On Feb 27, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
On 24.02.2008, at 21:49, George Lee wrote:
Or perhaps an issue with removing Calendaring, keeping Lime, and
keeping the
CMFPlone changes (for instance, a broken import Calendaring step in
CMFPlone
that it doesn't understand without Calendaring?) -
On Feb 27, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
On 27.02.2008, at 09:57, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:00 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 24, 2008, at 5:30 PM, George Lee wrote:
imho, yes.
i still don'
On 24.02.2008, at 21:49, George Lee wrote:
Tom Lazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
for the record: the front-page issue mentioned by wiggy did *not*
occur in my testing of the bundle itself, which suggests that it is
perhaps caused by some side-effect of previous merges. and certainly
outside th
On 27.02.2008, at 09:57, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:00 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 24, 2008, at 5:30 PM, George Lee wrote:
imho, yes.
i still don't see how i should have caught the bug wiggy h
On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:00 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 24, 2008, at 5:30 PM, George Lee wrote:
imho, yes. the fact that two additional packages are introduced by
the PLIP should have been pointed out, along with add
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2008, at 5:30 PM, George Lee wrote:
> imho, yes. the fact that two additional packages are introduced by
> the PLIP should have been pointed out, along with additional review
> notes about them, or at least
On Feb 24, 2008, at 5:30 PM, George Lee wrote:
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I've just reverted the WebDAV changes from Sidnei after playing a bit
with them. I did this for two reasons:
Hanno had some very good remarks that need to be addressed
I tested the 3.1 tree with just Cal
On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:51 PM, George Lee wrote:
P.S. I think that as a matter of process it make sense that a
release manager
can make / ask for a major revert for time's sake, but that the
framework team
should then speak up on that because ultimately it's supposed to be
their
decision and
for the record: the front-page issue mentioned by wiggy did *not*
occur in my testing of the bundle itself, which suggests that it is
perhaps caused by some side-effect of previous merges. and certainly
outside the scope of the framework-team testing... (not that it
actually matters now, th
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The frontpage issue I found is very simple to reproduce: if you create a
> new Plone site the text of the default frontpage is empty. After
> reverting the changes to CMFPlone frontpage creation worked again.
If that
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Let's all take a deep breath
>
> I think it's a bit worrying that these issues were only found after
> merge. I'm not particularly thrilled about having code ship with 3.1
> that is not used and that no-one will maintain. Arguably, this should
> never have
as a member of the framework team (and as somebody who co-reviewed
sidnei's bundle) i feel the need to speak up.
sidnei, i understand your frustration but please consider the following:
* your bundle was one of the most complex ones submitted (certainly
the one with the largest impact)
* e
12 matches
Mail list logo
