Re: [Wikimediauk-l] TLS review of Jack Lynch, You Could Look It Up
The Thonemann article turns out to be public (about a third of TLS articles are): http://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/public/encyclopedic-knowledge/ I rather enjoyed this - "Given the manner of its compilation, the accursed thing really is a whole lot more reliable than it has any right to be. Like many university lecturers, I used to warn my own students off using Wikipedia (as pointless an injunction as telling them not to use Google, or not to leave their essay to the last minute). I finally gave up doing so about three years ago, after reading a paper by an expert on South Asian coinage in which the author described the Wikipedia entry on the Indo-Greek Kingdom (c.200 BC–AD 10) as the most reliable overview of Indo-Greek history to be found anywhere – quite true, though not necessarily as much of a compliment to Wikipedia as you might think." Andrew. On 26 May 2016 at 11:56, Charles Matthews wrote: > Enjoyable two-page review today in the Times Literary Supplement by Peter > Thonemann, flagged on the front page as "The triumph of Wikipedia?" > > Lynch's book You Could Look It Up has the subtitle "The reference shelf from > ancient Babylon", and WP is duly mentioned in the review at length, with > Rich Farmbrough getting a namecheck. > > Thonemann is at Wadham College, Oxford, and gives good quotes: e.g. > "Wiki-editors are, in my experience, an exceptionally friendly and helpful > bunch". > > Charles > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Public domain day tomorrow
The "German focus" is no doubt partly down to better metadata in Wikidata, but also ties into something I spotted years ago - proportionally more notable people in dewiki died in 1945 than in enwiki. http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/2010/demographics-in-wikipedia/ Making the reasonable assumption that demographic skews in dewiki represent a German bias, it's easy to see why - the entire country was variously in a state of war, occupation, starvation and/or general upheaval that year, so you'd expect a higher mortality rate compared to most other places, even leaving aside the effect of "war deaths" per se. I haven't rerun this with Wikidata data (where we can use nationality rather than language-of-article) but suspect you'd see a similar thing. Next year (2017, for 1946 deaths) should be somewhat more balanced. Andrew. On 31 December 2015 at 11:17, Charles Matthews wrote: > > On 31 December 2015 at 08:12 geni wrote: > > > Partial list of works that will hit the public domain at midnight tonight > can be found at: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_in_public_domain > > That said this will have a fairly limited impact on wikipedia due to issues > with US copyright laws. > > Thanks. The impact on Commons and Wikisource is typically more noticeable. > > Some thoughts. > > I was looking around on Wikidata: generating lists of creators of works with > death dates in a given year, and associated with a given country, is a > natural task for it. From a Wikisource point of view, authors who write in a > given language is relevant, and there was a game created a couple of months > ago to fill in the corresponding data - seems not to be online right now, > though. > > My first pass at authors dying in 1945 yielded 103, as opposed to the 72 or > so in the enWP page you give. (Those are mostly writing in German, which is > probably more to do with attention paid to the "occupation" field than > anything else.) > > This business was discussed earlier in the year: the old thread at > > http://wikimediauk-l.wikimedia.narkive.com/4nyiV2zt/wikidata-training-session > > contains contributions from Andrew Gray, in particular a query using > subclasses of "author" which is certainly a good idea. But artists are also > relevant. > > A heavyweight SPARQL query that factored in the various copyright > jurisdictions would be a project I'd like to see done, of course. [1] is a > bare bones "humans who died in 1945" query, which should bring up about > 10,000 hits. > > Charles > > [1] > https://query.wikidata.org/#PREFIX%20wikibase%3A%20%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwikiba.se%2Fontology%23%3E%0APREFIX%20wd%3A%20%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.wikidata.org%2Fentity%2F%3E%20%0APREFIX%20wdt%3A%20%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.wikidata.org%2Fprop%2Fdirect%2F%3E%0A%0ASELECT%20%3Fitem%20%3FitemLabel%20%3Flast_time%20WHERE%20%7B%0A%20%20%20%20%7B%0A%09%09%09SELECT%20%3Fitem%20(MAX(%3Ftime0)%20AS%20%3Flast_time)%20%20WHERE%20%7B%0A%20%20%09%09%09%3Fitem%20wdt%3AP31%20wd%3AQ5%20.%0A%20%20%09%09%09%3Fitem%20wdt%3AP570%20%3Ftime0%20.%0A%20%20%09%09%09FILTER%20(%20%3Ftime0%20%3E%3D%20%221945-01-01T00%3A00%3A00Z%22%5E%5Exsd%3AdateTime%20%26%26%20%3Ftime0%20%3C%3D%20%221945-12-31T00%3A00%3A00Z%22%5E%5Exsd%3AdateTime%20)%20.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%7D%20%20GROUP%20BY%20%3Fitem%0A%20%20%20%20%7D%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%0A%20%20%20%20SERVICE%20wikibase%3Alabel%20%7B%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20bd%3AserviceParam%20wikibase%3Alanguage%20%22en%22%20.%0A%20%20%20%20%7D%0A%0A%7D%20ORDER%20BY%20ASC%20(%3Flast_time) > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Gender Balance (MySociety)
Hi Richard, I've been talking to EveryPolitician about this. Matching to Wikidata will pose something of a challenge but we're on it :-) A. On 5 October 2015 at 12:58, Richard Symonds wrote: > Hi all, > > Has anyone else seen the email from MySociety about the Gender Balance game > they've created? See > https://www.mysociety.org/2015/07/30/introducing-gender-balance-the-game-that-sorts-the-women-from-the-boys/ > for more about it. > > It appears they also have a database which we may be free to upload to > Wikidata... > > Richard Symonds > Wikimedia UK > 0207 065 0992 > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over > Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: [Talk-GB] Environment Agency LIDAR datasets OGL licensed now available
House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. >> United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia >> movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who >> operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). >> >> Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control >> over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. >> >> >> ___ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk > > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [Spam] 2016 in public domain
There's 2087 entries on Wikidata for people who died in 1945 and have an occupation which is some kind of 'creator' (though due to a quirk of the Wikidata hierarchy, that seems to include scientists + engineers) http://tools.wmflabs.org/autolist/autolist1.html?q=between%5B570%2C1945-01-01%2C1945-12-31%5D%20and%20claim%5B106%3A(tree%5B2500638%5D%5B%5D%5B279%5D)%5D For authors + subclasses thereof it's a more manageable 636: http://tools.wmflabs.org/autolist/autolist1.html?q=between%5B570%2C1945-01-01%2C1945-12-31%5D%20and%20claim%5B106%3A%28tree%5B482980%5D%5B%5D%5B279%5D%29%5D No major British names leap out from a quick skim through. Andrew. On 7 August 2015 at 22:12, leu...@fabiant.eu wrote: > Hi all, > > Last year there was 2015 in public domain and now we have 2016 in public > domain . . . but it only has one entry. > > I would be interested to know if anyone else is interested in working on > this and perhaps organising something for Public Domain Day, or perhaps an > event later in January when people have recovered from the holiday. > > Personally I am particularly interested in the work of the encyclopedist > Otto Neurath. > > all the best > > Fabina > aka Leutha > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Reducing the copyright term for (some) unpublished works
Hi all, Some initial thoughts at https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/2039_consultation - comments appreciated. Andrew. On 7 November 2014 at 17:58, Andrew Gray wrote: > Hi all, > > The government is currently consulting on reducing the copyright term > in some unpublished material - this is the "2039 problem" that a > number of institutions have been raising in recent weeks, where > unpublished works can be in copyright until 2039 despite being > potentially several centuries old. > > https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/reducing-the-duration-of-copyright-in-certain-unpublished-works > > This seems like something where WMUK should submit a response (we have > a pretty clear interest in rationalising the regulations here). > Deadline is a month away so we've got some time to think about it. > > I'm happy to draft up some notes for us to send in if no-one else is > putting something together - have we been looking at this already? > > Andrew. > > -- > - Andrew Gray > andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
[Wikimediauk-l] Reducing the copyright term for (some) unpublished works
Hi all, The government is currently consulting on reducing the copyright term in some unpublished material - this is the "2039 problem" that a number of institutions have been raising in recent weeks, where unpublished works can be in copyright until 2039 despite being potentially several centuries old. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/reducing-the-duration-of-copyright-in-certain-unpublished-works This seems like something where WMUK should submit a response (we have a pretty clear interest in rationalising the regulations here). Deadline is a month away so we've got some time to think about it. I'm happy to draft up some notes for us to send in if no-one else is putting something together - have we been looking at this already? Andrew. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
[Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: [okfn-discuss] ToS; DR Meetup, London, Wednesday
Forwarding in case this is of interest.
Andrew.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Reuben Binns
Date: 3 November 2014 12:11
Subject: [okfn-discuss] ToS;DR Meetup, London, Wednesday
To: okfn-disc...@lists.okfn.org
Interested in creating open data about online rights? ToS;DR ('Terms
of Service; Didn't Read'), a user initiative to rate and label terms
of service and privacy policies, are having a meetup and hackathon in
London on Wednesday.
Details: https://tosdr.org/conf/london201411.html
If you're free all afternoon, from 12:00, there will be a meetup of
the Open Notice / Kantara CISWG discussing related issues.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/nov-5-cis-kanataraopen-noticetosdr-meetup-mozilla-lonodn-tickets-13433862043
--
PhD Researcher, University of Southampton
Consultant, Ctrl-Shift
reubenbinns.com/about
@RDBinns
Encrypt messages to me using my PGP fingerprint:
http://reubenbinns.com/mykey.html (NB: I use separate keys for
encryption and signing)
___
okfn-discuss mailing list
okfn-disc...@lists.okfn.org
https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta
ons > Wikimedia UK > +44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173 > @StevieBenton > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over > Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Magna Carta
Hi Rod, That was indeed me... we did do a bit of work with the BL MSS department (the great work was done before I came, though - John Byrne and his work on the Cuthbert Gospel). I think I could probably persuade someone to do a review and feedback, especially if we've done a chunk of the reworking before then. Someone looked at the MC article some years ago with a view to reworking it - there's some detailed notes in Archive 2 which seem to be the discussion I remember. There appears to be a lot of tension between "MC as historic event/artifact", "MC as legal history", and "MC as living law", all of which are dealt with in the article but may not sit comfortably against each other. A. On 5 November 2014 11:04, Rod Ward wrote: > Hi all, > > > > An article in this weeks observer (see > http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2014/nov/01/magna-carta-800-celebrates-anniversary > ) points out that it will be the 800th anniversary of the signing of the > Magna Carta next year (15 June 2015) and suggests there will be various TV > and radio programmes (and books etc) to coincide with the significant date. > I note this article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_Carta ) regularly > gets 150,000+ page views per month and this is likely to increase. It was > listed as a Good Article back in the early days but was delisted in 2006 and > has gone downhill since then. It is also listed on the Vital Articles for > Society and Social Sciences. A few of us are trying to get it to at least GA > or even FA standard before the anniversary – any help would be appreciated. > > > > The specific reason for this email is that I think WikimediaUK had some sort > of relationship (possibly a wikimedian in residence or similar) with the > British Library years ago. For that or other sources does anyone have a > contact within the appropriate department (possibly manuscripts curator or > similar) of the BL who would be willing to help advise on the development of > this important article? > > > > Rod > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: [Wikimedia-l] Free journal access through The Wikipedia Library: new pilots
...in most areas, at least. Thirteen out of 194 public library services don't subscribe to the ODNB: Aberdeen Central Library Bridgend Library and Information Service Caerphilly Libraries Carmarthen Library Conwy County Borough Council East Sussex Libraries Inverclyde Libraries Isle of Anglesey Library Service Neath Port Talbot Libraries North Tyneside Libraries Rotherham Libraries South Lanarkshire Libraries South Tyneside Libraries http://global.oup.com/fdscontent/academic/xls/online_products/Online%20Oxford%20resources%20in%20UKPL.xls - though note that in some cases, you may be able to get access via a neighbouring area if you're registered there. Andrew. On 29 April 2014 12:13, Charles Matthews wrote: > On 28 April 2014 18:16, Richard Nevell > wrote: >> >> In case you've missed it, here's your chance to access Oxford University >> Press and Royal Society sources. I've found the Oxford Dictionary of >> National Biography particularly useful in the past. > > > The ODNB is fantastically useful for UK and British Empire history; worth > remarking in the UK context that here all you need for free access is a > library card (not everyone knows that, it seems). > > Charles > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [Advocacy Advisors] EU copyright consultation deadline has beenextended
In my infinite competence, I apparently missed that section entirely. Apologies :-) A. On 4 February 2014 15:26, Luis Villa wrote: > I changed the schedule yesterday morning- where are you looking? > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=European_Commission_copyright_consultation&diff=prev&oldid=7334381 > > Luis > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Andrew Gray > wrote: >> >> Quick query - given the extensions, have we filed the WMF submission >> yet or are we holding off for further comments through February? Not >> clear from the meta page... >> >> A. >> >> On 31 January 2014 23:25, Michael Maggs wrote: >> > Thanks for the update. Not sure how "terrific" I find that news, >> > personally, >> > given that I have spent around 20 hours over the last two days working >> > to >> > meet the original deadline! >> > >> > Best regards >> > >> > Michael >> > >> > >> > >> > Michael Maggs >> > Chair, Wikimedia UK >> > >> > On 31 Jan 2014, at 23:10, Luis Villa wrote: >> > >> > That's terrific to hear! >> > >> > As an update on my end, I've done up to question 71, so this gives us a >> > little more time to review and flesh those out. >> > >> > [For what it is worth, Michael, looking at the page here shows: >> > >> > From 05.12.2013 to 05.03.2014 (deadline extended). >> > >> > ] >> > >> > Luis >> > >> > >> > >> > ___ >> > Wikimedia UK mailing list >> > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk >> >> >> >> -- >> - Andrew Gray >> andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk > > > > > -- > Luis Villa > Deputy General Counsel > Wikimedia Foundation > 415.839.6885 ext. 6810 > > NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have > received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. > As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I > cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, > volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [Advocacy Advisors] EU copyright consultation deadline has beenextended
