In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: This should go on the "Comprehensive guide to updating from source to 5.0"
: that I'm sure our trusty release engineers are producing?
UPDATING has the closest thing to a comprehensive guide. As far as I
can tel
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Loren James Rittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: > This works. I'm not sure why this isn't the default. It loo
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I've implemented pccardc power and boot_deactivated support code for
: NEWCARD. They are needed for some mobile users including me.
:
: - Add pccardc power support code. Yes, it's OLDCARD compatible.
: -
Brooks Davis wrote:
> While moving a large (1GB) file from one parition to another today, I
> noticed an odd, reproducable pause. Basicly you create a large file
> somewhere and then delete it like so:
[ ... ]
> Within the next minute or so, I see a pause where the whole system stops
> for 5-10
[picking a random message to reply to]
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 03:12:50PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 11:40 AM -0700 10/29/02, Raymond Kohler wrote:
> >1) How is the speed compared to stable? I remember it being just
> >too slow some months ago and was wondering how it was improving.
>
>
Hi Mitsuru,
I was also thinking about this so I'm very happy with your patch!
It works great here!
This is very usefull for me as I have an internal pccard that I prefer not to
be active all time.
Thanks
Mark
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:55:32PM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> I've implemented p
Hi,
I am running current cvsuped within this week. I have an adaptec
builtin scsi controller and a seagate drive attached to it and
after every bootup as soon as there is heavy disk activity
the drive gets disabled for 1 or 2 minutes and meanwhile all
functionality RELATED to disk I/O freezes f
While playing with UFS snapshots on a UFS2 filesystem I mounted
specifically for this purpose, I encountered a little problem. It seems I
have processes deadlocked on each other.
Steps to repeat:
/# mount /dev/ad2a /mnt ; cd /mnt
/dev/ad2a on /mnt (ufs, local, soft-updates, multilabel) # UFS2
/mnt
Stijn Hoop wrote:
> I am experiencing a really noticable slower startup time on my very recent
> -CURRENT laptop for almost all programs. The problem seems to be in getting
> info in the cache, because it disappears when I start the same program again.
>
> It is even noticable when doing a simple
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Doug Rabson wrote:
> > The point is that with the current setup of the XFree86-4-libraries port,
> > you don't have any choice, since libX11 links to libXThrStub. This is the
> > key problem, IMHO. I have a machine running RedHat 8.0 and they don't have
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:02:16PM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:11:56PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:09:41PM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> > > Does anybody know if there is a good reason why libobjc is built with
> > > thr-single.c? As well, who
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:52:56PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> That said, if you want to make it work for you, I'm behind you
> 100%: I think any changes you want to make are OK; they can
> always be backed out, if anyone starts complaining about them
> breaking things, so I think it's kind of si
David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:52:56PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > That said, if you want to make it work for you, I'm behind you
> > 100%: I think any changes you want to make are OK; they can
> > always be backed out, if anyone starts complaining about them
> > breaking thi
Doug Rabson wrote:
> > > All you have to do is create a situation where a shared object that links
> > > to libc_r is loaded after libX11 and the thing breaks into little pieces.
> >
> > So let's dike out libXThrStub.so, and be done with it.
>
> I think the only stub which it defines that libc.so
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> :
> : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : > Loren James Rittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> :
> : > Thi
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> May I humbly propose that the API is broken and should be reworked? My
> frustration with cached_connection common/ftp sharing and this thrashing
> trying to overload the return value are signs that the API needs
> rethinking.
What do you mean "overload t
Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I got same result as Poul-Henning. It seems installed libssh.a in
> chroot does not have mm_auth_krb5().
The *installed* libssh shouldn't matter. What matters is the libssh
which is built during 'make world' inside the chroot. That's what
sshd should b
At Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:01:32 +0100,
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I got same result as Poul-Henning. It seems installed libssh.a in
> > chroot does not have mm_auth_krb5().
