On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Chris Stankevitz
wrote:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2010-June/024394.html
>
> In the above post, a FreeBSD GNOME team member recommends "rebuilding and
> reinstalling sysutils/polkit, sysutils/policykit, and sysutils/consolekit".
>
> Q: How
I see no one in this list knows about that topic. Do someone knows where I can
ask? Are there another mailing list more focused on programming problems?
Thank you.
On 22:02, Sun 20 Jun 10, Ruben Pollan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm new user of FreeBSD, using it as a desktop since a week. I develop an
Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Chris Stankevitz
wrote:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2010-June/024394.html
In the above post, a FreeBSD GNOME team member recommends "rebuilding and
reinstalling sysutils/polkit, sysutils/policykit, and sysutils/consol
I've got two FreeBSD machines on two different networks(and two
different locations). One of them is as fast machine (i7-920) while
the other one is a Intel Atom. How can I build on the fast machine and
use those binaries on the slow one, without mounting /usr/obj using
nfs? first I was thinking ab
2010/7/1 Christer Solskogen
> I've got two FreeBSD machines on two different networks(and two
> different locations). One of them is as fast machine (i7-920) while
> the other one is a Intel Atom. How can I build on the fast machine and
> use those binaries on the slow one, without mounting /usr/
Hi,
On 6/30/10 8:00 PM, Mr. Darren wrote:
Though this will not be the focus of my question. Lots of ports are being
created for FreeBSD and none submitted. I don't know why.
My problem arises when trying to install one of these which is put together
quite well. pkg_add -r http://site/somet
Hi,
On 7/1/10 5:28 AM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Chris Stankevitz
wrote:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2010-June/024394.html
In the above post, a FreeBSD GNOME team member recommends "rebuilding and
reinstalling sysutils/polkit, sysutils/poli
Hi,
On 7/1/10 6:48 AM, Anders Andersson wrote:
2010/7/1 Christer Solskogen
I've got two FreeBSD machines on two different networks(and two
different locations). One of them is as fast machine (i7-920) while
the other one is a Intel Atom. How can I build on the fast machine and
use those binari
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> You could use 'make package-recursive', or have a look at
> ports-mgmt/tinderbox, which does this by default.
>
Or as I do: rsync /usr/ports/packages :)
--
chs,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/1/10 5:28 AM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Chris Stankevitz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2010-June/024394.html
>>>
>>> In the above post, a FreeBSD GNOME team m
Hello,
I wanted to know if I could safely update one of my production server from
7.2p8 to 7.3-RELEASE without having to recompile all userland apps installed… ?
I am using portmaster and have a couple of hundred ports installed…
Thanks for your advise
¯¯
On 2010-07-01 15:28:00, Mikle Krutov wrote:
> Sorry for late-answer, but why are you running wine in jail?
> May be that's the source of the problem.
> For me, it was just installed into /usr/local/ as some other
> program, some 32bit libs were in lib32, and so on.
As mentioned, I've tried it in
Sorry for late-answer, but why are you running wine in jail?
May be that's the source of the problem.
For me, it was just installed into /usr/local/ as some other
program, some 32bit libs were in lib32, and so on.
2010/6/25, xorquew...@googlemail.com :
> On 2010-06-24 18:57:35, Mikle Krutov wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2010 12:44:10, bsd wrote:
> I wanted to know if I could safely update one of my production
> server from 7.2p8 to 7.3-RELEASE without having to recompile all userland
> apps installed… ?
>
> I am using portmaster and have a couple of hundred
Apologies for the cross posting.
I recently did a fresh install of Freebsd 8 , amd64.
I then added Xorg and KDE (4.3) from the sysinstall packages system.
I read about policykit, which seems really cool. I set-up PolicyKit in
the KDE systems settings and things worked great (adding USB drives),
On 30 June 2010 15:34, Chris Maness wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:49 AM, krad wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 29 June 2010 07:20, Chris Maness wrote:
> >>
> >> My named server used to resolve for external hosts. Recently I have
> >> noticed that it no longer resolves names for resolvers not on the
Can a sub block of IP address space be used, and if so, what is the wild card?
