Re: [O] How to escape an asterisk on org-mode

2014-06-12 Thread Albert Krewinkel
Hi James, James Ryland Miller writes: > I'm trying to escape an asterisk character, i.e. "*" to use in regular > text. I.e., "The person wanted to say *BSD". And I don't want to use a > verbatim or code block because monospace is not what I need. > > I've tried \* to escape the character and it d

[O] bug#17746: bug#17746: 24.4.50; "byte-code: `recenter'ing a window that does not display current-buffer." when composing a message

2014-06-12 Thread Nicolas Richard
Daimrod writes: >> PS: The change about throwing an error when recentering a window >> that does not display the current buffer breaks ~37 tests in Org >> master branch, even with this fix. I need to digg this further. > > Err, what's the rational behind this change? It is meant to catch cases w

[O] bug#17746: bug#17746: 24.4.50; "byte-code: `recenter'ing a window that does not display current-buffer." when composing a message

2014-06-12 Thread Daimrod
Nicolas Richard writes: > Daimrod writes: >>> PS: The change about throwing an error when recentering a window >>> that does not display the current buffer breaks ~37 tests in Org >>> master branch, even with this fix. I need to digg this further. >> >> Err, what's the rational behind this chan

Re: [O] How to escape an asterisk on org-mode

2014-06-12 Thread James Miller
Thank you very much. That was most informative. Sent from James Miller's iPhone. > On Jun 12, 2014, at 3:01 AM, Albert Krewinkel wrote: > > Hi James, > > James Ryland Miller writes: >> I'm trying to escape an asterisk character, i.e. "*" to use in regular >> text. I.e., "The person wanted t

[O] bug#17746: bug#17746: 24.4.50; "byte-code: `recenter'ing a window that does not display current-buffer." when composing a message

2014-06-12 Thread Daimrod
Daimrod writes: > Nicolas Richard writes: > >> Daimrod writes: PS: The change about throwing an error when recentering a window that does not display the current buffer breaks ~37 tests in Org master branch, even with this fix. I need to digg this further. >>> >>> Err, what's th

[O] bug#17746: bug#17746: 24.4.50; "byte-code: `recenter'ing a window that does not display current-buffer." when composing a message

2014-06-12 Thread Bastien
I've now fixed this in the maint and master branch of Org's repository. Firmly waiting for warnings from the CAR and CDR random checks! -- Bastien

[O] bug#17746: bug#17746: 24.4.50; "byte-code: `recenter'ing a window that does not display current-buffer." when composing a message

2014-06-12 Thread Daimrod
Daimrod writes: > Daimrod writes: > >> Nicolas Richard writes: >> >>> Daimrod writes: > PS: The change about throwing an error when recentering a window > that does not display the current buffer breaks ~37 tests in Org > master branch, even with this fix. I need to digg this furt

[O] bug#17746: bug#17746: 24.4.50; "byte-code: `recenter'ing a window that does not display current-buffer." when composing a message

2014-06-12 Thread Bastien
Daimrod writes: > I've read the fix in org-mode and I understand that it was a silly > question. Please ignore it. Well, the whole thread gave me the guts to dive in and to find, as often, how tiny the challenge was -- so thanks for soft-prodding! -- Bastien

[O] Alternative to arrow keys (more ergonomic)?

2014-06-12 Thread Martin Beck
I'm using Shift+RightArrow and Shift+LeftArrow quite often to change the scheduled or deadline dates of a task in my agenda view.   As I have a normal large keyboard (where the arrow keys are between the alphanumeric block and the numeric keypad like here: http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/_base_

Re: [O] Alternative to arrow keys (more ergonomic)?

2014-06-12 Thread Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo
Hi Martin, "Martin Beck" writes: > I'm using Shift+RightArrow and Shift+LeftArrow quite often to change > the scheduled or deadline dates of a task in my agenda view. As I have > a normal large keyboard (where the arrow keys are between the > alphanumeric block and the numeric keypad like here:

Re: [O] Alternative to arrow keys (more ergonomic)?

