;
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Prasanna Huddar <
> prasanna.hud...@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Prasanna
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Hema Gopalkrishnan
>> *Sent:* 17 December 2015 05:31
>>
As Luis and I just discussed - it would be good if we can have the
following possibility:
1. Have feature names odl-openflowplugin-A & odl-openflowplugin-B (the A &
B names to be named as per the characteristics of the designs - not
odl-openflowplugin* & odl-openflowplugin-li*).
2. Have top level
Hi folks,
I am out both of these days. Will be back on Jan 5th - hence we will have a
meeting on Jan 6th instead of Jan 4th (I will use Luis's Webex - will send
the meeting invite for Jan 6th that I will update with Luis' Webex later).
Thanks,
Abhijit
_
Thanks Luis! I think I had sent the invite - but will resend it tomorrow.
On Sunday, January 3, 2016, Luis Gomez wrote:
> Sure Abhijit, I will send you the webex link once I receive your invite.
>
> > On Dec 25, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare > wrote:
> >
> >
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20160106T17Z
DTEND:20160106T18Z
DTSTAMP:20160104T163114Z
ORGANIZER;CN=Abhijit Kumbhare:mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com
UID:14f0sdjt8348cs7v7p9ik6k...@google.com
Resent the invite - it may not have gone out cleanly. I have also edited
the permissions to let Luis or anyone modify the event to add the webex
info.
Again reminder - no meeting today.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
wrote:
> Thanks Luis! I think I had sent the invite -
Victor,
Michal Rehak has worked on this - but he is on a vacation till around Jan
17. Perhaps Anil Vishnoi may have some idea on this as well.
Thanks,
Abhijit
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:45 AM, VictorVu wrote:
> Hello,
> I am working on a job involving ODL SFC and Openflowplugin. The
> documen
You can open it in OpenFlow plugin and assign it to Robert - and he can
take a look at it and reassign back to OpenFlow plugin (bugs@opendaylight).
Just add Kamal, Anil, Muthu and me in the cc.
On Thursday, January 7, 2016, Luis Gomez wrote:
> After further analysis the FRM stopped to work after
Thanks Tony!
On Friday, January 8, 2016, Tony Tkacik -X (ttkacik - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
at Cisco) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Problem was caused by same root cause which caused also SFC and Netvirt
> issues,
>
> Fix was merged today: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/32259/
>
>
>
> Tony
>
>
>
> *Fro
Web friendly format:
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-openflowplugin/2016/openflow_plugin_jan_10/opendaylight-openflowplugin-openflow_plugin_jan_10.2016-01-11-17.05.html
Format friendly to https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo archives
below.
Meeting summary
-
Thanks for sending this comparison Shuva/Muthu/Bhalaji.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Shuva Jyoti Kar <
shuva.jyoti@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Please find attached the ppt on plugin comparison for today’s call
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Shuva
>
> ___
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20160120T17Z
DTEND:20160120T18Z
DTSTAMP:20160119T011310Z
ORGANIZER;CN=Abhijit Kumbhare:mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com
UID:64lb2dsevmjr7md24022u00...@google.com
Luis,
Does https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5001 happen only in
cluster or happens otherwise as well?
Thanks,
Abhijit
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Luis Gomez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I spent most of the day fixing the cluster test so we can measure both
> plugins with the same te
Yes - please add a bug.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Anil Vishnoi
wrote:
> Hi Guy,
>
> Can you please open a bug here for the issue
> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=openflowplugin
>
> Thanks
> Anil
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Sela, Guy wrote:
>
>> Yeah I know
Being reverted by https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33061/ .
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Thanh Ha
wrote:
> Hi openflowplugin-devs,
>
> I merged this patch on your behalf because openflowplugin's currently
> breaking all projects ability to validate their code:
>
> https://git.open
https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/#/meetings/detail?uuid=M47AWSYYKSRYZY1E87Y0KWNQ84-A0TB
___
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Thanks for the info Luis! Let's discuss more in the meeting today. At first
glance - the group/flow push order seems to be a longer work item - and its
a good news this one is fixed with the Lithium design (and one of the very
strong reasons it will be good to move to the Lithium design soon if we
Meant to say that the group/flow order seems to be a non-trivial item (one
or two of the others may be as well).
