[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin & parallelization

Harry van der Wolf wrote: > 2010/6/5 Yuv >> On Jun 5, 2:33 am, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: >> > Thank you. I'm still considering the boost::thread. If it is not too >> > complicated to use boost thread I'll use it because OpenMP adds >> > another dependency. But certainly it's good to know that it's

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin headers

Ander wrote: > I'm currently developping a panorama stitching web app and I'd like to > use some useful hugin function (eg. CalculateFOV). I downloaded hugin > sources, at first I wanted to use only the classes I needed but it > seems that I'm forced to include the rest of the source files... > So

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-2010.2.0_beta1 released

Bruno Postle wrote: [...] > Summary of major changes since 2010.0.0: [...] > * New equisolid, orthographic and stereographic lenses are supported, requires > libpano13-2.9.17_beta2 or later. [...] > * libpano13-2.7.17 is required, note that this is still in beta itself. [...] These two lines sl

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-2010.2.0_beta1 released

Bruno Postle wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > Hugin is a Panorama stitcher and more. A powerful software package > for creating and processing panoramic images. > A hugin-2010.2.0_beta1 (beta 1) tarball is available here: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/hugin/files/

[hugin-ptx] [Patch] Enhance FindPANO13.cmake to support version checking (was: hugin-2010.2.0_beta1 released)

On 2010-07-17 Bruno Postle wrote: [...] > Actually, since you already added a pkgconfig file to libpano13, it > would be nicer if the Hugin cmake setup just checked for the right > libpano13. Hello, because pkg-config does not seem to required/available on WIN32 I have gone for pulling the v

[hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu Deb for Hugin 2010.02

Dale Beams wrote: > http://www.tatteredmoons.org/hugin/deb/ubuntu/10.04/20100730-hugin_deb.html Hello, * These are cmake built packages ---> No proper package dependencies. ---> Install to /usr/local/ ---> Not integrated in menu system This should not make any major problems, though. Beca

[hugin-ptx] Re: Jilted Ceilings

Dale Beams wrote: [...] > good match == green bar > http://www.tatteredmoons.org/hugin/screenshots/Screenshot-3.png > alignment shows 2.3 good fit > http://www.tatteredmoons.org/hugin/screenshots/Screenshot-4.png > result > http://www.tatteredmoons.org/hugin/screenshots/Screenshot-5.png > optim

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin HDR noobie question

inhumangeek wrote: > I'm trying to merge bracketted shots into an HDR panorama using hugin. > I can't seem to see how this works - I've found a tutorial but it says > to choose the "align_image_stack" and yet this option doesn't seem > to exist in the latest version. http://l

[hugin-ptx] Re: Jilted Ceilings

Eric O'Brien wrote: > Also, isn't EXIF data stored as Extended File Attributes? No, exif data is included in the image file. > All you need is for one program or one file transfer process to > fail to manage that data correctly and the next thing you know, > your images don't *have* any EXI

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin pre-compiled build for Ubuntu

Emad ud din Butt wrote: > Is there any precompiled build for Ubuntu available for latest > hugin. I have installed hugin from Ubuntu Software center. It > installed without any problem. But its version 2009.2.0.4461. Is > there any hugin builds like that with latest version. Or is there > any way

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin pre-compiled build for Ubuntu

Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag 09 September 2010 schrieb Emad ud din Btt: >> Many Thanks Dale and Kornel. Yes, It was fresh Ubuntu installation. >> I have updated it and Hugin is now working. I will update you if I get any >> error. >> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Dale Beams wrote: >> >

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin pre-compiled build for Ubuntu

Kornel Benko wrote: [...] > I created a perl script to extract the list of needed packages for a > given list of executables. dpkg-shlibdeps(1) already exists. > But it takes some looong time to do its job, therefore not > applicable to automatically execute. > The algorithm is following: >

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin pre-compiled build for Ubuntu

Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Freitag 10 September 2010 schrieb Andreas Metzler: >> Kornel Benko wrote: [...] >> >1.) determine all used shared libraries (parse output of "ldd >> >{executable}") >> ldd lists both dependencies and dependencie

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin pre-compiled build for Ubuntu

Yuval Levy wrote: > On September 9, 2010 01:06:15 pm Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >> Just for clarification: "Proper" Debian source packages also do this >> automatically. This is just cmake's broken idea of builing a debian >> format package. > do you mean

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin pre-compiled build for Ubuntu

Dale Beams wrote: > ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 17:56:44 [...] >> One of or probably the strongest point of Debian is that we have a >> policy that describes in great detail how packages must look like to >> make it possible that the packages work together and upgrade >> cor

[hugin-ptx] Re: Dependecy problem when trying to install Hugin on Ubuntu

Yuval Levy wrote: [...] > It's fixed now and it should not really complain (the only > dependency left is the one that existed even before and it is for > libpano, which anyway need to be built as well because the version > of libpano that ship by default with Debian and by extension 'buntu > is n

[hugin-ptx] [patch] hugin typo fixes

Hello, find attached a straightforward patch fixing these typos: halfs --> halves paramters --> parameters Unkown --> Unknown endianess --> endianness thanks, cu andreas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" grou

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 released

Bruno Postle wrote: > Hugin is a Panorama stitcher and more. A powerful software package > for creating and processing panoramic images. > A hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 (release candidate 1) tarball is available here: [...] Uploaded to Debian/experimental. cu andreas -- You received this message beca

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 released

Yuval Levy wrote: > On September 19, 2010 03:02:04 am Andreas Metzler wrote: >> > A hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 (release candidate 1) tarball is available here: >> [...] >> Uploaded to Debian/experimental. > is there a reason why you "break" the package in three

[hugin-ptx] Re: A hack?

Yuval Levy wrote: > Almost a year ago I proposed a small change to how Hugin handles the caching > of images [0]. It's a simple and dumb workaround and indeed in the ensuing > discussion improvements such as the using of wxThreads were discussed. [...] This does not help for the previews on Im

[hugin-ptx] Re: Integration Queue - current status

Pablo d'Angelo web.de> wrote on 2009-09-20: [...] > > 6. vigra-1.6 (Lukáš): it has been decided to push the changes upstream; > > wait for vigra-1.7 with the changes; then make Hugin work with > > [vigra]-1.7. @Lukáš and @Pablo: what does it take to prepare Lukáš' work > > to go into vigra; and

[hugin-ptx] Re: Where/what is libhuginANN for?

Harry van der Wolf wrote: [...] > When compiling via cmake the libhuginANN library is also built. It is a copy of http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mount/ANN/ afaict. > Where is this used and what is it good for? Currently only one program in the hugin suite seems to make use of the library. ametz...@ar

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-2010.2.0_rc2 released

Bruno Postle wrote: > Hugin is a Panorama stitcher and more. A powerful software package > for creating and processing panoramic images. > A hugin-2010.2.0_rc2 (release candidate 2) tarball is available here: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/hugin/files/hugin-2010.2_beta/ > This is a release

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin eats up to 12Gb of RAM and freezes system

Mateusz wrote: > Sorry, > This is not a projection I am trying to make. > nona freezes my system with those three files. > I also managed to make a linear assemble of my images, however when I > turn projection in preview to stereographic and I move a bit ONLY > image on axis (without moving thos

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin eats up to 12Gb of RAM and freezes system

Mateusz wrote: > On Oct 10, 3:01 pm, Andreas Metzler > wrote: [...] >> I do not completely understand "I move a bit ONLY image on axis". I >> tried this: >> open Fast Preview (OpenGL) >> switch to the "Move/Drag" Tab >> click into the ima

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin eats up to 12Gb of RAM and freezes system

Mateusz wrote: > Because I could not open uploaded zip file. I am pasting a link > http://www.kaduk.net/~mateusz/StepsToFreez.zip FWIW I get this instead of a crash: Checking nona...[OK] Checking enblend...[OK] Checking enfuse...[OK] Checking hugin_hdrmerge...[OK] Checking exiftool...[OK] nona

