On Friday, 22 April 2016 at 01:53:02 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 22 April 2016 at 00:35:21 UTC, Mithun Hunsur wrote:
supporting the presentation rather than _being_ the
presentation).
Powerpoints have a bad habit of damaging presentations rather
than supporting them...
I hate slid
On Friday, 22 April 2016 at 00:35:21 UTC, Mithun Hunsur wrote:
supporting the presentation rather than _being_ the
presentation).
Powerpoints have a bad habit of damaging presentations rather
than supporting them...
I hate slides. Focus on making interesting content and consider
doing a ha
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 07:53:53 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Many programmers (me included) are not good with picking colors
and thus presentations usually don't look as good as they could.
Ill just leave this here
http://i2.wp.com/socialmediaguerilla.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/data-in
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 22:37:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/20/2016 12:53 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Is there a official presentation template for Dconf 2016? If
not it would be
greate if someone could create one. Many programmers (me
included) are not good
with picking colors and thus
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 03:09:43 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 23:51:41 UTC, Seb wrote:
Honestly I prefer 1) - the changelog entry can be approved &
checked during the code review on Github and the reviewers can
check that such an addition is provided in th
On 4/20/2016 12:53 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Is there a official presentation template for Dconf 2016? If not it would be
greate if someone could create one. Many programmers (me included) are not good
with picking colors and thus presentations usually don't look as good as they
could.
I found
Am Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:34:35 +
schrieb Matthias Klumpp :
> Hi, and thanks for your detailed explanations!
You're welcome :-)
> On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 11:49:13 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> > On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 01:01:01 UTC, Matthias Klumpp
> > wrote:
> >> [...]
> >
> > Y
On 4/21/2016 8:47 AM, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
Issue created:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15947
Thank you.
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 20:40:03 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 07:53:53 UTC, Benjamin Thaut
wrote:
Many programmers (me included) are not good with picking
colors and thus presentations usually don't look as good as
they could.
My advice for "graphical-design-challeng
> > You can only install headers for one library version with this
> > approach! A versioned approach is nicer
> > /usr/include/d/libfoo/1.0.0 but requires explicit compiler
> > support and it's unlikely this will happen (or explicit dub
> > support and you compile everything through dub).
>
Am Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:34:35 +
schrieb Matthias Klumpp :
> That doesn't seem to be the case for LDC on Debian... It installs
> Phobos into /usr/include/d/std, which makes GDC go crazy as soon
> as LDC is installed too.
See also:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.1433.1460903305.26339.digi
Am Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:01:01 +
schrieb Matthias Klumpp :
> Hello!
> Me bringing dub to Debian (and subsequently Ubuntu) has sparked
> quite some interest in getting more D applications shipped in
> Linux distributions.
Having been in a similar situation years ago, I can share my
experience
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 09:07:57 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 01:01:01 UTC, Matthias Klumpp
wrote:
The question here is also, which compiler should be the
default (which IMHO would be the most complete, most bug-free
actively maintained one ^^).
Is performan
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 10:57:12 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
Humm, when I searched whether it should work, I only found a
reassuring post by Walter[1] almost a year ago. The issue
tracker does not seem to contain an entry either. Perhaps I
should create one, then.
[1] http://forum.dlang
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 11:58:23 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 01:01:01 UTC, Matthias Klumpp
wrote:
[...]
Many D users are enthusiasts and push the compiler to its
limits, they are usually stuck with DMD (even DMD HEAD
sometimes) as it provides the latest fixes. It
Hi, and thanks for your detailed explanations!
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 11:49:13 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 01:01:01 UTC, Matthias Klumpp
wrote:
[...]
You currently can't install druntime or phobos headers in this
directory, as each compiler will have slight
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 13:42:50 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 09:15:05 UTC, Thiez wrote:
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 04:07:52 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
I'd say either you specify the amount of retries, or give
some amount that would be acceptable for some bac
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 13:42:50 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 09:15:05 UTC, Thiez wrote:
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 04:07:52 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
I'd say either you specify the amount of retries, or give
some amount that would be acceptable for some bac
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 12:45:34 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/19/16 6:04 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 April 2016 at 14:53:18 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
or we
should do away with requiring handling all enum cases.
Are you suggesting getting rid of final switch
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 13:43:59 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Hi,
When I attempt to run the Phobos tests on my machine, I get the
following:
[...]
Should anyone run into this, these disappeared after updating
snn.lib.
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 09:15:05 UTC, Thiez wrote:
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 04:07:52 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
I'd say either you specify the amount of retries, or give
some amount that would be acceptable for some background
program to retry for. Say, 30 seconds.
Would that actua
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 09:23:26 UTC, tcak wrote:
You are using "spawn". So it is a multithreaded program.
-profile=gc doesn't work with multithreadd programs. Always
creates problems.
