Re: [fossil-users] Compiler warnings

2016-08-02 Thread Scott Robison
On Aug 2, 2016 9:12 AM, "Richard Hipp" wrote: > > On 8/2/16, Ron W wrote: > > > > Are there really still compilers in use > > that don't implement C99? > > > > I still build Fossil on a circa-2002 iBook. (See section 4 of > http://fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/build.wiki). I do not know >

Re: [fossil-users] Fix for stash-next pointer (fix for the fix)

2016-08-18 Thread Scott Robison
l expects me to read the output to understand the current state and status of commands issued? That's pretty user unfriendly... -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-11 Thread Scott Robison
o estimate where Fossil might > be a reasonable solution and where some other approach is needed. > I may not be understanding you, but from my point of view, it already does what you want by supporting versioned files that you simply never change. For example, you could have a repo that has a str

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-11 Thread Scott Robison
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: > On 09/11/2016 04:42 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > > I may not be understanding you, but from my point of view, it already > > does what you want by supporting versioned files that you simply never > > change. For example,

Re: [fossil-users] Files named "AUX" on Windows

2016-10-04 Thread Scott Robison
appear to be ordinary file names. If we do support it, Fossil potentially looks bad for creating files or directories that other processes can't interact with normally. I wouldn't mind taking a stab at it if enough people think it is worthwhile, but I'm not sure it is worth

Re: [fossil-users] Files named "AUX" on Windows

2016-10-05 Thread Scott Robison
rward slash. > > ...and NUL, I beleive. > Not to be confused with the DOS/Windows NUL device. :) -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] disabled due to excessive bounces (again?)

2016-10-17 Thread Scott Robison
On Oct 16, 2016 6:35 PM, "K. Fossil user" wrote: > > I am angry because Fossil knows nothing about marketing which is bad for any project... If I may paraphrase, Fossil's benevolent dictator has stated many times in the past that the One True Purpose (TM) of Fossil is to serve SQLite development.

Re: [fossil-users] on sha1 as a hash

2016-10-19 Thread Scott Robison
at someone will compromise a server with a weak password and completely replace the good repo with a bad repo, or just host a fork that looks legit and get people to pull from that instead. -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] features I'd like to have in fossil

2016-10-22 Thread Scott Robison
> If you color lines by meaing, it is easier to understand: Unless you're color blind, in which case it might be impossible to understand. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/li

Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary

2016-11-13 Thread Scott Robison
On Nov 11, 2016 5:28 PM, "K. Fossil user" wrote: > > Ah you don't understand again what I've said ... > > 1/ Fossil and SQLite work together, and to be clear, the same guy work for both projects. > I was even told that the AIM of Fossil is to help SQLite. > Do you agree at least with these ? Yes,

Re: [fossil-users] Question about the file formats.

2016-12-21 Thread Scott Robison
On Dec 20, 2016 10:59 PM, "John Found" wrote: Well, the compression is the last thing I am talking about. It is important, but not essential. I am talking about several people working on one file and then fossil merging the changes automatically (of course if there is no conflicts in the edits).

Re: [fossil-users] Support for commonmark markdown in fossil

2017-03-11 Thread Scott Robison
? If replace, would it "break" existing repos that are using markdown? If people have .md files with the existing markdown support, might this need a different extension? -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lis

Re: [fossil-users] Support for commonmark markdown in fossil

2017-03-11 Thread Scott Robison
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Mark Janssen wrote: > Good questions. Currently it replaces the existing markdown parser which > can break existing files. This is why I suggested the repo wide setting. > Sorry, I missed that part. > There are other possible solutions (switch on extension being

Re: [fossil-users] Is Fossil Hash-collision proof?

