On 21/11/2012 Dave Fisher wrote:
Does the project care to have an SSL certificate on
www.openoffice.org? Is one needed for other public assets like
wiki.openoffice.org?
I don't have a strong preference here, but it could be nice to have,
especially if we can later apply it to sites that requir
because attachment in the mail may be unavailable,so create a bug and
attach the patch in the bug,below is the bug link~
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121385
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Du Jing wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have modified the script of document general operation
Hi all,
I have modified the script of document general operation and completed
frame object automation script via uno, is there anyone can help to review
it?
Thanks~
On 11/21/12 11:31 PM, Robert Barbey wrote:
> Rob,
>
> thanks for the quick answer. Unfortunately, I wasn't talking about the Writer
> extension but about the Maven plug-in. It hasn't been decided yet whether the
> extension will be publicly available.
>
no problem, more important is that the e
Thanks to Fan's effort.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Fan Zheng wrote:
> I will take a look at the patch. thx.
>
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Joost Andrae
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > maybe it helps if someone documents the usage of issue ids within the
> > source code for unexperienced developers.
> >
> > In thi
I will take a look at the patch. thx.
2012/11/21 Joost Andrae
> Hi,
>
> maybe it helps if someone documents the usage of issue ids within the
> source code for unexperienced developers.
>
> In this example the issue represented by i120928 ( := OOo Issue Tracker ID
> 120928 ) is to be resolved
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=35763
It's about the import/export of underling color, I have verified with MS
word 2003, but I don't have MS word 97, could anybody help with this?
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Lou QingLe
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Georges Bolssens wrote:
>
> modules asked me to notify you of this fact, so here it is...
George --
Thanks for letting us know! These orientation modules are relatively
new and it's great you're using them. Please give additional feedback
and/or join mailing lis
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Nov 21, 2012, at 1:12 PM, jan iversen wrote:
>
>> thanks for your reply.
>>
>> On 21 November 2012 21:17, TJ Frazier wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/21/2012 14:24, jan iversen wrote:
>>>
having looked at the mediawiki pages, especially the amoun
On Nov 21, 2012, at 1:12 PM, jan iversen wrote:
> thanks for your reply.
>
> On 21 November 2012 21:17, TJ Frazier wrote:
>
>> On 11/21/2012 14:24, jan iversen wrote:
>>
>>> having looked at the mediawiki pages, especially the amount of updates,
>>> and
>>> make a trial installation my my pri
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Robert Barbey
wrote:
> Rob,
>
> thanks for the quick answer. Unfortunately, I wasn't talking about the Writer
> extension but about the Maven plug-in. It hasn't been decided yet whether the
> extension will be publicly available.
>
> Sorry for the confusion!
>
(
Rob,
thanks for the quick answer. Unfortunately, I wasn't talking about the Writer
extension but about the Maven plug-in. It hasn't been decided yet whether the
extension will be publicly available.
Sorry for the confusion!
Robert
On Nov 21, 2012, at 10:37 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Nov
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:19 PM, jan iversen wrote:
> Help me out please...
>
> 1) I thought imacat had helped me update l10n to the standard template, is
> that the same as branding ?
> 2) SVN stores the full html, if I modify that will I then loose the mdtext
> (I have never understood where mdt
Help me out please...
1) I thought imacat had helped me update l10n to the standard template, is
that the same as branding ?
2) SVN stores the full html, if I modify that will I then loose the mdtext
(I have never understood where mdtext is stored, it seems to be somewhere
locally in cms) ?
3) Wou
jan iversen wrote:
the l10n.openoffice.org, still has the old banner ?
Should I do something, I thought that when someone updated the master
template, it was all changed ??
If you use custom branding (and /l10n does, like /it does) you need to
update the banner manually: see
http://svn.apache
Sorry for saying it, but having promoted my companies most of my life, I
have learned one thing about the media
"good news is no news, bad news sells adverts"
I see your point, and I have been in there (too many times), but that is
not my point...we need to make sure we do not loose the IT de
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:54 PM, jan iversen wrote:
> If I may say so, based on my experience, we should not go too much into
> details about versions, this is about having a heterogeneous environment,
> something that most IT departments try to avoid at all cost, and AOO just
> happened to be the
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Robert Barbey
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> as I mentioned earlier on this list, I'm working on a Writer extension in
> Java. We're using Maven as a build tool and I wanted to let Maven generate
> description.xml and update.xml files based on the information in the P
Hi everyone,
as I mentioned earlier on this list, I'm working on a Writer extension in Java.