2014-06-12 Thread Thorsten Jolitz
jorge.a.alf...@gmail.com (Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo) writes: Hi, > I have the (totally useless) CapsLock key of my keyboard remapped to > Hyper, which allows me to use an extra modifier for emacs commands. > > For your case after you have a Hyper key you could "make" your own arrow > keys without y

Re: [O] Alternative to arrow keys (more ergonomic)?

2014-06-12 Thread Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo
Thorsten Jolitz writes: > Just out of curiosity - did you try this on the console (without X) too? Xmodmap does not work without X, at least I suppose that is what the X stands for =) If someone knows how to remap outside of X please let me know. Since I use emacs not in X in my phone, my wor

[O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Mark Edgington
In using org-mode, there is one problem that has always irked me (and is apparently also closely related to the FAQ "How do I ignore a headline?"). When I am writing something, I sometimes want to group things by concept or by work to be done, or any other number of groupings. BUT I do not want t

Re: [O] How to escape an asterisk on org-mode

2014-06-12 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, James Miller writes: > Thank you very much. That was most informative. For completeness, you can "escape" an asterisk in Org using entities, in this case \ast{}, or \star{}: "The person wanted to say \ast{}BSD. Now this is bold*" Unfortunately, for obvious reasons, this will not work

Re: [O] Alternative to arrow keys (more ergonomic)?

2014-06-12 Thread Thorsten Jolitz
jorge.a.alf...@gmail.com (Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo) writes: > Thorsten Jolitz writes: > >> Just out of curiosity - did you try this on the console (without X) too? > > Xmodmap does not work without X, at least I suppose that is what the X > stands for =) I know, thats why I asked. > If someone

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Thorsten Jolitz
Mark Edgington writes: > In using org-mode, there is one problem that has always irked me (and > is apparently also closely related to the FAQ "How do I ignore a > headline?"). When I am writing something, I sometimes want to group > things by concept or by work to be done, or any other number o

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Mark Edgington
Thorsten Jolitz gmail.com> writes: > > In a tree structure, when ignoring the parent node, it seems only > logical that the siblings are ignored too. > > You seem to use the wrong tool for the task (headlines), this looks like > a perfect use case for TAGS, i.e. define your (concept) groups as

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Thorsten Jolitz
Ken Mankoff writes: > Another common (for me) example is to have a heading called "* Appendix" > in a paper, and then the LaTeX "\appendix" command. The Org heading is > just for me. It should not be exported. All headings below the \appendix > command are Org sub-sections but should be promoted

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Eric Schulte
Mark Edgington writes: > In using org-mode, there is one problem that has always irked me (and > is apparently also closely related to the FAQ "How do I ignore a > headline?"). When I am writing something, I sometimes want to group > things by concept or by work to be done, or any other number o

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Ken Mankoff
+1 to the OP. On 2014-06-12 at 13:32, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: > > In a tree structure, when ignoring the parent node, it seems only > logical that the siblings are ignored too. I'm found myself in all of the following situations: 1. I want the heading and everything below not-exported 2. I w

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Ken Mankoff
On 2014-06-12 at 14:11, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: > Ken Mankoff writes: > >> Another common (for me) example is to have a heading called "* >> Appendix" in a paper, and then the LaTeX "\appendix" command. The Org >> heading is just for me. It should not be exported. All headings below >> the \append

[O] can show inline images anymore in orgmode

2014-06-12 Thread Xebar Saram
Hi all i have a weird problem. in the last few weeks i cant get orgmode to show inline images anymore. when i use org-toggle-inline-images i get the following error: progn: Wrong type argument: stringp, nil [2 times] can anyone help me to debug this? best Z.

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Aaron Ecay
Hi Eric, hi all, 2014ko ekainak 12an, Eric Schulte-ek idatzi zuen: > > I just ran across this need myself, and updated an old solution to work > with the new exporter. See the thread and my solution at the following. > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-06/msg00238.html It’

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Nicolas Girard
2014-06-12 20:54 GMT+02:00 Aaron Ecay : > Hi Eric, hi all, > > 2014ko ekainak 12an, Eric Schulte-ek idatzi zuen: >> >> I just ran across this need myself, and updated an old solution to work >> with the new exporter. See the thread and my solution at the following. >> >> http://lists.gnu.org/archi