2017-03-22 Thread Scott Robison
On Mar 21, 2017 11:04 PM, "Martin Vahi" wrote: I haven't encountered any collisions yet, but I was wondering, what will happen, if 2 different files that have the same size, same timestamps, different bitstreams, but the same hash (regardless of hash algorithm) were to be committed simultaneous

Re: [fossil-users] [PROPOSED FEATURE] Fossil commands output sent through a pager

2017-03-23 Thread Scott Robison
I don't know about what commands to paginate by default, but no to versionable settings for this. Don't want to force this on others. On Mar 23, 2017 4:08 PM, "Christophe Gouiran" wrote: > Good morning, > > I would like to implement the feature given in the title. > I'm inspired by what Git (by

Re: [fossil-users] [PROPOSED FEATURE] Fossil commands output sent through a pager

2017-03-26 Thread Scott Robison
On Mar 26, 2017 7:13 AM, "Christophe Gouiran" wrote: Hi all, First of all many thanks for all your feedback. I come back to you with an implemented solution. After many thinking, for me not all commands need to send their outputs to a pager. Only ones which may output a big amount of lines in

Re: [fossil-users] [PROPOSED FEATURE] Fossil commands output sent through a pager

2017-03-26 Thread Scott Robison
On Mar 26, 2017 11:25 AM, "Christophe Gouiran" wrote: Please find as attached file another patch which: 1. First test for a real terminal before spawning the pager command. 2. No more paginate json command. I see that most of you complain about this proposed feature. It was only a propos

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil interprets plain-text file as a binary file

2017-03-27 Thread Scott Robison
On Mar 27, 2017 6:44 PM, "Byron Sanchez" wrote: Recently, however, fossil has started interpreting one of these org-mode files as a binary file. Now, fossil prompts with it's binary-file warning each time I update the file. In addition, this file can no longer be diffed in the web interface, sinc

Re: [fossil-users] update Fossil performance chart?

2017-03-29 Thread Scott Robison
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:46 AM, jungle Boogie wrote: > On 28 February 2017 at 08:04, jungle Boogie wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> This is most likely a request only Dr. Hipp can fulfill has he has >> access to all the databases. >> >> Is it possible for this chart to be updated? >> https://www.fossil-s

Re: [fossil-users] Couple of beginner questions

2017-03-30 Thread Scott Robison
straightforward two byte encoding back then. As Bill Gates (then CEO of MS, MS being one of the earliest members of the Unicode Consortium) said in 1991: "Okay, so 640K of RAM isn't enough memory, but 64K code points will definitely encode more characters than we'll ever possibly nee

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with crlf-glob *

2017-04-08 Thread Scott Robison
On Apr 8, 2017 3:29 PM, "Thomas" wrote: On 2017-04-08 21:59, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 4/8/17, Thomas wrote: > >> >> C:\fos>fossil settings crlf-glob *.obj >> C:\fos> >> C:\fos>fossil settings crlf-glob * >> Usage: fossil settings ?PROPERTY? ?VALUE? ?-global? >> C:\fos>fossil settings crlf-glob

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-10 Thread Scott Robison
On Apr 10, 2017 12:48 PM, "Thomas" wrote: Hello, As stated in one of my earlier mails, I also got an issue with files to ignore. I have now created a folder .fossil-settings and placed the glob files in it. Actually, I got a batch file that reads the file filter settings from another file and

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-10 Thread Scott Robison
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Thomas wrote: > On 2017-04-10 20:00, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> On Apr 10, 2017 12:48 PM, "Thomas" > <mailto:tho...@dateiliste.com>> wrote: >> Example of .fossil-settings\ignore-glob: >> *.obj >>

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-10 Thread Scott Robison
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Thomas wrote: > On 2017-04-10 20:34, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Thomas wrote: >>> >>> On 2017-04-10 20:00, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> Let's say you have a repo named bob. You ha

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-10 Thread Scott Robison
seems to have been put in place to check either the file in the repo or the file on the disk depending on what is available. I don't have time to understand it completely, but that seems to be the source of my confusion as to when / where versioned settings are accessed / read. -- Scott