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
wrote:
> Thanks for the info Luis! Let's discuss more in the meeting today. At
> first glance - the group/flow push ord
ally, when the number of flows gets to
> around 4k per switch, there is a problem.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jan
>
>
> From: on behalf of Abhijit Kumbhare <
> abhijitk...@gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, January 25, 2016 at 10:16 PM
> To: Anil Vishnoi
> Cc: "t...@lists
Small mistake - should have been - all OF Plugin committers and
contributors.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
wrote:
> Critical bugs should be fixed by all the OF Plugin committers. Some may be
> deferred after a bug scrub or release noted as fix being available
Thanks Luis.
On Thursday, January 28, 2016, Luis Gomez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a summary of latest OFP tests:
>
> 1) He plugin:
>
> It looks like latest changes addressed:
>
> - Longevity test issues:
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-periodic-long
No meeting today- we will do this bug scrub in the Monday meeting.
> On Jan 29, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote:
>
> This event has been changed.
> more details
> »<https://www.google.com/calendar/eve
Apologies for the confusion- the reminder was sent by a mistake. As I
mentioned earlier in the week- we will have the bug scrub on Monday - if we
don't get enough time on Monday due to other topics- we will schedule other
times.
On Friday, January 29, 2016, Abhijit Kumbhare
wrote:
> No
Hi,
Please find the query for the major/critical/blocker bugs:
https://bugs.opendaylight.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=blocker&bug_severity=critical&bug_severity=major&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=IN_PROGRESS&bug_status=WAITING_FOR_REVIEW&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2C
Browser friendly format meeting minutes:
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-openflowplugin/2016/openflow_plugin_meeting_feb_1_2016/opendaylight-openflowplugin-openflow_plugin_meeting_feb_1_2016.2016-02-01-17.07.html
Text format friendly to direct linking of lists.opendaylight.org link
Hi folks,
I today's meeting it was suggested that we should have a vote for the
committers for the following question as not all committers were present
during the meeting:
Shall OF Plugin recommend dependent ODL projects to all move to Li plugin
design in the Be SR 1 timeframe?
Please vote: yes
> Hi ,
>>
>> My vote is Yes.
>>
>> Thx
>> Kamal
>>
>>
>> From: on behalf of
>> Abhijit Kumbhare
>> Date: Monday, February 1, 2016 at 10:22 PM
>> To: "openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org" <
>> openflowp
Thanks Luis. Will send the list to you a little later after checking with
Muthu the status of some of them.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Luis Gomez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We currently passed all openflow tests for RC1:
>
>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/integration-distribution-
Thanks Luis. May be better to wait for Michal Polkorab to comment.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Luis Gomez wrote:
> Hi OFP devs,
>
> It looks like this patch:
>
> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33652/
>
> broke CPqD switch support in both plugins:
>
>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.o
2. replace CPqD switches with OVS switches (since OVS 2.3 - groups are
> supported).
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Michal Polkorab
>
>
> --
> *From:* Abhijit Kumbhare
> *Sent:* 05 February 2016 01:24
> *To:* Luis Gomez
> *Cc:* openflowjava-dev
-
Browser Friendly format meeting minutes:
-
https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-openflowplugin/2016/openflow_plugin_meeting_feb_8__2016/opendaylight-openflowplugin-openflow_p
Yes - agreed. Luis and I had done several bug scrubs earlier in the release
where we had looked at and closed many bugs which were no longer valid
(especially from the Hydrogen days, etc.). We can remove many more of these
by scrubbing further (including the list you sent) and as you say close
many
Anil is looking at it.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:09 AM, An Ho wrote:
> Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN and VTN Team,
>
>
>
> There may be a potential blocker related to openflowplugin and vtn.