Quick query - given the extensions, have we filed the WMF submission yet or are we holding off for further comments through February? Not clear from the meta page... A. On 31 January 2014 23:25, Michael Maggs wrote: > Thanks for the update. Not sure how "terrific" I find that news, personally, > given that I have spent around 20 hours over the last two days working to > meet the original deadline! > > Best regards > > Michael > > > > Michael Maggs > Chair, Wikimedia UK > > On 31 Jan 2014, at 23:10, Luis Villa wrote: > > That's terrific to hear! > > As an update on my end, I've done up to question 71, so this gives us a > little more time to review and flesh those out. > > [For what it is worth, Michael, looking at the page here shows: > > From 05.12.2013 to 05.03.2014 (deadline extended). > > ] > > Luis > > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [Wikimedia-l] Speakerthon update
I'm assuming the pending is for final validation (but Andy will know...) The earliest samples released were CC-BY, which seems to be the most likely answer: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mary_Robinson_-_Desert_Island_Discs_-_28_July_2013.flac A. On 19 January 2014 15:45, David Gerard wrote: > On 18 January 2014 11:29, Andy Mabbett wrote: > >> The "Speakerthon" event is in progress at New Broadcasting House in London: >>https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:BBC_voice_project >> We've already added sound files to the (English) Wikipedia articles on >> Tim Berners-Lee, Agnetha Fältskog, Stanley Johnson and Adrian Lester, >> with many more uploaded and awaiting templating: >>https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:BBC_voice_samples >> Volunteers are beavering away, finding more sound clips to upload. > > > > Fantastic work, well done! > > What licence will they be released under? (I see they're on Commons > with status "OTRS pending" ...) > > > - d. > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraiser Launch Today
FYI. Andrew. -- Forwarded message -- From: Megan Hernandez Date: 2 December 2013 23:22 Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraiser Launch Today To: Wikimedia Mailing List Hi all, The fundraising team is kicking off our year-end campaign in the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand at midnight UTC on December 3, 2013. SF staff - banners are going up in a few minutes. Check out our latest banner. http://en.wikipedia.org/?banner=B13_1202_clr_blgs_enYY&reset=1 Quick reminder: We have been running banners at a low-level since the start of the fiscal year in July. In that time, we have continuously tested new banners to find improvements that will allow us to reduce the number of banners people see each year. This is our first year experimenting with year-round fundraising. We've already raised over $13 million USD -- which is roughly equal to about how much we raised after our first full week of the 2012 fundraising campaign. During this year-end campaign, banners will be displayed to 100% of readers. *A few key facts:* - Amount raised in testing prior to the year-end campaign: Roughly $13.5 million USD - Campaign goal: $20 million USD - Banners will run to 100% of English readers in the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand - Previous donors will receive a reminder to donate email during the month of December - Mobile banners will be displayed in the US - We will run campaigns in other countries and languages in 2014 If you spot any errors, please let us know on the meta talk page<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fundraising_2013>. Feel free to ask questions there as well. More background info on meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_2013 Thanks for your help! Megan -- Megan Hernandez Director of Online Fundraising Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Amazon Tax avoidance
Vouchers to the value of --- (or a list of three or four options) seems perfectly fine to me. Agree on anecdote ;-) A. On 29 November 2013 20:29, rexx wrote: > Surely the easiest solution is to offer "gift vouchers of the winner's > choice to the value of £X" and ask all the finalists what their preference > is? The moral dilemma is then conveniently shuffled off onto the recipient. > > Anecdotally, I took me almost a year to redeem my last Amazon gift voucher - > my sense of duty to the givers finally overcame my distaste for Amazon's tax > avoidance; on the other hand, my John Lewis voucher was used almost > immediately. You may draw the conclusion that either (i) I own a lot of > cushions, or (ii) the plural of anecdote is not data. > > Cheers > -- > Rexx > > > > On 29 November 2013 20:03, Andrew Gray wrote: >> >> The average time it takes me to redeem an Amazon voucher is under a month. >> I can say from experience I hang on to John Lewis vouchers for a lot longer >> before needing to buy a cushion ;) >> >> I agree with that Amazon vouchers are potentially problematic, but they're >> also a lot more useful than many other options due to sheer ubiquity, and I >> think people appreciate the sense that they can be used for books & don't >> require offline use. It's a trade-off... >> >> A. >> >> On 27 Nov 2013 14:39, "Fæ" wrote: >>> >>> On 27 November 2013 14:18, Richard Symonds >>> wrote: >>> > To be fair, I will be moving away from Amazon for day-to-day purchases >>> > after >>> > watching Panorama last night... it's not really feasible to move away >>> > from >>> > Amazon vouchers, but I will definitely look into how we might be able >>> > to. >>> >>> I have always been against giving Amazon vouchers. If you have to use >>> vouchers, then employee-owned organizations like John-Lewis are always >>> going to be a more ethical purchase. >>> >>> The TV programme was entertainment, not an analysis. Amazon did not >>> get an opportunity to respond. In particular having been a quality >>> manager for factory floor production, using basic statistical process >>> control for optimizing batch pick time is not in the least bit >>> unreasonable. Bizarrely worker break times were not mentioned (nobody >>> works a 10 hour shift without multiple reasonable breaks), neither was >>> the very fair process for allocating and rewarding night-work shifts. >>> I don't know why anyone would pick stock in areas where the light were >>> out, this was plainly a stupid thing to do, and the floor manager at >>> the time should have asked staff to not do that and defer those jobs >>> until the electrician had fixed those problems. >>> >>> It may be worth asking Amazon for a direct statement about how they >>> respond to the criticism (from a single contract employee and from >>> haphazardly self-selected ex-employees, that the programme was almost >>> entirely based on). >>> >>> Fae >>> -- >>> fae...@gmail.com http://j.mp/faewm >>> >>> ___ >>> Wikimedia UK mailing list >>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> >> >> ___ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Amazon Tax avoidance
The average time it takes me to redeem an Amazon voucher is under a month. I can say from experience I hang on to John Lewis vouchers for a lot longer before needing to buy a cushion ;) I agree with that Amazon vouchers are potentially problematic, but they're also a lot more useful than many other options due to sheer ubiquity, and I think people appreciate the sense that they can be used for books & don't require offline use. It's a trade-off... A. On 27 Nov 2013 14:39, "Fæ" wrote: > On 27 November 2013 14:18, Richard Symonds > wrote: > > To be fair, I will be moving away from Amazon for day-to-day purchases > after > > watching Panorama last night... it's not really feasible to move away > from > > Amazon vouchers, but I will definitely look into how we might be able to. > > I have always been against giving Amazon vouchers. If you have to use > vouchers, then employee-owned organizations like John-Lewis are always > going to be a more ethical purchase. > > The TV programme was entertainment, not an analysis. Amazon did not > get an opportunity to respond. In particular having been a quality > manager for factory floor production, using basic statistical process > control for optimizing batch pick time is not in the least bit > unreasonable. Bizarrely worker break times were not mentioned (nobody > works a 10 hour shift without multiple reasonable breaks), neither was > the very fair process for allocating and rewarding night-work shifts. > I don't know why anyone would pick stock in areas where the light were > out, this was plainly a stupid thing to do, and the floor manager at > the time should have asked staff to not do that and defer those jobs > until the electrician had fixed those problems. > > It may be worth asking Amazon for a direct statement about how they > respond to the criticism (from a single contract employee and from > haphazardly self-selected ex-employees, that the programme was almost > entirely based on). > > Fae > -- > fae...@gmail.com http://j.mp/faewm > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Amazon Tax avoidance
Unless I've missed something, this gift aid is money we could be reclaiming from the government to supplement donations, but aren't able to. We're not actually paying it in tax. The difference is limited in practice - the government still gets money that we don't - but it is a bit confusing to treat it as a £200,000 outgoing when we never actually see it. Andrew. On 29 November 2013 00:04, Richard Symonds wrote: > Rexx is referring to gift aid on the global WMF fundraiser, which isn't > collected at all because the fundraising is done by the WMF these days, > rather than ourselves. WMF cannot collect gift aid. > > On Nov 28, 2013 9:01 PM, "James Farrar" wrote: >> >> That's outrageous. Why are we wasting money? >> >> On 28 Nov 2013 02:32, "rexx" wrote: >>> >>> About £200,000 per year. It's a pity Amazon isn't as publicly spirited as >>> WMUK. >>> >>> -- >>> Rexx >>> >>> >>> >>> On 27 November 2013 21:38, James Farrar wrote: >>>> >>>> How much more tax than legally required does WMUK pay? >>>> >>>> On 21 Nov 2013 09:04, wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> > Can I go ahead and announce that WMUK will provide a Kobo and two >>>>> > Amazon >>>>> > vouchers? (About £70 worth of prizes in total.) >>>>> >>>>> Has the Amazon Tax avoidance been sorted Out? >>>>> >>>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-20560359 >>>>> >>>>> I am not sure that WMUK would want to be seen endorsing Amazon if this >>>>> is >>>>> not the case? >>>>> >>>>> all the best >>>>> >>>>> Fabian >>>>> User:Leutha >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list >>>>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >>>>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >>>>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >>>> >>>> >>>> ___ >>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list >>>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >>>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >>>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> Wikimedia UK mailing list >>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >>> >> >> ___ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Grade II buildings (was english heritage)
It's on the Wikidata roadmap, it's just not there yet. No need for a second development project :-) Phase 1 was interwikis, Phase 2 was being able to pull data out and display it in infoboxes etc, Phase 3 is being able to generate lists for a specific property or combination of properties. In an ideal world, we'd have [[List of listed buildings in Newtown, Loamshire]] with some general text and then a function asking Wikidata for "a table with one line per entity, displaying these properties, and including every entity with status:listed_building and location:Newtown_Loamshire" A. On 13 October 2013 19:26, Chris Keating wrote: > >> Being able to use WD-generated lists will be a very different >> ballpark, but as that software doesn't really exist yet... ;-) >> > > Is this something for the "list of Wikimedia-related tech tools someone > ought to build really"? > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Grade II buildings (was english heritage)
While it's technically true that there are no plain numeric limits on templates, in practice the high complexity of the EH listed building templates (etc) imposes a practical limit - I'm not sure of the exact level, but one to two hundred sounds about right. We hit this problem fairly regularly with some of the larger cities, and I ended up simplifying the templates to compensate a couple of times. Being able to use WD-generated lists will be a very different ballpark, but as that software doesn't really exist yet... ;-) A. On 12 October 2013 17:38, rexx wrote: > Your memory serves you badly, Michael. MediaWiki imposes no such limit on > templates; The Wikipedia article Israel > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel) has 452 reference templates, for > example. MediaWiki does impose a limit on the depth of transclusions and the > number of expensive parser functions, but those restrictions are unimportant > now that we can call a Lua module from within a template to do the same job > with much less stress on the server. > > "List of rivers of England" > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rivers_of_England) is an example of > how about 1500 geographical entries have been organised, so sheer numbers > don't necessarily present a barrier to creating wiki articles. As querying > Wikidata is not possible at present (and we don't have a date for its > implementation), I wouldn't recommend waiting for that before starting work > on the Grade II buildings. > > -- > Doug > > > > On 12 October 2013 16:13, Michael Maggs wrote: >> >> Yes, we have all the grade II data for England and the corresponding data >> for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, too. However, getting that >> information onto Wikipedia in a usable format is not trivial are there are >> getting on for half a million building records. >> >> Automated linkages between Wikipedia and the Monuments Database rely on >> each record being represented by a template in Wikipedia, and unfortunately >> MediaWiki limits the number of templates to no more than 130 or so (if my >> memory serves) per page. That means breaking the records up into such small >> lists that navigation becomes a nightmare. Even for the grade II* buildings >> we have some areas that have been split into separate pages of buildings >> based on name A-M and name N-Z. Such lists are totally hopeless for users >> who need to find a particular building and know neither the name it happens >> to have been give in the official listing nor even in which listing area it >> appears (these are based largely on obsolete county and other regional >> boundaries). >> >> So, yes, it would be good to get these on, but some new approaches will be >> needed. Wikidata may well be able to help in the future (eg by providing a >> searchable Wiki database which is automatically linked with the various >> sources of official data). >> >> Michael >> >> >> >> On 12 Oct 2013, at 15:40, Maarten Dammers wrote: >> >> > Hi Rod, >> > >> > Op 11-10-2013 13:05, rodward schreef: >> >> Andy, >> >> >> >> Getting the photos CC licenced would be good, however most >> >> counties/areas don't have lists of GII buildings (certainly not using the >> >> template developed for WLM - although many may be too long for current >> >> template restrictions). Perhaps any communication with EH could include a >> >> request for the data & then the same semi automated development processes >> >> applied to creating the lists (would make it much easier if GII are >> >> included >> >> next year). >> > I believe we have the data, just haven't imported it yet to Wikipedia >> > because grade2 buildings weren't included in Wiki Loves Monuments this >> > year. >> > Now that Wiki Loves Monuments is over we could start importing the >> > remaining >> > lists to Wikipedia. If lists get to big you just have to split them up. >> > This >> > is how we did it in the Netherlands too. For example the city I'm from >> > (Haarlem) has over 1100 Rijksmonumenten. In the centre of the city this is >> > so dense that I ended up with several lists per street. All these >> > individual >> > lists are for Haarlem are connected through a navigation template so you >> > don't get lost. >> > >> > Maarten >> > >> > >> > ___ >> > Wiki Loves Monuments mai
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Alastair McCapra's conflict of loyalties between CIPR and WMUK
or to provide feedback and context. This would be a good >> time to have other members contribute on the Water cooler with varying >> viewpoints. >> >> Links: >> 1. >> https://wiki.wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Water_cooler#Alastair_has_provided_a_full_statement >> 2. >> https://wiki.wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/COI#Employment_related_to_the_Charity >> >> Thanks, >> Fae >> -- >> fae...@gmail.com http://j.mp/faewm >> >> ___ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] 'Illustrating Wikipedia brochure' - your thoughts?