We're using Maven as a build tool and I wanted to let Maven generate
description.xml and update.xml files based on the information in the POM.
That's why I started writing a Maven plug-in that can do th
Am 11/21/2012 09:41 PM, schrieb jan iversen:
On 21 November 2012 21:30, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I got the impression that the majority would support a
4.0 version as our next release.
So do I.
Besides the next major release we should also continue the discussion o
thanks for your reply.
On 21 November 2012 21:17, TJ Frazier wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 14:24, jan iversen wrote:
>
>> having looked at the mediawiki pages, especially the amount of updates,
>> and
>> make a trial installation my my private server, I know I can cope with the
>> maintenance problems
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:17 PM, TJ Frazier wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 14:24, jan iversen wrote:
>>
>> having looked at the mediawiki pages, especially the amount of updates,
>> and
>> make a trial installation my my private server, I know I can cope with the
>> maintenance problems (but NOT with spam
On 21 November 2012 21:30, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> I got the impression that the majority would support a
>> 4.0 version as our next release.
>>
>
> So do I.
>
>
> Besides the next major release we should also continue the discussion on
>> further language packs based
Am 11/21/2012 01:07 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
Hi,
first of all I would like to volunteer again as release manager for our
next release if it's ok for our community.
Sure, I would support this.
Second I would like to define with you what our next release will be.
After various discussion an
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I got the impression that the majority would support a
4.0 version as our next release.
So do I.
Besides the next major release we should also continue the discussion on
further language packs based on 3.4.1 to make the latest translations
available as soon as possible.
Indeed, great update. :-)
Marcus
Am 11/21/2012 06:59 PM, schrieb jan iversen:
Wow, that is really impressing
jan.
On 21 November 2012 17:47, Rob Weir wrote:
Sorry, I failed to announce that we hit the 25 million download mark
last Thursday. We're now almost at 26M.
See: http://ww
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:01 PM, jan iversen wrote:
> You are doing an extremely fine job, recruiting new volunteers, and as we
> all can see it works (maybe we should get a couple more developers).
>
> Is somebody doing a follow-up in the form of registering something like.
> - how many voluntee
On 11/21/2012 14:24, jan iversen wrote:
having looked at the mediawiki pages, especially the amount of updates, and
make a trial installation my my private server, I know I can cope with the
maintenance problems (but NOT with spam attacks, that requires more than
just one person).
If the communi
the l10n.openoffice.org, still has the old banner ?
Should I do something, I thought that when someone updated the master
template, it was all changed ??
I also tested qa.openoffice.org which are ok, in respect of the banner, but
has a message saying that the page is outdated, and the page it lin
You are doing an extremely fine job, recruiting new volunteers, and as we
all can see it works (maybe we should get a couple more developers).
Is somebody doing a follow-up in the form of registering something like.
- how many volunteers registered their interest,
- how many are are still active
New blog post up:
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/call_for_marketing_volunteers
If anyone is interested, more detailed information is in the blog post
and referenced pages.
Also, I'd appreciate any help you might be able to offer in spreading
news of this blog post via Twitter, Facebook, Googl
having looked at the mediawiki pages, especially the amount of updates, and
make a trial installation my my private server, I know I can cope with the
maintenance problems (but NOT with spam attacks, that requires more than
just one person).
If the community agrees to it, using the lazy consensus,
If I may say so, based on my experience, we should not go too much into
details about versions, this is about having a heterogeneous environment,
something that most IT departments try to avoid at all cost, and AOO just
happened to be the excuse for making the structure slimmer. In my opinion a
res
On 21/11/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
Freiburg putting the blame for the challenges of managing
heterogeneous IT systems solely on an old version of OpenOffice.org is
wrong and unfair, IMHO. But it is common.
