Re: Top Posting Mania [was Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow]

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote: > > > > Woj, I'm really surprised that you, of all people, seem lately to have > > been converted to the Micro$oft Outlock-trained style of top-posting, > > including tail-quoting all sorts irrelev

Re: Top Posting Mania [was Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow]

> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote: Woj, I'm really surprised that you, of all people, seem lately to have been converted to the Micro$oft Outlock-trained style of top-posting, including tail-quoting all sorts irrelevant and repeated trailers etc, after years of your (almost too- :) c

Publicidad

Clic aqui si no ves la imagen -- To unsubscribe from this list visit http://www.ekipate.es/lists/lt.php?id=YR5SBAwKVQQYC1BMAQ4FVAM%3D To update your preferences visit http://www.ekipate.es/lists/lt.php?id=YR5SBAwKVQUYC1BMAQ4FVAM%3D -

Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Kailash Kailash wrote: > I am using FreeBSD 7.0 in 64 BIT mode. Same code compiled on BSD 7.0 runs > 50% speed (as expected by CPU and code architecture) compared to BSD 6.2. > Here is one real code with binary output. On 3.0 GHz Woodcrest processor, I > am able to

Re: FreeBSD 7.1: iwi problem with intel 2200 pro wireless card

Hello John, I also have a T42p that I just installed FreeBSD 7.1 onto. I use the Intel 2200BG as well, so hopefully this helps. I noticed on your loader.conf that you have the license at the end of "WiFi Config. I placed mine at the beginning. as in the example below. Have you tried loading t

Top Posting Mania [was Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow]

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:13:08 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > you install it from ports and use explicitly, everything else still uses > default > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote: > > > Can old version of GCC used with BSD 7.0 without facing any compatibility > > proble

AUDITORIAS DEL ISR, IETU, IVA e IDE

AUDITORIAS del ISR, IETU, IVA e IDE Con la = reforma fiscal de 2008 entro en vigor la Ley del IETU ( (Impuesto Empresarial a = Tasa Única). El tiempo transcurre y la autoridad correspondiente se dispone instrumentar actos de fiscalización en materia de IETU , para verif

Property Update February 2009 - International Property Directory

February 2009 - Interest is picking up in select markets Choose Your Language: Ajman - UAE International Property Directory are pleased to announce a FIRST for a FINANCE FACILITY IN AJMAN Goldcrest Properties, one of our recommended developers of note are now pl

Re: Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:18:03AM -0800, GESBBB wrote: > I am using this snippet of code in a bash script that is run via CRON. > ? > ? > > # See if we are running via CRON > ??? if [ ! -t 0 ] > ? then > # Use the BASH RANDOM function to generate a random number between 0 & 32767 > ??? RE

Problems with gnome-keyring-daemon and console-kit-daemon on FreeBSD 7.1

Hi all, I installed FreeBSD 7.1 a few days back along with Gnome. I added dbus_enable=YES and hald_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf to get dbus and hald up and running. Since then, I am getting the following error messages when I start gnome : gnome-keyring-daemon : couldn't allocate secure memor

RE: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow

you install it from ports and use explicitly, everything else still uses default On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote: Can old version of GCC used with BSD 7.0 without facing any compatibility problem? Thanks, Kailash -Original Message- From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:woj...@wojte

Re: Problem with dbus and hald on FreeBSD-7.1

Le 18/02/2009 à 13:36:59+0530, manish jain a écrit > > Hi, > > I installed FreeBSD 7.1 on my system a couple of days back. While the > rest of the system works very well, I keep getting the following errors > when I start gnome : > > gnome-keyring-daemon : couldn't allocate secure memory to k

Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow

On Wednesday 18 February 2009 03:44 pm, Kailash Kailash wrote: > I am using FreeBSD 7.0 in 64 BIT mode. Same code compiled on BSD > 7.0 runs 50% speed (as expected by CPU and code architecture) > compared to BSD 6.2. Here is one real code with binary output. On > 3.0 GHz Woodcrest processor, I am a

MEETING

Estas buscando pareja. -- To unsubscribe from this list visit http://www.ekipate.es/lists/lt.php?id=YR5QBw0OUwwYCFpMAQ4FVAM%3D To update your preferences visit http://www.ekipate.es/lists/lt.php?id=YR5QBw0OUw0YCFpMAQ4FVAM%3D