Chris
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Chris Maness wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:49 AM, krad wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 29 June 2010 07:20, Chris Maness wrote:
>>>
>>> My named server used to resolve for external host
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Mark Moellering wrote:
> Apologies for the cross posting.
> I recently did a fresh install of Freebsd 8 , amd64.
> I then added Xorg and KDE (4.3) from the sysinstall packages system.
>
> I read about policykit, which seems really cool. I set-up PolicyKit in
> the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2010 15:05:37, Chris Maness wrote:
> Can a sub block of IP address space be used, and if so, what is the
> wild card?
Yes. You can use lists of IPs or address-and-mask in BIND ACLs. See:
http://www.isc.org/files/arm96.html#address_match_li
Hi,
I've been seeing quite a bit of ssh bruteforce attacks which appear to
be dictionary-based. That's fine; I have proper measures in place, such
as key-only access, bruteforce tables for pf(4), and so on.
What caught my interest is if I attempt to log in from a machine where I
do not have
On 06/30/2010 04:45 PM, Diego Arias wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rob wrote:
I've seen the SYBA SY-PEX40008, but would prefer to have a PCI-e 4x
connector for the bandwidth and avoid a port multiplier if possible. Since
this will be in a ZFS pool, I'd prefer not to have 1 bad port ta
I'd like to set up Sendmail to facilitate e-mail (with attached jpeg) delivery
to an internet account from my wireless IP
camera. That's all I want it to do, nothing more. I've been a very satisfied
FreeBSD user for a few
years and am reasonably comfortable with OS and software configuration,
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:10:41 -0700 (PDT), Chris Stankevitz
wrote:
> My rc.conf file has this entry: gnome_enable="YES"
>
> Q: Where on my hard drive can I find the instructions executed to "enable"
> GNOME?
>
> A: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/gnome [bad answer: file does not exist]
gnome_enable is a 'de
Hello,
is there a person who can help me to solve some problems with sysinstall
and its install.cfg.
How can i manage that my mfsroot executes custom commands ?
--
Viele Grüsse aus Menden
Thomas Toka
Webmaster, Administra
I can't record conversations using my sound card. pcm is just not in the
set of sources.
Is this a bug or I miss somethig?
Audio device loaded with this message:
pcm0: at cad 0 nid 1 on hdac0
Trying to set pcm as recording device prints this:
$ mixer +rec pcm
mixer: unknown recording device: p
> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Chris Stankevitz
> Subject: rc.conf: gnome_enable="YES" - which instructions executed?
>
> My rc.conf file has this entry: gnome_enable="YES"
>
> Q: Where on my hard drive can I find the instructions executed to "enable"
> GNOME?
>
> A: /usr/l
I'm trying to access applications on my employer's network via Citrix.
I'm using seamonkey as my browser on FreeBSD 7.3 Release. I have
installed diablo-jdk-freebsd7.i386.1.6.0.07.02.tbz. and the
icedtea6-stubs package.
My employer's website for Citrix access facilitates the installation
of the
> I use file backed GELI fs in this manner. Of course you
> can script it yourself, but I find the ez-jail handles my
> requirements perfectly.
Thanks, I'll look into using GELI. I think if I do that, I'll have to mount
the file system in the host environment at boot time so that it can prompt f
I'm running a FreeBSD 8.0 image in VirtualBox 3.2.4. I use this image
as a "sandbox" environment for testing web apps.
I haven't used this image in a couple of months, and during that time,
I have updated VirtualBox multiple times. Now, when I start my
FreeBSD image, the FreeBSD image crashes wi
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> I would like to learn more about how rc operates. I want to know
> where on the hard drive the instructions are located that activate
> when I say gnome_enable="YES". I naively thought I would find a file
> called "/usr/local/et
Hi folks,
I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with
all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G
drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition configuration
when I did the install.