[hugin-ptx] Re: Problem with installing hugin

Ehsan Esbati wrote: > Hey peeps, > First of all thanks to all the people who worked on the latest > release, well done! > I have been trying to build from source according to wiki instructions > on a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10. Every thing goes smoothly until I > try to install the packages a

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin and the 10.10 'buntus

Yuval Levy wrote: [...] > The Hugin PPA [3] can use an update. The packages contributed by > Philipp Seidel about six months ago are 2010.0.0 and for Karmic and > Lucid only. Does any of the experienced deb packagers (Andreas?) > have source packages available that can be fed to Launchpad? [...]

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin crashes while loading images

On 2010-10-23 kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 23 Okt., 11:55, rm369 wrote: > > I have made a lot of panorama pictures with the same camera (Casio EX- > > Z40), tuned contrast etc. with Picasa 3.8 (in Ubuntu 10.10/wine) and > > try to stitch them with hugin 2010.2.0 (same result in XP and Ubuntu >

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin crashes while loading images

rm369 wrote: [...] > I have uploaded a 2 picture series that causes hugin to crash to > http://home.arcor.de/rm369/tmp/CIMG0875.JPG and > http://home.arcor.de/rm369/tmp/CIMG0876.JPG > if you have want/are able to debug. > Can anyone help me how to make all of my images work with hugin? [...] I

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin crashes while loading images

rm369 wrote: [...] > Now there is only one problem still left with one series which may be > no problem of hugin but of my unsufficient knowledge: > In the series http://home.arcor.de/rm369/tmp/CIMG0961-CIMG0967.zip (10 > MB, sorry) none of the offered optimization options leads to a working > pan

[hugin-ptx] Re: Terminology

In article <201010240952.07722.goo...@levy.ch> (gmane.comp.misc.ptx) you wrote: > On October 24, 2010 09:47:16 am kfj wrote: [...] >> I wasn't refering to that NG you probably mean ;) >> I just meant NG as a general abbreviation for newsgroup. > my time to apologize. Newsgroups as in NNTP [0] see

[hugin-ptx] [RFC] How about installing private libraries in a private directory

Hello, on unix* hugin stores functions used by multiple executables in private shared libs. This is done to minimize the size of executables. However afaict these libraries are not supposed to be used by programs outside hugin. Nobody seems to be responsible for defining and monitoring a public i

[hugin-ptx] Re: Integration Queue - current status

Bruno Postle wrote: [...] > There are some other libraries that should be removed from Hugin: as > far as I can tell ANN and levmar are the same as the respective > upstream versions. Hello, I have taken a look at libANN today. Quoting ANNmanual_1.1.pdf | 2.2 Configuring ANN | In this sect

[hugin-ptx] Re: [RFC] How about installing private libraries in a private directory

Harry van der Wolf wrote: > 2010/10/31 Andreas Metzler [...] >> Anyway, how about making this fact [1] a little bit more official by >> moving the libs to a private subdirectory ($libdir/hugin) and using >> rpath? >> Suggested patch attached. [...] > This patch w

[hugin-ptx] Re: [RFC] How about installing private libraries in a private directory

On 2010-10-31 Harry van der Wolf wrote: [...] > The cmake version of Hugin is like any unix/bsd/linux version and just > installs the libraries in /usr/local/lib by default or the prefix your > prefer, with the limitation however that rpath is unknown. > The bundle is created from the XCode IDE an

[hugin-ptx] Re: [RFC] How about installing private libraries in a private directory

Bruno Postle wrote: [...] > Yes the libraries are private, for now anyway, we also don't install > header files that you would need if they were 'public'. Since > nobody should be linking to the libraries we shouldn't be installing > the .so symlinks either. Hello, I will uprovide an updated

[hugin-ptx] Re: [RFC] How about installing private libraries in a private directory