One trivial note (not affecting the actual text) - remember 3D and 2D will be a lot more easily understood than 3d and 2d, which parse as "third, second". Looking at the document ... is there a reason the numbers aren't flush with the lines they refer to? It seems a little odd to have. 1. Do step 1. 2. Do the next step rather than 1. Do step 1. 2. Do the next step. Other small issues: * There are some weird linebreaks on p11. * We switch between "Non-commercial" (p12) and "Non-Commercial" (p10) * Can we add links under the three CC licenses listed on p10? They're relatively human-readable - eg creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Andrew. On Tuesday, 17 September 2013, Stevie Benton wrote: > Thanks Jonathan. Before I go through the awkward job of tinkering with the > InDesign file, what do other people think about the revision? > > Thank you, > > Stevie > > > On 17 September 2013 12:47, Jonathan Cardy < > jonathan.ca...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote: > > Thanks all, > > *Possible revised wording with examples from the borderline and less > repetition. > * > * > UK Freedom of panorama* > > Under UK law, you can photograph, upload and share with the world a > photo of any 3d artifact such as a building or sculpture that is > permanently publicly displayed in the UK, even if the object is still under > copyright. But you need to check four things: > 1 Is it permanently on display? Temporary exhibits such as on the fourth > plinth in Trafalgar square are not included, but the Angel of the North is. > 2 When you took the photograph were you somewhere normally open to the > public? Inside a pub or museum is fine, where you work or were a guest > probably isn't. > 3 Was it 3d not 2d? Buildings and sculpture are 3d, graffiti, paintings > and signs are 2d. So a photograph of stained glass illuminated by light > shining through it is 3d, but the same stained glass window reflecting your > flash at night is 2d and might still be under copyright. > 4 Did you take the photo in the UK? Most other countries have stricter > rules. > > > Regards > > > Jonathan Cardy > GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives & Museums) Organiser/ > Trefnydd GLAM (Galeriau, Llyfrgelloedd, Archifdai a llawer Mwy!) > Wikimedia UK > 0207 065 0990 > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control > over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. > > > Press Enter to send your message. > > > On 17 September 2013 11:43, Stevie Benton > wrote: > > Thanks again everyone for all of your input. As there is still some > correspondence going around the booklet I'm going to leave it open for > comments until 12pm tomorrow. At that point, I plan to close the discussion > and prepare a final proof before sending to the printers and uploading to > Commons. > > Thank you, > > Stevie > > > On 17 September 2013 10:40, Edward Hands wrote: > > Thank you Martin for your kind words. Harry's edit a > > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] 'Illustrating Wikipedia brochure' - your thoughts?
One trivial note (not affecting the actual text) - remember 3D and 2D will be a lot more easily understood than 3d and 2d, which parse as "third, second". Looking at the document ... is there a reason the numbers aren't flush with the lines they refer to? It seems a little odd to have. 1. Do step 1. 2. Do the next step rather than 1. Do step 1. 2. Do the next step. Other small issues: * There are some weird linebreaks on p11. * We switch between "Non-commercial" (p12) and "Non-Commercial" (p10) * Can we add links under the three CC licenses listed on p10? They're relatively human-readable - eg creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Andrew. On Tuesday, 17 September 2013, Stevie Benton wrote: > Thanks Jonathan. Before I go through the awkward job of tinkering with the > InDesign file, what do other people think about the revision? > > Thank you, > > Stevie > > > On 17 September 2013 12:47, Jonathan Cardy < > jonathan.ca...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote: > > Thanks all, > > *Possible revised wording with examples from the borderline and less > repetition. > * > * > UK Freedom of panorama* > > Under UK law, you can photograph, upload and share with the world a > photo of any 3d artifact such as a building or sculpture that is > permanently publicly displayed in the UK, even if the object is still under > copyright. But you need to check four things: > 1 Is it permanently on display? Temporary exhibits such as on the fourth > plinth in Trafalgar square are not included, but the Angel of the North is. > 2 When you took the photograph were you somewhere normally open to the > public? Inside a pub or museum is fine, where you work or were a guest > probably isn't. > 3 Was it 3d not 2d? Buildings and sculpture are 3d, graffiti, paintings > and signs are 2d. So a photograph of stained glass illuminated by light > shining through it is 3d, but the same stained glass window reflecting your > flash at night is 2d and might still be under copyright. > 4 Did you take the photo in the UK? Most other countries have stricter > rules. > > > Regards > > > Jonathan Cardy > GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives & Museums) Organiser/ > Trefnydd GLAM (Galeriau, Llyfrgelloedd, Archifdai a llawer Mwy!) > Wikimedia UK > 0207 065 0990 > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control > over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. > > > Press Enter to send your message. > > > On 17 September 2013 11:43, Stevie Benton > wrote: > > Thanks again everyone for all of your input. As there is still some > correspondence going around the booklet I'm going to leave it open for > comments until 12pm tomorrow. At that point, I plan to close the discussion > and prepare a final proof before sending to the printers and uploading to > Commons. > > Thank you, > > Stevie > > > On 17 September 2013 10:40, Edward Hands wrote: > > Thank you Martin for your kind words. Harry's edit a > > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] 'Illustrating Wikipedia brochure' - your thoughts?
One trivial note (not affecting the actual text) - remember 3D and 2D will be a lot more easily understood than 3d and 2d, which parse as "third, second". Looking at the document ... is there a reason the numbers aren't flush with the lines they refer to? It seems a little odd to have. 1. Do step 1. 2. Do the next step rather than 1. Do step 1. 2. Do the next step. Other small issues: * There are some weird linebreaks on p11. * We switch between "Non-commercial" (p12) and "Non-Commercial" (p10) * Can we add links under the three CC licenses listed on p10? They're relatively human-readable - eg creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Andrew. On Tuesday, 17 September 2013, Stevie Benton wrote: > Thanks Jonathan. Before I go through the awkward job of tinkering with the > InDesign file, what do other people think about the revision? > > Thank you, > > Stevie > > > On 17 September 2013 12:47, Jonathan Cardy < > jonathan.ca...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote: > > Thanks all, > > *Possible revised wording with examples from the borderline and less > repetition. > * > * > UK Freedom of panorama* > > Under UK law, you can photograph, upload and share with the world a > photo of any 3d artifact such as a building or sculpture that is > permanently publicly displayed in the UK, even if the object is still under > copyright. But you need to check four things: > 1 Is it permanently on display? Temporary exhibits such as on the fourth > plinth in Trafalgar square are not included, but the Angel of the North is. > 2 When you took the photograph were you somewhere normally open to the > public? Inside a pub or museum is fine, where you work or were a guest > probably isn't. > 3 Was it 3d not 2d? Buildings and sculpture are 3d, graffiti, paintings > and signs are 2d. So a photograph of stained glass illuminated by light > shining through it is 3d, but the same stained glass window reflecting your > flash at night is 2d and might still be under copyright. > 4 Did you take the photo in the UK? Most other countries have stricter > rules. > > > Regards > > > Jonathan Cardy > GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives & Museums) Organiser/ > Trefnydd GLAM (Galeriau, Llyfrgelloedd, Archifdai a llawer Mwy!) > Wikimedia UK > 0207 065 0990 > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control > over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. > > > Press Enter to send your message. > > > On 17 September 2013 11:43, Stevie Benton > wrote: > > Thanks again everyone for all of your input. As there is still some > correspondence going around the booklet I'm going to leave it open for > comments until 12pm tomorrow. At that point, I plan to close the discussion > and prepare a final proof before sending to the printers and uploading to > Commons. > > Thank you, > > Stevie > > > On 17 September 2013 10:40, Edward Hands wrote: > > Thank you Martin for your kind words. Harry's edit a > > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] 'Illustrating Wikipedia brochure' - your thoughts?
The Angel of the North is an excellent example of visible, well-photographed, modern public art. Plus it's a good excuse to include a picture of it :-) A. On Saturday, 14 September 2013, Andy Mabbett wrote: > On 14 September 2013 16:29, HJ Mitchell > > wrote: > > An example might be useful in illustrating the point for novices; > Nelson's > > Column comes to mind... > > Nelson's Column would be out of copyright anyway. Perhaps a more > contemporary example, such as the Angel of the North? > > > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Offer: Photography training workshops for Wikimedia volunteers
Hi Stevie, Glad to see this is going ahead - perhaps worth a post to the Commons VP about it? Andrew. On 6 September 2013 11:56, Stevie Benton wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I hope you're well. > > Hello everyone. I've been looking in to the possibility of offering some > photography training for Wikimedia volunteers. This is definitely something > we can do in the form of one-day workshops for small groups. This would be > delivered at no cost to the volunteers so at this point I'd like to assess > how much appetite there is for this kind of workshop and get a sense of how > many people would like to take part. > > This would be a really worthwhile activity and help to empower volunteers > and give them additional skills that can be used not only when contributing > to Wikimedia projects, but elsewhere, too. If you are interested, please do > let me know, either by replying here or commenting on the Water Cooler here > - > https://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Water_cooler#Photography_training_workshops_for_volunteers > > Thank you, > > Stevie > > -- > > Stevie Benton > Communications Organiser > Wikimedia UK > +44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173 > @StevieBenton > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over > Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Momvent: Policy Topics and Priorities Questionnaire
Relevant to this list. A. -- Forwarded message -- From: Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov Date: 2 September 2013 10:19 Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Momvent: Policy Topics and Priorities Questionnaire To: Advocacy Advisory Group for WMF LCA < advocacy_advis...@lists.wikimedia.org>, Wikimedia Mailing List < wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org> tl;dr Help us decide which policy issues are important to Wikimedia by filling out a questionnaire [1] Hello everybody, Wikimania and most people's summer holidays are over, in Brussels bureaucrats are slowly retunring to work and it is time for us to step up our activity. This being said, there is not monitoring report of August, instead, please help us get as many Wikimedians as possible to fill out our survey! We as a community are an active and prominent part of "the internet". Still, we can't deal with each and every issue it comes across. We are trying to build up a structure [2] that lets us monitor policy procedures with future impact on our work and are hoping to articulate our needs and wishes. It is therefore crucial to us to know what as many people people within our movmement think and which topics they deem important. In short: Which policy issues should be on our priority list? The survey [1] takes less than 10 minutes (I personally nailed a 6:34) and will help us immensely with our strategy planning. It is intended to also define the questions in a survey we are planning to send out to political parties ahead of the European Parliament elections 2014. Thanks for the help and have a great autumn! Dimi [1] https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1vSrFiYCAN-RPXdikdkkHmT_ZzWPdD5DcDpMye9uAiHM/viewform [2]http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/EU_policy ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Job Offer: Technical Position for WLM 2013
Possibly of interest to some. Please circulate... Andrew. -- Forwarded message -- From: Karthik Nadar Date: 23 July 2013 19:28 Subject: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Job Offer: Technical Position for WLM 2013 To: Wiki Loves Monuments Photograph Competition Dear WLMers, We at the Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 international coordination team are looking forward to hire a contractor to take care of the maintenance of the infrastructure behind Wiki Loves Monuments, and everything that is needed to run smoothly the contest. Yes, this will be a paid contract and we would expect the person to work for us for three months from August up-to October. We are looking for a candidate of either gender with the following skills: Python — at an experienced level; MySQL —at an experienced level; PHP — at an experienced level; CSS/JS/HTML at a basic level; Be a quick learner: need to learn basic MediaWiki code; Among the tasks the contractor will need to perform you have: running “Erfgoedbot” and adding countries to the monuments’ database. They will need to write PHP–based tools (statistics) using data from a MySQL database. The contractor, when selected, will be working for the Wiki Loves Monuments international coordination team. He will sign a contract with Wikimedia Nederlands, the fiscal sponsor of the Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 international project. If you are interested, please forward your resume and your portfolio to cristian.conso...@wikimedia.it. The deadline to send applications is 29 July 2013. The Wiki Loves Monuments international team consists of volunteers and so, it might take time from our side to review your applications, but we will make sure it doesn’t takes more than a week. Regards, Karthik Nadar and Cristian Consonni, On behalf of the WLM international team. ___ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list wikilovesmonume...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Two events in London - Royal Opera House & British Library, 22 and 29 June
Hi all, A quick reminder/notification (as appropriate!) about two upcoming events in London this month: * Royal Opera House editathon, 22 June * WWI workshop, British Library, 29 June The Royal Opera House event will be focusing on the ballets of Sir Frederick Ashton, one of the UK's most prominent choreographers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ballet/Royal_Opera_House_editathon The British Library event will be a chance to use some of the newly digitised (and not yet online) Europeana WWI material to help build articles, or to work on any other projects that might be of interest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/British_Library/WWI Please pass this on to anyone who might be interested! Thanks, - Andrew. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] JISC training program - one week to apply!