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Nicolas Girard
2014-06-12 21:21 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Girard : > 2014-06-12 20:54 GMT+02:00 Aaron Ecay : >> Hi Eric, hi all, > > > I also ran across this need. What I had in mind was that certain todo > types would be treated as inline. > For instance, if "P" was a member of this hypothetical > org-inline-todo-keywor

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Ken Mankoff
On 2014-06-12 at 15:21, Nicolas Girard wrote: > I also ran across this need. What I had in mind was that certain todo > types would be treated as inline. > ... > Such a feature is more generic and would be useful in other contexts ; > and the LaTeX-related issues discussed in this thread would b

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Nicolas Girard
2014-06-12 21:26 GMT+02:00 Ken Mankoff : > > On 2014-06-12 at 15:21, Nicolas Girard wrote: > > I vote for the following tags: > > + :noexport: Does not export item, content, and children. > + :ignoreheading: Does not export heading. Exports content and children. > + :ignorecontent: Does not export

Re: [O] org-mime spurious alternative

2014-06-12 Thread Eric Schulte
Sébastien Delafond writes: > Hello, > > from Debian bug #751014 (http://bugs.debian.org/751014): > > When org-mime-library is set to semi, org-mime generates a spurious > alternative section around the HTML part. This is due to two bugs in > the function org-mime-multipart: > > 1. it att

Re: [O] How to specify the tangled comment to be the location of the noweb ref definition instead of where it was tangled?

2014-06-12 Thread Eric Schulte
> > How do I make the code comment specify the actual location of the source block > ref, not just where it was expanded and tangled? > Currently inserting comments around snippets of code expanded with noweb is not supported. You may be able to fake this through the clever use of variables along

Re: [O] [bug][babel] noweb gotcha

2014-06-12 Thread Eric Schulte
Charles Berry writes: > The following > > , > | #+PROPERTY: tangle yes > | > | #+NAME: print-abc > | #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp > | (format > | "<<%s>>" "abc") > | #+END_SRC > | > | #+NAME: print-def > | #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp > | (concat > | "<<" "def" ">>") > | #+END_SRC > | > | #+BEGIN_SR

Re: [O] A simple org tangle and weave makefile

2014-06-12 Thread Eric Schulte
Grant Rettke writes: > Hi, > > My goals was to have a simple makefile to tangle and weave a document; > so org-mk was out of scope. > > Just wondering; how could I have done it better? > > ## > INIT=.emacs.el > > $(INIT): TC3F.org > time emacs --batch --no-init-file --load .org-mode.emacs

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Eric Schulte
> > I also ran across this need. What I had in mind was that certain todo > types would be treated as inline. > For instance, if "P" was a member of this hypothetical > org-inline-todo-keywords, then > > * P a paragraph > some contents > > would be rendered as > > some contents > > by the exporte

Re: [O] patch: Oracle engine for SQL blocks

2014-06-12 Thread Eric Schulte
Hi John, This patch looks great. Given it's length FSF copyright assignment will be required so please begin that process and when it is complete I'll be very happy to apply this patch. Thanks, Eric "John Dell'Aquila" writes: > Hi, > > This patch makes Oracle a supported database for SQL sour

Re: [O] [bug][babel] noweb gotcha

2014-06-12 Thread Charles C. Berry
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Eric Schulte wrote: Charles Berry writes: The following , | #+PROPERTY: tangle yes | | #+NAME: print-abc | #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp | (format | "<<%s>>" "abc") | #+END_SRC | | #+NAME: print-def | #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp | (concat | "<<" "def" ">>") | #+END_SRC | | #+BEG

Re: [O] can show inline images anymore in orgmode

2014-06-12 Thread Daimrod
Xebar Saram writes: > Hi all Hi, > i have a weird problem. in the last few weeks i cant get orgmode to show > inline images anymore. when i use org-toggle-inline-images i get the > following error: > > progn: Wrong type argument: stringp, nil [2 times] > > can anyone help me to debug this? 1.