> Further investigated is needed as it may block Beryllium from releasing.
> Please provide ETA and let me know if th
0am or Fri Jan 22 10am Pacific Time
>
> *Where*
> #opendaylight-openflowplugin IRC channel (map
> <https://maps.google.com/maps?q=%23opendaylight-openflowplugin+IRC+channel&hl=en>
> )
>
> *Calendar*
> abhijitk...@gmail.com
>
> *Who*
> •
> Abhijit Kumbhare -
Besides the system tests - please sanity test the build for the basic
operations.
-- Forwarded message --
From: An Ho
Date: Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: [release] Beryllium RC3 ready to test
To: Thanh Ha , "rele...@lists.opendaylight.org"
, odl-dev-list
Thanks Than
-
Browser Friendly format meeting minutes:
-
https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-openflowplugin/2016/openflow_plugin_meeting_feb_15__2016/opendaylight-openflowplugin-openflow_
Not sure why they are not being run. Or why they are failing.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Shuva Jyoti Kar <
shuva.jyoti@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi Abhijit/Luis/JamO,
>
>
>
> I do see the openflowplugin-it not being run on verification or merge
> builds. When I run them , its failing sayin
Ah - yes - I remember it now.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Jamo Luhrsen wrote:
> Shuva,
>
> here is the patch where Anil removed it:
> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/33068/
>
> comments explain it.
>
> JamO
>
>
> On 02/16/2016 09:51 AM, Abhijit
That's good. As Anil mentioned he will take a look at it.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jamo Luhrsen wrote:
> The re-run did not abort:
>
>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-beryllium/382/
>
> so I know that will probably be good enough t
Sounds good. Will update.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Luis Gomez wrote:
> Hi ofp devs,
>
> I do not see any issue (that we do not know) in the RC3.1 test. Can we
> tell Go in the sheet?
>
> BR/Luis
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *An Ho
> *Subject: **Re: [release] [ACTION NEEDED
That's nice.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Jamo Luhrsen wrote:
> ovsdb, ofp,
>
> these are always fun to look at:
>
> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin/FeatureTrees/Beryllium
> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OVSDB_Integration/FeatureTrees/Beryllium
>
> JamO
>
Hideyuki,
Thanks for bringing this topic up! I was planning to initiate a
conversation on this later today - since the Beryllium release was
officially approved today. First of all - I think we should dedicate a TWS
session for this topic regarding the following discussion and feedback:
1. OpenFl
;
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-periodic-longevity-lithium-redesign-only-beryllium/
> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5271
>
> BR/Luis
>
>
> On Feb 18, 2016, at 12:42 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare
> wrote:
>
>
Interesting. I wonder - why that would be?
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Alexis de Talhouët wrote:
> OVS 2.3.x scales fine
> OVS 2.4.x doesn’t scale well.
>
> Here is also the docker file for ovs 2.4.1
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Alexis de Talhouët
> wrote:
>
> can I use your conta
Hello OpenFlow Plugin,
I would like to thank all of you for your efforts in helping in the release
of OpenFlow Plugin for Beryllium - and by that extension the OpenDaylight
Beryllium release. There was a lot of work from many of you - Anil, Hari,
Jozef, Kamal, Kavitha, Michal, Muthu, Renato, Rober
gt; With regards
>
> Ashutosh
>
>
>
> *From:* openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:
> openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of *Luis
> Gomez
> *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2016 1:15 PM
> *To:* Abhijit Kumbhare
> *Cc:* openflowplug
move to Li plugin but not before
> we fix some of the stability and cluster issues it has.
>
> BR/Luis
>
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare > wrote:
>
> Ashutosh,
>
> About your question:
>
> >> Is it possible to validate Li-plugin (performs equ
we fix some of the stability and cluster issues it has.