Hi all, A quick reminder that the JISC "call for tenders" closes in one week, at 12 noon on Wednesday 22nd: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/fundingopportunities/funding_calls/2013/04/wikimedia.aspx They're looking for someone to organise and run a (funded) nine-month training and support program for academic programmes interested in engaging with Wikipedia; it's structured as a request for tenders rather than a recruitment process, allowing groups or partnerships to bid for it, but they are happy to take bids from individuals as well. "Jisc invites tenders for an individual or organisation to be the Jisc ‘Wikimedia Ambassador' and run a nine month training and coordination project for the use of Wikimedia tools and techniques for educational purposes. The purpose of the training is to disseminate skills and knowledge leading to improved coverage and accuracy of articles relating to information produced by Jisc funded programmes presented on Wikimedia projects. The purpose of the coordination project is to promote open knowledge and to increase the uptake and use of Wikimedia tools for the dissemination of academic knowledge and content." -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Elections 2013
Should anyone be considering standing... -- Forwarded message -- From: *Risker* Date: Thursday, 2 May 2013 Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Elections 2013 To: Wikimedia Mailing List I am pleased to announce that self-nominations are now being accepted for the 2013 Wikimedia Foundation Elections. This year, elections are being held for the following roles: - Board of Trustees The Board of Trustees is the decision-making body that is ultimately responsible for the long term sustainability of the Foundation, so we value wide input into its selection. There are three positions being filled. More information about this role can be found at < http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections_2013/Board_elections/2013 >. - Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC)< http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Funds_Dissemination_Committee/Framework_for_the_Creation_and_Initial_Operation_of_the_FDC >makes recommendations about how to allocate Wikimedia movement <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia> funds to eligible entities. There are two positions being filled. More information about this role can be found at < http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections_2013/FDC_elections/2013 >. - Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) Ombud The FDC Ombud receives complaints and feedback about the FDC process, investigates complaints at the request of the Board of Trustees, and summarizes the investigations and feedback for the Board of Trustees on an annual basis. One position is being filled. More information about this role can be found at < http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections_2013/FDC_Ombudsperson_elections/2013 >. The candidacy submission phase lasts from 00:00 UTC April 24 to 23:59 UTC May 17. More information on this election can be found at < http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections_2013>. Please feel free to post a note about the election on your project's village pump, or to translate it and distribute it on other Wikimedia movement mailing lists. Any questions related to the election can be posted on the talk page on Meta, or sent to the election committee's mailing list, On behalf of the Election Committee, Risker ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [Spam] Re: Nice piece from another country.
500m for all projects in all languages. Wikipedia-specific is probably smaller. The 365m figure is from the Wikipedia article lead, though ;-) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia A. On 24 April 2013 13:42, Thehelpfulone wrote: > Also, "It estimates that is has about 365 million readers worldwide." I > thought we just crossed the 500 million mark for unique visitors? > > Sent from my iPhone > > --- > Thehelpfulone > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Thehelpfulone > > On 24 Apr 2013, at 12:50, Richard Symonds > wrote: > > I believe so, if Stevie has time: he's currently in San Francisco so is > trying to get all the time he can with the WMF staff. > > Richard Symonds > Wikimedia UK > 0207 065 0992 > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over > Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. > > > > On 24 April 2013 12:43, Harry Burt wrote: >> >> Seems well-informed. Is there any intention to ask for "Wikipedian" to be >> changed to "Wikipedian-in-Residence" in the prose if not the headline? I >> always thought the latter had quite a nice ring to it myself. >> >> Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Jon Davies >> wrote: >>> >>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-22264118 >>> >>> -- >>> Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK. Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169 >>> tweet @jonatreesdavies >>> >>> Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and >>> Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered >>> Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. >>> United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia >>> movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who >>> operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). >>> >>> Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990. >>> >>> Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk >>> >>> ___ >>> Wikimedia UK mailing list >>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >>> >> >> >> ___ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Wikimedian in Residence, National Library of Scotland
Hi all, Both the Scots and the Scots Gaelic Wikipedias are now notified - I had been meaning to get around to this earlier today but it had slipped due to some other work, along with notifiying the en.wp Edinburgh project. NLS are definitely aware of the possibilities of working with the gd.wp community; I've brought it up at some of the meetings I've had with them in the past, and they were interested - they do have an active organisational plan to do more to support Gaelic, and it's easy to see how working with WP could fit in there. (The plan is interesting reading, incidentally: http://www.nls.uk/about-us/corporate-documents#gaelic ). I'm hoping to have a chat with our contact there sometime in the near future, and I'll remind them about it :-) - Andrew. On 22 April 2013 23:43, rexx wrote: > I'm sure folks will forward the news to other lists that they subscribe to. > > Here's some background reading: > http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2012/11/were-looking-for-wikipedians-in-residence/ > http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedian_in_Residence_draft_job_description > http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/2013_Activity_Plan#GLAM_Wikipedians_in_Residence > http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/uk/1/1e/DC_staff_report_to_the_board_Feb_2013.pdf > - and the documents that Daria links to. > > I'm not aware of any feedback from the community on the part of the 2013 > Activity Plan that deals with the WiR programme. > > It would be wonderful if we had a Scots Gaelic speaker involved in our > activities in Scotland. Sadly only around 60,000 people now speak Gàidhlig > and most appear to be in the Islands. While I'd like to think that we could > find a bilingual WiR to work in Edinburgh, I wonder what the chances > realistically are of finding one? It's certainly worth asking the question, > though. > > -- > Rexx > > > > > On 22 April 2013 22:29, i...@cymruwales.com wrote: >> >> Hi Andrew >> >> 1. Can you send me a link to the wiki community discussions regarding this >> post please. >> >> 2. I note that you have only informed the en wiki community of this news; >> don't you think that Uicipeid Gàidhlig (and Scotts) should have been told at >> the same time? >> >> 3. I note that the job spec requirements include: >> >> communicate in English clearly to a wide variety of audiences and have >> excellent presentation skills >> >> Surely, the ability to speak Gàidhlig would be an advantage to this post >> and should have been mentioned? >> >> Best regards >> >> Robin >> >> >> >> > On 22 April 2013 at 12:02 Andrew Gray wrote: >> > >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Just as my work at the British Library is coming to an end, I'm >> > delighted to be able to tell people about a new Wikimedian in >> > Residence post at the National Library of Scotland - I've helped work >> > to set this up, and I think there's a real potential for doing amazing >> > things here. The NLS is a great institution, with some really >> > innovative and forward-thinking work, and as well as the obvious >> > strengths in Scottish history and culture they have major map >> > collections and one of the most interesting publishing archives in the >> > UK. Lots of scope for interesting projects here. >> > >> > It's full-time, for four months, though this may possibly be >> > negotiable to a longer period at part time - it's worth asking. The >> > job is paid and formally employed by the Library, funded jointly by >> > the Library and by Wikimedia UK. >> > http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2013/04/1533/ has further details and a >> > link to the NLS recruitment site. >> > >> > Please circulate this widely! >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > -- >> > - Andrew Gray >> > andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk >> > >> > ___ >> > Wikimedia UK mailing list >> > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> >> ___ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Wikimedian in Residence, National Library of Scotland
Hi all, Just as my work at the British Library is coming to an end, I'm delighted to be able to tell people about a new Wikimedian in Residence post at the National Library of Scotland - I've helped work to set this up, and I think there's a real potential for doing amazing things here. The NLS is a great institution, with some really innovative and forward-thinking work, and as well as the obvious strengths in Scottish history and culture they have major map collections and one of the most interesting publishing archives in the UK. Lots of scope for interesting projects here. It's full-time, for four months, though this may possibly be negotiable to a longer period at part time - it's worth asking. The job is paid and formally employed by the Library, funded jointly by the Library and by Wikimedia UK. http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2013/04/1533/ has further details and a link to the NLS recruitment site. Please circulate this widely! Thanks, -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Privacy Policy - please comment and edit
Is the hosting switch actually going ahead? I know we'd been discussing this, but I'd lost track of who was going to make the decision... Andrew. (still not convinced it's a good idea, for various reasons) On Friday, 12 April 2013, Katie Chan wrote: > On 12/04/2013 00:44, Thehelpfulone wrote: > >> >> "This policy describes what happens to personal information obtained >> through the websites hosted at uk.wikimedia.org >> <http://uk.wikimedia.org> and wikimedia.org.uk >> <http://wikimedia.org.uk>. This policy will be updated periodically." - >> WMUK wiki is currently on the Foundation's servers so is subject to the >> Foundation's privacy policy - not this one if I understand correctly? >> > > Doesn't mean it can't be subject to both. And there are currently plans > for WMUK wiki hosting to be moved away from WMF servers. > > KTC > > -- > Katie Chan > Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the > author and do not necessarily represent the view of any organisation the > author is associated with or employed by. > > > Experience is a good school but the fees are high. > - Heinrich Heine > > __**_ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l<http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l> > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Another voting reminder
So it is! I plead, um, ignorance of the conference schedule as an excuse... - Andrew. On 11 April 2013 18:53, Thomas Morton wrote: > Unless I've missed something; the EGM is Saturday, Richard has noted the > proxy deadline for tomorrow. > > Tom > > > On 11 April 2013 18:50, Andrew Gray wrote: >> >> On 11 April 2013 17:54, Thomas Dalton wrote: >> > Presumably thats for people wanting to use you as a proxy. There's no >> > deadline for proxies in general, right? The proxy can just turn up >> > with the letter of authorisation, I think. >> >> According to the schedule, ballot papers are distributed at 3.30, so >> announcing you have additional proxy votes *after* that point might >> prove awkward and would certainly delay things a bit, which for such a >> short EGM is a problem. >> >> http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/EGM_2013 >> >> -- >> - Andrew Gray >> andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk >> >> ___ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Another voting reminder
On 11 April 2013 17:54, Thomas Dalton wrote: > Presumably thats for people wanting to use you as a proxy. There's no > deadline for proxies in general, right? The proxy can just turn up > with the letter of authorisation, I think. According to the schedule, ballot papers are distributed at 3.30, so announcing you have additional proxy votes *after* that point might prove awkward and would certainly delay things a bit, which for such a short EGM is a problem. http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/EGM_2013 -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] EGM resolution regarding the change in board structure - alternatives
The quorum figure includes proxy votes not present. I doubt WMUK can absolutely assure people of quoracy, given it's dependent on whether those same people turn up! Andrew. On Wednesday, 10 April 2013, Gordon Joly wrote: > > > I believe that quorum is about 30 people, but there are only 20 names on > the list here: > > http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/**EGM_2013<http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/EGM_2013> > > Given the importance of this agenda, can WMUK assure members that meeting > will indeed be quorate? Or is the sign up list not representative? > > Gordo > > > __**_ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l<http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l> > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Anyone interested in Lua and PIzza one day?
On 5 April 2013 15:19, Katie Chan wrote: > Hi all, > > This has been arranged for Sunday 19 May. For those interested, please sign > up on <https://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Lua_on_Wikimedia>! Hurrah! Looking forward to it. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: [Talk-GB] Aerial Photographs
Spotted this. The rights issues around the material would no doubt be interesting, but this might be something where we could offer some funding to offset the costs of digitisation/storage, and look to get a tranche of the material onto Commons. Thoughts? Andrew. -- Forwarded message -- From: Andy Robinson Date: 5 April 2013 10:54 Subject: [Talk-GB] Aerial Photographs To: talk...@openstreetmap.org Folks, Sheffield University has some surplus aerial imagery that could be available to us if we wish to have it. Its described as a considerable collection (amounting to around 6 filling cabinets) of UK (mostly England, and mainly northern England) black & white 9" x 9" photographic prints, dating from around WWII to the early 1980s. There are a few index sheets, many of the boxed sets are labelled. I've asked for some more details so that we might consider storage requirements (They are currently temporarily stored in a garage but need to be in a dry low humidity room really) and should get some photos of what it all looks like in the next few days. In the meantime two questions for UK OSMers: 1. Do you think this is a resource that we should go for and build upon as a sub-project within OSM? 2. How should we best deal with physical storage until such time as items can be digitised. The question about what to do with documents (same applies to all the map sheets I have) after digitising can be left till a later date. I'm less worried about scanning and managing the files now as I have sufficient scanning equipment to cover most bases and disk space attached to an OSM sever doesn't appear to be an issue. We would need to come up with tools and methods of turning them into a seamless mosaic but I'm sure given the task there's a workable solution for that too. All thoughts, suggestions and offers welcome. Cheers Andy ___ Talk-GB mailing list talk...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] WMUK EGM Saturday 18th April.
Checked, no luck. One of those anomalies, I guess! Andrew. On Thursday, 4 April 2013, Michael Peel wrote: > > On 3 Apr 2013, at 23:38, Andrew Gray > > wrote: > > > FWIW, I got a renewal reminder on 15/3, renewed the same day, but > > didn't get an email about the EGM on the 20th. > > Andrew, could you check your spam folder please? I've just checked, and > the email was definitely sent to you on the 20th (to your 'generalist' > address). > > On 4 Apr 2013, at 09:36, Gordon Joly > > wrote: > > > Thanks. Yes, I have that email. I was not looking for an email from " > fundrais...@wikimedia.org.uk " > > > > Probably makes more sense to have an email from/sender such as " > members...@wikimedia.org.uk "... > > Indeed, the email should have come from that address, but was accidentally > sent from the fundraising address (which is easy to do accidentally from > the civicrm interface). Future emails should be coming from the > membership@address. > > Thanks, > Mike > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] WMUK EGM Saturday 18th April.