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-10 Thread Scott Robison
On Apr 10, 2017 5:02 PM, "Thomas" wrote: On 2017-04-10 22:28, Scott Robison wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Thomas wrote: > >> I reckon I owe you a beer! ;-) >> > > Not at all. I don't drink, anyway. Well, not beer. :) > You're prob

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-11 Thread Scott Robison
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Thomas wrote: > On 2017-04-11 05:22, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> Perhaps it should be documented, but I don't think it is a bug. It is >> the software doing the job it was originally told to do (track versions >> of a file)

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-11 Thread Scott Robison
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 2:31 PM, David Mason wrote: > > On 11 April 2017 at 14:34, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> No, it is an explicit command clearly stating the user's desire for >> exclusion of these files *that are not already under source control*. >> The f

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-11 Thread Scott Robison
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Thomas wrote: > On 2017-04-11 19:34, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> No, I try to explain why what you see isn't a design flaw, and >> apparently fail. But I'll keep trying! > > > Since I've never heard of any software that

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-11 Thread Scott Robison
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Thomas wrote: > On 2017-04-11 22:01, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 2:31 PM, David Mason wrote: >>> >>> I think --ignore should give an error if the --ignore matches a file >>> already >>> i

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-11 Thread Scott Robison
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Thomas wrote: > On 2017-04-11 22:11, Thomas wrote: >> >> On 2017-04-11 22:01, Scott Robison wrote: >>> >>> I was thinking about that earlier (well, a warning, not an error, >>> which presumes you can't continue).

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-11 Thread Scott Robison
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Thomas wrote: >> On 2017-04-11 22:11, Thomas wrote: >> >> add >>--ignoreIgnore unmanaged files matching >> patterns

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-11 Thread Scott Robison
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Thomas wrote: > On 2017-04-11 22:51, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Scott Robison >> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Thomas wrote: >>>> >>>> On

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with crlf-glob *

2017-04-12 Thread Scott Robison
On Apr 12, 2017 10:31 AM, "Thomas" wrote: On 2017-04-09 02:19, Richie Adler wrote: > Thomas decía, en el mensaje "[fossil-users] Issue with crlf-glob *" del > 8/4/2017 17:46:14: > > Does anyone know how to unveil the secret of getting the mentioned >> asterisk into the crlf-glob setting without

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with crlf-glob *

2017-04-12 Thread Scott Robison
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Thomas wrote: > On 2017-04-12 18:01, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> On Apr 12, 2017 10:31 AM, "Thomas" > <mailto:tho...@dateiliste.com>> wrote: >> >> On 2017-04-09 02:19, Richie Adler wrote: >> >>

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with crlf-glob *

2017-04-12 Thread Scott Robison
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Thomas wrote: > On 2017-04-12 23:24, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> When I am using the download from fossil-scm.org, I am able to use >> single quotes to 'escape' the asterisk. Double quotes do not work. > > > On Window

Re: [fossil-users] A tutorial about "branches", "trunks", "leafs", etc.?

2017-04-29 Thread Scott Robison
On Apr 29, 2017 8:30 PM, "The Tick" wrote: OK, I think I've figured it out! You're supposed to do a fossil >open< with a version name being "trunk" (default) or "branch name". When finished, do a fossil close. It appears that I can even do this in separate directories at the same time -- one in

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with: fossil revert -r xxx

2017-05-11 Thread Scott Robison
I'm on the road and may not be thinking clearly, but if you're trying to revert your entire tree to the state 6 or 7 commits ago, might it be easier to update to the commit you want, rename the first commit in the now unwanted branch, and continue on from the new root? -- Sco

Re: [fossil-users] manifest setting "l" flag

2017-09-28 Thread Scott Robison
There is a winsymlink branch I created some time ago. Hasn't been kept up to date (I didn't need it, just thought it might be useful for feature parity) but I could take a look at it if you were interested. Or you could. On Sep 28, 2017 7:08 PM, "Andy Goth" wrote: > http://fossil-scm.org/index.h