I've taken the following steps:
# csup -4 /etc/stable-su
hello my os fails to start,this is the error and also my keyboard doesn't
work
Root mount waiting for: usbus3
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad2s2a
ROOT MOUNT ERROR:
If you have invalid mount options, reboot, and first try the following
from the loader prompt:
set vfs.root.mountfrom.
On Jul 01 11:24, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with
> all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G
> drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition configuration
> when I did the install.
>
> I've taken
Thanks guys.
:-)
Doesn't that seem odd that the "default" partition size for root
(512M) isn't quite big enough?
Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
to eliminate this problem?
Ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
Chip Camden writes:
> I've experienced the same thing on amd64 -- the default partition size
> for root is too small. Rather than going to the trouble of correcting
> it, I just 'rm -r /boot/kernel.old' when it fails and then redo 'make
> installkernel', and all seems OK.
That's a little danger
Chip,
That sounds like a smart thing to do; can you tell me more about how
to do that (or point me to a www resource; I'm happy to read more
about that).
:-)
Ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
Try rm -r /boot/kernel.old
I bet that's the problem.
--
James Bailie
http://www.mammothcheese.ca
-Original Message-
From: Ed Flecko
Sender: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:24:46
To:
Subject: /boot is full after running "make installkernel" on FreeBSD 8.0
Hi
On Jul 01 15:10, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Chip Camden writes:
>
> > I've experienced the same thing on amd64 -- the default partition size
> > for root is too small. Rather than going to the trouble of correcting
> > it, I just 'rm -r /boot/kernel.old' when it fails and then redo 'make
> > instal
On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Thanks guys.
>
> :-)
>
> Doesn't that seem odd that the "default" partition size for root
> (512M) isn't quite big enough?
>
> Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
> to eliminate this problem?
>
> Ed
>
Well, then i do not get why i was albe to play
some 3d games on wine with fbsd 8.0 amd64
about when 8.0 was released.
Also http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine#head-6963d527c173e57b1567e881305b544d33435b6d
2010/7/1, xorquew...@googlemail.com :
> On 2010-07-01 15:28:00, Mikle Krutov wrote:
>> Sorry for lat
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, J wrote:
I'd like to set up Sendmail to facilitate e-mail (with attached jpeg) delivery
to an internet account from my wireless IP
camera. That's all I want it to do, nothing more. I've been a very satisfied
FreeBSD user for a few
years and am reasonably comfortable with
Chip Camden writes:
> On Jul 01 15:10, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Chip Camden writes:
>>
>> > I've experienced the same thing on amd64 -- the default partition size
>> > for root is too small. Rather than going to the trouble of correcting
>> > it, I just 'rm -r /boot/kernel.old' when it fails a
Chip Camden writes:
> On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote:
>> Thanks guys.
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Doesn't that seem odd that the "default" partition size for root
>> (512M) isn't quite big enough?
>>
>> Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
>> to eliminate this problem?
>
On 2010-07-01 23:37:37, Mikle Krutov wrote:
> Well, then i do not get why i was albe to play
> some 3d games on wine with fbsd 8.0 amd64
> about when 8.0 was released.
> Also
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine#head-6963d527c173e57b1567e881305b544d33435b6d
I don't either. I've tried every possible com
>
> A healthy fear, indeed.
>
> For one thing, I'd certainly rather have someone
> do "rm /boot/kernel.old/*.ko" than "rm -r /boot/kernel.old".
>
> Being even more selective is an obvious extension...
>
Why not move the old "useless" kernel to another drive. Sure if the system
kernel fails and you
Since it would be smart to have at least one known, good kernel, why
not make the / partition maybe 1G?
I know the smaller the / partition, the better the performance (since
it's the first partition of the drive), but I can't imagine a slightly
larger / partition would impact performance that much
On Thursday 01 July 2010 14:00:06 xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On 2010-07-01 15:28:00, Mikle Krutov wrote:
> > Sorry for late-answer, but why are you running wine in jail?
> > May be that's the source of the problem.