On 3 April 2013 22:32, Katie Chan wrote: > On 03/04/2013 21:43, Gordon Joly wrote: >> Was the EGM announced here, or to members via CiviCRM? > > Members entitled to vote should have received an email notice of EGM > individually. As a member, I received an email from > fundrais...@wikimedia.org.uk on 20 March with the subject "Katie - please > vote in our Extraordinary General Meeting". FWIW, I got a renewal reminder on 15/3, renewed the same day, but didn't get an email about the EGM on the 20th. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Royal Opera House editathon - 22 June
Hi all, Working with the Royal Opera House, we've organized an editathon to take place on Saturday 22 June, provisionally include some form of behind-the-scenes tour as well (though we're still looking into the details). The goal for the day is to focus on improving coverage of the works of Sir Frederick Ashton - one of the UK's foremost choreographers and a founding figure of the Royal Ballet. More details are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ballet/Royal_Opera_House_editathon If you're interested, please do sign up and keep the date free! I'll send around another reminder closer to the time. Thanks, -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Wikidata workshop
On 28 March 2013 09:34, Andrew Gray wrote: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:GLAM/BL/Wikidata > > All welcome - my targeted audience is librarians & digital-humanities types, > but if you're a Wikimedian who's interested in figuring out what's going on > with the new project, please do come along! PS: no ticketing etc. required, but if you're intending to come please do let me know so I can arrange coffee & check we're not overflowing the room! -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Wikidata workshop
Hi all, I've had a lot of interest (during workshops, etc) about the potential of Wikidata, both from librarians and from researchers; there's a general sense that it'll be very interesting, but no-one's quite sure what they'll be able to do with it :-) We'll be having a Wikidata session at GLAM-Wiki, but of course not everyone is happy to come along to a short session on a Friday afternoon as part of a larger conference. To get around this, I've organised an introductory workshop at the BL on 26th April, 2-5pm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:GLAM/BL/Wikidata All welcome - my targeted audience is librarians & digital-humanities types, but if you're a Wikimedian who's interested in figuring out what's going on with the new project, please do come along! Conversely, if you're comfortable using/understanding Wikidata, and you'd like to come along and help me *give* the workshop, please do let me know :-). I'm reasonably comfortable with talking about it, but I'm aware there are some gaps... Thanks, - Andrew. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Anyone interested in Lua and PIzza one day?
May 11th is a board meeting, so the basement might be crowded! Andrew. On 15 March 2013 15:13, WereSpielChequers wrote: > May 11th would be the day before the May London meetup, that might be > convenient for some people. > > WSC > > > On 15 March 2013 12:42, Jon Davies wrote: >> >> Hey why not? >> >> I think there is interest in this so we should think how and where we >> should advertise it. Obviously on the UK Wiki. >> >> Not a huge fuss to do - someone to open the office on a Saturday? >> >> Skype or whatever and lots of pizza. >> >> Tom's offer is kind. Can you suggest a date? >> >> >> On 15 March 2013 12:18, Gordon Joly wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> I thought you said "luau and pizza"... >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luau >>> >>> Silly me, >>> >>> Gordo >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> Wikimedia UK mailing list >>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK. Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169 >> tweet @jonatreesdavies >> >> Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and >> Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered >> Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. >> United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia >> movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who >> operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). >> >> Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990. >> >> Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk >> >> ___ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Photograph cropping day!
Hi all - thanks for the interest! We've finally secured a room, after an awful lot of phoning around and juggling of bookings - we'll be working with the images on Monday 18th March, at the BL Conference Centre (which some of you may remember from GLAMcamp, or from one of my public workshops). I haven't set up times etc yet, but we have the room all day - there's a public wireless network, and I'll arrange coffee and sandwiches. If you are still interested in coming along on the 18th, please drop me an email to say so, and I'll start pulling names together :-) - Andrew. On 11 February 2013 17:19, Andrew Gray wrote: > Hi all, > > As some of you may know, I've been working on a project part-funded by > WMUK to digitise and release a collection of historic Canadian > photographs. After some work, we are now at a state where the metadata > is at a high level of quality, and the glorious high-resolution TIFFs > are piling up - there's currently about 2,000 waiting to go, and more > are going to roll in. It's all very exciting, and I'm really looking > forward to a big announcement once we've got them all on Commons. > > Unfortunately, they all look like this: > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chef_de_Police,_D._Legault,_de_Montreal_%28HS85-10-13348%29.tif > > and in terms of being useful on Commons, it would be good if we could > offer this: > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chef_de_Police,_D._Legault,_de_Montreal_%28HS85-10-13348%29.jpg > > Rather than a couple of us spend hours every day for a month working > on these, we thought we might try and do it in one go - I'm currently > seeing if I can get a room at the British Library one afternoon, set > up some laptops, bring in some coffee and sandwiches, and have a shot > at breaking through the entire collection. Having a group of people > look at the images also means we'll have more eyes looking out for > interesting things, which can only be a bonus :-) > > We don't have a date yet, but tentatively we're thinking early/mid > March. If anyone would be interested, in coming along, do let me know, > and I'll be in touch once we've got fimer plans... > > -- > - Andrew Gray > andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Photograph cropping day!
On 12 February 2013 13:59, Michael Peel wrote: > Install Gimp (http://www.gimp.org/) on the visitor laptops and take them > along? GIMP is indeed on all the visitor laptops (at least on the Ubuntu side). I'll leave the Windows side up to Richard :-) (We should probably document this on-wiki somewhere...) -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Photograph cropping day!
Very nice! I will have a play, but it looks like that's more oriented towards reorienting than cropping... (I feel like there *ought* to be some kind of monstrous seventeen-clause command line script I can write to do this sort of thing, but no luck so far) - Andrew. On 11 February 2013 20:06, Harry Burt wrote: > Has anyone tried using unpaper [1] on a sample of images? I could do -- all > you really need is a Unix-based OS and some command-line savvy - but I'm a > little tied up just at the moment. > > Harry > > -- > Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) > > [1] http://unpaper.berlios.de/ > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Photograph cropping day!
Hi all, As some of you may know, I've been working on a project part-funded by WMUK to digitise and release a collection of historic Canadian photographs. After some work, we are now at a state where the metadata is at a high level of quality, and the glorious high-resolution TIFFs are piling up - there's currently about 2,000 waiting to go, and more are going to roll in. It's all very exciting, and I'm really looking forward to a big announcement once we've got them all on Commons. Unfortunately, they all look like this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chef_de_Police,_D._Legault,_de_Montreal_%28HS85-10-13348%29.tif and in terms of being useful on Commons, it would be good if we could offer this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chef_de_Police,_D._Legault,_de_Montreal_%28HS85-10-13348%29.jpg Rather than a couple of us spend hours every day for a month working on these, we thought we might try and do it in one go - I'm currently seeing if I can get a room at the British Library one afternoon, set up some laptops, bring in some coffee and sandwiches, and have a shot at breaking through the entire collection. Having a group of people look at the images also means we'll have more eyes looking out for interesting things, which can only be a bonus :-) We don't have a date yet, but tentatively we're thinking early/mid March. If anyone would be interested, in coming along, do let me know, and I'll be in touch once we've got fimer plans... -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Membership grace period
On 7 February 2013 17:22, David Gerard wrote: > On 7 February 2013 17:01, Katherine Bavage > wrote: > >> So - I'm not advocating FOR a reduction in limiting the grace period to a >> shorter time span (say, three months) but rather seeking your thoughts on >> whether that would be a good or a bad idea and why, much like I did when >> asking about verifying the identity of members applying for membership. >> Candid responses welcome. > > I'm thinking you should nag us more. > > *cough* I suspect I am one of said members. Where do I go to give you > my money again? Yeah, I'm with David - active members in grace are mostly just forgetful :-). As there are virtually no things for which being a member is essential other than voting, it's very easy to not get around to it... Is it possible to set up recurring membership dues as a direct debit? -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Fw: WikiConference 2013 Speakers
On 20 January 2013 19:16, WereSpielChequers wrote: > Where the Geograph outscores WLM is that they aren't time limited, some of > their photographers have uploaded images from decades ago, and they cover > the same object in different seasons. I think that makes them more > compatible with Wikipedia, September foliage can hide some of the features > we want to photograph, winter snow can highlight earthworks and other > archaeology, past events are best illustrated with old photos, and > waterfalls in particular are much better illustrated with minigalleries > showing winter spate next to summer trickles. Isn't WLM also non-time-limited? They have to be *submitted* to the contest (and Commons) in a specific month, but older images are still acceptable - see for example the Israeli winner, which was taken in the winter of 1992. http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/11/29/wiki-loves-monuments-2012-the-israeli-finalists/ -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] WikiConference 2013 Speakers WLM
On 16 January 2013 17:39, Jon Davies wrote: > John - you are in the office tomorrow - let's draw up a plan as to what > needs to happen and make it one of the first tasks of the new GLAM > organiser. Would this be too late? They will probably not be around before the start of April (assuming a month notice/moving/etc), and the reference plan has WLM well along by then: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011/Timeline That said, it would certainly be an interesting project to get them off the ground with! -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Fw: WikiConference 2013 Speakers
On 16 January 2013 20:38, HJ Mitchell wrote: > I remember the discussion (though I didn't remember the mention of the EH > list). > > I suppose we could try asking them nicely to give us the list in a more > useful format, but even if we could import just the name of the building, it > would be a start. I had a chat with Richard (N) about this today and we concluded it was probably worth asking again to see what was available and/or if they'd be interested in being involved in some way - WLM was an astounding success last year and getting involved for the UK might catch their attention ;-) Incidentally, has anyone run across this site? http://www.britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/site/about They seem to be using the same EH/etc data sources, but have assembled it into something usable. The same guy has produced http://www.ancientmonuments.info/site/about/ as well. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] WikiConference 2013 Speakers
As I recall, the objections were in part that we have most of this material already on Commons (via Geograph), but badly organised. I don't know if that's changed, or if we've got a better idea of what's out there... - Andrew. On 16 January 2013 16:45, HJ Mitchell wrote: > Well we have a list of Grade I listed buildings in every county. I'm sure it > would be easy enough to have a bot do the same for Grade II* and Scheduled > Ancient Monuments, and that gives us a ready-made target list. How much more > organisation is needed, beyond creating the necessary project pages on the > relevant wikis and getting the word out? > > Harry Mitchell > http://enwp.org/User:HJ > Phone: 024 7698 0977 > Skype: harry_j_mitchell > > > From: Thomas Morton > To: UK Wikimedia mailing list > Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2013, 16:31 > Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] WikiConference 2013 Speakers > > Excellent suggestions, thanks, I will look into it. > > A WLM speaker would be great... last year it was mentioned, but only as a > plea for someone to step forward and organise the UK effort. > > I looked into what it would take but it seems a larger job than I'd have > time for given my other committements - is there noone from the GLAM side of > things who can take it on?? > > Tom > > > On 15 January 2013 21:11, Lodewijk wrote: > > If the UK would be participating in Wiki Loves Monuments this year, would > that be an angle to search a keynote? (national or European) I doubt someone > from the international team would qualify as a ''keynote'' (maybe regular > though?) but someone from Heritage England or even one of the European > umbrella organizations (Europa Nostra, Europeana) could do something? > > Just a thought, > > Lodewijk > > > 2013/1/15 Jon Davies > > AGM 8th of June with more activities on the 9th. > > On 15 January 2013 11:21, Joe Filceolaire wrote: > > date? > On Jan 15, 2013 11:19 AM, "Thomas Morton" > wrote: > > Morning Everyone, > > As you might know, the 2013 conference will be in Lincoln, organised by the > Conference Committee with support from the office. > > With the venue chosen, we now need to figure out an exciting programme. A > lot of this is in the planning stage and we will be releasing more > information later, however one of the first thing we need to do is figure > out some keynote speakers. > > Later in the year we will be calling for papers and speakers from within the > community, right now we are focusing on finding one or two "big names" who > have something relevant to say. > > As this is your concert we need to know who you want to hear from! > > It could be anyone; from celerities, to politicians, to activists. We're > looking for intriguing suggestions, people with a unique perspective. > > Some initial suggestions have been made, please please do suggest further > ideas here on the mailing list, by emailing myself or posting on this page: > http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiConference_UK_2013/Speakers > > Regards, > Tom > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > > > > > -- > Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK. Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169 > tweet @jonatreesdavies > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990. > > Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing lis
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [WMUK Office] Volunteer Declarations of Interest.
On 7 December 2012 17:33, Chris Keating wrote: > What we can't have is a situation where someone on (say) a GLAM Committee is > helping make decisions about where Wikimedia UK is seeking to appoint > Wikimedians in Residence, or what their contract should say, and then > applying for one of those Wikimedian in Residence posts. I hope this makes > sense. That seems more in line with what was initially posted: http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Draft_volunteer_Conflict_of_Interest_Policy - while Jon's comment seems to suggest that even if you have no decision-making ability, you'd be best to keep quiet on the whole thing Just In Case, which is a bit more restrictive. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Anyone interested?