>
> The *installed* libssh shouldn't matter. What matters is the libssh
> which
Hi,
Yesterday I tried to upgrade wine on my FreeBSD-current box. It didn't
compile until I changed following in server/context_i386.c (looks like
this is because of commit of 1.28 version of src/sys/i386/include/reg.h)
--8<---cut here---start->8---
--- context_
> I am experiencing a really noticable slower startup time on my very
> recent-CURRENT laptop for almost all programs. The problem seems to be
> in getting info in the cache, because it disappears when I start the
> same program again.
This almost certainly is caused by the 'ioslow' addition to
sp
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Doug Rabson wrote:
> > > > All you have to do is create a situation where a shared object that links
> > > > to libc_r is loaded after libX11 and the thing breaks into little pieces.
> > >
> > > So let's dike out libXThrStub.so, and be done with it.
> >
Eric J. Chet wrote:
Hello
I just tried a -current buildworld which failed:
---
"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/tmac/Makefile", line 2: warning: duplicate
script for target "-s" ignored
make: don't know how to make doc-common-s. Stop
---
Anybody else seeing this?
Thanks,
Eric
Yes, buildworld
I've seen this looking for ISO images
of FreeBSD-5.0-DP1:
5.0-DP1-disc2.iso - 5.0 Developer Preview #1 - live filesystem.
is it possible to work with this filesystem ?
I mean, what can be done ? is it auto-bootable or
I need to boot from the other one ?
Thanks
--
JFRH.
To Unsubscribe
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 07:48:14AM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > I am experiencing a really noticable slower startup time on my very
> > recent-CURRENT laptop for almost all programs. The problem seems to be
> > in getting info in the cache, because it disappears when I start the
> > same prog
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 00:38:39 +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Please review it. If there is no objection, I'll commit it at next
> weekend.
Reviewed -stable, looks OK. Would be nice to have this fix. Thanks.
rvdp
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebs
On 29-Oct-2002 Garrett Wollman wrote:
> Has anyone managed to make one of these work? I get the following
> messages:
>
> cardbus1: Expecting link target, got 0x59
> cardbus1: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=100
> cardbus1: Resource not specified in CIS: id=14, size=400
> cardbus1: (
On 29-Oct-2002 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>: Has anyone managed to make one of these work? I get the following
>: messages:
>:
>: cardbus1: Expecting link target, got 0x59
>: cardbus1: Resource not specified i
Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:01:32 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > The *installed* libssh shouldn't matter. What matters is the libssh
> > which is built during 'make world' inside the chroot. That's what
> > sshd should be linked against.
> Sorry for my
> Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > At Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:01:32 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > The *installed* libssh shouldn't matter. What matters is the libssh
> > > which is built during 'make world' inside the chroot. That's what
> > > sshd should be linked against.
> >
John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The part where it is failing is in release.3 of release/Makefile.
> Following that around libssh should probably be rebuilt with K5,
> so shouldn't KPROGS in kerberos5/Makefile also have
> secure/lib/libssh?
Indeed. Thanks for tracking this down.
DES
--
Da
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Vitaly Markitantov wrote:
> When i tries to copy a file from smbfs share mounted by mount_smbfs
> i get an error:
> cp: ./filename: Bad address
>
> But when i copy a file to share i get kernel panic like this:
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
Ear
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:52:56PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Chad David wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:04:21PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > Chad David wrote:
> > > > Does anybody know if there is a good reason why libobjc is built with
> > > > thr-single.c?
> > >
> > > Historical th
Hi,
I don't think many people in the FreeBSD community use
Objective-C, hence the apparent lack of a maintainer.
