Re: After install getting an error, "Manual server updates required"

[rahul Metangale]

Hi Christian,

On ReviewBoard site following message is displayed it does not tell which 
updates are required? (I have used mod_python will thay cause problem):
Manual server updates required

A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After 
these changes are made, you should restart your server.

If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing 
list
. 

Along with that one more message is there regarding permission to data 
directory for root user. Which i granted and restarted the server still 
that message is there.


Thanks,

Rahul M

On Friday, November 30, 2012 5:22:17 PM UTC+5:30, rahul Metangale wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have just completed installation of review baord on CentOS 5 and getting 
> following error on site
>  Manual server updates required 
>
> A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After 
> these changes are made, you should restart your server. 
>
> If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing 
> list . 
>
> I tried following:
>
> 1. Tried upgrade using rb-site upgrade
>
> 2. create a fresh site with fresh database.
>
> Can some one please give me some directions.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rahul
>
>  
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: It's too easy to upload diffs "wrongly"

[David Trowbridge]

It's correct to upload full diffs. The best way to do this is to use the
post-review tool, which (with no arguments) will do the right thing.

-David


-David


On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Will  wrote:

> So... don't any users know how whether it's correct to upload full diffs
> or partial diffs?
>
>
>
> On Thursday, 22 November 2012 12:44:25 UTC, Will wrote:
>>
>> Where is it described in the documentation the correct way to make
>> several diffs and upload them incrementally?
>>
>> We had a situation where one of our developers only uploaded partial
>> diffs each time (just the changes since the last time he uploaded a diff),
>> meaning there was no way to see his complete set of diffs together.
>> I don't blame him because how was he supposed to know not to do that?
>> We ended up hacking some extra instructions into the "add review"
>> template and marking them bold red to try and prevent people doing this.
>>
>> ReviewBoard assumes all diffs are complete (from first commit to last),
>> and it figures out the rest, allowing reviewers to easily drill down by
>> revision if they want.
>> If any of the uploaded diffs are not complete, then reviewers can
>> completely miss changes that were made.
>>
>> a) where is the "right" way to add diffs documented?
>>
>> b) shouldn't reviewboard make it a lot more difficult to upload diffs
>> "wrongly"
>>
>>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: It's too easy to upload diffs "wrongly"

[Will]

So... don't any users know how whether it's correct to upload full diffs or 
partial diffs?



On Thursday, 22 November 2012 12:44:25 UTC, Will wrote:
>
> Where is it described in the documentation the correct way to make several 
> diffs and upload them incrementally?
>
> We had a situation where one of our developers only uploaded partial diffs 
> each time (just the changes since the last time he uploaded a diff), 
> meaning there was no way to see his complete set of diffs together.
> I don't blame him because how was he supposed to know not to do that?
> We ended up hacking some extra instructions into the "add review" template 
> and marking them bold red to try and prevent people doing this.
>
> ReviewBoard assumes all diffs are complete (from first commit to last), 
> and it figures out the rest, allowing reviewers to easily drill down by 
> revision if they want.
> If any of the uploaded diffs are not complete, then reviewers can 
> completely miss changes that were made.
>
> a) where is the "right" way to add diffs documented?
>
> b) shouldn't reviewboard make it a lot more difficult to upload diffs 
> "wrongly"
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

[Christian Hammond]

If you upgrade your Djblets, this will now be fixed.

Separately from this, though, I must strongly encourage you to move off of
Windows as a host, as 1.6.x will be the last release where we officially
support it. Going forward, it may break, and we won't be testing it.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:20 AM, kvr  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Tried to install development version of 1.7RC, hit some errors.
> Debug info shows below.
> NameError at /
>
>
> global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined
>
>
> Request Method:GET Request URL:http://107.108.50.12:8085/ Django 
> Version:1.4.2Exception
> Type: NameError Exception Value:
>
> global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined
>
> Exception 
> Location:C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\djblets-0.7.4-py2.7.egg\djblets\siteconfig\django_settings.py
> in _set_cache_backend, line 47 Python Executable: 
> C:\Python27\python.exePython Version:
> 2.7.3
>
> Any clue to fix this?
>
>
> On Friday, November 30, 2012 4:25:52 PM UTC+5:30, Daniel Laird wrote:
>>
>> Very exciting - I look forward to getting this installed.
>> One question I have is about RBTools?
>>
>> I am using ReviewBot and that depends on the API branch of RBtools.
>> Do you know if the API branch is going to be merged / released at the
>> same time?
>>
>> Also I understand there was a plan for a Python API for 1.7 (as well as
>> the RESTful API) - is that still planned or has that slipped to 1.8 (or
>> later)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Dan
>>
>> On Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:08:07 PM UTC, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>
>>> Review Board "Better Late Than Never" 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had hoped to
>>> get this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances during some
>>> production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, it was
>>> worth the wait :)
>>>
>>> There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension interface
>>> changes in this release.
>>>
>>> See the news and release notes for more information.
>>>
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/11/29/review-board-**
>>> 1-7-rc-1-released/
>>>
>>> We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give it a
>>> try. Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many changes made
>>> until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions you hit.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>
>>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: After install getting an error, "Manual server updates required"

[Christian Hammond]

We'd need to see what updates it wants you to resolve.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:52 AM, rahul Metangale
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I have just completed installation of review baord on CentOS 5 and getting
> following error on site
>  Manual server updates required
>
> A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After
> these changes are made, you should restart your server.
>
> If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing
> list .
>
> I tried following:
>
> 1. Tried upgrade using rb-site upgrade
>
> 2. create a fresh site with fresh database.
>
> Can some one please give me some directions.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rahul
>
>
>
>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

After install getting an error, "Manual server updates required"

[rahul Metangale]

Hi All,

I have just completed installation of review baord on CentOS 5 and getting 
following error on site
 Manual server updates required 

A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After 
these changes are made, you should restart your server. 