Re: [fossil-users] manifest setting "l" flag

2017-09-29 Thread Scott Robison
On Sep 29, 2017 7:43 AM, "Andy Goth" wrote: On 09/28/17 21:34, Scott Robison wrote: > There is a winsymlink branch I created some time ago. Hasn't been kept > up to date (I didn't need it, just thought it might be useful for > feature parity) but I could take a look

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

2017-11-21 Thread Scott Robison
On phone, apologies in advance for top posting... The value I see from multi vcs support isn't providing easy setup of hosting one repo on multiple formats (though that would be awesome). I like the idea of using fossil at work where I'm forced to use git (or Perforce, though that hasn't been ment

Re: [fossil-users] Lots of web interface changes

2017-12-06 Thread Scott Robison
I read that as no, he isn't having the same problem. On Dec 6, 2017 2:59 PM, "Richard Hipp" wrote: > On 12/6/17, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > >> know.) Are you still having the same problem with the latest > >> code, even after hitting

Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

2017-12-14 Thread Scott Robison
I'd bet that you can commit as anyone and push it if you have that access. You probably wouldn't keep that access for long, though. On Dec 14, 2017 12:13 PM, "Warren Young" wrote: > On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:19 AM, jungle Boogie > wrote: > > > > So Warren edited a file at the same exact time as ta

Re: [fossil-users] Digital signatures on check-ins. Was: tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

2017-12-21 Thread Scott Robison
Forged should be a skull and crossbones. I would think yellow and red unlocked locks and green locked locks, but definitely with hover text for those of us with faulty color perception. On Dec 21, 2017 3:16 PM, "Richard Hipp" wrote: > On 12/21/17, jungle Boogie wrote: > > > > How are the signat

Re: [fossil-users] Setting up an internet Fossil server

2018-02-26 Thread Scott Robison
I've done similar work for my own lighttpd based personal server. If you'd like I can share my config, maybe it would be helpful. On Feb 26, 2018 1:36 PM, "Roy Keene" wrote: > Scott, > > Fossil can be run in any URL suffix on an existing domain. This > is how, for example ChiselApp.com

[fossil-users] Dilbert Git

2018-05-02 Thread Scott Robison
In reading today's Dilbert, I imagined how it applies to git: http://dilbert.com/strip/2018-05-02?utm_source=dilbert.com/newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=brand-loyalty&utm_content=strip-image -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-u

[fossil-users] svn to fossil-scm migration

2011-03-15 Thread Scott Robison
So, I have a subversion repository that I've been using for about 18 months for personal stuff I work on at home and a parallel trac installation. It has served me well, but I figured I should try out a dvcs since the world is moving that way. Having been a fan of SQLite for years I discovered foss

Re: [fossil-users] svn to fossil-scm migration

2011-03-15 Thread Scott Robison
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > It should never crash, regardless of any model differences. > > What version of Fossil are you running?  (What does "fossil version" say?) > > Can you send me your repo by private email so that I can try it here and > debug the problem? > O

Re: [fossil-users] svn to fossil-scm migration

2011-03-15 Thread Scott Robison
immediate attention to the report and the fix. Take care. SDR On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Scott Robison > wrote: >> >> I fear that my problem is probably likely due to the very different >> models between sv

Re: [fossil-users] Commit question

2011-04-05 Thread Scott Robison
I believe Ctrl-Z is defined as EOF in ASCII which predates Microsoft. Terminating text files with EOF was the solution employeed by CP/M because file sizes were a sector count instead of a byte count. On Apr 5, 2011 3:06 PM, "Ron Wilson" wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejew

Re: [fossil-users] Commit question

2011-04-05 Thread Scott Robison
Ah, thank you. I am on the road with barely enough bandwidth to email. At least I was smart enough to give myself an out with "I believe" instead of stating it as solid fact. :) SDR On Apr 5, 2011 6:48 PM, "Ross Berteig" wrote: > At 06:37 PM 4/5/2011, Scott Robinson wrote: > >I believe Ctrl-Z is

