On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 17:37 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I think we might be talking about two different things. I was just
> referring to CGit links, not anything with bugs/issues and users. For
> example, redirecting this:
>
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/nautilus/tree/README.md
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 15:13 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 11:19 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> > > Work is in progress to let maintainers upload tarballs with the
> > > generate API reference for developer.gnome.org
> >
> > Hi,
> > okay, how is that supposed to work
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 10:08 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Could you give some context and explanation on this? I could take the
> gnome-autoar, but need to know why this is wanted and the alternative
> to gnome-common.
When the wiki comes back:
https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Gno
On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 13:57 -0600, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> Hi developers,
>
> We're getting closer, but we're not yet at a point where we can
> recommend that you try generating release tarballs with BuildStream and
> expect it to work. So I have to reluctantly recommend that you use
> JH
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 14:31 -0600, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
>
>
> I'll use one specific anecdote. On October 30, the Autotools build
> files were removed from at-spi2-core. The accompanying JHBuild
> moduleset update switching it to use meson was pushed by Philip
> Withnall (thanks!) on Dec
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 07:34 -0600, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:25 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > Were you actually using JHBuild to run integrated system
> > components
> > (gnome-shell, gnome-session)? If so, how? I was not aware that
> > that
> > was even pos
Hey Daniel,
On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 11:49 +0100, Daniel Garcia Moreno wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 9:35 PM, Philip Withnall .uk> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-01-16 at 12:17 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> > > It doesn't really matter when you do it. There are some
> > important
> > > things:
Hello all,
If you're feeling a little generous in this holiday season, do I have
the project for you!
I've spent the past week and a bit triaging libgweather's bugzilla,
adding automated tests, and hooking up continuous integration so it's
easier than ever to contribute to libgweather.
But we st
On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 05:43 +, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 6:48 AM Nicolas Dufresne a> wrote:
> > Le mardi 28 novembre 2017 à 14:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 04:21 +00
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:48 -0500, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> Le mardi 28 novembre 2017 à 14:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > Hey,
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 04:21 +, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Hi list,
> > >
> > > This is a
Hey,
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 04:21 +, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> This is about the migration tool for Bugzilla bug reports to GitLab
> issues. See, for background, issues [1] and [2]. Currently, the
> migration tool posts all the migrated issues and their associated
> comme
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 20:15 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> GNOME 3.27.2, the second unstable release in the 3.28 development
> cycle, is now available.
>
> The porting of more modules to meson continues (which is great!), but
> It's still causing some problems for some modules. Se
On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 09:11 -0600, PWR PWR wrote:
> Great discussion! I would encourage making things as customization
> and personalized as possible, as a principle of open source software.
Close enough:
http://www.islinuxaboutchoice.com/
___
desktop-de
On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 11:05 +, Allan Day wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> ...
> > I don't think that applications such as Calendar, Contacts, or
> > finding
> > and reminding apps should be removed from the requirements for a
> > well-
> > rounded, de
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 07:50 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Allan Day wrote:
> > Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > ...
> > > > > I don't see the relation between sandboxable and unremovable.
> > > > >
> > > &
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 12:16 +, Allan Day wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> ...
> > > > I don't see the relation between sandboxable and unremovable.
> > > >
> > >
> > > On an image-based OS, wouldn't it be the case that anything
>
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 11:23 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Jeremy Bicha
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 4:45 PM, wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Florian Müllner > org> wrote:
> > >> Why is that in the list? I would expect most users to use th
On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 19:03 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently about half of the GNOME core apps are unremovable in GNOME
> Software. It's the set of apps that are not new additions to core
> over
> the past two years, but at this point that's entirely arbitrary. So
> we
> n
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 10:51 +, Allan Day wrote:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> ...
> > I don't see the relation between sandboxable and unremovable.
> >
>
> On an image-based OS, wouldn't it be the case that anything that's
> not a flatpak would be part of the image, and therefore unremovable?
>
On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 16:27 +0200, Felipe Borges wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We have been discussing for quite some time the inclusion of GNOME
> Usage in the GNOME release, initially as a "demo".