On 2010-11-02 Harry van der Wolf wrote: > 2010/11/2 Andreas Metzler >> Bruno Postle wrote: >> [...] >>> Yes the libraries are private, for now anyway, we also don't install >>> header files that you would need if they were 'public'. Since

[hugin-ptx] Re: [RFC] How about installing private libraries in a private directory

Harry van der Wolf wrote: [...] > There are still symlinks for: > libicpfindlib.0.0.dylib > libicpfindlib.dylib -> libicpfindlib.0.0.dylib > liblocalfeatures.0.0.dylib > liblocalfeatures.dylib -> liblocalfeatures.0.0.dylib > libmakefilelib.0.0.dylib > libmakefilelib.dylib -> libmakefilelib.0.0.dyl

[hugin-ptx] Re: Some of my recent hugin efforts

Robert Krawitz wrote: [...] > 8) For control points with exposure stacks, I found the following > strategy to work well: connect the middle exposures to the other > middle exposures, and connect the low and high exposures only to > the middle exposure of the same stack (and maybe to each oth

[hugin-ptx] Re: some mailing list admin, displaying the membership list

Bruno Postle wrote: > I'd like to change a googlegroups setting so that members can see > the members list. This page doesn't include email addresses, just > usernames. > The old 'ptx' mailman list allowed this, and it doesn't seem right > that this stuff should be hidden in an open project.

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin and the 10.10 'buntus

Bruno Postle wrote: [...] > I suspect this patch is renaming autopano-noop.sh to autopano-noop. > It will fail whenever autopano-noop.sh changes (which it did > yesterday), hence no autopano-noop file for dpkg to find. The patc http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-phototools/hugin.git;a=blob;f=debian/

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin and the 10.10 'buntus

Yuval Levy wrote: [] > On October 17, 2010 12:04:05 pm Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >> If you have got experimental[1] in sources.list this should work: > thanks for the instructions, Andreas. They do work. A few questions. >> edit Maintainer and/or Uploaders in debian/

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin and the 10.10 'buntus

Yuval Levy wrote: > On November 7, 2010 03:13:44 pm Yuval Levy wrote: >> Do I understand correctly that the ./debian folder is all what is added to >> a plain unpacked tarball? i.e. if I would like to do a bleeding edge >> build rather than a 2010.2.0 build, could I simply copy the ./debian >> fo

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin and the 10.10 'buntus

Yuval Levy wrote: [...] >> libxi-dev and libxmu-dev are unecessarily pulled in, we patch this >> (42_stoplinklibXI_libXmu). > IIRC I added those two [0], and the CMake build would stop with an > error on my system without them. IIRC it seemed to be related to > the ATI proprietary video drivers

[hugin-ptx] Re: linux installation question, error regarding Boost

Julien wrote: > Hello all. > Today I tried to compile and install hugin 2010-2, but I ran into [...] > boost not found. Bad BOOST_ROOT? On windows, try editing > Boost_root_suffix > I don't think to have any boost-files, or anything pointing to > something with the > name boost in it. Anyone a

[hugin-ptx] Re: Claiming an SF account in LP

Erik Krause wrote: > Am 22.11.2010 17:55, schrieb Yuval Levy: >> * Make sure your SF account is in good standing and that you are receiving >> emails at it. >> * Log on to the [https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin Hugin bug tracker]. >> * Find a ticket or comment that you filed in the old tracker (un

[hugin-ptx] Re: autopano-noop and other repo cruft

Yuval Levy wrote: > now that we have cpfind, do we really need to install the > autopano-noop thing? > I don't think so. > Unless I'm told I am wrong, I will send to oblivion in the depth of the repo > the following files: > ./utils/autopano-noop.sh > ./utils/CMakeLists.txt [...] Hello, Autop

[hugin-ptx] multirow/stacked still uses autopano-sift(-c)