Re: [O] controling width of graphviz source block result

2014-06-12 Thread regcl
Hi Nicolas, Thank you for your earlier comments. In order to adjust the scaling of a graphic generated by a R source block I am doing this ... ** adjusting scaling of a figure generated from source #+begin_src R :results graphics silent :file foo2.pdf :exports results plot(c(1:10), c(10:1))

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Nicolas Girard
2014-06-12 22:13 GMT+02:00 Eric Schulte : >> > > Why TODO types rather than a tag? IMO using a TODO type would conflate > task management and document structuring. Agreed. > What do you think about the > attached patch which should add this functionality to the core. > Seems fine to me ! I cre

Re: [O] [bug][babel] noweb gotcha

2014-06-12 Thread Eric Schulte
"Charles C. Berry" writes: > On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Eric Schulte wrote: > >> Charles Berry writes: >> >>> The following >>> >>> , >>> | #+PROPERTY: tangle yes >>> | >>> | #+NAME: print-abc >>> | #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp >>> | (format >>> | "<<%s>>" "abc") >>> | #+END_SRC >>> | >>> | #+NAME: prin

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Eric Schulte
Nicolas Girard writes: > 2014-06-12 22:13 GMT+02:00 Eric Schulte : >>> >> >> Why TODO types rather than a tag? IMO using a TODO type would conflate >> task management and document structuring. > > Agreed. > >> What do you think about the >> attached patch which should add this functionality to t

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Ken Mankoff
On 2014-06-12 at 16:13, Eric Schulte wrote: > What do you think about the attached patch which should add this > functionality to the core. Why "inline"? Org already has "inline TODO items" which is a different thing. I don't think the word "inline" signifies that a heading will or won't be e

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Eric Schulte
Ken Mankoff writes: > On 2014-06-12 at 16:13, Eric Schulte wrote: >> What do you think about the attached patch which should add this >> functionality to the core. > > Why "inline"? > > Org already has "inline TODO items" which is a different thing. > > I don't think the word "inline" signifies

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Samuel Wales
if i were a newcomer i'd wonder how these affected babel, agenda, etc. maybe noexport, noexportheading, noexportcontent, exportpromotechildren? On 6/12/14, Ken Mankoff wrote: > + :noexport: Does not export item, content, and children. > + :ignoreheading: Does not export heading. Exports content

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
Mark Edgington writes: > In using org-mode, there is one problem that has always irked me (and > is apparently also closely related to the FAQ "How do I ignore a > headline?"). When I am writing something, I sometimes want to group > things by concept or by work to be done, or any other number o

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Ken Mankoff
Hi Eric, On 2014-06-12 at 20:46, Eric Schulte wrote: Can you suggest a more intuitive/appropriate tag name? I'm not personally partial to "inline", it was just the first thing that occurred to me. Previous implementations of similar behavior used the tag "prelim". I posted the following b

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Mark Edgington
Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes: > Ken Mankoff gmail.com> writes: > > > > I don't think the word "inline" signifies that a heading will or won't > > be exported and/or its children promoted. > > > > Can you suggest a more intuitive/appropriate tag name? Would it be possible / sensible to allow

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Mark Edgington
Eric Abrahamsen ericabrahamsen.net> writes: > > It looks like a groundswell for remove-andor-promote tags for headlines, > but for the sake of argument let me propose the use of blocks. It seems > to me that something like a "generic block" (a block that does nothing > but delete its begin/end de

Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

2014-06-12 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
Mark Edgington writes: > Eric Abrahamsen ericabrahamsen.net> writes: >> >> It looks like a groundswell for remove-andor-promote tags for headlines, >> but for the sake of argument let me propose the use of blocks. It seems >> to me that something like a "generic block" (a block that does nothin

Re: [O] a minor patch to awk invocation

2014-06-12 Thread Achim Gratz
The problem was that a) I'm using tcsh. b) Some part of the system-wide csh.cshrc related to Emacs' shell-mode was also run for non-interactive shell invocation while only appropriate for interactive use (that's where the errors from tset and stty came from). c) Your second patch 6fb03

Re: [O] babel C, C++, D enhancement

2014-06-12 Thread Achim Gratz
Eric Schulte writes: > This new patch looks great, and the test suite passes locally. I've > just applied it. You also get a warning from the byte-compiler on something that is clearly a bug. I think the fix should be: --8<---cut here---start->8--- diff --git