I might be able to make it - do you know what sort of thing they envisage by "linking with Wikipedia"? - Andrew. On Tuesday, 20 November 2012, Jon Davies wrote: > This is not a high priority but if anyone is interested in popping along I > have an invitation; > > From Kings College: > > I am organising an event for the afternoon of 3rd December at King’s > College on the Strand. This afternoon meeting/round-table will look at the > potential of linked open data in archives, libraries and museums including > linking with Wikipedia and cultural content more broadly. After a light > lunch from 12-1, we will have a roundup of relevant projects, including our > own Step change, then in the second half a ‘where do we go from here’ type > session. We are envisaging around 30 people and will finish around 4pm. > Let me know, > > Jon > > -- > *Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK*. Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169 > tweet @jonatreesdavies > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990. > > Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk > > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Operation Cowboy: OpenStreetMap editathon in London
I recently sat down and figured it out myself, for what it's worth, but it took quite a few hours of "hmm, is this what I'm meant to do?". Documentation (especially on "editorial decisions") is often sparser than on Wikipedia, so it's easier to feel a bit lost as to what you're meant to be doing and whether you should code something as A, B or C. It feels a bit to me like Wikipedia in 2005-6 - you can figure out what you're doing with a bit of effort, but you're never quite sure how it's going or if someone else approves. - Andrew. On Wednesday, 14 November 2012, Katherine Bavage wrote: > Sadly I'm not in London that weekend :( > > However, as I said on Sunday Tom, I'm a n00b with OSM stuff but I'd like > to be able to log in for an hour or two and do my part remotely. Is this > really feasible i..e to 'learn how to map' if you're not there? > > If not, no worries, I don't doubt this will be a success and I'd be keen > to help/join another event in future! > > Kat > > On 12 November 2012 15:30, Tom Morris 'cvml', 't...@tommorris.org');> > > wrote: > >> Over the last day or so, I've been working on putting together a new >> event in London, Operation Cowboy. The plan is for it to be the weekend >> after next, which is very soon, I know. >> >> http://lanyrd.com/2012/cowboy-london/ >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/London_OPC2012 >> >> Operation Cowboy is a plan for an all-night OpenStreetMap editathon >> (mapathon!) focussed around improving OpenStreetMap for the United States, >> an area OpenStreetMap is known to be not quite so good (compare San >> Francisco with London: on OpenStreetMap, damn near every pub, bar and shop >> in central London is on the map, in San Francisco, it's not nearly as good). >> >> Though the best mapping we can do generally involves getting a GPS out >> and walking or cycling the streets yourself, there's plenty of work that >> can be done to improve OSM from your armchair. >> >> You can read more about Operation Cowboy at: >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Operation_Cowboy >> >> Part of the point of the Operation Cowboy event is to be a place where >> Wikimedians and others who haven't played around with OpenStreetMap and >> want to learn can come along, learn how to set up an account and start >> editing. Though we'll use the US as the focus of the event, the skills >> people learn improving the US map will be applicable to improving the map >> for their local area in the UK. >> >> -- >> Tom Morris >> <http://tommorris.org/> >> >> >> >> ___ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > 'wikimediau...@wikimedia.org');> >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> > > > > -- > *Katherine Bavage * > *Fundraising Manager * > *Wikimedia UK* > +44 20 7065 0949 > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control > over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* > > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] a Creative Commons staff visiting London
I am delighted by the vote of confidence, but I don't think I can fairly call the BL "small" by any use of the word ;-) I haven't seen our current exhibition yet (only opened yesterday, and I was out of town) but I don't think it has a significant digital component, unlike the previous one. Definitely agree on visiting TNA at Kew, but note that Jo is now in York a lot of the time. Zeyi - do you know when your friend is going to be around? - Andrew. On Thursday, 8 November 2012, Richard Symonds wrote: > Zeyi, > > From my perspective, the best person to visit would be Andrew Gray at the > British Library. He's the official Wikipedian in Residence there and is, > frankly, excellent. He might have time for coffee and a chat - likewise, > your engineer friend could visit the UK Chapter office in central London, > next to Old Street station, and have a chat with the staff. > > Richard Symonds > Wikimedia UK > 0207 065 0992 > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control > over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* > > > > On 8 November 2012 13:37, Roger Bamkin > > > wrote: > >> Hi Zeyi, >> if she or he lands at Heathrow then go to the museum at the National >> Archives which is very close. They were the first to use QRpedia in London >> I think and they have worked with WMUK releasing images as well as hosting >> hack days. and they have a self appointed wiki in residense (Jo Pugh). >> They have also talked about releasing other works to wikisource. >> >> I'd be pleased to help if needed and we have other examples outside >> London. >> >> Roger >> >> On 8 November 2012 13:00, zeyi > 'cvml', 'zeyi...@googlemail.com');> >> > wrote: >> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> I have a friend who has been the software engineer in IBM and IT >>> marketing in Nortel and Cisco, and worked really close with Japanese >>> Wikimedia chapter. He is interesting on how small museum/gallery improve >>> their accessment and through digital technology and planning to visit some >>> in his london visit. >>> >>> Any suggestion or recommedation? thanks. >>> >>> Zeyi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> Wikimedia UK mailing list >>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> 'wikimediau...@wikimedia.org');> >>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Roger Bamkin >> Victuallers Ltd >> 01332 702993 >> 0758 2020815 >> Google+:Victuallers >> Skype:Victuallers1 >> Flickr:Victuallers2 >> >> >> ___ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > 'wikimediau...@wikimedia.org');> >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> >> > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Edinburgh area volunteers for a workshop?
Hi all, I'm running a series of "introduction to Wikipedia" workshops next week in Edinburgh (two at Edinburgh University, two at NLS). Three look to be going smoothly, but one of them, on Thursday 8th at the university, is proving a bit of a problem - it's got fifteen or so participants, which is a bit many for me to handle on my own. I've approached a couple of people I was hoping might be able to help, but without much success - one has just confirmed they can't make it, and the other has had to pull out. Is anyone in the Edinburgh area able and willing to come over for a few hours in the afternoon to help out? I can offer gratitude and a good meal afterwards, and it's quite good fun - no particular experience required, just a willingness to answer questions about Wikipedia (in both theory and practice). Thanks, -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Editathon at Oxford, 26th October
Hi all, If you're a student or staff at the University of Oxford, you might like to know that they're organizing an editathon at the Radcliffe Science Library on 26th October. Building on the Royal Society event tomorrow, it's focusing on women in science: http://courses.it.ox.ac.uk/detail/ENGR If you've any questions, please let me know and I'll pass them on to the organisers. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Ada Lovelace Day organised by Wikimedia UK - 19 October 2012, London
Hi all. Just to let you know that the Royal Society have shuffled some rooms around and found a lot more tickets for the evening panel session, so if you're in London on Friday evening, please do come along! http://royalsociety.eventbrite.com/ to book. - Andrew. On 17 September 2012 16:49, Daria Cybulska wrote: > Dear all, > > It's Ada Lovelace Day on 16 October and it's most suitable for Wikimedia UK > to get involved. The day exists to celebrate the contributions of women in > the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. As you may > know, Ada Lovelace is considered the first programmer, due to her work on > Charles Babbage's analytical engine. As such, she's someone we can very much > hold up as a role model. Wikimedia UK is organising a Women in Science > themed editing event for Ada Lovelace Day on Friday 19 October 2012 and > would like to invite you to attend! > > We have organised a group 'Edit-a-thon' to improve Wikipedia articles about > women in science, held at the Royal Society's library, London, 2:30-6pm. We > had a very high response from the academic community, and we filled many > more spaces than expected! However, there are still a couple of places free > for people who would like to help train new contributors - please get in > touch if you are interested. There will also be opportunities to get > involved online, which we will publish at our Wikimedia UK event's page (see > below). > > Following the Edit-a-thon there will be an panel discussion with Uta Frith > from the Royal Society and other female scientists on women in science (the > focus will be much broader than just the representation of the topic on > Wikipedia). The panel discussion will take place from 6:30pm - 8:00pm, and > you are most welcome to attend - there are still free places available, so > please feel free to register here > http://royalsociety.org/events/2012/wikipedia-workshop/ > > Wikimedia UK also has a page for the event, which you can see here > http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ada_Lovelace_Day_2012 > > Hope to see many of you there. > > Best, > Daria > > > -- > Daria Cybulska - Events Organiser, Wikimedia UK > +44 (0) 207 065 0994 > +44 7803 505 170 > -- > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over > Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. > > > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Geonotices.
On 16 October 2012 10:21, Charles Matthews wrote: > While we're on the topic: could someone add in the Cambridge meetup to > the current notice? Charles Done. (Still not sure if we should have this one national-level notice, or if we should try much more targeted ones - London area, Cambridge area, Manchester area, etc. Hmm.) -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Dunhuang Project - Silk Road editing week
Hi all, I'm currently working on fixing up some of the details for an event we have running later in October with the International Dunhuang Project, an international group working with a large collection of manuscripts and artefacts from the eastern end of the Silk Road. http://idp.bl.uk/ & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Dunhuang_Project The aim is to work on content related to the broad context of Central Asian/Silk Road history and archaeology, using the resources and expertise of the group to develop articles on topics such as: * major archaeological sites in the region * history of the regions and periods covered * key archaeologists, explorers, and scholars * related ancient languages, art, and culture A number of IDP staff in the BL are commited to working on this over several days, and we're also making arrangements for some groups of postgraduate students in related fields to get involved. It'll run over four days at the British Library in London - 23rd to 26th October - and Wikimedians who'd like to get involved are welcome to come on any of the days. It will be inside the staff areas at the library, so we *will* be able to have reference books available, which has often been a problem in the past with these events! If you're interested, please get in touch or sign up on the wiki - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/BL/IDP - and please do forward this to anyone else who might be interested. IDP is a multinational group, and we're keen to make sure some of this extends beyond the English Wikipedia. Hope to see some of you there! -- - Andrew Gray Wikipedian in Residence, British Library andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Support service (was:Social enterprise)
On 3 October 2012 13:20, Andreas Kolbe wrote: > This is the sort of discussion that should be had on-wiki, just to arrive at > some clarity about the fundamental issues. > > I have raised the topic on Jimbo's talk page. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Replacing_OTRS_with_a_commercial_consultancy_service Is anyone actually suggesting replacing OTRS? I saw Tom's proposal above as an adjunct to it (which I'm not wild on either, but it's at least defensible) Replacing it would certainly be a step too far... -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Forthcoming unconferences: MuseumCamp, BarCampNFP, LibCamp
On 30 September 2012 21:11, Andy Mabbett wrote: > Do we have anyone attending LibraryCamp (LibCamp) in Birmingham: > >http://www.eventbrite.com/event/3931870330 > > on Saturday 13 October? I was going, but I'm going to Wikimedia CCE instead. For some reason I'd missed this until now - not completely sure if I can reasonably make it to Birmingham for 9am, but I've put in for a waitlist ticket. One of my colleagues from the BL is going, though! -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Cutting back the 2013 plan
Training led and run by volunteers has very little to do with the objections to the plan, which is about allocation of Chapter resources, focus, and staff time. I don't see why we're running these two objections together. - Andrew. On Friday, 28 September 2012, Thomas Dalton wrote: > I'll say again, the issue here is the plan in aggregate. Specific examples > aren't really important - there is plenty of room for reasonable people to > come to different conclusions on a specific budget item. What we should be > able to agree on though, is that this plan, when considered as a whole, is > problematic. > On Sep 28, 2012 10:44 PM, "Andrew Gray" wrote: > >> On 28 September 2012 18:40, Thomas Dalton >> wrote: >> >> > Training is something the chapter is already involved in and should >> > therefore ensure is done well, since it reflects on the chapter. Having >> > individuals contacting potential trainees directly appears >> unprofessional >> > and leads to an inefficient and inconsistent response. >> >> I don't think it's producing bad results, but perhaps I'm biased. >> >> I've been spending the past six months doing *exactly this*; contacting >> organisations directly, usually through personal contacts, arranging >> training, and (with the invaluable help of volunteers) delivering it. I >> have kept the chapter informed, but the sessions are pretty much >> independent of the ongoing WMUK training events, though they provide >> support (laptops, printed sheets, etc). I do not believe the chapter are in >> any way unhappy with this arrangement; they've had plenty of opportunity to >> say if they are! >> >> It's certainly more efficient than asking the chapter to do it - you >> yourself have argued on this very mailing list that they are overworked, >> and trying to do too much. To demand it be centralised is to give them yet >> more work to do, on top of the existing load. It also introduces extra >> inefficiencies - they won't be going through the same direct connections, >> which makes the offer of a workshop less likely to be accepted, and it's >> much easier to arrange a session when the person delivering it is also the >> person negotiating it. >> >> Yes, random people emailing random contacts offering training is bad. But >> if we trust the person to deliver the training professionally, and we are >> willing to send them out there to represent the community in doing so, I >> can't imagine any reason we wouldn't trust them to reach out and organise >> the sessions as well. >> >> -- >> - Andrew Gray >> andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk >> >> >> -- >> - Andrew Gray >> andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk >> >> ___ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> >> >> -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Cutting back the 2013 plan
On 28 September 2012 18:40, Thomas Dalton wrote: > Training is something the chapter is already involved in and should > therefore ensure is done well, since it reflects on the chapter. Having > individuals contacting potential trainees directly appears unprofessional > and leads to an inefficient and inconsistent response. I don't think it's producing bad results, but perhaps I'm biased. I've been spending the past six months doing *exactly this*; contacting organisations directly, usually through personal contacts, arranging training, and (with the invaluable help of volunteers) delivering it. I have kept the chapter informed, but the sessions are pretty much independent of the ongoing WMUK training events, though they provide support (laptops, printed sheets, etc). I do not believe the chapter are in any way unhappy with this arrangement; they've had plenty of opportunity to say if they are! It's certainly more efficient than asking the chapter to do it - you yourself have argued on this very mailing list that they are overworked, and trying to do too much. To demand it be centralised is to give them yet more work to do, on top of the existing load. It also introduces extra inefficiencies - they won't be going through the same direct connections, which makes the offer of a workshop less likely to be accepted, and it's much easier to arrange a session when the person delivering it is also the person negotiating it. Yes, random people emailing random contacts offering training is bad. But if we trust the person to deliver the training professionally, and we are willing to send them out there to represent the community in doing so, I can't imagine any reason we wouldn't trust them to reach out and organise the sessions as well. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: [Wikimedia-l] FDC members