The proper way to submit patches to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing list at the FSF GCC project
is to follow the procedures documented at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
If you are
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:17:07AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:02:16PM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:11:56PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:09:41PM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> > > > Does anybody know if there is a g
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Krzysztof [iso-8859-2] Jêdruczyk wrote:
> Yesterday I tried to upgrade wine on my FreeBSD-current box. It didn't
> compile until I changed following in server/context_i386.c (looks like
> this is because of commit of 1.28 version of src/sys/i386/include/reg.h)
Thanks for the h
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:19:43AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:52:56PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > That said, if you want to make it work for you, I'm behind you
> > 100%: I think any changes you want to make are OK; they can
> > always be backed out, if anyone star
< said:
> I used to use one. The dc(4) driver was broken a while back and
> now has issues with this card that it didn't used to have, but it
> should mostly work (it just needs to be ifconfig'd down and up when
> it freezes sometimes). You do need the dc(4) driver in your kernel
> or kldload th
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: < said:
: > I used to use one. The dc(4) driver was broken a while back and
: > now has issues with this card that it didn't used to have, but it
: > should mostly work (it just needs to be ifconfig'd down an
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:48:23PM +, Daniel Flickinger wrote:
> /usr/src/lib/libc/uuid/uuid_compare.c:31:18: uuid.h: No such file or directory
> /usr/src/lib/libc/uuid/uuid_create.c:30:18: uuid.h: No such file or directory
> /usr/src/lib/libc/uuid/uuid_create_nil.c:31:18: uuid.h: No such
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:48:23PM +, Daniel Flickinger wrote the words in effect
of:
> [ ... ]
>
> I have not seen a commit since that time --4+ hours.
>
> everything else compiled; obviously a lot of incompletes
> without libc
Hey there.
Could you please do a `make inclu
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:23:00AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:52:56PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > That said, if you want to make it work for you, I'm behind you
> > > 100%: I think any changes you want to make are OK; they can
> > > alway
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:23:53AM -0700, Chad David wrote:
>
> Which brings us back to my original question... why are ObjC threads
> disabled? I don't much care about my other patches, I just want
> to know who the 10 others are who will break if we enable threads,
> and how to fix that breakag
* De: David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-30 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Objective-C threads ]
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:23:53AM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> >
> > Which brings us back to my original question... why are ObjC threads
> > disabled? I don't much care about my other patc
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:16:26AM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> No there is no reason, and yes the changes are generic. I don't really
> expect there to be many (if any) changes to libobjc that are not generic,
> so if gcc-patches is the place to go, that is where I'll go.
It is.
> In your experi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:09:16AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:23:53AM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> >
> > Which brings us back to my original question... why are ObjC threads
> > disabled? I don't much care about my other patches, I just want
> > to know who the 10 othe
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:22:21AM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-30 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: Objective-C threads ]
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:23:53AM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> > >
> > > Which brings us back to my original question... why
* De: Chad David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-30 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Objective-C threads ]
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:22:21AM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > * De: David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-30 ]
> > [ Subjecte: Re: Objective-C threads ]
> > > On Wed, Oct 30
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> Hmm, it is true that I could use ATAPI command directly in burncd, and
> I actually have a version in the lab that is ~75% converted to that,
I'd love to see that once you're ready to release.
> but that is not the only issue here. The ATAPI cd driver
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 29-Oct-2002 clark shishido wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:40:53AM -0700, Raymond Kohler wrote:
> >> 1) How is the speed compared to stable? I remember it being just too slow some
>months ago and
> >> was wondering how it was improving.
> >>
>
Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > That's bizarre... it's defined in libc_r, so there's no reason for
> > the omission in libc.
>
> I only added stubs that I thought the implementation of libc used
> (or would use).
Makes sense.
Actually, it looks like most of this could be done with macros,
including th
Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> I've seen this looking for ISO images
> of FreeBSD-5.0-DP1:
>
> 5.0-DP1-disc2.iso - 5.0 Developer Preview #1 - live filesystem.
>
> is it possible to work with this filesystem ?