If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing 
list. 


I tried following:

1. Tried upgrade using rb-site upgrade

2. create a fresh site with fresh database.

Can some one please give me some directions.

Regards,

Rahul

 

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

[kvr]

Hi,

Tried to install development version of 1.7RC, hit some errors.
Debug info shows below.
NameError at /

global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined


Request Method:GETRequest URL:http://107.108.50.12:8085/Django 
Version:1.4.2Exception 
Type:NameErrorException Value:

global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined

Exception 
Location:C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\djblets-0.7.4-py2.7.egg\djblets\siteconfig\django_settings.py
 
in _set_cache_backend, line 47Python Executable:C:\Python27\python.exePython 
Version:2.7.3
 
Any clue to fix this?


On Friday, November 30, 2012 4:25:52 PM UTC+5:30, Daniel Laird wrote:
>
> Very exciting - I look forward to getting this installed.
> One question I have is about RBTools?
>
> I am using ReviewBot and that depends on the API branch of RBtools.
> Do you know if the API branch is going to be merged / released at the same 
> time?
>
> Also I understand there was a plan for a Python API for 1.7 (as well as 
> the RESTful API) - is that still planned or has that slipped to 1.8 (or 
> later)
>
> Cheers
> Dan
>
> On Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:08:07 PM UTC, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Review Board "Better Late Than Never" 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had hoped to 
>> get this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances during some 
>> production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, it was 
>> worth the wait :)
>>
>> There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension interface 
>> changes in this release.
>>
>> See the news and release notes for more information.
>>
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/11/29/review-board-1-7-rc-1-released/
>>
>> We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give it a 
>> try. Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many changes made 
>> until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions you hit.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> -- 
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

[Daniel Laird]

Very exciting - I look forward to getting this installed.
One question I have is about RBTools?

I am using ReviewBot and that depends on the API branch of RBtools.
Do you know if the API branch is going to be merged / released at the same 
time?

Also I understand there was a plan for a Python API for 1.7 (as well as the 
RESTful API) - is that still planned or has that slipped to 1.8 (or later)

Cheers
Dan

On Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:08:07 PM UTC, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Review Board "Better Late Than Never" 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had hoped to get 
> this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances during some 
> production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, it was 
> worth the wait :)
>
> There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension interface 
> changes in this release.
>
> See the news and release notes for more information.
>
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/11/29/review-board-1-7-rc-1-released/
>
> We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give it a try. 
> Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many changes made 
> until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions you hit.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Configuring Review Board for GIT

[Krishnan Raghupathi]

Hi ,

 I am using ReviewBoard version 1.6.1 and am facing a difficulty in 
configuring this for our GIT repository. Our GIT repository is hosted on a 
remote machine i.e different from the one hosting ReviewBoard. In the Add 
repository of ReviewBoard, I selected the following options - 

Hosting service - Custom
Repository type - Git

I left the Path and Mirror Path fields blank since the GIT repository is on 
a remote machine and not accessible via a path.

Since I am able to access our GIT repository on a browser via cgit, I am 
assuming that I need to specify the Raw file URL mask with a value similar 
to http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/plain/?id2= as 
specified in the ReviewBoard documentation. 

I tried using different variations of this string after replacing 
git.gnome.org with the host name for our GIT repository but it did not 
work. 

I am new to GIT - so it would help me  a lot if someone could guide me on 
what string I should use for setting the Raw file URL mask.

Thanks,
Krishnan









-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Reviewboard & CMSynergy

[meenakshi agrawal]

Did you get a plugin for integrating CMSyergy with Review Board??Am also 
looking for a similar kind of thing for my project.

On Tuesday, 17 March 2009 22:11:10 UTC+5:30, adi wrote:
>
> Hey David, 
>
> Thanks for the response. I'm willing to help out on this. Sadly don't know 
> where to start from. I looked at 
> all the other scmtools in the repository. I guess I need to come out with 
> another such interface for cmsynergy.
> Are there any docs that I can refer to?
>
> --aditya
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:51 AM, David Trowbridge 
> 
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> We're happy to include support for any SCMs out there, but it's not
>> realistic for us to implement support for cmsynergy or other SCMs that
>> we don't have access to. If you or someone else were to submit a patch
>> for a cmsynergy SCMTool, we'd be happy to include it.
>>
>> -David
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, aditya vikram 
>> > 
>> wrote:
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > I read a couple of posts about mapping cmsynergy to reviewboard 
>> concepts.
>> > Are you planning to have cmsynergy supported in Reviewboard? I'll be 
>> really
>> > looking forward as it as we use it as one of the few SCM tools (other 
>> being
>> > svn & cvs)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Aditya
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en