Hello, the multirow/stacked cp-detector stanza in the default setup combines autopano-sift(-c) with align_image_stack. Is this done intentionally (e.g. because cpfind is supersmart and combining with align_image_stack does not improve results)? cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, D

[hugin-ptx] Re: autopano-noop and other repo cruft

Yuval Levy wrote: > On November 27, 2010 10:19:39 am Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >> PS: I intend to upload 2010.4.0 beta1 to debian/experimental tomorrow. >> Works-for-me packaging is already in git >> git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-phototools/hugin.git but I wanted to push

[hugin-ptx] Re: autopano-noop and other repo cruft

Yuval Levy wrote: > On November 27, 2010 01:46:36 pm Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Samstag, 27. November 2010 schrieb Andreas Metzler: >> > Yuval Levy wrote: >> > > dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for >> > > /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 >>

[hugin-ptx] 2010.4.0 multirow/stacked

Hello, 2010.4.0 does not include a cp-detector definition that combines cpfind with align_image_stack, however there is one that combines Autopano-SIFT(-C) with align_image_stack ("Autopano-SIFT-C (multirow/stacked)". Is this done on purpose (I do not know, perhaps it just does not make sense and

[hugin-ptx] Re: autopano-noop and other repo cruft

Yuval Levy wrote: [...] > while we are at it, the Debian packages drops a couple of other dependencies. > > Should we drop them too? see attached patch. [...] In the long run it is probably not worth forking this cmake test from GLUT. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Matu

[hugin-ptx] Re: Re: autopano-noop and other repo cruft

On 2010-11-29 Yuval Levy wrote: [...] > Today I've used your hugin-2010.4.0+dfsg~beta1 as basis. Thanks for > updating (from my posted files?). The description in debian/control > has not been updated. I did update it in my package. [...] I have compared your description with the ours and trie

[hugin-ptx] Re: ANN: Hugin-2010.4.0beta2 released

Yuval Levy wrote: [...] > Hugin-2010.4.0beta2 RELEASE NOTES [...] uploaded to Debian/experimental. cu andreas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: ht

[hugin-ptx] Re: Stitching perfectly flat pictures (maps) together

Olivier Croquette wrote: > Hi all, > I have an usual task at hand, which is to stitch together small maps > into a bigger global map. [...] Have you already checked out the tutorial by Bruno Postle? http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/scans/ cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him,

[hugin-ptx] Re: ANN: Enblend Tracker

Yuval Levy wrote: [tracker moved] Hello, First off: Thanks a lot for the effort. Is it possible to also copy over the closed isues? Or could you make the the old tracker publically readable again (writing should of course be prevented.)? Currenly I have no way check with what explanation "2880

[hugin-ptx] Re: ANN: Enblend Tracker

T. Modes wrote: [...] > here is the link to the issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/sf-2880914 Thank you. cu andreas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is availab

[hugin-ptx] Re: Idea for horizontal/vertical lines

panostar wrote: [...] > I've never found it takes a lot of time. How long can it take to > click on two pairs of vertically aligned features (not necessarily > "lines" BTW)? And if you are going to click on both ends of a line to > create a line on which to set points on, there's hardly much sav

[hugin-ptx] Re: ANN: Hugin-2010.4.0_rc1 released

In article <201012231551.37438.goo...@levy.ch> (gmane.comp.misc.ptx) you wrote: [...] > Hugin-2010.4.0_rc1 RELEASE NOTES Hallo, ich habe gerade die Pakete nach Debian/experimental hochgeladen. http://www.bebt.de/hugin/ lg Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other

[hugin-ptx] Re: ANN: Hugin-2010.4.0_rc1 released

Yuval Levy wrote: > On December 24, 2010 04:16:55 am Andreas Metzler wrote: >> ich habe gerade die Pakete nach Debian/experimental hochgeladen. >> http://www.bebt.de/hugin/ > Danke, Andreas! > When verifying the sha256sum it occured to me that the file > hugin_2010.4.0