> I mean, what can be done ? is it auto-bootable or
> I need to boot f
I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
awkward. In particular, especially for people who
have worked with SysV-style init scripts, it's
rather surprising that "/etc/rc.d/nfsd stop" does
not actually stop the nfsd process. Likewise, 'start'
doesn't actually start the specified system.
I
Chad David wrote:
> > That said, if you want to make it work for you, I'm behind you
> > 100%: I think any changes you want to make are OK; they can
> > always be backed out, if anyone starts complaining about them
> > breaking things, so I think it's kind of silly for you to ask
> > for permission
On 30-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
> Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
>> I've seen this looking for ISO images
>> of FreeBSD-5.0-DP1:
>>
>> 5.0-DP1-disc2.iso - 5.0 Developer Preview #1 - live filesystem.
>>
>> is it possible to work with this filesystem ?
>> I mean, what can be do
Chad David wrote:
> In your experience, how long is the delay between gcc-patches accepting
> something and FreeBSD picking it up, ie. is it worth the effort?
Jeremey Allison (of SAMBA) and I made patches to ACAP to get it
to compile under G++, and that required patches to G++ 2.9.3 to
support per
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
> awkward. In particular, especially for people who
> have worked with SysV-style init scripts, it's
> rather surprising that "/etc/rc.d/nfsd stop" does
> not actually stop the nfsd pro
John Baldwin wrote:
> > It's an installed FreeBSD that is on a CDROM. It depends on your
> > BIOS being able to boot the FS as if it were a hard disk image.
>
> Huh? It doesn't do that. If it is bootable, then it boots into
> sysinstall just like CD #1. What it is useful for is to be used
> as
Fresh -current, fresh fracture:
cd /usr/src/release/..; make TARGET_ARCH=i386 TARGET=i386 -j12 -DNO_MAKEDB_RUN
-DMAKE_KERBEROS5 SUBDIR_OVERRIDE="kerberos5 lib/libpam lib/libssh secure/usr.bi
n/ssh secure/usr.sbin/sshd" buildworld distributeworld DISTDIR=/R/stage/trees
Terry Lambert wrote:
> You're right... I confused the "Live FS" with the "Live CD",
> which is a seperate image distribution. Sorry for the bum
> information.
FWIW, on the original question of "what is it for", I personally
tend to use it to create chroot environments for hosted builds
across Fre
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > That's bizarre... it's defined in libc_r, so there's no reason for
> > > the omission in libc.
> >
> > I only added stubs that I thought the implementation of libc used
> > (or would use).
>
> Makes sense.
>
> Actually, it loo
After a discussion on cvs-all regarding size of our libc, I wrote a quick
script to see where the problems are. A cursory glance at its output
shows there are numerous things we can improve, including:
* setproctitle(3) uses 4k of static scratch buffers when it could
allocate these on the s
> The systems hostname was changed between Aug & Oct, but it's the
> same laptop, a P3-800 w/256MB memory.
>
> Thoughts?
>
I have not really noticed a performance difference here. In fact with
WITNESS and INVARIANTS disabled, I find that -CURRENT seems to be a bit
faster than -STABLE.
Ken
To Uns
Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > Patch looks correct.
> >
> > Please commit? 8-).
>
> Well I made a libc with this patch and rebuilt XFree86-4-libraries without
> libXThrStub but I ran into problems compiling the clients. The clients
>
Nate Lawson wrote:
> Here is a link to the size of various components of libc, sorted by text
> size. If you can find some way to reduce or even remove some of this,
> please submit a patch.
>
> http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/lib_size.out
Move the resolver code out to ibresolv.so, and link
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> > Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > > That's bizarre... it's defined in libc_r, so there's no reason for
> > > > the omission in libc.
> > >
> > > I only added stubs that I thought the implementation of libc used
>
Gordon Tetlow writes:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> > I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
> > awkward. In particular, especially for people who
> > have worked with SysV-style init scripts, it's
> > rather surprising that "/etc/rc.d/nfsd stop"
Terry Lambert wrote:
> Nate Lawson wrote:
> > Here is a link to the size of various components of libc, sorted by text
> > size. If you can find some way to reduce or even remove some of this,
> > please submit a patch.