> > For me, it was just installed into /usr/local/ as some other
> >
> > p
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Mark Moellering wrote:
> Thanks for the response. Is there a newer kde4 package or do I have to
> compile it? I have compiled it before and it is a very long process...
> (even on a quad core machine)
yes, there are packages for kde 4.4.4 in the 8-stable reposito
On 1 July 2010 21:12, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Since it would be smart to have at least one known, good kernel, why
> not make the / partition maybe 1G?
>
> I know the smaller the / partition, the better the performance (since
> it's the first partition of the drive), but I can't imagine a slightly
> l
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Chip Camden writes:
>
> > On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote:
> >> Thanks guys.
> >>
> >> :-)
> >>
> >> Doesn't that seem odd that the "default" partition size for root
> >> (512M) isn't quite big enough?
> >>
> >> Should I make the partition size sl
Hello,
I setup my system using "packages". I have 675 "packages" installed and 0
"ports" installed.
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the locally compiled
"port"?
Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions and will leave me with 0
installed "packages" and 675 i
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:24:46AM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with
> all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G
> drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition configuration
> when I did th
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:07:50PM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Thanks guys.
>
> :-)
>
> Doesn't that seem odd that the "default" partition size for root
> (512M) isn't quite big enough?
>
> Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
> to eliminate this problem?
Many pe
Henrik,
When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition.
When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I
thought "O.K...I'll let FreeBSD make the partition sizes IT wants to
and see if I have the same problem, and I did.
Apparently, 512M is just, not, qui
Hi, Chris
On 7/1/10 5:23 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Hello,
I setup my system using "packages". I have 675 "packages" installed and 0
"ports" installed.
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the locally compiled
"port"?
Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010, Rob wrote:
> On 06/30/2010 04:45 PM, Diego Arias wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rob wrote:
> >
> >> I've seen the SYBA SY-PEX40008, but would prefer to have a PCI-e 4x
> >> connector for the bandwidth and avoid a port multiplier if possible. Since
> >> this will
On 7/1/10 5:31 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi, Chris
On 7/1/10 5:23 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Hello,
I setup my system using "packages". I have 675 "packages" installed
and 0 "ports" installed.
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the locally
compiled "port"?
Ideally the proc
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
> Once "ports" or "packages" are installed,
> there is no
> differentiation to the system.
Interesting. If this is true, then I can just start upgrading my 'pkg_add'
installed packages using ports and eventually they will all be converted over
to 'make'.
Henrik Hudson writes:
> > Or just make one large partition. Not on a server, but I don't
> > see much reason for using multiple partitions on a laptop.
>
> Multiple partitions still isn't a bad idea if you ever have to
> fsck and even on a desktop / laptop I usually mount /tmp as
> noexe
On 7/1/10 5:58 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
Once "ports" or "packages" are installed,
there is no
differentiation to the system.
Interesting. If this is true, then I can just start upgrading my 'pkg_add'
installed packages using ports and eventually the
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Tim Gustafson wrote:
> > I use file backed GELI fs in this manner. Of course you
> > can script it yourself, but I find the ez-jail handles my
> > requirements perfectly.
>
> Thanks, I'll look into using GELI. I think if I do that, I'll have to
> mount the file s
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the
> locally compiled "port"?
portmaster -f -a
> Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
Be prepared to answer hundreds of "options" questions. To take the default
option you mus
On 7/1/10 7:27 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the
locally compiled "port"?
portmaster -f -a
Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
Be prepared to answer hundreds of "options" ques
On 2010-07-01 22:16:26, David Naylor wrote:
>
> Have you tried the packages from http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/wine/
>
> They worked for me with nvidia and intel.