>
> The project has been evolving quite fast and it is expected to have
> an
> Outreachy student worki
Hey,
On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 20:28 +0800, 藍挺瑋 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that all nautilus-* repositories on git.gnome.org became
> inaccessible after nautilus was moved to GitLab. It is still possible
> to
> access these repositories with GIT or SSH protocol, but I hope we
> can
> keep HTTPS
On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 14:41 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On 13 October 2017 at 13:54, Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
>
> > I'm now getting comments on commits which are really bug reports,
> > like
> > this one:
> > https://github.com/GNOME/gdk-
On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 13:12 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Hey,
>
> As expected the GitHub mirror might be costing us some contributions
> rather than attracting more:
> - none of the projects repositories mention that the mirrors are
> mirrors
> - the READMEs don't me
On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 18:14 +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 2017-09-05 17:46 GMT+02:00 Bastien Nocera :
> >
> > - try integrating with (currently out-of-tree) OOM killer helpers
> > to go
> > away from application lifetime management by the users
> > - imple
On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 16:29 +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> [ Please keep the CC list for replies ]
>
> So, is having a mobile UX something in scope for GNOME as a project
> and the GNOME Shell?
> Did anyone try to use GNOME on a smaller, phone-sized display
> already?
> Is there interest in the
irrored module, so
that's not viable.
> On mar, 5 de septiembre de 2017 13:13 Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > As expected the GitHub mirror might be costing us some
> > contributions
> > rather than attracting more:
> > - none of the proje
Hey,
As expected the GitHub mirror might be costing us some contributions
rather than attracting more:
- none of the projects repositories mention that the mirrors are
mirrors
- the READMEs don't mention that they're mirrors either, or point to
the upstream code, Bugzilla or code contributions
- n
On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 15:41 +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> Should not be a big deal, basically all URLs are still working
> (ssh://u...@git.gnome.org etc...)
They don't, as per my mail.
> and Carlos is not going to stop
> looking at bugzilla bugs for now. This just means that people can
> start su
On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 16:30 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> Hey Bastien,
>
> I don't feel is neither wise or unwise. Do you have some specific
> concern?
> The only one we had was translations, and that seems to work.
I think that this sort of failure, while we're working on stabilising
the softwa
On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 15:47 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> I guess you can expect this from the previous email, Nautilus has
> moved and is now officially living in our instance of GitLab.
>
> Many thanks to Alberto Ruiz and Andrea Veri for resolving the issues
> we were blocking on.
Just before
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 12:20 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> I have a list of about 12 apps that don't have search providers and
> probably should. I'd love for us to make some progress on that -
> would it make a good goal?
Let's fix the search providers infrastructure first. They're unusable
on slow ma
On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 11:38 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 11:13 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 01:04 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > GNOME 3.25.91, a late deve
On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 11:13 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 01:04 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > GNOME 3.25.91, a late development preview of the upcoming GNOME
> > 3.26
> > release, is now available.
Hey,
On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 01:04 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> GNOME 3.25.91, a late development preview of the upcoming GNOME 3.26
> release, is now available. Please help us test it. If you want to
> compile GNOME 3.25.91 by yourself, you can use the jhbuild
> modulesets
> ava
On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 22:23 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 18:50 +, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> > Looks like GNOME Initiatives could use with some updating as well.
> > There are some that are current and some that might need to be
> > revisited. For instance:
> >
> > D
On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 11:02 +0200, Jens Georg wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > As you may know we continue working and pushing for our transition
> > from Bugzilla and cgit to GitLab.
> > Similarly to what we said in the previous mail thread, we are still
> > in
> > the pilot program phase, that mean
On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 20:42 +0200, Petr Kovar wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:21:05 -0500
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Jeremy Bicha
> > wrote:
> > > If you want to do these things, please branch for 3.26 and make
> > > your
> > > changes to git master for
On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 17:47 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > What usually happened in the past was that the older version was
> > used
> > when such a problem happened, which would hopefully have
> &g
On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 15:40 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> Hi developers,
>
> I'm still struggling to get buildable release modulesets for
> 3.25.90.
> As you know, tarballs for that release were due Monday and the
> release
> was due Wednesday, but it's Saturday now and I haven't delivere
Hello,
On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 19:59 +, Leslie S Satenstein via desktop-
devel-list wrote:
> Has Gnome ever been really tested with btrfs file system. I have
> raised bug reports about the user logon locking up if there is an
> extension and both the extension code itself of the user's home
> fo
On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 08:33 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> developer.gnome.org is going to have some problems because for meson
> modules 'ninja dist' does not include generated gtk-doc files in the
> tarball. At least one maintainer is working around this by manually
> generating
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 07:56 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Carlos Soriano via
> desktop-devel-list wrote:
> > This is done now in
> > https://git.gnome.org/browse/nautilus/commit/?id=365ec7f7ac1cec51dc
> > 0248dd05b17cb78252a788
>
> I don’t think that’s suffici
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 12:08 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 05:59:02AM -0400, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> > For now we won't relicense the files, since that would require
> > copyright holders to agree (iiuc). Instead is the project that will
> > become GPL3+, since the combina
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 11:50 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote:
> I would also be supportive of a solution using Phabricator+cgit. Phab
> for task management and patch review, since its task management is
> more
> powerful than gitlab’s, and its patch review workflow doesn’t have
> the
> problems of gitl
On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 11:21 +0200, Felipe Borges wrote:
>
> +1: I am supportive of the initiative.