Indeed this is quite common. But, if in this case we have reasons to
believe that better pra
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> With the holiday weekend coming up, I'd like
> to suggest that that's as good a time as any
>
> to adjust the location of your svn tree to
> top-level. Instead of doing a straight svn mv
> of the tree, I plan to copy it instead and
> set the
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
> Here's the response from LO referenced in the story:
> http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2012/11/16/open-letter-to-the-city-of-freiburg/
>
Thanks for this, Andrew. Sad and shortsighted to say the least.
The comments on this same page were en
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:35:56 +0100
Armin Le Grand wrote:
> Hi Regina,
>
> On 21.11.2012 15:32, Regina Henschel wrote:
> > Hi Jürgen,
> ---snip---
> > We are planning some bigger UI changes for the next release (sidebar)
> >> and such UI changes are always a good indicator for a new major re
Wow, that is really impressing
jan.
On 21 November 2012 17:47, Rob Weir wrote:
> Sorry, I failed to announce that we hit the 25 million download mark
> last Thursday. We're now almost at 26M.
>
> See: http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html
>
> -Rob
>
Rob Weir wrote:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=call_for_marketing_volunteers
Nice post, and I see it's now published at
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/call_for_marketing_volunteers
but I would suggest to consider a couple of items for community development:
1) The call
Hi Regina,
On 21.11.2012 15:32, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
---snip---
We are planning some bigger UI changes for the next release (sidebar)
and such UI changes are always a good indicator for a new major release
to signal our users bigger changers. I know Ariel has also some
incomp
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Nov 21, 2012, at 6:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Ian C wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> saw this today
>>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9233890/German_city_dumps_OpenOffice_switches_to_Microsoft?source
Dave Fisher wrote on Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 08:35:39 -0800:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Nov 21, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > With the holiday weekend coming up, I'd like
> > to suggest that that's as good a time as any
> >
> > to adjust the location of your svn tree to
> > top-lev
Sorry, I failed to announce that we hit the 25 million download mark
last Thursday. We're now almost at 26M.
See: http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html
-Rob
On Nov 21, 2012, at 6:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Ian C wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> saw this today
>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9233890/German_city_dumps_OpenOffice_switches_to_Microsoft?source=CTWNLE_nlt_pm_2012-11-20
>>
>> Maybe an upgrade from 3.2 wou
Hi Joe,
Thanks!
On Nov 21, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> With the holiday weekend coming up, I'd like
> to suggest that that's as good a time as any
>
> to adjust the location of your svn tree to
> top-level. Instead of doing a straight svn mv
> of the tree, I plan to copy it instead
Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
Hi,
first of all I would like to volunteer again as release manager for our
next release if it's ok for our community.
+1
+1 on that from me also
Sec
On 11/21/2012 09:25, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
Hi, all,
I created a wiki to show some fidelity improvement samples since AOO
3.4.1 in our current build:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Fidelity_Improvement_Since_AOO341#OOXML_Support
The purpose of this wiki is to promote our signifi
With the holiday weekend coming up, I'd like
to suggest that that's as good a time as any
to adjust the location of your svn tree to
top-level. Instead of doing a straight svn mv
of the tree, I plan to copy it instead and
set the old location read-only, given that
past source releases still depen
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
> Regina Henschel wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jürgen,
>>
>> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> first of all I would like to volunteer again as release manager for our
>>> next release if it's ok for our community.
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
> +1 on that f
Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
Hi,
first of all I would like to volunteer again as release manager for our
next release if it's ok for our community.
+1
+1 on that from me also
Second I would like to define with you what our next release will be.
After various
On 11/13/12 5:27 PM, Cassi DeMars wrote:
>
>>
>> I have to confess that I am a little bit lost to get a complete overview
>> of all the branding relevant things.
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>
>
>
> We can create something unique and custom for you in all sorts of file
> formats
> so it displays properly
On 11/21/12 4:22 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Regina Henschel
> wrote:
>> Hi Jürgen,
>>
>> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> first of all I would like to volunteer again as release manager for our
>>> next release if it's ok for our community.
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Regina Henschel
wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> first of all I would like to volunteer again as release manager for our
>> next release if it's ok for our community.