RE: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow

Can old version of GCC used with BSD 7.0 without facing any compatibility problem? Thanks, Kailash -Original Message- From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:46 PM To: Kailash Kailash Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re:

Re: World doesn't build correctly

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Frank Wißmann wrote: > Am Dienstag 17 Februar 2009 21:20:15 schrieb Polytropon: >> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:14:58 +0100, Frank Wißmann > wrote: >> > What is going wrong here? Why isn't ther build a 7_STABLE as I >> > desire? What do I need to change to get my wante

Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow

looks like they "improved" gcc. you can install older from ports. On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote: I am using FreeBSD 7.0 in 64 BIT mode. Same code compiled on BSD 7.0 runs 50% speed (as expected by CPU and code architecture) compared to BSD 6.2. Here is one real code with binary out

FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow

I am using FreeBSD 7.0 in 64 BIT mode. Same code compiled on BSD 7.0 runs 50% speed (as expected by CPU and code architecture) compared to BSD 6.2. Here is one real code with binary output. On 3.0 GHz Woodcrest processor, I am able to copy from one cache to another cache at the speed of 24Gbytes/se

Re: World doesn't build correctly

Am Dienstag 17 Februar 2009 21:20:15 schrieb Polytropon: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:14:58 +0100, Frank Wißmann wrote: > > What is going wrong here? Why isn't ther build a 7_STABLE as I > > desire? What do I need to change to get my wanted results? > > Are you sure you have the correct sources? How

Re: Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

On Feb 18, 2009, at 12:29 PM, GESBBB wrote: I am a little confused. I believe the problem is with the "if [ ! -t 0 ]" statement. I tried to redirect the error message; however, it still appears in the email sent by CRON. I tried using this statement instead: if ( ! tty -s &> /dev/null ) and

Re: Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

> From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk > GESBBB wrote: > | I am using this snippet of code in a bash script that is run via CRON. > | > | > | > | # See if we are running via CRON > |    if [ ! -t 0 ] > |      then > | # Use the BASH RANDOM function to generate a random number betwe

How to create statically linked bacula-fd?

We blew up one of our servers recently and we wanted to restore backed-up data from a Bacula storage server. The Bacula recovery process states that one needs to create a statically linked bacula-fd daemon in order to start the recovery process but it does not offer a how-to for FreeBSD systems-- o

Re: Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

On Wednesday 18 February 2009 10:40:47 Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, GESBBB wrote: > > I am using this snippet of code in a bash script that is run via CRON. > >   > > > > # See if we are running via CRON > >     if [ ! -t 0 ] > >   then > > # Use the BASH RANDOM function to gener

Re: Determining process preventing umount of busy partition

On Wednesday 18 February 2009 06:07:52 Polytropon wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:30:55 -0900, Mel wrote: > > This is weird, though. New theories (where are Chase, Cameron and Foreman > > when you need them!): > > Spying around in someone else's house. :-) > > > fstat is lying, instead use: > > f

Re: Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, GESBBB wrote: I am using this snippet of code in a bash script that is run via CRON.   # See if we are running via CRON     if [ ! -t 0 ]   then # Use the BASH RANDOM function to generate a random number between 0 & 32767     RESTING=$((RANDOM/60))     sleep ${R

Re: No periodic daily?

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: > All, > > I'm having a strange issue with one of my boxes. It's the router for our DS3: > > router#uname -a > FreeBSD router.mycompany.com 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Mon May > 19 01:16:12 PDT 2008 > r...@router.mycompany.com:/usr/obj/usr/sr

Re: memory limitations per process

2009/2/18 : > Hi, > > I'm running into a per process memory limit at work (on Windoze though), but > I'm wondering what's the limit per process in FreeBSD for 32 bit systems, ie > i386? Is it 4gb or 2? From stuff I found on the Net, I'm guessing 4gb, but > wanted to ask anyway. It seems to be an i

Re: No periodic daily?

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Fred Condo wrote: > At a minimum, we'd want to see the contents of /etc/periodic.conf As I just posted, this looks like an error in my postfix configuration. > (as an aside) Any reason you're running an unpatched 7.0 on your > router? 7.0 is up to around patch 10

Re: No periodic daily?

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: > All, > > I'm having a strange issue with one of my boxes. It's the router for our DS3: > > router#uname -a > FreeBSD router.mycompany.com 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Mon May > 19 01:16:12 PDT 2008 > r...@router.mycompany.com:/usr/obj/usr/sr

No periodic daily?