Re: [fossil-users] crnl-setting bug

2011-04-07 Thread Scott Robison
I believe the glob-style wildcard pattern matching is being performed by mingw during program startup before handing control over to main (because cmd.exe does not do wildcard expansion itself in either Windows 7 or XP). SDR On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > On Thu,

Re: [fossil-users] crnl-setting bug

2011-04-07 Thread Scott Robison
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > I believe the glob-style wildcard pattern matching is being performed > by mingw during program startup before handing control over to main > (because cmd.exe does not do wildcard expansion itself in either > Windows 7 or XP).

Re: [fossil-users] crnl-setting bug

2011-04-07 Thread Scott Robison
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Ron Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Scott Robison wrote: >> I believe the glob-style wildcard pattern matching is being performed >> by mingw during program startup before handing control over to main >> (because cmd.exe

Re: [fossil-users] crnl-setting bug

2011-04-07 Thread Scott Robison
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Wilson, Ronald wrote: >> >> Confirmed. Single quotes work on Win7. >> > > Actually, single quotes don't work either because the single quotes get > preserved in fossil: According to http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/compile.html: Filename globbing Wildcards on the

Re: [fossil-users] [vb.net] Which files/folders can be safely ignored?

2011-10-03 Thread Scott Robison
I think it's more a question of how you're using fossil. If you are using it for an actual distributed project, then you probably don't (or at least might not want) to include suo files. If you are using it just for vcs as a solo developer, there is no technical reason not to include the suo file.

Re: [fossil-users] Announcement Fuel 0.9.6

2012-05-14 Thread Scott Robison
>> A small request: with an announcement like this, can you please include an >> indication what Fuel is? > Sure. > Fuel is a Qt-based cross-platform GUI front-end to Fossil. > > As this isn't the first time I mentioned Fuel on this list, I didn't > think people > wouldn't know what it was about. M

Re: [fossil-users] Trac-to-Fossil Was: Wysiwyg wiki editing. Was: Side-by-side wiki editing?

2012-05-15 Thread Scott Robison
> On 15 May 2012 03:01, Ron Wilson wrote: > Trac's versioning for wiki and issues is native to Trac, and is used > solely for the wiki and issues. The version control of the source for > a project is entirely separate. > > Trac does not use your source control choice for issues or wiki. Though as

Re: [fossil-users] Trac-to-Fossil Was: Wysiwyg wiki editing. Was: Side-by-side wiki editing?

2012-05-15 Thread Scott Robison
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> Though as I recall, the (default at least) database is SQLite. :) > > > The connections run much deeper.  See > http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracHistory for a brief history of Trac. > Never heard of CVSTrac?  Try using "ping" to find the IP

Re: [fossil-users] "losing" history in private branch merge?

2012-05-25 Thread Scott Robison
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Nolan Darilek wrote: > Shame, I actually kind of liked that individual commits were preserved. > Squashing and such was part of why I left Git. History should be preserved, > whether you are working alone in private or in the open. History is preserved in your pr

Re: [fossil-users] source code file is considered by fossil to be binary.

2012-06-24 Thread Scott Robison
It might be better (more portable) to escape those as octal or hex sequences (like '\002' or '\x02'). On Jun 24, 2012 3:11 PM, "James Bremner" wrote: > Richard Hipp writes: > > > In your case there is a Ctrl-B (ascii 0x02) in the 2150th byte of the > file, > > which makes Fossil think it is a b

[fossil-users] Fossil 1.23

2012-08-25 Thread Scott Robison
I downloaded the lastest Windows fossil build tonight and am giving DVCS another shot. Some notes: 1. I like the fact that I could --date-override the initial create date stamp. 1a. I wish that I could --date-override a commit at the command line so that I didn't have to edit the date stamp via th