> >
> > http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/lib_size.out
>
> Move the resolv
On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 11:43 AM, Doug Rabson wrote:
I compiled kde3 a week or so ago on my laptop running -current and it
is
now my new desktop, so I think reports of kde being totally hosed are
a
bit exagerated or perhaps dated.
Hmm. I compiled it a few days ago and it was qui
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> >
> > > Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > > > That's bizarre... it's defined in libc_r, so there's no reason for
> > > > > the omission in libc.
> > > >
> > > > I only a
[The crucial question is hidden somewhere...]
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 08:55:05PM +, Daniel Flickinger wrote:
> Sent: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:02:17 -0800 by Marcel Moolenaar
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:48:23PM +, Daniel Flickinger wrote:
> + > /usr/src/lib/libc/uuid/uuid_compare.c:31:18:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Doug Rabson wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > > Patch looks correct.
> > >
> > > Please commit? 8-).
> >
> > Well I made a libc with this patch and rebuilt XFree86-4-libraries without
> > libXThrStub
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > Here is a link to the size of various components of libc, sorted by text
> > > size. If you can find some way to reduce or even remove some of this,
> > > please submit a patch.
> > >
> > > http://www.roo
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
awkward. In particular, ... "/etc/rc.d/nfsd stop" does
not actually stop the nfsd process. ...
... I've found this behavior to be quite annoying. I'll
see if I
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> > Doug Rabson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > > Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > > > Patch looks correct.
> > > >
> > > > Please commit? 8-).
> > >
> > > Well I made a libc with this pa
/etc/rc runs /etc/rc.sysctl twice:
one "early", after mounting filesystems, reseeding the random number
generator and adding a swap file, and before running rc.serial, rc.pccard,
rc.network.
one "late", after network_pass4 but before raising the securelevel.
This was added in response to
http:/
Peter Wemm wrote:
> Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > Here is a link to the size of various components of libc, sorted by text
> > > size. If you can find some way to reduce or even remove some of this,
> > > please submit a patch.
> > >
> > > http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/li
Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > Well, it must have the same problem with Solaris then. Somehow,
> > you've got to force it to link libc_r before libc...
>
> The only way I can see to do that is to link libX11, libXt and friends
> against libc_r.
What this com
Terry Lambert wrote:
> Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > > Here is a link to the size of various components of libc, sorted by tex
t
> > > > size. If you can find some way to reduce or even remove some of this,
> > > > please submit a patch.
> > > >
> >
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 08:55:05PM +, Daniel Flickinger wrote:
> Sent: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:02:17 -0800 by Marcel Moolenaar
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:48:23PM +, Daniel Flickinger wrote:
>> /usr/src/lib/libc/uuid/uuid_compare.c:31:18: uuid.h: No such file \
>> or directory
>+> [snip
In the last episode (Oct 30), Doug Rabson said:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > We've been over this before. To make this work right, we need to
> > make /bin and /sbin dynamically linked. NetBSD's /rescue/*
> > approach would solve the "oops!" and other foot shooting problems.
>
>
Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Poul-Henning, your patch to src/sys/i386/include/reg.h
>
> revision 1.28
> date: 2002/10/20 20:48:56; author: phk; state: Exp; lines: +6 -9
> Change the definition of the debugging registers to be an array, so
> that we can index into it, rath
> Hi,
>
> I am running current cvsuped within this week. I have an adaptec
> builtin scsi controller and a seagate drive attached to it and
> after every bootup as soon as there is heavy disk activity
> the drive gets disabled for 1 or 2 minutes and meanwhile all
> functionality RELATED to disk
Hello,
I am using a Force 4203 motherboard which has multiple PCIX busses. Devices
on PCIX busses > 0 are not detected. This is the dmesg with ACPI enabled.