>
> After catching up with the discussion, my personal pros and cons are:
>
> Pros:
>
> - code browsing is better than cgit
Seeing the history of a single file is unfortunately much harder than
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 21:29 +0200, Iñigo Martínez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using meson for some months now at work, and I've taken
> advantage of what I learned to port some applications' build systems
> to it (gnome-todo[0], bijiben[1] and gnome-calendar[2]). While I'm
> waiting for those pat
On Sat, 2017-05-20 at 22:36 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Somehow, the starting image from the transition display a blank
> instead
> as demonstrated by the screencast below:
> https://luya.fedorapeople.org/videos/Screencast%20from%2020-05-17%201
> 0:32:45%20PM.webm
I didn't wa
On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:47 -0400, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> Maybe I didn't explain well. Emilio points out there could one one of
> those extensions that say GPL2+ to link to a GPL2-only library. But
> that would make the extension itself GPL2 anyway, and it's License
> file would have to reflect th
On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 13:50 -0400, Carlos Soriano via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
> Wouldn't that make the actual extension GPL2-but-not-GPL3 comaptible
> since the start, and therefore cannot be GPL2+ project and therefore
> its License file would need to reflect that?
No. nautilus' license says "
Hey,
At GUADEC 2010, Matthias asked Richard Hughes and I to help with gnome-
control-center's port to GTK+ 3.x and update all the panels to the new
control-center shell that Jon McCann had been polishing.
Skip forward 7 years later, and I'm mostly doing patch reviews for
features and redesigns do
Hey,
On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 14:22 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> [Written on behalf of Alberto Ruiz, Carlos Soriano, Andrea Veri,
> Emmanuele Bassi and myself.]
>
> Please bear in mind that this is just a recommendation! We are not
> claiming to have complete knowledge and we would like to hear
> quest
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 11:13 -0400, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> There are few by error.
> The important cases are lineup-parameters used for uncrustify, and
> the threatics part from gnome-builder.
> However, we already spent time on implementing our own thing in the
> past with git-archive-all (GPLv3+)
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 09:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > If nautilus is GPLv3+, that means we can't link it against GPLv2-
> > only
> > or LGPLv2-only libraries in the extensions. I'm also not ope
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 17:01 +0300, Ernestas Kulik wrote:
> (Attempt no. 2, since Geary hates me)
>
> Hi,
>
> As the current licensing situation in Nautilus is quite complicated,
> I
> and Carlos are planning a move to relicense the entire codebase to
> GPLv3+.
>
> The codebase has files under se
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 15:55 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 08:50 -0400, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> > > Original Message
> > > Subject: Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org
> > > Local Time: May 17, 2017 2:10 PM
> &g
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 08:50 -0400, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> > Original Message
> > Subject: Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org
> > Local Time: May 17, 2017 2:10 PM
> > UTC Time: May 17, 2017 12:10 PM
> > From: had...@hadess.net
> > To: Carlos Soriano
> > desktop-devel-list
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 06:36 -0400, Carlos Soriano via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
> Hey Bastien,
>
> Not sure if you read the wiki and the workflow we outlined in there,
> since we mention how this works. You will realize that's not
> necessary for you, neither a git-bz alternative since you will u
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 13:54 +0200, Jehan Pagès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Sébastien Wilmet
> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:45:26AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 11:33 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> >
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 13:49 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:45:26AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 11:33 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> > >
> >
> >
> > > Most developers are more familiar with the Gi
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 11:33 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
>
> Most developers are more familiar with the GitHub workflow, I think
> it's
> an easier workflow than attaching a patch to a bugtracker ticket.
> Once
> the contributor has pushed a branch on the fork repo, all the rest
> can
> be done
On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 13:29 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 01:08:24PM +0800, xiaofeng wrote:
> > When I use the "Select All" action, the next step is always being
> > "Copy",
> > what about your next step? If that's the most case, what about to
> > add an
> > action
On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 15:56 +, jfle...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> It makes sense.
