I thought this might be a bug.
You thought correct :) I'll try to fix it.
Only commenting $INTLLIBS out made all perl plug-in to crash.
Gimp.so needs to be linked with libintl.
** WARNING **: wire_read: unexpected EOF (plug-in crashed?)
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 05:39:02PM +0900, SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You thought correct :) I'll try to fix it.
Only commenting $INTLLIBS out made all perl plug-in to crash.
That isn't that bad ;) Your patch to add intllibs was only added very
recently. The problem is that
By some sort of strange coincidence, I was in the process of cleaning
up the file gimp_tips.txt, when I saw the message from Ar't suggesting
to update that file.
Well, here are some tips that I would like to remove from gimp_tips.txt:
: When trying to save files as GIF, XPM, or any other
Is there any current archive for the Gimp mailing lists?
All links given the www.gimp.org page are dead and should probably be
removed (this also applies to the gtk-list).
I have unsubscribed myself from the gimp-users list some time ago and
I wanted to have a look at the current traffic before
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 10:36:19PM +0100, Raphael Quinet wrote:
Is there any current archive for the Gimp mailing lists?
http://www.mail-archive.com/gimp-user%40xcf.berkeley.edu/ and
http://www.mail-archive.com/gimp-developer%40scam.xcf.berkeley.edu/ have
relatively recent archives. They're at
did someone take that out of cvs? i just did an update from the anon-cvs
tree (the one hosted by debian,) and cvs axed pathsP.h from the app/ dir.
now gimp won't build.
any ideas?
actually, nothing is getting put into the intl/ dir either.. the main
makefile still looks for stuff in there.
Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
just deactivate the "Use Global Paint Options" button in the preferences
dialog's "Interface-Tool Options" page. Otherwise the opacity as set in the
brushes dialog will be used.
shouldn't we simply make this the default? that means, changing the
Hello,
if I want to answer some posting, I normally want it to go to the list, but
because the list is not the sender and an "reply to" isn't set, the mail is
addressed privately to the sender. Some times I'm able to change this
behaviour -- sometimes not ;-))
Isn't it a good idea to add this
Group replies will go to the list.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 02:27:50PM +0100, Uwe Koloska spake unto the masses:
I've known other lists that mask all mail to and from as the list and I honestly
didn't like that too much. I wonder if kmail (that's your mail client right?) has a
feature like mutt (the mail client I use) does. With
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
I think that this sort of munging would be a good idea. Duplicate replies
bother me, and that's the default behavior for a list such as this
one. Howver, don't flame me about it, just read this essay for an
alternative point of view to
hi
Questions:
* How to change RGBA image to an RGB image ?, because it's not
intuitive enough. New option in "Remove Alpha" menu would be
more helpful than explaining this and that.
Disadvantages:
* perl plugins
* in toolbox sometimes windows get really odd
(color, palette, brushes,
I hereby announce the Season For Tips (Tally Ho!)
Please send the tips to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and insert "Tips"
in the subject line. Be cooperative and pre-format
the text (I presume you know the rules: max 4 lines,
70 characters per line, tips must be useful).
All new tips are to be published in
Hi,
Does Gimp Hollywood have much activity going on lately? As far as I see
the ChangeLog, the last update was July last year. This version seems to
be based on 1.0.4 with minimum plug-ins supporting different color
precisions. I hear that the merge into main Gimp takes place after 1.2,
but I am
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Nick Lamb wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 12:50:05PM -0500, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
Useful isn't the opposite of Harmful, and I wonder if he realises
that... The classic paper is "Goto considered harmful", which doesn't
deny that it's a useful feature but just tells us
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 08:42:24PM +, Ar't wrote:
Disadvantages:
* perl plugins
What in particular do you see as a disadvantage about the perl plugins?
Their existance alone seems to irk some people, for reasons I'm not
at all clear on. I happen to think some of them are kinda neat
16 matches
Mail list logo