Thanks, but as I mentioned in the hackers@ thread (and possibly this one),
it's actually DRI that's the problem. I can't even r
I have a file containing this
drwxrwxr-x 14 89987 546 512 Jun 6 2009 7.2-RELEASE
drwxrwxr-x 14 89987 546 512 Mar 23 04:59 7.3-RELEASE
drwxrwxr-x 13 89987 546 512 Nov 23 2009 8.0-RELEASE
drwxrwxr-x 13 89987 546 512 Jul 1 04:56 8.1-RC2
I want to strip off everything to the left of
> "Chris" == Chris Stankevitz writes:
Chris> Be prepared to answer hundreds of "options" questions. To take the
default option you must press "TAB, ENTER" to each query. Have fun!
Chris> Chris
Chris> TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB,
Chris> ENTER, TAB, ENTE
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Chris> Be prepared to answer hundreds of "options"
> questions. To take the default option you must press
> "TAB, ENTER" to each query. Have fun!
>
> I just hit the letter "O" for "OK".
Randal,
Thank you, pressing "O" is indeed easier than TAB,
> "Chris" == Chris Stankevitz writes:
Chris> Thank you, pressing "O" is indeed easier than TAB, ENTER.
Chris> Unfortunately, I already pressed TAB, ENTER about a hundred
Chris> times. The build is now going. Hopefully any extra "TAB, ENTER"
Chris> sequences I made will be forgotten by portm
Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
Once "ports" or "packages" are installed,
there is no
differentiation to the system.
Interesting. If this is true, then I can just start upgrading my
> 'pkg_add' installed packages using ports and eventually they will
> all be
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> --- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
> However, your comment seems to be in disagreement with online
> warnings of "do not mix 'pkg_add' packages with 'make' ports".
>
> My original question's intention was to prevent me from
On Jul 01 12:29, Chip Camden wrote:
> On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote:
> > Thanks guys.
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > Doesn't that seem odd that the "default" partition size for root
> > (512M) isn't quite big enough?
> >
> > Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs)
> > to el
In article <4c2d2839.3040...@comclark.com> you write:
>I have a file containing this
>
>drwxrwxr-x 14 89987 546 512 Jun 6 2009 7.2-RELEASE
>drwxrwxr-x 14 89987 546 512 Mar 23 04:59 7.3-RELEASE
>drwxrwxr-x 13 89987 546 512 Nov 23 2009 8.0-RELEASE
>drwxrwxr-x 13 89987 546 512 Jul 1 04
>I have a file containing this
>
>drwxrwxr-x 14 89987 546 512 Jun 6 2009 7.2-RELEASE
>drwxrwxr-x 14 89987 546 512 Mar 23 04:59 7.3-RELEASE
>drwxrwxr-x 13 89987 546 512 Nov 23 2009 8.0-RELEASE
>drwxrwxr-x 13 89987 546 512 Jul 1 04:56 8.1-RC2
>
>I want to strip off everything to the l
Chip Camden wrote:
On Jul 02 07:43, Aiza wrote:
I have a file containing this
drwxrwxr-x 14 89987 546 512 Jun 6 2009 7.2-RELEASE
drwxrwxr-x 14 89987 546 512 Mar 23 04:59 7.3-RELEASE
drwxrwxr-x 13 89987 546 512 Nov 23 2009 8.0-RELEASE
drwxrwxr-x 13 89987 546 512 Jul 1 04:56 8.1-R
Fellow FreeBSDians,
I am experiencing a problem with my FreeBSD server box. I can't get the
system up. when I boot the machine its boots asking for boot options, and going
with the default boot option
This is an old freeBSD server box with FreeBSD-6.1
then its reaching mount root>
a
> From: "dhaneshk k"
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Sent: Friday, July 2, 2010 12:26:34 AM
> Subject: Server cannot boot : mount root> got stuck
> Fellow FreeBSDians,
>
>
> I am experiencing a problem with my FreeBSD server box. I can't get
> the system up. when I boot the machine its bo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2010 16:12:36, J wrote:
> I'd like to set up Sendmail to facilitate e-mail (with attached jpeg)
> delivery to an internet account from my wireless IP camera. That's
> all I want it to do, nothing more. I've been a very satisfied
> FreeBSD u
77 matches
Mail list logo