[hugin-ptx] Re: control point generator help needed

Tom Sharpless wrote: > On Dec 25, 1:41 pm, Yuval Levy wrote: >> On December 25, 2010 12:38:39 pm Tom Sharpless wrote: >>> I keep suggesting that someone should make Hugin do CP finding >>> intelligently, when the arrangement of the source images is already >>> known.  But so far nobody has volun

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano updated

D M German wrote: > I have added the Thoby projection for the Nikkor 10.5. It is now in > subversion. [...] Hello, FYI the respective commit contains a couple of unrelated and probably unintional changes: ametz...@argenau:~/SVN/upstream/libpano$ lsdiff /tmp/1306.diff debian/control debian/compat

[hugin-ptx] Re: Installing compressed man pages

Yuval Levy wrote: [...] > And the man pages can use localization too. These are all *.pod > files in the doc/ folder. Make a subfolder for your locale there > according to the standard found in /usr/share/man (at least in > Debian/Ubuntu), copy the .pod files in there and start hacking away. > I

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano updated

dmg wrote: > I have committed the changes to SVN. [...] Thank you very much. cu andreas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.or

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2010.5.0 should be 2011.1.0

Harry van der Wolf wrote: > I wanted to build the new Hugin with the thoby projection but did see that > we are still at 2010.5. I assume this should be 2011.1.0 or is there a > specific reason to keep it on 2010.5.0? Hello, afaict 2010.5. is perfectly fine and the correct choice: The next stab

[hugin-ptx] Re: cpfind rocks!

GnomeNomad wrote: [...] > Just to add my little bit to this: no trace of cpfind on the Sidux > (Debian) installation I have here. How would I see if it's installed? dpkg -S bin/cpfind What version of hugin do you have installed? cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. Hi

[hugin-ptx] Re: cpfind rocks!

Russ wrote: > I just updated this package on Ubuntu 10.10 and was a bit dismayed > when I couldn't really find cpfind easily. It wasn't in the dropdown > selector for cp detector, and going into the preferences menu I was > lost in trying to figure out how to add it. In reading Terry's > comment

[hugin-ptx] Re: Questions from an Alien from Another Space and Time

On 2011-03-04 tcorbet wrote: > On Mar 4, 10:38 am, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > On 4 Mrz., 19:13, tcorbet wrote: > > > Just for the record.  I hate to say it, but the Files option for this > > > Group does correctly appear if I go back to Internet Explorer from old > > > tried and true Firefo

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2011.0_beta2 released

On 2011-02-28 Yuval Levy wrote: > Hugin-2011.0.0_beta2 RELEASE NOTES [...] Uploaded to Debian/experimental It requires libpano13(-2|-dev) to build, which is already available in experimental. http://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/libpano13 cu andreas -- `Wh

[hugin-ptx] Re: Large, complex scanned image mosaic stitch help request - Redux

tcorbet wrote: [...] > So, let me first dare to disagree with the opinion that the set of > images are "not shots of one drawing". I believe that, in contrast to > what happens when a single camera takes multiple of shots of a scene > without changing its XYZ coordinates on the planet, the result

[hugin-ptx] Re: Toward RC1: show stoppers

Peter Suetterlin wrote: > didn't have much time for panos lately, but remembered I had some > trouble with exposure optimization some time ago. So I had a look > at the respective project, and it still crashes. > It's a 3-image partial pano, manual control points. It stitches > fine, but when I

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2011.0.0_rc1 released

Yuval Levy wrote: > Hugin-2011.0.0_rc1 RELEASE NOTES [...] uploaded to Debian/experimental. cu andreas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wi

[hugin-ptx] Re: Cmake files upgrading to ubuntu 11.4

Kornel Benko wrote: > Finaly I upgraded. I changed the cmake-build accordingly, hopefully > other platforms are not affected. Hello, I assume the changes are for multi-arch? This part of the patch looks like it * either breaks building on anything except amd64 multi-arch * or works around a dee

