted seeing a lot of movies I was told I *had* to 
>> > see, almost all of which turned out to be crap. 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > ---------[ Received Mail Content ]---------- 
>> > Subject : RE: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS* 
>> > Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 12:18:23 -0700 (PDT) 
>> > From : Augustus Augustus 
>> > To : scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
>> > 
>> > Martin, 
>> > 
>> > Tracey and Bosco are correct. Just go and see it and enjoy it for what 
>> > it's worth. my wife and i saw it last night, and we both liked it, and 
>> > trust me. when i saw she liked a sci-fi movie, that is a feat! 
>> > 
>> > Fate. 
>> > 
>> > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Tracey de Morsella wrote: 
>> > 
>> > From: Tracey de Morsella 
>> > Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS* 
>> > To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
>> > Date: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 2:48 PM 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Martin: 
>> > 
>> > Why can’t you see it absorb it, enjoy it if possible and then 
>> > come home and complain about the inconsistencies, Like Galactigus did 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
>> > [mailto:scifinoir2@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Bosco Bosco 
>> > 
>> > Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:01 AM 
>> > 
>> > To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
>> > 
>> > Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS* 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Dude 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > This movie is GREAT. Miss it if you must but it's GREAT. Did I mention 
>> > it's 
>> > frakin GREAT. I really think you're cheating yourself by taking a stand 
>> > against without having seen it. Seriously. 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > God that movie was GREAT. 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Bosco 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Martin Baxter 
>> > wrote: 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > From: Martin Baxter 
>> > 
>> > Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS* 
>> > 
>> > To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
>> > 
>> > Date: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 12:45 PM 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Adrianne, I've never thought of Doctor Who as a reboot, merely a 
>> > restart. The nature of the show itself allows for far more flexibility in 
>> > storytelling. The same can be said for Trek, but there are established 
>> > events that formed the show's collective mythos. IMO, those events are 
>> > being juggled, solely to make money. Yes, it's the Way of All Things. I 
>> > don't have to accept it. 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > I won't. I'll NEVER see this movie, not on cable, not on free TV, not even 
>> > if someone were to send it to me, wrapped in C-notes. I'd send it right 
>> > back. 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > ---------[ Received Mail 
>> > Content ]---------- 
>> > 
>> > Subject : Re: [scifinoir2] New Trek- My take *SPOILERS* 
>> > 
>> > Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 11:43:31 -0400 
>> > 
>> > From : Adrianne Brennan 
>> > 
>> > To : scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > I dunno. I don't see what they're doing as being any different from the 
>> > 
>> > reboot of Doctor Who, except with more major canonical differences. 
>> > 
>> > ~ "Where love and magic meet" ~ 
>> > 
>> > http://www.adrianne brennan.com 
>> > 
>> > Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon: 
>> > 
>> > http://www.adrianne brennan.com/ botdm.html 
>> > 
>> > Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates: 
>> > 
>> > http://www.adrianne brennan.com/ bamc.html 
>> > 
>> > Dare to take The Oath in this fantasy series: 
>> > 
>> > http://www.adrianne brennan.com/ books.html# the_oath 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 10:31 AM, wrote: 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > In a message dated 5/10/09 4:24:35 AM, sincere1906@ gmail.com writes: 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > My great fear is that this spawns a whole Trek series that won't have 
>> > some 
>> > 
>> > > universal appeal because they adhere to any dynamic set of principles, 
>> > but a 
>> > 
>> > > Trek universe where things get blow'd up real good and the movie crowd 
>> > can 
>> > 
>> > > clap on cue. Too early to make that judgment before the next film, so 
>> > we'll 
>> > 
>> > > just have to wait and see... 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > MHO 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > Sin/Black Galactus 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > I was about to stay silent on this but the paragraph above prompted me 
>> > to 
>> > 
>> > > put my .02 cents in. 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > What Sin/Black Galactus stated is something I call "The Galactica 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > > Syndrome". That is you got a show based on a earlier project that 
>> > while 
>> > 
>> > > forming it's own audiance base is shunned by most-if not all of the 
>> > 
>> > > orignials show's base. Shows like this usually don't have that much of 
>> > a 
>> > 
>> > > long shelf-life being period 'flashes in the pan". 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > Pre-new movie Star Trek (OST, ST:NG, ST:DS9, ST:V) while set either/or 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > > different time periods, situtations, characters, etc. could have went 
>> > this 
>> > 
>> > > way. Their was something about those shows (and the movies based on 
>> > them) 
>> > 
>> > > that fans from other shows could like and this brought in many fans 
>> > from 
>> > 
>> > > those shows. Which in turn made the great. However the flipside of 
>> > this is 
>> > 
>> > > that it produces 'lazy' exicution, that eventually results in bad 
>> > products 
>> > 
>> > > which angers and drives of the fans of those shows. Forcing efforts to 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > > bring new life into those shows. Sometimes successful, sometimes not. 
>> > It 
>> > 
>> > > depends on how much cannon they 'break' when doing it to make the show 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > > new/hip to make it acceptable to both new/old fans. 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > This, IMO is why Enterprise was not well recieved by the pre-new movie 
>> > Star 
>> > 
>> > > Trek community. It broke too much cannon, and many of the stories 
>> > weren't 
>> > 
>> > > that good. Which is also why it didn't get that many new fans (IMO if 
>> > it 
>> > 
>> > > wasn't for the ST name Enterprise would have been canciled in it's 
>> > first 
>> > 
>> > > season). 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > while the new Battlestar Galactica was a somewhat hit. It was not so 
>> > by 
>> > 
>> > > many fans of the old series who concider it broke too much cannon (and 
>> > the 
>> > 
>> > > fact it's creators also had 'lazy exicution' sydrome judging from it's 
>> > later 
>> > 
>> > > episodes) and this IMO the show will probally fade over time. And in 
>> > my 
>> > 
>> > > opinion I see the new Star Trek movie and it's alternate timeline will 
>> > while 
>> > 
>> > > finding intial popular support will eventually go the way of new BG as 
>> > it's 
>> > 
>> > > new fans will stick to this movie. While fans of pre-new movie ST will 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > > eventually ignore it and continue on, asking for more stuff in the 
>> > pre-new 
>> > 
>> > > movie ST background. 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > But hey it's only my opinon. 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > -GTW 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > ************ ** 
>> > 
>> > > The Average US Credit Score is 692. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! ( 
>> > 
>> > > http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100126575x122237 6999x1201454299/ 
>> > aol?redir= http://www. freecreditreport .com/pm/default. 
>> > aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=May51009Avgfoot erNO62) 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > http://www.youtube. com/watch? 
>> > v=JQdwk8Yntds 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=JQdwk8Yntds 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=JQdwk8Yntds 
>> > 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=JQdwk8Yntds 



-- 
Read the Bitter Guide to the Bitter Guy. 
http://thebitterguy .livejournal. com 


------------ --------- --------- ------ 

Post your SciFiNoir Profile at 
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/scifinoir2 /app/peoplemap2/ entry/add? 
fmvn=mapYahoo! Groups Links 






http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=JQdwk8Yntds 















      

Reply via email to