>>
>> BR/Luis
>>
>> On Feb 19, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare
>> wrote:
>>
>> Ashutosh,
>>
>> About your question:
>>
>> >> Is it possible to validate Li-plugin (p
-
Browser Friendly format meeting minutes:
-
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-openflowplugin/2016/openflow_plugin_meeting_feb_22/opendaylight-openflowplugin-openflow_plugin_
Hi folks,
In the OpenFlow Plugin meeting yesterday we talked about the migration to
the Lithium design for all the projects consuming OpenFlow Plugin and we
decided the following migration path makes the most sense:
1. The SR1 is due March 17 (cutoff March 13) & we have some issues
(mentio
putation with users for some time to come.
>>
>> I don't think it necessarily prohibits doing this, but it's certainly
>> something to carefully consider.
>>
>> --Colin
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare
>> wrote:
Small correction (using the word relatively stable instead of really
stable) - please read the corrected one below:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
wrote:
> Addressing the general question (that Colin/Chris/Ryan raised) - I would
> like to make clear this is a plan fr
; projects migration plan to Li design in the service releases
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> +1, great point Chris. The ability to cherry pick back critical patches
>>> that affect security or product stability is necessary to drive user
>>> success. Unfortu
nd I'll try my best to make it to the session.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ryan Goulding
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare
> wrote:
>
>> Ryan,
>>
>> Please read my latest email and let me know your thoughts. Especially the
>> seco
e motivation to consolidate on a single implementation.
> I just worry about breaking the contract we have with people consuming our
> releases.
>
> I look forward to discussing options at the developer design forum.
>
> --Colin
> On Feb 24, 2016 1:37 PM, "Abhijit Kumbh
Thanks Phil. Several of us from OpenFlow Plugin will be there - including
at the minimum Anil, Kamal & Shuva.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Phil Robb
wrote:
> Hello Abhijit Kumbhare and the openflowplugin development team:
>
>
> If you've already registered for the B
So Hideyuki/Michal - the change you have done to support the Li design -
what does it use? Using DS/operational stats? Stats RPC enabled by default?
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Tai, Hideyuki
wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> Thank you for your great explanation.
> I think I understand the situation co
ust filed a report in the Bugzilla.
>
> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5432
>
>
>
> In addition to that, the following two bugs are need to be fixed.
>
> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5328
>
> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4
We do have the discussion session at the design forum in San Mateo tomorrow
at 9:20 am
___
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1h96mGvKipI_QKRdkmKpU3EAELY6LxCgahraT81F1tZU/edit?usp=sharing
___
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
e their
> applications.
>
>
>> I understand your concerns Robert and Abhijit, and agree with Ryan in
>> empathizing with the motivation to consolidate on a single implementation.
>> I just worry about breaking the contract we have with people consuming our
>> rele
lan or design? I think Openflowplugin Flow
> Programmer I did has overlap with this.
>
>
>
> What Openflow resource Will “OpenFlow Resource Manager” manage?
>
>
>
> *From:* openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:
> openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.openday
Hi Aneesha,
Guy and Gal are interested in understanding the repo details of the circuit
switching sub project under OF extensions as they want to understand their
options for some other extension. Can you please shed light on
ofextensions/circuitsw repo etc.? I am not sure if they want it as a for
Corrected Gal's address
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
wrote:
> Hi Aneesha,
>
> Guy and Gal are interested in understanding the repo details of the
> circuit switching sub project under OF extensions as they want to
> understand their options for some othe
/2016 09:35AM -
> To: Abhijit Kumbhare
> From: Pande Gaurav/DEL/TCS
> Date: 12/17/2015 02:35PM
> Cc: Abhijit Kumbhare , Anil Vishnoi <
> vishnoia...@gmail.com>, "Kamal Rameshan (kramesha)" ,
> Muthukumaran K , "Michal Rehak -X (mirehak -
> PANTHEON TE
Thanks Luis. But I think his message (unexpected rpc response in
GetFeaturesOutput) seems to be different than the bug (which has unexpected
rpc response in BarrierOutput). Also he seems to be having issue with the
delay in the switch notifications.
Chris - are you running the openflow-plugin-li (
Alexis,
May not be a bad idea - for optional capabilities. Which of the
capabilities would you like to turn default off and which default on?