> Since simple-scan is written in vala/C and Paperwork in Python 3, I
> guess any common ground would have to be written in C/GObject. It's
> going to take time ... Not sure if I will ever enough free time to do
> eve
Hey,
On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 12:54 +, jfle...@gmail.com wrote:
> First of all, I want to thank you all for your comments and
> feedbacks. I wasn't really expecting such a nice welcome :-)
>
> Regarding the HIG, you can actually also thank Mathieu Jourdan ( http
> s://github.com/mjourdan ). He h
On Sat, 2017-04-29 at 12:06 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > Are you saying you reverted jhbuild module changes, without
> > notifying
> > the committer, because there's a problem with the grilo/gr
On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 10:19 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 00:37 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Peter Hutterer
> > > wrote:
>
On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 00:37 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> > I will, but I'll keep the two parallel for at least a release or
> > two.
> > If you
> > need me to add anything specific to keep continuous happy for the
> > time
> > be
Hey,
After splitting up gnome-settings-daemon in small independent daemons
for the GNOME 3.24 release, making it more robust and easier to debug,
a regression was discovered in gnome-settings-daemon's multimedia keys
plugin, which handles, well, multimedia keys and offers up an API for
application
On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 12:43 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 at 00:52:25 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> > There has been many instances of us protecting our brand by asking
> > people to
> > stop using our logo for commercial purposes, CC-BY-SA/LGPLv3 does
> > grant
> > precisely th
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 11:44 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> So far, we have this gnome-nightly-apps repository which contains
> copies of the flatpak manifests for a bunch of gnome apps. That is
> redundant and suboptimal. Recently, flatpak has gained the ability to
> find manifests in git reposito
On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 05:55 -0500, Carlos Soriano Sanchez wrote:
> Got down again
At least it's a sick note, not a rant like Behdad sent to the wrong
list ;)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 01:23 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> I'd be very careful in framing this issue in absolute terms like
> you've been doing. For instance, I think you need to be explicit in
> saying you're speaking with your Fedora packager hat on.
Does it matter when, when pushed to master a
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 11:07 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some GNOME modules have started to experiment with switching to the
> meson build system instead of Autotools. Personally, I want to
> encourage this; even though as a project we haven't come to any
> consensus on whether we wan
On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 16:58 -0500, Baptiste Saleil wrote:
> Thanks for the link to the blog post (thus the explanation to disable
> the feature).
>
> So you mentioned that "Extract here" should not be available.
The "Extract here" from file-roller, further down the menu, shouldn't
be there. The "
On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 16:07 -0500, Baptiste Saleil wrote:
> Again, I was never prentious enough to say that someone is stupid. I
> only talked about a feature that I, personally, find "stupid", I
> never talked about an actual person and I never would.
It's still not constructive.
> To go back to
On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 13:12 -0500, Baptiste Saleil wrote:
In passing, I'm not a native english speaker.Maybe you took
personally the "you" in my last sentence, it was a general "you"
meaning the users and not the developers. Maybe I should have said
"If one wants..."
Whethe
Hello Baptiste,
On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 12:00 -0500, Baptiste Saleil wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> File roller extract my archives in current directory by double click
> since 3.22
> Is this a bug or a feature ?
>
> If it's a feature, is there a bug report or discussion I can track to
> understand why devs
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 10:18 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 11:53 +0100, Sam Thursfield wrote:
> > Would a GNOME-goal to ensure that every project follows the Build
> > API
> > help
> > here?
>
>
> What do the meson developers think about the Build API?
>
> I think I woul
Hey,
gnome-settings-daemon 3.23.2 is now released. The major change is that
instead of launching a single big daemon, gnome-session will now launch
a number of smaller daemons.
Eventually, those daemons will be started as needed (through timers, or
D-Bus autostart) via systemd --user, as announce
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 09:33 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hello,
> this is a heads up that the evolution-data-server, evolution,
> evolution-ews and evolution-mapi products will switch from Autotools
> to
> CMake for the 3.23.1 release.
The email doesn't explain the most important part though.
Great stuff, thanks!
> On 21 Sep 2016, at 21:21, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 21:11 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> Matthias rebuilt the version set at least once today in order to pick
>> up stragglers. Not sure why your releases didn't get in; seems like
>> today's ot
On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 19:06 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 00:00 +, Release Team wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > We would like to inform you about the following:
> > * GNOME 3.22.0 newstable tarballs due
> > * Hard Code Freeze ends
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The following modules
On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 07:19 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:17:13AM +1000, Daniel Kasak wrote:
> On my system, when I start gnome ( I usually use Enlightenment ), I
> see both tracker and evolution processes taking about 192MB of
> memory.