Then it would probably help if that is mentioned on this page
somewhere.
https://dlang.org/dmd-wind
On 4/20/16 3:53 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Is there a official presentation template for Dconf 2016? If not it
would be greate if someone could create one. Many programmers (me
included) are not good with picking colors and thus presentations
usually don't look as good as they could.
Kind Regards
On 4/20/16 4:23 AM, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 06:36:01 UTC, bearophile wrote:
It's easy to cover all the values in a switch, using ranges.
Not as easy as you would think:
int i;
switch(i) {
case 0: .. case 9:
break;
case 10: .
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 19:32:01 UTC, Basile Burg wrote:
a system exist to throw @nogc exceptions that would work in
this case (the message doesn't have to be customized so it can
be static):
@nogc @safe
void throwStaticEx(T, string file = __FILE__, size_t line =
__LINE__)()
{
sta
On 4/19/16 6:04 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 April 2016 at 14:53:18 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
or we
should do away with requiring handling all enum cases.
Are you suggesting getting rid of final switch ?
No, what I'm suggesting is that final switch behave consistently. For
On 4/20/16 11:09 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 23:51:41 UTC, Seb wrote:
Honestly I prefer 1) - the changelog entry can be approved & checked
during the code review on Github and the reviewers can check that such
an addition is provided in the PR. On a new release w
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 01:01:01 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
## How complete are the free compilers?
This is an important question, because we would need to know
whether we can expect D code to be compiled by any compiler, or
whether there are tradeoffs that must be made.
This question is
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 11:49:13 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I'd love to have some extended compiler support (so you could
simply do gdc -use=libfoo:1.0.0 and this would pick up the
correct headers and linker flags). But as some DMD maintainers
are opposed to this idea it won't happen. You'
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 01:01:01 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
## Where should D source-code / D interfaces be put?
If I install a D library or source-only module as a
distribution package, where should the sources be put? So far,
I have seen:
* /usr/include/d
* /usr/include/dlang/
* /u
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 00:55:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
qznc wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 07:53:53 UTC, Benjamin Thaut
wrote:
Many programmers (me included) are not good with picking
colors and thus presentations usually don't look as good as
they could.
My advice fo
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 08:30:59 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 01:01:01 UTC, Matthias Klumpp
wrote:
## How complete are the free compilers?
## Why is every D compiler shipping an own version of Phobos?
The constraints on shipping a shared phobos between them:
ABI c
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 09:23:26 UTC, tcak wrote:
I'm trying to use DMD option "-profile=gc".
You are using "spawn". So it is a multithreaded program.
-profile=gc doesn't work with multithreadd programs. Always
creates problems.
Humm, when I searched whether it should work, I only fo
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 09:00:41 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 08:10:15 UTC, Dsby wrote:
I see https://dlang.org/deprecate.html#delete
...
so, I want to know why don't destroy direct printf ?
if you call destroy on struct pointer it is same as assign null
to i
On Tuesday, 19 April 2016 at 13:34:24 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 April 2016 at 13:05:35 UTC, tcak wrote:
I would recommend making a copy of the whole repository locally
before any of that just in case you mess something up, at least
while you're not as confident with git.
Isn't i
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 22:31:31 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 22:27:36 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko
wrote:
I'm trying to use DMD option "-profile=gc". With this option,
the following simple program crashes with 2.071.0 down to
2.069.0 but still works on 2.068.2. The c
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 04:07:52 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
I'd say either you specify the amount of retries, or give some
amount that would be acceptable for some background program to
retry for. Say, 30 seconds.
Would that actually be more helpful than simply printing an OOM
message a
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 17:42:03 UTC, Basile Burg wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 10:19:17 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
Anyway, something need to be changed.
a) allow Range Cases (nice for ints but bad idea for enums)
b) require also non-enum types to explicitly state all c
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 01:01:01 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
The question here is also, which compiler should be the default
(which IMHO would be the most complete, most bug-free actively
maintained one ^^).
Is performance of the outputted code a criterium? Or the number
of supported
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 01:01:01 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
## How complete are the free compilers?
## Why is every D compiler shipping an own version of Phobos?
These two can be answered at once. LDC and GDC share the same
frontend code as DMD, but not the glue layer and backend (don't
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 17:21 +, Karabuta via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> […]
>
> Works well for Fedora 23 in software centre. I will recommended
> Fedora 24 for 3.20
I have submitted a bug report for the failure on Fedora Rawhide.
--
Russel.
==
On 4/20/2016 5:08 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
I have an idea already, are they being accepted or only in Berlin?
Since we may get to 150 people attending, we have to be a little more organized
about this than usual :-)
An awful lot of the attendees have names I don't recognize, so they may not be
42 matches
Mail list logo