Thanks,
Abhijit
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Alexis de Talhouët
wrote:
> Hello OFP-dev,
>
> I can see here that all switch capabilities are by defaul
lowplugin-Ii.
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
> On 04 Mar 2016, at 01:45, Abhijit Kumbhare > wrote:
>
> Thanks Luis. But I think his message (unexpected rpc response in
> GetFeaturesOutput) seems to be different than the bug (which has unexpected
> rpc response in BarrierOutput). Also he
-
Browser Friendly format meeting minutes:
-
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-openflowplugin/2016/openflow_plugin_meeting_march_7_2016/opendaylight-openflowplugin-openflow_p
Phil,
You mentioned the attachment that the new ODL member had sent (he/she has
mentioned: for example we want to extend openflow action, then we need to
extend nearly 20 RPCs/ notifation/data listed in attachment.). Do you have
the attachment he/she mentions? Also what actions are they planning t
Sending the attachment doc by Phil to OFP.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare
wrote:
> Phil,
>
> You mentioned the attachment that the new ODL member had sent (he/she has
> mentioned: for example we want to extend openflow action, then we need to
> extend
Senthil - other than Kamal's suggestion - why not upgrade to use Beryllium?
Also make your changes on the master?
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Kamal Rameshan (kramesha) <
krame...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi Senthil,
>
> If I understand you correctly, I assume you made changes in the code and
> you
Hi folks,
As part of the M1 requirements - we need to have the following in place for
M1: project lead, project contact, test contact and documentation contact.
I propose a self nomination period from now to Tuesday March 15, 5 pm
Pacific. If there are multiple candidates we can have the election
Hi folks,
I would like to self nominate for the OpenFlow Plugin Project Lead position
for the Boron release.
Thanks,
Abhijit
___
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/op
Looks like there will be a fewer folks today - and several folks seem to be
in general confused about the daylight savings change today. Let us cancel
the call & talk over email.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Muthukumaran K wrote:
>
>
Do we have plugin call today ? Since ONS is going on ther
>
>> >>>>>Begin forwarded message:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>*From: *An Ho mailto:an...@huawei.com>
>> <mailto:an...@huawei.com>>
>> >>>>>*Subject: **[openflowplugin-dev] [Action Needed] OPENFLOWPLUGIN
>> B
documentation (especially we need to have the new design documented better
- especially since it is the design going forward).
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> As part of the M1 requirements - we need to have the following in place
> for M1:
OpenFlow Plugin Project
1. Offset: 1
2. Project Lead: Abhijit Kumbhare; Email: abhijitk...@gmail.com or
abhijit.kumbh...@ericsson.com; IRC: abhijitkumbhare
3. Project Contact: Abhijit Kumbhare; Email: abhijitk...@gmail.com or
abhijit.kumbh...@ericsson.com; IRC: abhijitkumbhare
4. Test Contact
-
Browser Friendly format meeting minutes:
-
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-openflowplugin/2016/openflow_plugin_meeting_march_21/opendaylight-openflowplugin-openflow_plugi
ata
> tree.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Michal
>
>
> --
> *From:* Luis Gomez
> *Sent:* Monday, March 21, 2016 17:23
> *To:* Michal Rehak -X (mirehak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
> *Cc:* Abhijit Kumbhare; An Ho; Jamo Luhrsen; Kamal Rameshan
Hi OpenFlow Plugin committers,
Jozef has taken an increasingly bigger role in the OpenFlow Plugin project
via code commits as well as participation in the OpenFlow Plugin meetings.
He has been involved in making the Lithium design clustering stable and
high performance - and in general will be a m
Hi OpenFlow Plugin committers,
I hope to see good contributions from your side in the Boron release.
However I understand if some of you may not have the time commitment for
the project you previously had. Hence I would like to solicit your input
regarding whether you plan to be active in the Boro
Thanks for a detailed explanation Jozef and Michal. Need to digest it more
- but a quick question: is this the best way for 4117? Do we need to tweak
the way a bit? What about the new recommendation that was provided by the
MD-SAL team to use the data tree change listener (DTCL) instead of the Data
I have updated the title to start with the words: "Li Migration: ".
