At this point, I guess I'm looking for recommendations on a window
manager.
Here are the major problems with XFCE4 4.6:
* < 20% probability of starting X without crashing and locking
computer
* 20-25 minutes to start X (was about 1 under XFCE4 4.4)
* 0% chance of shutting down successfully if
I want to use my home server to build Xorg and KDE packages for a
desktop. man ports says make package will install the port. I don't
need Xorg on the server and I would like to tweak make.conf to build
for a different architecture. Is there a way to do this?
___
Ross wrote:
I want to use my home server to build Xorg and KDE packages for a
desktop. man ports says make package will install the port. I don't
need Xorg on the server and I would like to tweak make.conf to build
for a different architecture. Is there a way to do this?
_
Good Day every one!
We have a situation and we are looking for a solution (the client is specific
to implement this way):
We are using FreeBSD FW cluster (2 units) for our DMZ zone. We are using CARP
for VIP and round robin load balance. The result is not always balance, most of
the times it
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has blocked an attachment.
Sender = freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Recipient(s) = SUMMERS.DAVID
Subject = Returned mail: Data format error
Scanning time = 3/20/2009 3:40:11 AM
Action on file blocking:
The attachment message.exe matches the file blocking settings. Sc
I do believe that man pkg_create will give you the correct answer :)
Regards,
Ivailo Tanusheff
Deputy Head of IT Department
ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD
Ross
Sent by: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
20.03.2009 09:21
To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
Building packages without
On Thursday 19 March 2009 22:48:47 Ross wrote:
> I want to use my home server to build Xorg and KDE packages for a
> desktop. man ports says make package will install the port. I don't
> need Xorg on the server and I would like to tweak make.conf to build
> for a different architecture. Is there a
On Thursday 19 March 2009 15:50:22 Gene wrote:
> Morning All:
>
> I've searched the archives and googled and generally applied what I found
> to no good effect.
>
> While installing the kde4 port, I got to libspectre. The libspectre port
> insists that I must have libgs to compile it.
What pulls i
Ross wrote:
> I want to use my home server to build Xorg and KDE packages for a
> desktop. man ports says make package will install the port. I don't
> need Xorg on the server and I would like to tweak make.conf to build
> for a different architecture. Is there a way to do this?
>
Use ports-mgm
--
_
Pozdrawiam
Pajewski RafaĆ
Administrator
--
K2. Dla nas to mozliwe.
K2 Internet S.A.
tel. +48 22 448 70 00
faks +48 22 448 71 01
00-145 Warszawa al. Solidarnosci 74 A
e-mail: bi...@k2.pl http://www.k2.pl
KRS 059690 NIP 951-19-83-801 Regon 016378720
Wysokosc kapitalu zakl
Keith Seyffarth wrote:
At this point, I guess I'm looking for recommendations on a window
manager.
Here are the major problems with XFCE4 4.6:
* < 20% probability of starting X without crashing and locking
computer
* 20-25 minutes to start X (was about 1 under XFCE4 4.4)
* 0% chance of shutti
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Keith Seyffarth wrote:
>
> At this point, I guess I'm looking for recommendations on a window
> manager.
Try a smaller one, like evilwm. It's (pretty much) all command line. For
example, you would open up a term and launch firefox from there (# firefox).
Once yo
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Keith Seyffarth wrote:
At this point, I guess I'm looking for recommendations on a window
manager.
Here are the major problems with XFCE4 4.6:
* < 20% probability of starting X without crashing and locking
computer
* 20-25 minutes to start X (was about 1 under XFCE4 4.4)
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:01:29 -0800, Mel Flynn wrote
> On Thursday 19 March 2009 15:50:22 Gene wrote:
> > Morning All:
> >
> > I've searched the archives and googled and generally applied what I found
> > to no good effect.
> >
> > While installing the kde4 port, I got to libspectre. The libspectre
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Frank Shute wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 03:21:05PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> >
> > The last couple of days I've been running portupgrade -av and am to the
> > point where I'd like to move onto something else, but there is one
> package
> > that won't upgrade
> From: f...@brightstar.bomgardner.net
> To: ch...@monochrome.org; cho...@charter.net
> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:45:11 -0600
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Portsnap vs CSup
>
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:50:48 -0400 (EDT), Chris Hill wrote
> > On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Charles Hows
Got X? You already got one ;-)
http://81.174.174.115/twm/twmrc.htm
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
compiling the kernel on that could take several days by itself let alone
compiling X and then a thick GUI like KDE or GNOME. amazing that a 100MHz
system with 48 megs of ram can still run so fast if you build it right.
for sure not KDE, but X and FreeBSD itself with good software running on
i
Paul B. Mahol wrote:
On 3/18/09, rasz wrote:
hi
i have 2 distinct questions, and first is, i installed a linux app
(binaries) and it failed
when run complaining that it needs a "CPU with SSE instuctions enabled".
does anyone know what this is and related too?
For example, mplayer chec
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:15:37 -0600 (MDT)
Keith Seyffarth wrote:
>
> At this point, I guess I'm looking for recommendations on a window
> manager.