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.0.0_RC2 released

Yuval Levy wrote: > Hugin-2011.0.0_rc2 RELEASE NOTES [...] > The 2011.0.0_rc2 source tarball can be downloaded > * from SourceForge at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/hugin/files/hugin/hugin-2011.0_beta/hugin-2011.0.0_rc2.tar.bz2/download > * from Launchpad at > http://launchpad.net/hugin/2011

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano13-2.9.14 tarball for linux

Doug wrote: > Can someone point me to a URL to download a linux tarball? > I've been going scatty trying to find it on sourceforge or anywhere on > google - all I can find is a Win32.zip. The sourcecode (for linux and windows) is here http://sourceforge.net/projects/panotools/files/libpano13/li

[hugin-ptx] Re: Files without license

D M German wrote: [...] > ./src/hugin_base/hugin_math/eig_jacobi.cpp [...] This one is from . I had contacted the author in June but did not receive any response. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful

[hugin-ptx] Re: Problem compiling hugin (Ubuntu 8.04)

Yuval Levy wrote: [...] > I've just started https://launchpad.net/~hugin > I'm reading into the packagers information for Ubuntu, though I would > very much prefer if somebody who is already experienced in packaging for > Ubuntu would step in. > Anybody care to join and help? [...] Hello, Pa

[hugin-ptx] [PITA] lens_calibrate/* newly added files in SVN head without proper copyright/license header

Hello, I hope you won't hate me for this. ;-) src/lens_calibrate/ has been recently added and not all of the files contain a complete copyright/license header. I would appreciate if you could fix this. Spline.h Spline.cpp - No copyright year(s), "GNU LGPL license" is too unspecific (which versi

[hugin-ptx] Re: [PITA] lens_calibrate/* newly added files in SVN head without proper copyright/license header

Tim Nugent wrote: > Sorry i'll fix this tomoro. Tim [...] Thank you. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this

[hugin-ptx] Re: lens_calibrate/* newly added files in SVN head without proper copyright/license header

Tim wrote: > On 5 Sep, 11:47, Tim wrote: [...] >> Ok done, apart from >> cmake_install.cmake >> which isn't under version control, It used to be, but was removed this morning by brunopostle, thanks. >> and Spline.h/cpp which are Tom's >> (Sharpless), so I'll leave them to him. Both have bee

[hugin-ptx] Re: [PITA] lens_calibrate/* newly added files in SVN head without proper copyright/license header

Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: > 2009/9/4 Yuval Levy : >> Andreas Metzler wrote: >>> I hope you won't hate me for this. ;-) >> actually... I *love* you. I am happy that I am not the only one who is >> nagging for this small but IMO important detail. >> We sti

[hugin-ptx] [Press] LWN The Grumpy Editor's hugin experience

Hello, FYI lwn.net has posted a hugin review as part of the grumpy editor's series on . It is subscriber content only currently but will be freely accessible after a week. The editor wasn't very grumpy though, the article ends with "It definitely belongs on any L

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_beta3 released

Bruno Postle wrote: > On Fri 11-Sep-2009 at 15:16 +0200, Serge Droz wrote: >> ../libhuginbase.so.0.0: undefined reference to `gluOrtho2D' >> ../libhuginbase.so.0.0: undefined reference to `gluErrorString' > I 'think' this is caused by building on a system with the > proprietary nvidia driver,

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_beta3 released

Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > this also fails for me on up to date Debian/unstable *without* Nvidia > stuff if I am using -Wl,--as-needed. > mkdir build-dir > cd build-dir && cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr > -DCMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS="

hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com

Hello, https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2720906&group_id=77506&atid=550441 is closed, being marked as fixed in rev 4219. It is not. If I open the testcase from Ubuntu LP in hugin 2009.2.0 (4385) I still get the segfault. On startup hugin warns about invalid controlpoint