Note that I have actually put the printf's for the vendor id's and device
id's in the bge driver since the BCM5701 NIC does not get detected.
Doug Rabson wrote:
> > You need to link the library against libc_r.so instead of libXThrStub.so.
>
> Probably not. Doing that breaks the existing 'feature' of being able to
> use X11 in entirely non-threaded programs. I'm not sure whether that is
> acceptable. It also stops programs from being abl
Doug Rabson wrote:
> > I think the only sensible solution to this problem is for libraries which
> > provide an actual pthreads implementation (rather than a set of stubs) to
> > define strong symbols. Wierd debugging wrappers can still be achieved via
> > some dlopen/dlsym hackery.
>
> For what i
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: The reasons are the same as they used to be: incomplete language support
: and incomplete library support. Language support is being completed but
: is far from here yet. See the paper referenced in Loren's repl
Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Oct 30), Doug Rabson said:
> > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > > We've been over this before. To make this work right, we need to
> > > make /bin and /sbin dynamically linked. NetBSD's /rescue/*
> > > approach would solve the "oops!" and other f
Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Oct 30), Doug Rabson said:
> > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > > We've been over this before. To make this work right, we need to
> > > make /bin and /sbin dynamically linked. NetBSD's /rescue/*
> > > approach would solve the "oops!" and other f
"M. Warner Losh" wrote:
> And there's a comment:
> * 64-bit precision often gives bad results with high level languages
> * because it makes the results of calculations depend on whether
> * intermediate values are stored in memory or in FPU registers.
> which seems like a compiler issue, not an
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Doug Rabson wrote:
> > > You need to link the library against libc_r.so instead of libXThrStub.so.
> >
> > Probably not. Doing that breaks the existing 'feature' of being able to
> > use X11 in entirely non-threaded programs. I'm not sure whether that is
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Doug Rabson wrote:
> > > I think the only sensible solution to this problem is for libraries which
> > > provide an actual pthreads implementation (rather than a set of stubs) to
> > > define strong symbols. Wierd debugging wrappers can still be achieved
Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Note that dynamically-linked executables take significantly longer to
> > exec than statically-linked ones.
>
> Indeed yes. Running ld-elf.so.1 isn't free. Also, calling PIC libraries
> isn't free either. Not only that, but even fork(2) is slower when you come
> *from* a
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Doug Rabson wrote:
> > You can't have a library that's sort of threaded and sort of not
> > threaded: pick one.
>
> Yes you can - libX11 is *thread safe* but doesn't create threads. When a
> real pthreads implementation is present, libX11 uses its implementation of
> mutex, cond etc. to ensure its
Doug Rabson wrote:
> > > For what its worth, doing this (defining strong pthread_* symbols in
> > > libc_r) makes everything work fine, with or without libXThrStub.
> >
> > No, this would be bad. There's some justification for not
> > doing this, in allowing programs linked againts libraries linke
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: "M. Warner Losh" wrote:
: > And there's a comment:
: > * 64-bit precision often gives bad results with high level languages
: > * because it makes the results of calculations depend on whether
: > * intermedi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:23:48PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Gordon Tetlow wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >
> >>I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
> >>awkward. In particular, ... "/etc/rc.d/nfsd stop" does
> >>not actually stop the nfs
< said:
> I think I don't understand what you are saying at all. It doesn't
> seem top jive with the rest of the messages in this thread.
Of course not, it's Terry ``Irrelevant Tangent'' Lambert you're taking about.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe f
< said:
[rude snipe deleted...]
Sorry, that was un-called-for (and was intended to be a private
message to Warner).
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Ok, so based on the promising response I got to my original 3 questions,
I went ahead and upgraded. It went _very_ smoothly, with the help of
UPDATING and some experience with this sort of thing. No make errors at
any point. The only issues I hit were my fault, like forgetting to run
mergemaste
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