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.23

2012-08-25 Thread Scott Robison
ot;Rene" wrote: > On 2012-08-25 09:47, Scott Robison wrote: > >> I downloaded the lastest Windows fossil build tonight and am giving >> DVCS another shot. Some notes: >> >> 1. I like the fact that I could --date-override the initial create >> date stamp. &g

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.23

2012-08-25 Thread Scott Robison
ject needs won't involve much or any of the d in dvcs) and the warm fuzzy of contributing to the project in some small way. SDR On Aug 25, 2012 3:17 AM, "Francis Daly" wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:47:44AM -0600, Scott Robison wrote: > > Hi there, > > > 2. I

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.23

2012-08-25 Thread Scott Robison
I'm not much of a visual/ui design guy but I'll see what I can come up with. SDR On Aug 25, 2012 9:09 AM, "Richard Hipp" wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Scott Robison wrote: > >> >> As for the color coding, I was not referring to bran

Re: [fossil-users] How to save typing when checking out branches with long names?

2012-08-27 Thread Scott Robison
Just throwing out a couple of ideas: fossil globco 154 Or perhaps slightly less bad: fossil co --glob 154 Though I'm not personally looking for this functionality myself so not having it as an official feature doesn't bother me. SDR On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > >

Re: [fossil-users] How to save typing when checking out branches with long names?

2012-08-27 Thread Scott Robison
12 at 7:18 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > >> fossil co --glob 154 >> >> Though I'm not personally looking for this functionality myself so not >> having it as an official feature doesn't bother me. > > > > FWIW: as Richard said, it's _technically_ e

Re: [fossil-users] Support for Win9x?

2012-09-13 Thread Scott Robison
Even if someone is still supporting Win9X, it does not necessarily follow that they are doing anything more that testing binaries in that environment. I would not be heartbroken if such support were removed. SDR On Sep 13, 2012 8:25 AM, "Jan Danielsson" wrote: > On 09/13/12 16:02, Richard Hipp w

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancement idea. Was: trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

2012-09-13 Thread Scott Robison
I'd like to assist with that contribution. Assuming someone hasn't already done it by the time I click send. :) SDR On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Greiner wrote: >

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancement idea. Was: trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

2012-09-13 Thread Scott Robison
I assumed (dangerous though it may be) that "leaves anything that isn't UTF-16 unchanged" meant "don't convert any buffer to UTF-8 if the origination buffer is not UTF-16". SDR On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:04 PM, David Given wrote: > On 13/09/12 21:08, Richard Hipp wrote: > [...] > > Basically, we

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancement idea. Was: trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

2012-09-13 Thread Scott Robison
Unix. There are small, portable conversion routines in SQLite that you can > copy. > > D. Richard Hipp - d...@sqlite.org > Sent from phone - pardon brevity > > On Sep 13, 2012 7:44 PM, "Scott Robison" wrote: > > I assumed (dangerous though it may be) that "leaves

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancement idea. Was: trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

2012-09-14 Thread Scott Robison
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Detection of embedded non-printing characters, especially U+, would be > nice. > > Should we insist on a BOM at the beginning of the file? > I don't think a BOM should be mandatory, as it is not required by Unicode. Another thought: U

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancement idea. Was: trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

2012-09-14 Thread Scott Robison
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Csaba Kos wrote: > I think now would be a good time to discuss the possibility of a more > generic > text conversion framework, i.e. not only UTF16 to UTF8 but also SHIFT-JIS > to UTF8, and so on. Also CR+NL to NL conversion could be handled by such > framework as

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancement idea. Was: trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

2012-09-15 Thread Scott Robison
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Csaba Kos wrote: > I am a fossil novice myself, but I don't think there is such > functionality built-in currently. > I was talking about tagging encoding as well as end of line handling, but mainly I was giving myself an out in case I was speaking in favor of s

