Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop “compatibility” mode

2011-01-30 Thread Ρυακιωτάκης Αντώνης
As we use to say in Uberwald, if you > don't want a monster, you don't pull a lever :) > It's just a matter of thunderstomrs, really! ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop “compatibility” mode

2011-01-30 Thread Christopher Curtis
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote: > On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 01:43 +0100, Bogdan Szczurek wrote: > >> The thing is, that we concluded that permamenet transition or even >> occasional use of Gimp would be much more appealing for Ps-bred guys >> (like me ;)) if one would have possib

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop “compatibility” mode

2011-01-30 Thread Rob Antonishen
> The world would be better if each application domain had a consistent > set of core accelerators.  File->New, File->Save, Cut/Copy/Paste, etc. > are good for most all applications.  For a graphics program, common > tools like Pencil, Eraser, Move, Crop, etc. should have consistent > accelerators.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop “compatibility” mode

2011-01-30 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 12:35 -0500, Christopher Curtis wrote: > The world would be better if each application domain had a consistent > set of core accelerators. File->New, File->Save, Cut/Copy/Paste, etc. > are good for most all applications. For a graphics program, common > tools like Pencil, E

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop “compatibility” mode

2011-01-30 Thread Christopher Curtis
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Rob Antonishen wrote: >> The world would be better if each application domain had a consistent >> set of core accelerators.  File->New, File->Save, Cut/Copy/Paste, etc. >> are good for most all applications.  For a graphics program, common >> tools like Pencil, E

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop “compatibility” mode

2011-01-30 Thread Christopher Curtis
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote: > Yes, perhaps it might be nice if the key to get the eraser was the same > in inkscape and gimp and blender and gedit and krita and mypaint, but it > could no longer be "E" because that inserts text in gedit, so we'd end > up using conrtol-sh

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop “compatibility” mode

2011-01-30 Thread Christopher Curtis
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote: > Yes, perhaps it might be nice if the key to get the eraser was the same > in inkscape and gimp and blender and gedit and krita and mypaint, but it [...] I overlooked Krita. Krita uses as a BG Color Fill and + as a FG Color Fill according

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop “compatibility” mode

2011-01-30 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 13:59 -0500, Christopher Curtis wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote: > > > Yes, perhaps it might be nice if the key to get the eraser was the same > > in inkscape and gimp and blender and gedit and krita and mypaint, but it > > could no longer be "E

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop “compatibility” mode

2011-01-30 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 1/30/11, Christopher Curtis wrote: > So all I'm suggesting is that instead of simply producing PhotoShop > keybindings (which is a fine idea, IMO) They already are produced > that an interested person actually look at the broader picture to see > if there is any accelerator convergence among