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Tai, Hideyuki
wrote:
> Hi OpenFlow Plugin project folks,
>
> Could you take a look at the following bug?
> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5602
> This is about problems which applic
Is that a switch (router) reboot or the reboot / restart of ODL? The
reconciliation feature in Beryllium should take care of the switch reboot,
while having persistence enabled and I believe the flows in the config
datastore should be able to take care of the ODL restart.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4
Folks,
Cancelling the meeting today - as many folks seem to have the Easter
holiday. Let's continue talking over the email.
Thanks,
Abhijit
___
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mail
ct: RE: [openflowplugin-dev] Vote for Jozef Bacigal as OpenFlow Plugin
committer
To: "Kamal Rameshan (kramesha)" , Anil Vishnoi <
vishnoia...@gmail.com>, Abhijit Kumbhare
Cc: "openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org" <
openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org>
Congrats Jozef! Looking forward for even more from you!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Colin Dixon
Date: Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [VOTE] Jozef Bacigal as OpenFlow Plugin
committer
To: Abhijit Kumbhare
Cc: "Kaempfer, Gideon" , C
We have the list here:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:Beryllium:Design:Coexistance#Projects_Affected
and in:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hci5TMUPyB6PX8Al-fwfVqvs5SQVa2wZLja_7rKWN6o/edit#gid=556767095
But it will not hurt to have the list easily acces
I've added it here:
>
> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Tech_Work_Stream:Main#Upcoming_Meeting_Agendas
>
> --Colin
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
> wrote:
>
>> Sounds good to me.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:53 AM, A
-
Browser Friendly format meeting minutes:
-
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-openflowplugin/2016/openflow_plugin_meeting_april_4/opendaylight-openflowplugin-openflow_plugin
policy-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:
> groupbasedpolicy-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of *Abhijit
> Kumbhare
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 2:41 PM
> *To:* Colin Dixon; Release;
> *Cc:* sfc-...@lists.opendaylight.org; lacp-...@l
o issues?
>
> --Colin
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Since in today's TWS there were not many project leads and committers of
>> the dependent projects attending - the action item for me was to sen
"NOGO" and identify
> any bugs/issues pending at this spreadsheet [3], including the issues you
> mentioned in your email below with regards to the openflow statistics
> collector.
>
> Your feedback is greatly appreciated. Please do not hesitate to reach out
> to Abhijit Kumbh
1. Discuss the dependent projects and their issues:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImtd764e-hOgJAxoJKl85fxHCPu2agLfqsBtf13zQY/edit#gid=251530127
2. Discuss the inventory to topology migration conclusion of the discussion
___
openflowplugin-dev
-
Browser Friendly format meeting minutes:
-
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-openflowplugin/2016/openflow_plugin_meeting_april_11__2016/opendaylight-openflowplugin-openflow
Question is - is this a bug or a feature? i.e. in case of L2 switch - they
would not have any issues as they have just used the RPCs and have no flow
in the config datastore. In the case of the apps or someone manually using
the config datastore (via RESTCONF) - if the code is magically making sure
user is
> not careful and uses the incremental numbers as a flow id (which is not
> very unlikely scenario).
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
> wrote:
>
>> Question is - is this a bug or a feature? i.e. in case of L2 switch -
>> they would not have any
Yes.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Anil Vishnoi wrote:
> By same mechanism you mean, using the same format for the flow-id creation?
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare
> wrote:
>
>> In-line.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Anil
ough RPC to prevent any nasty bugs.
>
>
>
> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:31:15 -0700
>
> From: Abhijit Kumbhare >
>
> To: Anil Vishnoi >
>
> Cc: OpenDayLight-L2switch-Dev >,
>
> openflowplugin-dev <
> openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.
1 - 100 of 515 matches
Mail list logo