Re: [fossil-users] Latest stable release or dev release does not compile with option: --static

2013-01-30 Thread Scott Robison
While I agree that the -Dstrcmp... solution is inadequate, strcmp is subject to the system locale setting. While it might default to the C locale (giving the expected binary comparison behavior), it might not. One may not consider locale the same as localization, but whatever you choose to call it,

Re: [fossil-users] Latest stable release or dev release does not compile with option: --static

2013-01-30 Thread Scott Robison
And never mind, I guess I was wrong. Not sure why I couldn't have checked that *before* clicking send, but c'est la vie. SDR On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Jan Nijtmans > wrote: >> >> 2013/1/30 Sergei Gavrikov : >> > [FYI] >> > >> > A

[fossil-users] Automation

2014-05-09 Thread Scott Robison
needed config table values. FWIW, this is very plain looking stuff (I'm not a web guy at all) but I'd be happy to share the scripts and such when I'm finished. Probably the most useful part is just the scripts in the directory that give a front end that enumerates the existing re

Re: [fossil-users] Automation

2014-05-09 Thread Scott Robison
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> links to each fossil. I have a two line fossil cgi script that gives me access to those repos. I've even created a little page to allow me to change a pas

Re: [fossil-users] Automation

2014-05-09 Thread Scott Robison
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > IIRC we don't actually use the mtime in the config file (or not often, > anyway). Feel free to set it to 0 or (as we do internally): > strftime('%s','now'). It's a Unix timestamp (so (date +%s) can be used from > scripts). > > Forgot to commen

Re: [fossil-users] Automation

2014-05-09 Thread Scott Robison
On May 9, 2014 3:11 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote: > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Scott Robison wrote: > It doesn't need to be great - it'll just be for my own use. i've never gotten around to using the "login group" support. I looked briefly into

Re: [fossil-users] Location of ".fossil" Database

2014-05-21 Thread Scott Robison
On May 21, 2014 9:34 AM, "Igor de Oliveira Couto" wrote: > > Dear Fossil Gurus, > > I'm a new user - have been using Fossil for just over a month now - and I'm loving it. One point that I found somewhat disappointing, is that Fossil creates a ".fossil" database in my home directory. > > I know tha

Re: [fossil-users] Location of ".fossil" Database

2014-05-21 Thread Scott Robison
BAH! How dare someone make my wordy points while I'm also making them! :) SDR ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Location of ".fossil" Database

2014-05-21 Thread Scott Robison
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > i will most certainly attempt to remember that point the next time this > comes up. It reduces the argument form "Mac vs Windows vs *nix" to "POSIX > vs non-POSIX," which is not only simpler to grasp and argue around, but is > geeky enough to

[fossil-users] users table photo column

2014-05-27 Thread Scott Robison
fic skins/themes to use or is it something that is generally usable/accessible? This is mostly a curiosity based question. At the moment all the photo for all rows is NULL so it's not something I'm "worried" about copying, per se. Just wondering the rationale/workings of it. --

Re: [fossil-users] users table photo column

2014-05-27 Thread Scott Robison
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > In any case, in the process I was looking at schema and saw there is a >> "photo" column in the users table. I imagine it is for a photo of the user, >> but cannot find anywhere that it is used. Is this something that was added >> for specifi

[fossil-users] Markdown

2014-05-27 Thread Scott Robison
)" which really seems kinda ugly (though I like the rest of what little I've played with so far). -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown

2014-05-28 Thread Scott Robison
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On 5/27/2014 22:58, Scott Robison wrote: > >> The best I can come up with for a link to a >> wiki page (from another wiki page) is something like >> "[Page](wiki?name=Page)" which really seems kinda ugly &g

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown

2014-05-28 Thread Scott Robison
On May 28, 2014 2:31 PM, "Warren Young" wrote: >{deleted stuff} > The attached Fossil repo also contains a copy of the official Markdown documentation. It was included in the test suite, so I linked to it from the repo's wiki, rather than remove it. > Thanks very much for the effort! ___

Re: [fossil-users] DRH's PGCon 2014 Keynote (with Fossil sighting!)