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano13-2.9.15_beta1 released

In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Bruno Postle wrote: [...] > A libpano13-2.9.15_beta1 (beta 1) tarball has been uploaded to > sourceforge: > https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=96188&package_id=237430 > This is a 'beta' so the final release is likely to have further > bugfixes. The

hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com

Gerry Patterson wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Andreas Metzler < > ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org> wrote: >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2720906&group_id=77506&atid=550441 >> is closed, being marked as fixed in re

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano13-2.9.15_beta1 released

In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Bruno Postle wrote: > A libpano13-2.9.15_beta1 (beta 1) tarball has been uploaded to > sourceforge: [...] Hello, Make check shows some errors due to missing files in the tarball - Comparing reference images: 2 reference/

[hugin-ptx] Re: [PanoTools-devel] libpano13-2.9.15_beta1 released

In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Bruno Postle wrote: > On Sun 13-Sep-2009 at 17:08 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: >>on a *quick* glance over the diff (relative to .14) I cannot see where >>the ABI has changed without preserving compatibility. The only change >>I can see is the additi

[hugin-ptx] libpano: supporting kfreebsd-*

Hello, Debian is currently applying the patch quoted below to get libpano13 to build on kfreebsd-*. It would be nice if this could applied. thanks, cu andreas == Author: Cyril Brulebois http://bugs.debian.org/543998 --- a/configure +++ b/conf

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_beta4 released

Serge Droz wrote: > On 09/14/2009 07:21 AM, Yuval Levy wrote: [...] >> A hugin-2009.2.0_beta4 (beta release 4) tarball is available here: >> > Clicking the above link gives a 404 File not found

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_beta4 released

Yuval Levy wrote: [...] > A hugin-2009.2.0_beta4 (beta release 4) tarball is available here: [...] Hello, builds fine on Debian (and probably Ubuntu). http://www.bebt.de/debian/dists/lenny/hugin2009.2/ cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so gra

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.2.0_beta4 released

Harry van der Wolf wrote: > 2009/9/15 Yuval Levy [...] >> Help -> About Hugin (ou "aide" -> "à propos" en français) >> what does it say on the Version line? > Hi Youv, > I've already found out that this doesn't work on OSX (cmake and XCode) and > not on my Ubuntu. I suppose the $DISPLAY_VERSI

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano13-2.9.15_beta2 released

In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Bruno Postle wrote: [...] > * The soname in beta1 had been mistakenly incremented to 2.0.0. The > ABI hasn't changed since 2.9.14, so this library again has an soname > of 1.0.0. i.e. the same as 2.9.14. > * Initial commit of code to optimise and render tilt for > multi-

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano13-2.9.15_beta2?released

In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Bruno Postle wrote: > On Thu 17-Sep-2009 at 15:47 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: >>afaict these new features finally make the soname change necessary. The >>size of some structs has changed due to new members (correct_Prefs, >>optVars, MakeParams). &g

hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com

Andreas Metzler wrote: > Gerry Patterson wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Andreas Metzler < >> ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org> wrote: >>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2720906&group_id=77506&atid=550441 >&g

hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com

Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > sorry for pestering, but the bugreport is still marked as fixed. [...] Nevermind. It is not *still* marked as fixed, but marked as fixed *again*. r4436 does the trick. Sorry for the noise. cu andreas --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[hugin-ptx] Re: fonction0 in boost is not included from the correct place with debian

"Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" wrote: > I've updated debian sid. > In the update, all boost related stuff changed to version 1.40.0 > In libboost1.40-dev, function0.hpp is located in /usr/include/boost/ > function/function0.hpp > ./src/hugin_base/vigra_ext/ImageTransforms.h has to be adjusted to >

[hugin-ptx] Re: Canon 7D or SONY Alpha 850 - which one would you buy?

Yuval Levy wrote: > Tim Nugent wrote: [...] >> sell your video camera and just use the SLR for movies too. > not yet. the current crop of SLRs are no good for movie making. They > need a tiltable LCD display first. ... which currently seems to reduce the selection to the Lumix GH1. (Yes, I kn

  1   2   3   >