Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Mark Loeser wrote:
>> Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>> c) Allow flags from use.desc to also exist in use.local.desc. In the
>>> case that a flag for a package exists in both, the use.local.desc
>>> description overrides the use.desc one. This allows
Hey Dan,
You don't happen to have IRIX discs for the Octane2 do you? I have an
O2, and I wanted to install IRIX on it to test some stuff out, but I
lost the disks and SGI wants $450 to send me new ones (yikes!).
On Jan 15, 2008, at 16:25, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
All:
As I am no longer an e
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 18:27 -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 16:25 -0800, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> > 1x HP ZX2000 1.4 GHz Itanium2
>
> I know that you said off-list, but I'm stating this here simply because
> I want to make sure people know that I have "dibs" if this meets my
>
On 1/15/08, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 17:00 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > My expectation is that `grep "flag" use.local.desc` will give me a
> > list of packages using that flag (or having it in the description),
> > one per line. Putting paragraphs in there
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 16:25 -0800, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> 1x HP ZX2000 1.4 GHz Itanium2
I know that you said off-list, but I'm stating this here simply because
I want to make sure people know that I have "dibs" if this meets my
needs.
Can this box be upgraded to SMP?
If not, I rescind my "dibs"
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 17:00 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> My expectation is that `grep "flag" use.local.desc` will give me a
> list of packages using that flag (or having it in the description),
> one per line. Putting paragraphs in there doesn't seem right.
A single long line still fills this "requir
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:25:21 -0800
Daniel Ostrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If anyone is interested contact me off list. I live in northern
> California for shipping reference.
That counts all Europeans out, I guess. Shipping is horrendous
across the Pond, even to the UK, let alone the hop acro
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 16:25 -0800, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> All:
>
> As I am no longer an ebuild dev (real life job got in the way) I have a
> whole slew of hardware that I'm willing to ship to any gentoo dev for
> the cost of shipping alone. The list of hardware is as follows:
>
> 1x HP C3700 750
All:
As I am no longer an ebuild dev (real life job got in the way) I have a
whole slew of hardware that I'm willing to ship to any gentoo dev for
the cost of shipping alone. The list of hardware is as follows:
1x HP C3700 750 MHz PA-RISC
1x Dec/Compaq PWS 600 600 MHz Alpha
1x SGI Octane2 Dual 19
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 00:06 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Since dostrow is being retired or is retired, correct me if I'm wrong
> we decided (actually we rolled dices :-) that welp is the new lead.
Not really retired, just not doing ebuild work anymore (only doing
events management for LWE and t
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Since dostrow is being retired or is retired, correct me if I'm wrong
we decided (actually we rolled dices :-) that welp is the new lead.
- drac
You're kidding...
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Ryan Hill wrote:
What do people think of this?
a) Keep use.desc as it is: a list of common flags and a short general
description of their meaning.
Good.
b) Keep use.local.desc as it is: a list of per-package flags that are
specific to one to a few ebuilds (i think 5
Not much. Aside from the continuation of my plans for world domination!
(Oops, did I mention that in public? :o)
Night night dears! :P
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 08:50 +1000, Patrick Ohearn wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Peter Weller wrote:
>
> > Yay for dice! :D
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 00:06
Mark Loeser wrote:
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
a) Keep use.desc as it is: a list of common flags and a short general
description of their meaning.
Sounds good.
b) Keep use.local.desc as it is: a list of per-package flags that are
specific to one to a few ebuilds (i think 5 is the nu
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Peter Weller wrote:
> Yay for dice! :D
>
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 00:06 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > Since dostrow is being retired or is retired, correct me if I'm wrong
> > we decided (actually we rolled dices :-) that welp is the new lead.
> >
> > - drac
Congrats we
Yay for dice! :D
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 00:06 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Since dostrow is being retired or is retired, correct me if I'm wrong
> we decided (actually we rolled dices :-) that welp is the new lead.
>
> - drac
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Since dostrow is being retired or is retired, correct me if I'm wrong
we decided (actually we rolled dices :-) that welp is the new lead.
- drac
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
A brief summary about the Gentoo GUIs project:
1 - Markus (jokey) recently released a new version of Maintainer-Helper.
It already has the basic operations running and some people are working
in a Gtk+ port.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~jo
# Raúl Porcel (15 Jan 2008)
# Pending removal 15 Feb 2008, upstream discontinued the software
# Unstable, old
net-libs/dclibc
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:33:48 -0800
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so per the one discussion in #-dev this evening, I'm looking for
> questions to put on a new user survey.
>
> For style of questions, multiple choice (both pick-one and pick-many) or
> simple integers would be
On Monday 14 January 2008, likewhoa wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2008 12:16 AM, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 22:53 +, likewhoa wrote:
> > > Which livecd(s) do they prefer?
> > >
> > > > Gentoo livecd-2007.0
> > > > Sabayon livecd
> > > > Sysresccd
> > > > Knoppix
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 05:34 Tue 15 Jan , Rajiv Aaron Manglani (rajiv) wrote:
> > 1.1 net-misc/zaptel/zaptel-1.2.22.1-r1.ebuild
> >
> > file :
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-misc/zaptel/zaptel-1.
> >2.22.1-r1.ebuild?rev=
On Jan 15, 2008 4:05 AM, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was really speaking mostly of the people who
> dislike the *idea* of an Installer for Gentoo, and then go and bash it
> as much as they can without providing any real evidence or reasons,
> except for the old faithful "it's ag
23 matches
Mail list logo