2014-06-01 Thread Scott Robison
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Joel Bruick wrote: > I just wanted to share Richard's PGCon 2014 keynote for anyone here that > wasn't aware of it: > Thanks for sharing that. And it was good to hear an entire presentation about SQL without once (that I can recall) hearing it pronounced "sequel".

Re: [fossil-users] DRH's PGCon 2014 Keynote (with Fossil sighting!)

2014-06-02 Thread Scott Robison
DOH! Ah well, usually it was S-Q-L. :) On Jun 2, 2014 10:00 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Scott Robison > wrote: > >> Thanks for sharing that. And it was good to hear an entire presentation >> about SQL without once (that I can recall

Re: [fossil-users] Bookmarks (Re: git->fossil->git does not obtain the same commit hashes.)

2014-06-04 Thread Scott Robison
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Joel Bruick wrote: > > I think Git is a great, powerful, and flexible tool that actually has a > much simpler design than it initially appears. But to get to a place where > you actually understand that design (and, thus, understand Git), takes > about 99x more ef

Re: [fossil-users] Bookmarks (Re: git->fossil->git does not obtain the same commit hashes.)

2014-06-04 Thread Scott Robison
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Joel Bruick wrote: > Consider it yours. > Thanks. Final form: OH: To understand Git's design takes 99x more effort than 99% of software. Once you get to that point it's wonderful! // Too true! Curse the 140 character limit! :) -

Re: [fossil-users] Bookmarks (Re: git->fossil->git does not obtain the same commit hashes.)

2014-06-04 Thread Scott Robison
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Scott Robison > wrote: > >> I really want to steal this in tweet form: >> >> "To get to a place where you understand Git's design takes 99x more >> effort than 99% o

[fossil-users] Links within Fossil

2014-06-06 Thread Scott Robison
rce & documentation files in sync. Thanks in advance for your help! -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Links within Fossil

2014-06-06 Thread Scott Robison
On Jun 6, 2014 4:20 PM, "Richard Hipp" wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> ... is it possible to link to a given line number (range) within a given artifact, perhaps highlighting it in the process? > > You mean like this

Re: [fossil-users] autosync from GUI

2014-06-07 Thread Scott Robison
On Jun 7, 2014 1:27 PM, "Ron Wilson" wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: >> >> For the local UI case, sure, i can see it being useful, but people would also expect it to work remotely, and it often wouldn't. > > When running the local UI, that is seen as part of the loc

Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git?

2014-06-07 Thread Scott Robison
On Jun 7, 2014 1:47 PM, wrote: > > Well, I can give a couple of personal examples that you easily try yourselves: > > * Windows side: Copy/Paste in Windows can not deal with LF endings correctly. Example: PNotepad editor in Windows loads Linux files but copy-pasting from it (for example) to other

Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git?

2014-06-07 Thread Scott Robison
On Jun 7, 2014 12:44 PM, "Richard Hipp" wrote: > > Years ago (decades ago, actually), somebody rigged up fopen() so that it did automatic NL <-> CRNL conversions unless you used "rb" or "wb" as the "type" parameter. This seemed like a clever solution at the time and was warmly embraced by many de

Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git?

2014-06-07 Thread Scott Robison
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:40 PM, wrote: > * Several old time assemblers will choke on wrong line endings. Their >>> binaries cannot be updated as the source is no longer available. So, you >>> must edit code only in the right format or you’re out of luck. >>> >> > This seems to be conflating th

Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git?

2014-06-07 Thread Scott Robison
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:08 PM, wrote: >> I completely agree with the points other than the one that "the DVCS > is the only tool that can effectively manage the EOL convention of the > files". I use a text editor daily that is capable of normalizing EOL > convention (though of course there a

  1   2   3   >