Possibly of interest - one of the members is Mike Peel. - Andrew. -- Forwarded message -- From: *Patricio Lorente* Date: Sunday, 16 September 2012 Subject: [Wikimedia-l] FDC members To: wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org. Dear friends: I just posted the initial composition of the Funds Dissemination Committee in http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Funds_Dissemination_Committee/2012_FDC_members as resolved today by the Board of Trustees. The resolution will be published as soon as possible. I would like to thank all the nominees, on behalf of the Board of Trustees. Many committed and valuable wikimedians nominated themselves to serve in this Committe. For those who were not appointed, we will ask you to help us in other ways. For those who were appointed, welcome aboard! Best, Patricio. -- Patricio Lorente Blog: http://www.patriciolorente.com.ar Identi.ca // Twitter: @patriciolorente ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: Context A2 scanner for sale
Predominantly maps, I would assume. However, it'd be better to write the plan first and then see what equipment we need to beg/borrow/steal, rather than the other way around... - Andrew. On Tuesday, 4 September 2012, Thomas Dalton wrote: > What would we actually scan on it? When we've discussed digitisation > equipment before, I think it has usually been in relation to one of those > scanners for books. Are there many flat works larger than A3 that we are > likely to want to digitise? > On Sep 4, 2012 3:20 PM, "Andy Mabbett" > 'a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk');>> > wrote: > >> This may be of interest. >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: Emma Cavalier > 'ecaval...@npg.org.uk');>> >> Date: 4 September 2012 15:09 >> Subject: Context A2 scanner for sale >> To: m...@jiscmail.ac.uk >> >> >> The National Portrait Gallery have recently installed a brand new >> photographic studio and no longer have use for their Contex CopyMate18 A2 >> scanner. >> Rather than send the still working scanner for disposal we'd like to >> invite >> offers from institutions who might be able to make use of it. Recommended >> use would be digitising newspapers or other large documents. Monochrome >> photographs required quite a bit of post-scanning processing in Photoshop >> although full colour photographs were quite successful. The scanner did >> not >> replace our A4 or A3 scanning equipment but was purchased to allow us to >> digitise works larger than A3. >> We are offering the CopyMate 18 scanner, usb & power cables, calibration >> chart, all the scanner software (original cds and more recent downloads), >> third party software and dongle from Colorado (this give us more accurate >> colour output than the Contex software), plus electronic copies of >> instruction manuals from Contex and basic installation, common errors and >> maintenance instructions written in-house). The software is Windows only >> and >> requires a PC with at least 3GB of RAM. The scanner was purchased in 2006 >> and used approximately once a week. It was last serviced, including new >> lamps in April 2009 and has not been used for the last 4 months. >> It measures approximately 130 x 65 x 20 cm and at least two people will be >> needed to move it. It will need to be collected from the National Portrait >> Gallery's administration building in Central London by the end of >> September. >> The scanner will be sold as seen, no guarantee is given or implied. It >> will >> be possible to view the scanner in action at the Gallery at the time of >> collection. The contact details of the maintenance company we used for >> servicing can be provided and we recommend that the scanner is serviced >> after installing it in its final location. >> >> Please email Emma Cavalier if you are interested. >> >> Best regards >> Emma Cavalier >> Digitisation Manager, National Portrait Gallery >> ecaval...@npg.org.uk >> >> >> >> >>website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/ >>Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup >> [un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/ >> >> >> >> -- >> Andy Mabbett >> @pigsonthewing >> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk >> >> ___ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > 'wikimediau...@wikimedia.org');> >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> > -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Fwd: Context A2 scanner for sale
On 4 September 2012 15:34, Richard Symonds wrote: > Very interesting indeed! Although quite where we'd put it... This is definitely one of those cases where the amazing awesomeness of it would be let down by the sheer practical implications - this is equivalent to having to buy and maintain an additional staff desk! (I used to share an office with an A3 scanner - it was a beast. An A2 scanner you'd have to build the office around.) -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Event at the British Library, 10 September
Hi all, This is to let you know about a couple of events at the British Library; on the 10th of September, we'll be hosting a workshop and exhibition tour. As with the original editathon back in January 2011, it should provide a good opportunity to meet curators, talk about possible collaborations, etc. If all goes to plan, we'll also have a group of newly released digital collections to work on, ready for sorting and uploading - details TBC. My work as Wikipedian in Residence has been heavily built around the training program in the last couple of months, and I'm hoping to be able to put more emphasis into content work from now on. If there's things you'd like me to try and work on later in the residency, or if you just want to chat about what's been done so far, please come along! In the evening, there is a tour arranged of the Writing Britain exhibition - this will start at 6.30 and be led by two of the curators organising the exhibition. Hopefully, it should be suitable for anyone working during the day and not able to make the afternoon session. I know it's a little unusual to hold an event on a weekday rather than a weekend, but this was the only day we could bring everything together! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/BL/September_2012 Later in the week, in the morning of Thursday 13th, John Byrne has arranged a tour of the British Museum's ''Writing Shakespeare'' exhibition - signup details below. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/BM/2012 Please let me know if you've any questions, and hope to see you there! -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Upcoming training workshops - London
Hi all, I posted a month or two ago asking for volunteers to help with some training workshops I was running at Birkbeck. Thanks again to the four who replied - the day went well and we got really positive feedback from the attendees. I've three more arranged in London, and one in Oxford: * 3rd September (British Library) * 24th September (British Library) * 8th October (University of Oxford) * 12th October (British Library) The three BL events are a mixture of those being advertised to AHRC researchers and postgraduates (see <http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/News-and-Events/Events/Pages/Wikipedia-courses-for-AHRC-awardholders.aspx>), with another intended for readers (ie users) at the British Library. The Oxford event is run by the university for its own postgraduates. They'll all be afternoon sessions running for three or four hours; a general introduction to Wikipedia and Q&A session, followed by a short practical session with the sandbox, a coffee break, and then time to do some "live" editing with experienced users around to lend a hand. If you'd be interested in helping train people at one or more of these sessions, please get in touch! They're fairly informal events, really quite enjoyable, and the more Wikipedians we have the better... -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Training coffee morning 12 August
On 6 August 2012 16:41, Charles Matthews wrote: > On 6 August 2012 15:57, Andrew Gray wrote: >> Hi Charles, >> >> I won't be able to make the 12th - it's the first free weekend I've >> had for a month or so, and I've sworn off going into London! - but I >> will be around in Cambridge working from home on Friday. Would you be >> free for a quick coffee sometime in the afternoon? > > That probably works. Great. Let me know what times would suit you... -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Training coffee morning 12 August
Hi Charles, I won't be able to make the 12th - it's the first free weekend I've had for a month or so, and I've sworn off going into London! - but I will be around in Cambridge working from home on Friday. Would you be free for a quick coffee sometime in the afternoon? - Andrew. On 6 August 2012 15:45, Charles Matthews wrote: > I'm running another "coffee morning", i.e. informal discussion session > about training issues. This one will precede the London meetup on > Sunday 12 August, and will be in the same place, Penderel's Oak pub in > Holborn (http://www.jdwetherspoon.co.uk/home/pubs/penderels-oak/). > I'll get a train that will allow me to be there by 11 am. All are > welcome, to discuss current and future training. > > I'll hang around during the meetup. But it does tend to get noisier, > which is why it seems worth setting aside a couple of hours before the > meetup itself starts. > > Charles > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] 1814-1839 prison execution journal
On 1 August 2012 14:31, David Gerard wrote: > On 1 August 2012 14:19, Andrew Gray wrote: > >> The best model for cases like this would be to develop a method where >> we have an agreed partner who'll digitise culturally significant >> material at a reasonable cost (or a group who can do it in-house, but >> for material like this that's tricky) and a standing offer to fund it >> for certain classes of limited-availability material like this. We >> then approach the auctioneers or booksellers, talk them in to letting >> us have it for a day to scan it, and let them do as they will after >> that. > > We need to develop in-house volunteer expertise, yes. > > So. What do we need? The Internet Archive would be the best people to talk to about this; they've experience in deploying scanning machines and training individuals to operate them. I don't know how much the hardware costs, but it seems there's one installed at the Natural History Museum: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/natureplus/community/library/blog/2012/07/25/bhl-the-vast-library-of-life It might be worth talking to them and asking if we can train a volunteer to use the hardware on an occasional basis, during slack time, to run our own programs. They have the software in place to contribute copies to IA (which ought to be best practice for our digitisation programs anyway), and we can handle the Commons side ourselves; all we need to do then is source the books! I'm happy to contact them and make enquiries about this, unless someone else already has NHM contacts - anyone? *However*, this is the general case for digitisation of normal print works. For manuscript material like this - rare, probably very fragile, and needing careful curation during the scanning process - I'd be really reluctant to let it near a volunteer who didn't have training and experience. For a program like this, outsourcing it is really the best way to go, and it's certainly more likely to be persuasive. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] 1814-1839 prison execution journal
On 1 August 2012 13:05, Andrew West wrote: > Currently on sale for £5,000, and the blog's author pleads: "There > must surely be an individual or institution who would be willing and > able to properly document the contents of Cotton's unique record of > Newgate's executions and put the results into the public domain." > Wikisource would be the perfect channel for putting the contents of > the journal into the public domain, if only we could get scans of the > whole book. Note, incidentally, that there must be some interesting overlap between this and Old Bailey Online, which will document many of the trials that preceded the hangings. http://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=t18120513-5-person102 - for example, is also covered in Cotton. > What's the possibility of WMUK buying the book for £5,000, scanning it > to Commons, then selling the book privately or to a dealer to recover > most of the money spent? I suspect that we would be unlikely to get more than half that were we to sell it direct to a dealer, and goodness only knows if we were to sell it privately. It's a bit of a gamble with donor funds! -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] 1814-1839 prison execution journal
On 1 August 2012 13:49, Fae wrote: > On 1 August 2012 13:29, Fae wrote: >> Scanning and promoting the use of the images and text for the public >> benefit. Then selling the book at either little loss or a likely >> profit for the charity once we have a lot of public attention on it. > > Slight amendment after thinking over a cup of tea - I would prefer to > see it donated to the British Library (or some another worthy public > archive) for the permanent public benefit, rather than resell. This > fits better with the Wikimedia UK mission and the receiving > institution might even help with archive quality digitization. Much as I would like to say "we here at the BL would love you to pay for a new and exciting manuscript", I'm not sure this is the best approach for spending Chapter funds in terms of value returned. Grants for a third party to acquire material is a long way from the sort of thing we've supported before, and while I think you could just about argue it's inside our objectives, I personally have my doubts. (Look at it another way: If an archive had come to us and said "we'd like you to fund digitisation of this book", we'd probably say yes at £250, maybe at £500, and start laughing if they said it would cost £5,000.) The best model for cases like this would be to develop a method where we have an agreed partner who'll digitise culturally significant material at a reasonable cost (or a group who can do it in-house, but for material like this that's tricky) and a standing offer to fund it for certain classes of limited-availability material like this. We then approach the auctioneers or booksellers, talk them in to letting us have it for a day to scan it, and let them do as they will after that. One risk here is that the digitisation would lower the marketable value of the final item, but I don't know how we'd quantify this one way or the other. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [WMUK Board] Statement regarding Ashley Van Haeften, Chair of Wikimedia UK
On 1 August 2012 12:01, Jon Davies wrote: > No effect I can see but Richard who monitors these things is in interviews > all day.I get notification of one-off and In fact a few quite generous > donations over the last 24 hours which surprised me. (£66.40 in total) > These normally happen at the weekend when I suppose people are at home, > using wikipedia and then feel generous. This was a bit different. > Can't really think there is a link one way or not. Is there a normal "last few days of the month" pickup? Everyone's just got paid... -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] New Laptops for events
On 31 July 2012 11:08, Richard Symonds wrote: > All, > > At the request of a volunteer, we've purchased three more laptops for > events. They're free for any volunteer to take along to events - just ask us > and we'll get them sent to you or the event. > > These ones are quite powerful, and relatively lightweight - they're the same > ones that we used at IBM as company laptops. They are extremely robust - > I've seen things happen to them that would make a Mac cry. The laptops > themselves are specced as follows: "Lenovo Thinkpad Edge 15, Intel Core > i3-380M processor, 15.6" screen, 4GB RAM, 500GB HDD". They have a webcam, > and a card reader, and a dual-layer DVD+-RW drive. > > They all come with Windows 7 installed, but it'd be nice if a volunteer with > experience in open-source software came in and got them to dual-boot with a > suitable version of Linux. Any volunteers? I use xubuntu 12.04 on an almost identical laptop (a Thinkpad L-420/i3), and can report it has no problems at all dual-booting beyond a slight bit of confusion in the bootloader. (For some reason, it thinks there are two Linuxes and two Windows 7 setups on the same machine. Beats me.) If you'd like me to do the same to these, I can come in sometime this week or next - I'm working from home several days, but working from the office is more or less the same... These are very robust, very pleasant machines to use. Thanks for getting them, Richard, it'll make future outreach a lot easier to organise. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Cambridge coffee morning this Saturday
On 17 July 2012 15:09, Charles Matthews wrote: > As previously mentioned to the list, I want to do some meetup-lite > events connected with training; and the first will consist of my being > at the CB2 cybercaff in Cambridge from 10 am to 1 pm this Saturday 21 > July. This is the same venue as the normal meetups but I'm relying on > word-of-mouth this time - please pass on the news to anyone who might > be interested in the area (WM training, distance education being the > particular new focus). Can't make it, I'm afraid - I'll be in Edinburgh. Hope it goes well... -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Edinburgh photography workshop
On the format, a wiki is practical for our users, but not for people new to the system - even if they are comfortable editing, using a complicated table is definitely a deterrent. We actively discourage posting contact details, for obvious reasons, which adds an extra hurdle to confirming - as we need names and contact details, we have to be able to follow up is they don't post them. (unrelatedly, I did sign up, but no email - can someone check if I am in fact registered?) - Andrew. On 11 Jul 2012 15:37, "geni" wrote: > On 11 July 2012 15:14, Richard Symonds > wrote: > > it's on a system which we have full control over, although the servers > are > > run by Google, obviously! The difference is that we have some control > over > > it. What other system would you suggest? happy to hear suggestions! > > Well the publicly posted list appeared to be working fairly well and > allows people to judge if this is an event they want to attend. The > most effective way of dealing with privacy related information is not > to collect it in the first place and since Mcdonald Road Library is > hardly a controlled area there is no real reason to. > > > -- > geni > > ___ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Training semi-meetups in Cambridge?
