Hi,
I have no interest or plans to do a PocketPC port myself (if I had a pda
I'd run a useful operating system on it, like Linux).
Sure... Linux runs on every PDA out there
That's not quite true - there are some that it refuses to run on due to
problems with the interface and pointing
Hello,
El Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:30:19 +0900
Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hello,
[...]
In fact using DateTime.Parse() is somewhat stupid ;-) Read
here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/05/03/CultureInfo/default
.aspx?side=true#a
The
Hi,
Now that it turned out that the bug is not reproducible with the
latest svn HEAD (i.e. the bug report is invalid)...
Alfredo Jose Muela Romero wrote:
Hello,
El Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:30:19 +0900
Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hello,
[...]
In fact using
Hi,
Alfredo Jose Muela Romero wrote:
El Tue, 09 Aug 2005 19:01:32 +0900
Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hi,
Now that it turned out that the bug is not reproducible with
the latest svn HEAD (i.e. the bug report is invalid)...
Which bug? Did I talk to any bug? :-S If I did
El Tue, 09 Aug 2005 20:13:09 +0900
Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hi,
Alfredo Jose Muela Romero wrote:
El Tue, 09 Aug 2005 19:01:32 +0900
Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hi,
Now that it turned out that the bug is not reproducible with
the latest svn HEAD (i.e.
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 00:14 +0200, Michal Moskal wrote:
Also, Gonzalo was trying
to work on the large file upload setup, which has better solutions
(buffering to files, like is done in Whidbey).
large file upload? I don't get it.
When POSTing anything big to a ASP.NET page or web
As a temporary solution I committed TARGET_JVM so that this destructor
will not be present in our build, but probably it's worth to do same for
Mono, too.
I wonder, what was the need to throw NotImplementedException
in FontNameConverter destructor? What will do GC when
destructor fails in
Mr Paolo,
I've demanded anything here??
Your message just showed the kind of person I'm dealing with. No need
for comments.
We'll continue in private and save the list from this things...
Hugo Ferreira
On 08/09/05 Paolo Molaro wrote:
On 08/09/05 Hugo Ferreira wrote:
Sure... Linux runs on
On 08/08/05 Paul F. Johnson wrote:
The same goes for a Symbian or RISC OS port.
Problem is that for RISC OS, they don't have dynamic linking support as yet
(though the RISC OS gcc is getting there). There would also have to be a
different layer between SWF and the desktop as it's not
Hello,
I wonder, what was the need to throw NotImplementedException in
FontNameConverter destructor? What will do GC when destructor fails in
such way? The code is in FontConverter.cs:283
It seems like code that was originally just stubbed out and not
completed.
Thanks for pointing this out,
System.Runtime.InteropServices._CustomAttributeBuilder is missing form .NET
Framework 1.1 RTM but is in SP1 and is included with NET_1_1.
This is true for System.Web.HttpResponse.TransmitFile as well and it is
included in NET_1_1.
I think including serivce pack extensions in Mono is the best
Hello Gert,
I don't recall if it existed in .NET 1.1, but it does exist in .NET 1.1 SP1.
I just installed .NET 1.1 SP1 (after much pain) and wrote a simple
program:
using System;
using System.Reflection.Emit;
class X {
static void Main ()
{
Type t = typeof
Hi!
Note that none of the interfaces starting with _ in
System.Runtime.InteropServices are present in the RTM version of 1.1 but are
in SP1. There may be other differences. So metadata comparsion should be
done on SP1 assemblies rather than on RTM.
I am very confused.
What does `RTM'
Hello,
You couldn't. I managed to find a document confirming that these
interfaces were indeed introduced in .NET 1.1 SP1 :
http://www.usysware.com/blog/?p=21
Microsoft's own documentation on MSDN2 says that these first appear in
NET 2.0, but I think they're just hiding that there isn't
hey,
Currently the AssemblyName (string) ctor is not implemented to receive
the long format assembly name (such MyAssembly, Version=1.2,...). The
attached patch adds support for it.
Some tests are also attached.
Carlos.
Index: icall.c
In the last message some attachments were missing.
All of them are now correctly attached.
Index: AssemblyName.cs
===
--- AssemblyName.cs (revisión: 48211)
+++ AssemblyName.cs (copia de trabajo)
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
using System.Text;
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Type t = typeof (CustomAttributeBuilder);
Console.WriteLine (t.BaseType);
And it does not display anything. When compiled with csc 8, it does
display _CustomAttributeBuilder.
Huh? _CustomAttributeBuilder is an interface, so it obviously
Hello,
Type t = typeof (CustomAttributeBuilder);
Console.WriteLine (t.BaseType);
And it does not display anything. When compiled with csc 8, it does
display _CustomAttributeBuilder.
Huh? _CustomAttributeBuilder is an interface, so it obviously won't show
18 matches
Mail list logo