>
>
> +1
>
>
>>
>> Second I would like to define with you what our n
Hi Jürgen,
Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
Hi,
first of all I would like to volunteer again as release manager for our
next release if it's ok for our community.
+1
Second I would like to define with you what our next release will be.
After various discussion and activities on the mailing list and
Hi, all,
I created a wiki to show some fidelity improvement samples since AOO
3.4.1 in our current build:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Fidelity_Improvement_Since_AOO341#OOXML_Support
The purpose of this wiki is to promote our significant fidelity
enhancements with shining sampl
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:06 PM, F C. Costero wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=call_for_marketing_volunteers
>
> A minor point about "perhaps second only to Linux and Firefox". Can
> OpenOffice be second to two other
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Ian C wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> saw this today
> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9233890/German_city_dumps_OpenOffice_switches_to_Microsoft?source=CTWNLE_nlt_pm_2012-11-20
>
> Maybe an upgrade from 3.2 would help them?
>
It is bizarre. They ran their desktops
Xue Fei,
Thanks for kick off this topic! It is very important for us to begin
think about 4.0 testing target and process!
IMO, 4.0 final regression test is unlikely to happen in this year, since
there are many big features we'd like to have in 4.0.
While one thing I think we can do from now
My dear dev team,
I am an user, so there is only an user opinion: a new UI? great!
+1
Emanuel Almeida
IT Analist
jan iversen wrote on 21/11/2012 11:34:41:
> +1 for 4.0, graduation is a very good argument.
>
> And thanks for volunteering, you have a big job ahead of you.
>
> Jan.
>
>
> On
+1 for 4.0, graduation is a very good argument.
And thanks for volunteering, you have a big job ahead of you.
Jan.
On 21 November 2012 14:24, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
> +1 for 4.0.
> We really should have a big release after graduation.
>
> - Shenfeng (Simon)
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Jürgen Schmidt
>
> >
+1 for 4.0.
We really should have a big release after graduation.
- Shenfeng (Simon)
2012/11/21 Jürgen Schmidt
> Hi,
>
> first of all I would like to volunteer again as release manager for our
> next release if it's ok for our community.
>
> Second I would like to define with you what our next
Hi,
first of all I would like to volunteer again as release manager for our
next release if it's ok for our community.
Second I would like to define with you what our next release will be.
After various discussion and activities on the mailing list and also at
the ApacheCon, I got the impression
Dong Bin,
Welcome to join us!
There are a lot of ways you can participate in Apache OpenOffice.
Please refer to the following if you didn't yet:
- http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/get-involved.html
- http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/orientation/index.html
We are
On Tuesday 20 Nov 2012 21:06:29 F C. Costero wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> > https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=call_for_marketing_vo
> > lunteers
> A minor point about "perhaps second only to Linux and Firefox". Can
> OpenOffice be second to two other
On Tuesday 20 Nov 2012 19:20:03 Rob Weir wrote:
> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=call_for_marketing_volunt
> eers
Single word, Bloody Brilliant.. yea I know...
Except for the linux thing, I know a lot of us Penguinistas would like to
think different but the fact is
Now i
On 11/20/12 1:16 AM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>
> On 11/19/2012 4:13 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>>
>> On 11/19/2012 3:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> Re this discussion initiated by Marcus on Nov 9 (I know longer have
>>> the original):
>>>
>>> http://markmail.org/message/fz7mkldympxwrnvn
>>>
>>> Whole looking
Hi, all
I have checked pvt reports after r1400866, and it is becoming stable except
for 3 issues[1][2][3] refered by linyi. Maybe new code delivery has fix
this unstable problem. I suggest that we can wait for pvt results of
following revisions and check their status. If this problem still exists,
Hi,
maybe it helps if someone documents the usage of issue ids within the
source code for unexperienced developers.
In this example the issue represented by i120928 ( := OOo Issue Tracker
ID 120928 ) is to be resolved to
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120928
Am 21.11.2012 08
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
ok I was on vacation and haven't seen this in time but I ask why we had
not simply add it to the existing pages
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Conferences/FOSDEM
We had an overall overview page conferences that aggregates all pages
with the category "conference".
The new
69 matches
Mail list logo