> I have 16GB of memory, so they're
On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 10:23 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote:
> In Debian, 'apt-get remove --purge tracker' fixes the problem ;)
It fixes nothing. You just work around whatever problem is either
really happening on the system, or is one of those grand-mother tales,
carried around in forums.
D
On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 14:19 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> I'm a downstream as well (Debian), which was caught by this change.
> Note this particular change was merged after the official beta
> release
> and is only in Git atm, but it's targetted for 3.22.
> Personally I'm a bit concerned that s
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 17:33 +, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
> I found that the Openweather extension maintained by Jens Lody
> suited me better than the Gnome version. So much so that its the one
> I recommend to other Gnome users
What "GNOME version" are you talking about?
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 13:05 +0200, Jens Georg wrote:
> >
> > This landed in gnome-settings-daemon, vino, rygel and gnome-user-
> > share.
> >
> > I'll make release for that first and last modules. Hopefully the
> > other
> > 2 will see releases for the beta release this week, otherwise
> > distri
On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 18:06 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Hey,
>
> "systemd --user" has been enabled in Fedora 24 beta, which will ship
> with GNOME 3.20. For GNOME 3.22, I'd like to make some changes in
> gnome-settings-daemon, first in the sharing plugin, th
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 10:19 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> ...
> > Any comments / opinions?
> >
>
> The dropdown list of search results that libgweather provides isn't
> great, so +1 from me.
I've wanted libgweather to move to using geocode-glib for a while, so
this would
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 11:48 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 10:17 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 10:29 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > >
> > > Don't all maintainers already use signed tags for releases?
> > No. I used to do this, but stopped a couple
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 09:43 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On tor, 2016-08-25 at 17:29 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On 25 August 2016 at 16:29, Alexander Larsson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > However, it would
> > > make more sense for each individual application developers to
> > > maintain
> >
On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 16:55 +0300, Alberts Muktupāvels wrote:
> For long time I already want/plan to merge gnome-screensaver into
> gnome-flashback. It will give more freedom to make needed changes
> without affecting any other users and/or sessions that still use
> gnome-screensaver. So I guess I
On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 14:12 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> Hi;
>
> On 21 July 2016 at 13:42, Ikey Doherty
> wrote:
> > So Jeremy Bicha kindly contacted me the other day to express
> > concern
> > with Budgie/GNOME Screensaver. I had been toying with the notion of
> > forking GNOME Screensaver du
On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 14:20 +0100, Ikey Doherty wrote:
>
> On 21/07/16 14:03, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 13:42 +0100, Ikey Doherty wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > So Jeremy Bicha kindly contacted me the other day to express
> >
On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 13:42 +0100, Ikey Doherty wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So Jeremy Bicha kindly contacted me the other day to express concern
> with Budgie/GNOME Screensaver. I had been toying with the notion of
> forking GNOME Screensaver due to its deadness, and making it work
> better for Budgie/Mo
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 23:23 +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>
> Well, 3 options with the other one being to have "A" and "B" content
> be
> placed in individual files, i.e. Screenshot - 2016-07-19 - 12:34 -
> LVDS1.png and Screenshot - 2016-07-19 - 12:34 - HDMI1.png, each one
> with
> their correct res
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 23:03 +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Over at mutter we've been working towards supporting proper multi DPI
> setups when running GNOME using Wayland. Proper multi DPI means to
> support having multiple monitors where two or more monitors have
> significantly different DP
On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 11:23 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 25/06/16 13:55, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > pnp-ids: Add --disable-udev command-line argument
>
> This is also a positive change for distributions that are neither
> exclusively Linux nor exclusively non-Linux (h
On Sat, 2016-06-25 at 13:36 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> From https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590059
>
> "
> hwdb has its own database which it compiles to binary, so that:
> 1) initialisation is practically free
> See https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-setting
From https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590059
"
hwdb has its own database which it compiles to binary, so that:
1) initialisation is practically free
See https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-settings-daemon/commit/gnome-set
tings-daemon/gnome-settings-
manager.c?id=d8c158e74caea048dea5a3823
On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 12:49 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-06-12 at 23:31 +, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > About nautilus-sendto
> > =
> >
> > Easily send files via mail
> >
> > News
> >
> >
&g
101 - 200 of 1040 matches
Mail list logo