The XFCE upgrade went smoothly for me, apart from missing icons,
although I don't use it all that much so I may have missed something.
At very least
On Friday 20 March 2009 05:21:20 Gene wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:01:29 -0800, Mel Flynn wrote
>
> > On Thursday 19 March 2009 15:50:22 Gene wrote:
> > > Morning All:
> > >
> > > I've searched the archives and googled and generally applied what I
> > > found to no good effect.
> > >
> > > While
> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:48:26 +0100
> From: woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
> To: millenia2...@hotmail.com
> CC: f...@bomgardner.net; ch...@monochrome.org; cho...@charter.net;
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: Portsnap vs CSup
>
> >
> > compiling the kernel on that could take sev
Neal Hogan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Frank Shute wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 03:21:05PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
The last couple of days I've been running portupgrade -av and am to the
point where I'd like to move onto something else, but there is one
package
Hi everyone, I have a mixed update: I was able to get it running, but once
it starts, it gets stuck. Here are the last two lines: isab0: on isab0
Please let me know if you need more info, or you have any advice on what
this could be.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
> Thanks fo
Hi all,
About a year ago, I setup MySQL 5.0.45 on a FreeBSD 6.x box (64 bit). I
read at the time that the use of pthreads with FreeBSD would significantly
improve performance, but as I was running the 64 bit version of FreeBSD, I
could not use them.
Fast forward to today - a different setup
Thanks!
Indeed I did have:
${fwcmd} 140 allow all from $CARP-PEER_physical_interface to any via
$local_external_interface
But it alone doesn't seem to be enough, sometimes it work but sometimes it
doesn't. with tcpdump, sometimes I can't see the VRRPv2 advertisement.
So now i added:
${fwcm
On Friday 20 March 2009 09:38:27 Matt Juszczak wrote:
> I decided to install a 64 bit version of FreeBSD 7.x (to address the 8 GB
> RAM in the box) and attempt to build with pthreads enabled, as well as a
> static build and optimized compiler options. Once again, got the
> error/warning in ports t
Matt Juszczak wrote:
Hi all,
About a year ago, I setup MySQL 5.0.45 on a FreeBSD 6.x box (64 bit).
I read at the time that the use of pthreads with FreeBSD would
significantly improve performance, but as I was running the 64 bit
version of FreeBSD, I could not use them.
Fast forward to tod
Matt Juszczak wrote:
Hi all,
About a year ago, I setup MySQL 5.0.45 on a FreeBSD 6.x box (64 bit).
I read at the time that the use of pthreads with FreeBSD would
significantly improve performance, but as I was running the 64 bit
version of FreeBSD, I could not use them.
Fast forward to tod
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 03:30:33PM -0400, Alhaji Barrie wrote:
> To put it simply, I am missing the syntax for the user name and password.
> Can someone help with the step by step process of getting past the original
> login screen?
Just remember that username and password are case sensitive.
Perh
You're confusing linux-threads with pthreads. The performance boosts mentioned
are done using the FreeBSD Posix threads ("pthreads") library, in FreeBSD 7.x
they are implemented using libthr(3).
The benchmarks also assume you are using SCHED_ULE, rather then SCHED_4BSD.
Nothing should be configure
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:13:52AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> For a special application, I need a programmable dialog library that
> has... well, how to describe it... anyone know SIOS? Or at least TSO?
> A bit like this. A kind of form-driven screen layout.
Besides dialog(3), there's also a C++ c
> >
> for sure not KDE, but X and FreeBSD itself with good software running on
> it works FAST on 100Mhz machine with 48MB RAM.
>
> Yes compiling is slow, but normal usage is FAST.
I never used gnome or KDE on it, ran Blackbox insted.
of course it's fast.
and even slower machines like 486/33 w
Andrew Moran schrieb:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had any success in installing FreeBSD 7.1 on a
> USB2 or Firewire 800 drive connected to an intel Mac Mini and
> successfully booting off of it?
If I remember right, enable the Open Firmware prompt to boot to other
devices than in
This looks like a hardware problem to me. However, I don't have any
experience with this type of SCSI hardware.
If it were my system I'd be double-checking the tape drive setup, cabling
and termination, and then substituting other cables and SCSI controllers.
One thing that confuses me is th
Hello Boris,
I followed your leads and I am now left with the following :
>> Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "gnomebreakpad":
libgnomebreakpad.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
>>
>> (acroread:41717): Pango-WARNING **: No builtin or
dynam
Manish Jain writes:
> Hello Boris,
>
> I followed your leads and I am now left with the following :
Please, show what exactly you have done. And give output of
two commands from those URLs. And try to not top-post. Otherwise
you yourself won't understand the email.
> >> Gtk-Message: Faile
Aloha,
I need to unsubscribe for a month. I keep getting rejected from the
server at unscribe. Any known issues with that?
Cound the keeper of the mail please contact me.
Thanks,
--
~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740
+ http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org +
On Friday 20 March 2009 12:38:22 Al Plant wrote:
> I need to unsubscribe for a month. I keep getting rejected from the
> server at unscribe. Any known issues with that?
Since I changed email address just yesterday, I have seen no issues. I used
the webinterface.