On 26 June 2012 12:54, Charles Matthews wrote: > I'm thinking of coffee mornings (Saturdays or Sundays) in Cambridge so > people interested in new training stuff can gather painlessly. Don't want > calendar events, just face time. > > I'm in Cambridge, as is Peter Coombe, as is Andrew Gray, and the Wellcome > Sanger Group includes Magnus Manske, Darren Logan (Rockpocket) and Alex > Bateman. A good start and obviously all would be welcome. I'm certainly interested, dates permitting. I'll probably be around 14th/15th July - ie, the weekend of Wikimania, so if anyone is left in the country then... -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] GLAM-WIKI 2012 - registration now open!
Dear all, I am pleased to announce that registration is now open for the GLAM-WIKI 2012 conference, to be held at the British Library in London on 14th - 16th September 2012. The conference will feature two days of presentations and workshops, with the Friday focused on the work Wikimedia and similar organisations have done in partnership with cultural institutions, presenting case studies and discussing the benefits to both parties. The Saturday will be oriented more towards the practical and technical side, looking at ways to work together and running workshops to share best practice. The third day, Sunday 16th, will be an unconference day, with the focus and agenda determined by the attendees on the day. We are currently taking proposals for talks, workshops and panel sessions, on three broad themes: * Open content in the GLAM sector * Developing sustainable partnerships * New models and future projects The call for papers will close on 23rd July, and the schedule will be announced on 30th July. Registration is now open at: http://glamwiki2012.eventbrite.co.uk/ and accomodation details will be released at a later date when hotel arrangements are confirmed. More details, and the call for papers, are at http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM-WIKI_2012 If you have any questions, please contact g...@wikimedia.org.uk -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] Academic training workshops
Hi all, As many of you know, as part of my work at the British Library I'll be organizing a series of training workshops on behalf of AHRC for postgraduates and academics, at various institutions around the country. These are mostly half-day sessions, giving training to specialists who are interested in contributing to Wikipedia or other Wikimedia projects, or learning more about engaging and collaborating with the Wikimedia community - I'm modelling them on the past sessions run by WMUK with, eg, the Institute of Physics. http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Physics_Workshop If they involve more than a small number of people, I'm quite keen to have someone else around, since it helps a lot if there's two or three people available to answer questions, demonstrate things, etc. If you'd be interested in coming along to one of these sessions and helping show people the ropes, please let me know and I'll keep you informed of future dates & locations - I can cover reasonable travel expenses where needed... Alternatively, if you have contacts who you think might be interested in hosting one at their institution, I'd be really interested to hear about it - part of the trick with setting these up is finding the right person to approach! Thanks all, -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Wikimedia UK's coolest projects
On 6 June 2012 16:12, Richard Symonds wrote: > All, > > We've had an email through from one of the Wikimania organisers, and thought > it best to ask you folks for input: > > Short version: What are our three coolest projects between Wikimania 2011 > and Wikimania 2012? Monmouthpedia, charitable status (though we might have to explain in detail quite *why* that one was such an achievement!). Not so sure about the third... -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] World War I Editathon taking shape
On 20 May 2012 14:31, Chris Keating wrote: > I've just updated the World War I Editathon page on-wiki with the details of > half a dozen academics who will be joining us on the 16th of June at the > British Library. > > http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/World_War_I/World_War_I_Editathon Hi all! As a quick followup note, anyone interested in this may also want to have a look at a Europeana-organised event in Leuven immediately beforehand, 13th-15th June: http://se.wikimedia.org/wiki/Projekt:Europeana_Awareness/Europeana_meets_World_War_I_Edit-a-thon/Message_in_English Leuven is apparently a very nice city, and it's about half an hour from the Eurostar terminus in Brussels by connecting train - if you're interested in the field, it's definitely worth a look. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] WikiConferences Planning Meeting 2 rescheduled
On 25/05/2012, Thomas Morton wrote: > On 25 May 2012 11:35, Richard Symonds > wrote: > >> This is on the same day (and same weekend) as the World War One >>> editathon... you're not likely to get many participants! >> >> > The editathon is the Saturday, the 17th is the Sunday :) Indeed - you can definitely go to both and compare them! (Drawing a humorous analogy between the Western Front and a Wikimania bid is left as an exercise for the reader.) We've still some places left at the editathon - if anyone's interested but hasn't signed up, now would be a great time... http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/World_War_I/World_War_I_Editathon -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] A V Denham
On 20/05/2012, Stevie Benton wrote: > Now, if only we had a Wikipedian in Residence there. Oh, wait... we do! > Perhaps Andrew could help. Beyond the fact that the article omits one novel (Time of torment, 1974 - the authority record is vague, but it looks like the same person) I don't think there's much I can add without extensive digging! No obvious secondary publications; she may be mentioned in more general works but it'd take me most of the day to find out. Newspaper sources are best for this sort of thing, and I see someone's already tried HighBeam... -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Role accounts
On 29 April 2012 13:08, Harry Burt wrote: > In any case, role accounts are in all practical terms regarded merely > an accountability issue these days. Which is probably why no page goes > into detail on the copyright matter. It also seems quite at odds with the fact that we *do* allow and assist organisations to release content under a free license - just so long as they go through another process. There are practical identification and verification benefits to doing it this way, but it certainly doesn't support any kind of copyright limitation. (I am becoming of the opinion that prohibiting role accounts is a bad idea full stop, but that's another story...) -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [offlist] Re: The British Library is looking for a Wikimedian In Residence (6 months)
On 9 February 2012 12:09, Andrew Gray wrote: > [offlist] Dear all: I am still outwitted by email. Thankyou for giving me an opportunity to demonstrate this on a slow morning :-) As you were... -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
[Wikimediauk-l] [offlist] Re: The British Library is looking for a Wikimedian In Residence (6 months)
[offlist] On 9 February 2012 11:23, Fae wrote: > Applications close in *2 weeks* so let any friends and folks on your > personal networks who might be interested know about this opportunity as > soon as possible. You can tweet using the > shortcut: http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/?p=778 Interesting indeed! Do you know when they expect the post to start, or is it subject to negotiation? -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] A few requests!
On 8 February 2012 16:34, Harry Burt wrote: > It's worth noting that traditionally PPCs have had difficulty sustaining > articles, whereas incumbent MPs are all notable. I suspect the same may be > true of L.A. elections. Yes. In early 2010, I reviewed a lot of pages for constituencies to look for articles on PPCs, which tend to be very problematic puff-pieces of limited notability. I think perhaps 75% were fairly irredeemable. In the current case, the best answer is to point toward the notability guidelines for politicians, which I think explicitly state that the community does not think candidates for an office which would otherwise confer notability can be notable simply by virtue of being candidates for it, and to explain that the corrolary of this is that articles on candidates are often deleted, which leads to tears. (Perhaps a bullet-point FAQ on "Can I have an article?", with common arguments and problems, is a worthwhile thing to produce for outreach purposes. "#15. 'But I wrote a book!'") -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Monmouthpedia
On 31 December 2011 11:32, Roger Bamkin wrote: > So I think the rebellion is named after the Duke of Monmouth - ie tricky to > link to [[Monmouth, Wales]] In a slightly convoluted mode, I believe the ship is as well. (At some point in the past few centuries it was decided that he was All Right After All, etc.) > Armoured Car, and Ship - Yes we should be able to link the QR codes > Monmouth Castle - Go for it! > There are lots of ideas on MonmouthpediA pages. Some are people who may be > local to you in fame but born in Monmouth. Is there a WP Monmouth[shire]? If not, this may be a good idea to kickstart one - identify relevant articles, start projecttagging, etc. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Fundraiser update - and SMS donations
On 30 November 2011 17:40, Chris Keating wrote: >> Gift Aid of less than 10% is disappointing, I estimate that as only half >> the signups that we should be getting. Might be worth testing some different >> mechanics and wording there. > > Yes, that's one of the things we're aiming to do next. Out of interest, do we know what the "normal" rate of obtaining gift-aid for this sort of charitable campaign is? -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Public domain day 2012
On 31 October 2011 13:45, Andrew Gray wrote:
> The most prominent British writer to die in 1941 was Virginia Woolf,
> so no doubt we'll see a spate of reprints by about March. Others
> include Hugh Walpole (prolific but mostly forgotten), P. C. Wren
> ("Beau Geste"), A. G. Macdonell ("England, Their England"), H. E.
> Marshall ("Our Island Story").
Following on from this, I tried skimming some other countries, and got
very excited when I noticed Tagore died in 1941, but on examination
he's in the public domain already - India is life + 60.
Japan, Canada and New Zealand are life + 50, but I don't immediately
see any exciting cases who died in 1961; Australia is in the process
of transitioning from life + 50 to life + 70, and as a result no-one
new will fall into the public domain this year. France is best left
aside as discussed above; Germany is life + 70, which means Emanuel
Lasker's books on chess will become PD, along with a handful of minor
novelists.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Public domain day 2012
On 31 October 2011 15:49, Thomas Dalton wrote: > Do we need to avoid them for some special legal reason or just because > we don't feel comfortable saying "Yay! This brilliant author got shot > in the head defending his country 70 years ago so we can now copy his > books with paying for them!"? If it's the latter, then we can probably > word things sufficiently delicately. It's a legal issue, but *only* regarding French authors (at least, I'm not immediately aware of any other countries which do the same thing). As part of a general French law regarding those killed or injured in wartime (and their dependents), authorial copyrights are extended by an additional thirty years in these cases, from seventy years after death to a hundred years after death. (A side-effect of this is that the *first* cases will become PD in a few years - 1 January 2015 for those killed during 1914.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mort_pour_la_France French law also has an odd caveat for works which were in copyright during the two world wars; the periods of these wars are not counted for calculating expiry dates, thus meaning that some works which were still in copyright in 1939, and would have expired over the next few years, will not do so for a bit longer. Per our article, this only applies for musical works - a court recently annulled it for most works - so we can just omit French composers from our calculations! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_law_of_France -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Public domain day 2012
On 31 October 2011 12:37, geni wrote:
> Yes we are coming up to January 1st when things go public domain in
> the UK. I understand there will be a bit of a party. Fireworks and
> suchlike.
>
> My list of works that go PD is a bit short at the moment and mostly
> focused on the your paintings thing but I hope to expand it a bit
> before the new year:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Geni/1941_deaths
The most prominent British writer to die in 1941 was Virginia Woolf,
so no doubt we'll see a spate of reprints by about March. Others
include Hugh Walpole (prolific but mostly forgotten), P. C. Wren
("Beau Geste"), A. G. Macdonell ("England, Their England"), H. E.
Marshall ("Our Island Story").
Non-fiction writers include Sir James George Frazer ("The Golden
Bough") and Evelyn Underhill (a major writer on Christian mysticism).
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] WMF veto on geonotices?
On 7 October 2011 13:02, Fae wrote: > I am unclear about the WLL central notice. Is there a discussion > somewhere that explains why this notice about a regional GLAM activity > would be a central notice rather than a USA specific Wikipedia > geonotice? The centralnotice was requested by the same person who set up the geonotice, and I'm guessing it's intended to ensure non-WP projects are notified (Commons and WS are likely "interested parties"). It's still targeted to the US and Canada only, but now running on multiple projects. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/CentralNotice/Calendar There's no explicit policy I can see regarding not duplicating notices globally and locally, but it's something I've always understood to be discouraged. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Suggestions for Merchandise
On 13 September 2011 13:58, Richard Symonds wrote: > +1. I very much like this idea! Does anyone know who set that up/who was in > charge of that idea? Commons has the PDFs here (which are bizarrely distorted by mediawiki, but there you go): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_Commons_Postcard.pdf http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_Commons_Postkarte_(sw).pdf You can probably chase down the original details via the author (or just by asking WMDE directly) -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