All, I'm having a strange issue with one of my boxes. It's the router for our DS3: router#uname -a FreeBSD router.mycompany.com 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Mon May 19 01:16:12 PDT 2008 r...@router.mycompany.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 The machine has stopped sending periodic dai

memory limitations per process

Hi, I'm running into a per process memory limit at work (on Windoze though), but I'm wondering what's the limit per process in FreeBSD for 32 bit systems, ie i386? Is it 4gb or 2? From stuff I found on the Net, I'm guessing 4gb, but wanted to ask anyway. It seems to be an implementation d

Re: Performance problem with samba/zfs

Mel wrote: On Monday 16 February 2009 07:56:02 Jonathan Belson wrote: I export a few samba shares from a FreeBSD amd64 server and I've been editing text files on one of the shares via a Windows box. This /usually/ works fine, but occasionally I'll get a pause of several seconds when I save back

Re: Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 GESBBB wrote: | I am using this snippet of code in a bash script that is run via CRON. | | | | # See if we are running via CRON | if [ ! -t 0 ] | then | # Use the BASH RANDOM function to generate a random number between 0 & 32767 |

wrong time stamp 1 JAN 1970 on /var/tmp/orbit-

I use FBSD 6.4-stable alpha. When starting a browser (firefox2 or kazehakase) no window is open, instead: GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See htt

Problem with BASH and [ ! -t 0 ] test.

I am using this snippet of code in a bash script that is run via CRON.     # See if we are running via CRON     if [ ! -t 0 ]   then # Use the BASH RANDOM function to generate a random number between 0 & 32767     RESTING=$((RANDOM/60))     sleep ${RESTING}     fi     It runs fine fro

Re: FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers

> --- On Sat, 2/14/09, Gabe wrote: > > > From: Gabe > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers > > To: "Matthew Seaman" > > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Date: Saturday, February 14, 2009, 8:41 PM > > --- On Sat, 2/14/09, Matthew Seaman > > wrote: > > > > > From: Matthew Se

Re: Determining process preventing umount of busy partition

On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:30:55 -0900, Mel wrote: > This is weird, though. New theories (where are Chase, Cameron and Foreman > when > you need them!): Spying around in someone else's house. :-) > fstat is lying, instead use: > fstat -f /usr -m -v Well, I've taken that pill. This is the resul

Re: [freebsd-network]why when OS reboot, my NIC status show no carrier

before freebsd show "hostname#", we can see NIC card status, but my NIC card status always show "status: no carrier" because it needs a while to get up. all is fine. after I login my freebsd , I used "ifconfig" command show my NIC card status is active could have any skill I can let my NI

Re: Performance problem with samba/zfs

Hi! On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Jonathan Belson wrote: > Hiya > > I export a few samba shares from a FreeBSD amd64 server and I've been > editing text files on one of the shares via a Windows box. > > This /usually/ works fine, but occasionally I'll get a pause of several > seconds when I s

console-kit-daemon errors

Hi, Please ignore my previous message "Problem with dbus and hald on FreeBSD-7.1". I added dbus_enable=YES and hald_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf. This solved the earlier problems, giving way to a new one. Now I am getting the following problem when I try to start gnome : console-kit-daemon[10

Re: w(5) shows non-existent or lost process?

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:08:41PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:43:30 + Anton Shterenlikht > wrote: > > > The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5, > > even though I have rebooted the box many times since. Does this mean > > the corresp

Problem with dbus and hald on FreeBSD-7.1

Hi, I installed FreeBSD 7.1 on my system a couple of days back. While the rest of the system works very well, I keep getting the following errors when I start gnome : gnome-keyring-daemon : couldn't allocate secure memory to keep passwords and or keys from being written to the disk gnome-

Re: w(5) shows non-existent or lost process?

On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:43:30 + Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5, > even though I have rebooted the box many times since. Does this mean > the corresponding entry in /var/run/utmp is wrong and shouldn't be there, or > i

[freebsd-network]why when OS reboot, my NIC status show no carrier

Hello, all: before freebsd show "hostname#", we can see NIC card status, but my NIC card status always show "status: no carrier" after I login my freebsd , I used "ifconfig" command show my NIC card status is active could have any skill I can let my NIC card status show "status: active" b