--
Mel
_
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
> Hi everyone, I have a mixed update: I was able to get it running, but once
> it starts, it gets stuck. Here are the last two lines: isab0: bridge. at device 31.0 on pci0
> isa0: on isab0
>
> Please let me know if you need more info, or you have
Mel Flynn wrote:
On Friday 20 March 2009 12:38:22 Al Plant wrote:
I need to unsubscribe for a month. I keep getting rejected from the
server at unscribe. Any known issues with that?
Since I changed email address just yesterday, I have seen no issues. I used
the webinterface.
###
On Friday 20 March 2009 10:46:20 Matt Juszczak wrote:
> > You're confusing linux-threads with pthreads. The performance boosts
> > mentioned are done using the FreeBSD Posix threads ("pthreads") library,
> > in FreeBSD 7.x they are implemented using libthr(3).
> > The benchmarks also assume you are
I did a pkg_add -r mysql60-server
and then
# mysql_install_db --user=mysql
Installing MySQL system tables...
090320 17:11:24 [Note] Falcon: unable to open system data files.
090320 17:11:24 [Note] Falcon: creating new system data files.
^T ^T
load: 0.01 cmd: mysqld 1028 [uwait] 0.01u 0.01s 0% 11
In light of Adam's comment and thinking about the comment he's responding
to, I realize that I may have been rather obnoxious. I appreciate Adam
setting that aside to give me and the list some of his time. I'm rather new
to fBSD (obvious) and I've got my parent's machine on it, which is hundreds
of
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:14:32AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Frank Shute wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 03:21:05PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> > >
> > > The last couple of days I've been running portupgrade -av and am to the
> > > point where I'd like to m
Well Frank, if/when you read my most recent comment, you'll notice that I've
probably confused ports and packages again. As has been the case for the
past week or so, thanks for taking the time.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Frank Shute wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:14:32AM -0500, Neal
Neal Hogan wrote:
In light of Adam's comment and thinking about the comment he's
responding to, I realize that I may have been rather obnoxious. I
appreciate Adam setting that aside to give me and the list some of his
time. I'm rather new to fBSD (obvious) and I've got my parent's
machine on i
In the last episode (Mar 20), Christoph Kukulies said:
> I did a pkg_add -r mysql60-server
> and then
>
> # mysql_install_db --user=mysql
> Installing MySQL system tables...
> 090320 17:11:24 [Note] Falcon: unable to open system data files.
> 090320 17:11:24 [Note] Falcon: creating new system data
Hey,
Does anyone know a faster way of extracting big rar files, or why is
it so slow?
I did a quick test with time (extracting the same ~800MiB file,
consisting of split archives):
unrar:
real4m29.637s
user0m4.969s
sys 0m3.131s
7z:
real3m50.020s
user0m4.784s
sys 0m1.82
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:12:12 -0400, Sean Cavanaugh
wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:48:26 +0100
> > for sure not KDE, but X and FreeBSD itself with good software running on
> > it works FAST on 100Mhz machine with 48MB RAM.
> >
> > Yes compiling is slow, but normal usage is FAST.
>
>
> I
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:34:52 +0100, cpghost wrote:
> Besides dialog(3), there's also a C++ class library that emulates
> Borland's Turbo Vision's SAA interface. Two implementations are
> in ports:
>
> devel/rhtvision
> devel/tvision
Ugh! :-) The day I got a TurboPascal 7.0 box and manuals I
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 11:17 +0100, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> On 3/18/09, Gary Dunn wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 18:53 +0100, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> >> On 3/13/09, Saifi Khan wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Maciej Suszko wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Saifi Khan wrote:
> >> >> > Hi all:
> >> >> >
> >>
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:04:00 -0500
Neal Hogan wrote:
> But, I wonder what the most efficient way is to update ports. I
> appreciate Adam's point about the fact that portupgrade (and
> portmanager and portmaster) are ports themselves and are going to not
> be as reliable as what is in base.
IMO t
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:53:16 +0200
Ghirai wrote:
> The shareware WinRAR on windows seems to be better implemented (?), as
> it uses both cores to the fullest, and as such the time needed to
> extract stuff is a lot shorter.
IIRC the unix version is portable C, but winrar has a lot of CPU
specifi
Does Maya for Linux run on FreeBSD via the compatibility layer? Also, does
a recent version of Matlab for Linux run on FreeBSD via the compatibility
layer? The Handbook only mentions Matlab 6.3, which is very old and dated.
Sabeeh
___
freebsd-questions
On Friday 20 March 2009 17:55:49 RW wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:53:16 +0200
>
> Ghirai wrote:
> > The shareware WinRAR on windows seems to be better implemented (?), as
> > it uses both cores to the fullest, and as such the time needed to
> > extract stuff is a lot shorter.
>
> IIRC the unix v
RW wrote:
IMO this doesn't make any sense. If portupgrade is failing on a port
where manual "make install" works, then portupgrade simply has a bug.
Any port upgrading tool belongs in a port, because it's more important
that it responds to changes in the ports system than changes in the
base sys
57 matches
Mail list logo